ML19354E734
| ML19354E734 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 01/24/1990 |
| From: | Wilson B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kingsley O Tennessee Valley Authority |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9002010248 | |
| Download: ML19354E734 (4) | |
Text
..; _.. -
- I JAN 2 4'1990:
)
l Docket Nos. 50-327, 50-328 License Nos. DPR-77, DPR-79 Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley, Jr.'
Senior Vice President, Nuclear Power Tennessee Valley Authority 6N 38A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattancoga, TN 37402-2801
Dear Mr. Kingsley:
SUBJECT:
CONFIRMATION OF MEETING'- SEQUOYAH DOCKET NOS. 50-327 AND 50-328 This ' confirms the telephone conversation between Mr.
M.
Medford, Vice President and Nuclear Technical Director, TVA and Mr. B..Liaw, Director,' TVA-Projects Division, NRC on January 23, 1990, concerning an Enforcement' Conference to be conducted at Room 10B13, White Flint Building in Rockville, Maryland, on February 14, 1990' at 1:00 p.m.
The purpose of the meeting--is to-discuss' TVA's apparent weaknesses in the corrective action and resolution of the Residual Heat Removal ~ pump deadheading issue.
A proposed agenda for the Enforcement Conference is' enclosed. Should you have any questions regarding these arrangements, we will be pleased to. discuss
-them.
ONG!NAL S!GNED3Y KENNETH P. BARR Bruce A. Wilson, Assistant Director.
for Inspection' Programs-TVA Projects Division' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
}
Enclosure:
(See page 3) l 4
I
-i J
9002010248 900124 05000327
- l lPDR-ADOCK g
.,4 I fI.;
sevc a
E..
1 JAN 2 4'109y Mr. Oliver D. Kingsley,- Jr.
2
Enclosure:
Meeting Agenda.
cc w/ encl:
3 F. L. Moreadith, Vice President M. Burzynski Nuclear Engineering Site Licensing Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 400 West Summit Hill Drive P. O. Box 2000 WT 12A 12A Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379 Knoxville, TN 37902-TVA Representative Dr. M. O. Medford Rockville Office-Vice President and Nuclear 11921 Rockville Pike Technical Director Suite 402.
Tennessee Valley Authority Rockville MD - 20852 6N 38A Lookout Place Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 General Counsel Tennessee Valley Authority County Judge 400 West Summit Hill Drive Hamilton County Courthouse ET 11B 33H Chattanooga, TN 37402 Knoxville, TN. 37902-Dr. Henry Myers, Science Advisor Michael H. Mobley, Director.
I Committee on Interior and Division of Radiological Health Insular Affairs T.E.R.R.A. Building U. S. House of Representatives 150 -9th Avenue North
. Washington, D. C.
20515 Nashville, TN 37203 J
C. A. Vondra, Plant Manager State.of-Tennessee
'I Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority bec w/ encl:
P. O. Box 2000 D. M. Crutchfield, NRR Soddy-Daisy, TN 37379 B. D. Liaw, NRR i
S. C. Black, NRR '
i Manager, Nuclear Licensing R. C. Pierson, NRR and Regulatory Affairs L, J. Watson, NRR/RII Tennessee Valley Authority J. B. Brady, NRR/RII SN 1578 Lookout Place J. Rutberg, OGC Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 NRC Document' Control Desk i
NRC Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
]
2600 Igou Ferry Soddy-0aisy, TN 37379 i
RII/NRR RII/NRR Jdtady:vyg L
n 1/74/S0 1/
/90 3
i-
F.
-3 l-ENCLOSURE MEETING AGENDA TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 14, 1990 1:00 P.M.
I.
Opening Remarks NRC II.
Issues of Concern NRC/TVA TVA's apparent failure to adequately identify and correct the RHR pump deadheading issue including:
Why the violation occurred and what corrective actions have or will be implemented to prevent--
recurrence of this type of problem.
I Why immediate action was not taken-to correct I
the problem when identified by the resident I
inspector.
Why the corrective action program was not utilized j
for this issue and whether programs or mechanisms i
exist which allow bypassing the corrective action program.
How NRC Bulletin responses are handled and how issues processed by this method enter the corrective action program for evaluation.
Whether the Nuclear Experience Review program processed this issue including how it was dispositioned by that program and whether an operability determination was made.
TVA's apparent failure to process a safety evaluation! for Revision 7 to Emergency Instruction E-0 including:
3 Why the revised.50.59 program under STD 6.1.3, '
t impiemented to correct this type of' problem, allowed this violation to happen and what corrective actions have or will be implemented to prevent recurrence of this type of problem.
Why the safety assessment for Revision 8 is:
significantly different than the one for Revision 7 and what implications this has on the implementation of the new program.
o i
7---
^
snclosure 2
Whether training implemented under the new standard i
adequately addressed ~why safety evaluations are required.
III. Closing Remarks NRC ln k
i r
t i
c
+
t 1