ML20002A731
| ML20002A731 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1980 |
| From: | Davidson D CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20002A730 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011210447 | |
| Download: ML20002A731 (2) | |
Text
'
a
'm-
. ~
s
,1 P o Box 5000 e CLEVELANo. eMio 44101 e TELEPHCNE (216) 622-9800 e ILLUMINATING SLOG.
- 55 PUBLic ScuARE DaNon R. Davidson f
wCE PetsiOENT systeu tvometamo aso co~stauctica October 27, 1980 Mr. A. B. Davis, Chief Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulator 7 Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen F.llyn, Illinois 60137 RE:
Perry Nuclear Power Plai.e Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Response to I. E. Report
Dear Mr. Davis:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your Inspection Report Number 50-440/
80-14, 50-441/80-13, attached to your letter dated October 6,1980, which I re-ceived on October S,1980.
This report identifies areas examined by Dr. M. J.
Oestmann during the inspection conducted August 19 to 21, 1980.
Attached to this letter is our response to the deviation described in Appendix A, Notice of Violation. This response describes the planned corrective action and the estimated date of completion as requested in your letter.
Please call if there are any additional questions.
Very truly yours, Y
l' t
e"f *]
D. R. Davidson Vice President System Engineering and Construction ksz Attachment ec:
J. Hughes, NRC-Site U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management Branch Washington, D. C.
20555 l
gc.Tc01980 80 11210 P/7
T.-
RESPONSE TO ENFORCEMENT ITEMS Below is our response to Appendix A, Notice of Violation, of United Scaces Nuclear Regulatory Comnission I. E. Repore 50-440/80-14; 50-441/80-13.
A.
Deviation j
Based on correspondence from the licencee to the Commission 1/, the l
licensee comaicted to conducting noise surveys semi-annually af ter the first year of construction.
Contrary to che above commitment, the licensee failed to conduct
(
noise surweys semi-annually in the fall of 1979 and spring of 1980.
B.
Response
-1.
When major noise producing activities were ac cheir peak, the l
- noise surveys were made, as committed. These activicles in-L cluded excavacion with its earth movers and heavy equipment, I
pile driving, and structural steel framing. The major portion of this work had been completed prior to che period during which we failed to conduce the noise surveys.
l Subsequent to reorganizacion and relocacion of personnel which occurred the latter half of 1978, transfer of the responsibility i
for p;rforming these surveys was not adequately addressed. The ommission, noced during this inspeccion, has been corrected l
by assignment of this responsibility to che Nuclear Test Seccion of the Nuclear Engineering Department. '
r l
1 l
2.
The Fall 1980 survey was conducted on October 20, 1980, and the report will be issued by November 28, 1980.
Future noise surveys will be conducted semi-annually as committed.
l i
l 1I Ler, dated July 30, 1974, from R. G. Schuerger, Manager, Civil and Mechanical Engineering, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating-Company,-
to W. H. Regan, Jr., U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.
p
.