ML20002A879
| ML20002A879 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  |
| Issue date: | 11/03/1980 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| IEC-80-21, NUDOCS 8011210768 | |
| Download: ML20002A879 (1) | |
Text
T h)[
h DUKE POWEH COMPANY PowEu Uuiz.nixo 4ee SouTu Cnuncu STHEET, CHARLOTTE, N. C. asa4a
't" s
Pl2 : 38 u m wau o. e4 n u a. s a.
November 3, 1980
.-1
~
Vice Passiocnv Tttte ost[ Anta 704
$tgame PmODuctiCN 3 M 4083 a
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director
~
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
[',
4~
Region Il 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Nos. 50-369, -370 Catawba Nuclear-Station ~..
Docket Kss 'Q 413, -414 )
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
My letter of October 20, 1980, discussed, on the Oconee Nuclear Station iocket. Duke Power Company's disagreement with the NRC interpretation of "directly supervised" refueling operations transmitted in IE Circular 80-21.
This letter is to clarify that the position indicated in my October 20, 1980 letter will also be utilized at McGuire Nuclear Station and Catawba Nuclear Station. Our position is as follows. The NRC interpretation places too great a restriction on the supervising SRO.
The supervising SRO should have the freedom to determine the location, i.e. operating deck, fuel building, control room which most requires his presence.
In li.Gc of the training and qualifications of operators involved in the movement of tael, and the detailed refueling program and procedures established, it is felt that an SRO can ' are effectively supervise refueling activities if he has this freedom.
V y truly yours, /
V
~
's.
du,
.. d, cu n
i William O. Parker, Jr.
)
LJB:ses Attachment k
()
s n.yiciM ti As u