ML19354D678

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 70-1359/89-01 on 891211-13 & Notice of Violation.Rept & Notice Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790(d))
ML19354D678
Person / Time
Site: 07001359
Issue date: 12/21/1989
From: Pate R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Crosbie K
IRT CORP.
Shared Package
ML19310C575 List:
References
NUDOCS 8912290050
Download: ML19354D678 (2)


Text

_

m,pp

Y

'g;2ggtpff"m

' 9 "0EifAT UW.;,. vr.uiDA DEC 211983 Docket No. 70-1359 IRT Corporation

?

3030 Callan Road

(

San Diego, California 92121

]

L Attention:

K. L. Crosbie.

L Corporate Radiation Safety Officer Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

NRC-SECURITY INSPECTION - IRT Thisletterreferstoanunannounced[icenseNo.SNM-1405,conductedbyMessrs.

-routine, safeguards inspection of your activities at IRT authorized by NRC i

D. Schaefer and A. McQueen of this office on Occember 11 and 13, 1989.

This letter also refers to the discussion of our preliminary inspection findings j

held by the inspectors with Mr. J. T. Dooley, Vice President, Finance, and yourself on December 13, 1989.

Areas examined during this inspection included activities related to the physical protection of Special Nuclear Material (SNM) as described in the enclosed inspection report.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and records, interviews with facility and other personnel, and observations by the inspectors.

Based on the results of the inspection, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC regulations, as set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed as Appendix A to this letter.

The item in Appendix A has been categorized into a severity level as described in the NRC Enforcement Policy, 10 CER Part 2, Appendix C.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to respond as indicated herein.

In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, documentation of the findings of your safeguards measures are exempt from public disclosure; therefore the enclosed inspectionreport,Ap)endixA,andyourresponsetoAppendixAwIllnotbe placed in the Public Jocument Room and will receive limited distribution.

The response' directed by this letter and the accompanying notice is not subjecttotheclearanceprovisionsoftheOfficeofManagementandBudget, otherwise required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL96-511.

t 110Ei';fi TT"" CITED HEntTill CGC.f UN HifDMiO!!

l l

8912290050 391221

{'DR ADOCK 07003359 d

FDC

< /

m 7

g 4

jaw t T-'Mrnen'nn rc;;tf.yEC 211989 2.M3 itifLiEijQ Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you, f

Sincerely, OUp.Pate, Chief[

' di S Y

Robert Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A

. Notice of Violation 2.

Inspection Report No. 70-1359/89-01(IE-V-906) cc w/o enclosures:

State of CA bec w/ enclosures:

docket file B. Faulkenberry J. Martin bec w/o enclosures:

J. Zollicoffer H. Smith ~

p REGION V/do

-Ib01 I

I

,hnson

. Pate

0. Schaefe A. McQueen M. Sc us er A,fF/89 o

124o/89 12/M/89 12/3l/89 1p 12////89 JEQUE51 COPY,

REQUEST S PY,l REQUEST COPY,

REQUEST COPY J REQUEST COPY,

1 UE9 / NO YES /( NQ)

IYES / NO YES / N0

) YES / NO l

L SEND TO

- K L

YES /

0

\\

a~d v w

J UY h !',l 7.:.;7 D R E'.4Til FC:; f ',

sli) iWEuliC'j,

,