ML19352B211
| ML19352B211 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/22/1981 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Jackie Cook CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| IAL, NUDOCS 8106030389 | |
| Download: ML19352B211 (1) | |
Text
..
it!,f.;EDfATE ACTIOf LETTER ~
fM
~
fo.g jo UNITED STATES d[A ),,,, g g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
$ "#' : [a REQON 111 i
e\\ '/.)
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
- /
sr GLEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 1
May 22, 1981
[>.&
Docket No. 50-329
/
f s
//
Docket No. 50-jh2 750 7
fr J b o,sayOj IOI Censumers Power Company
.-b 4.
8g!f ATTN:
Mr. James W. Cook
/
Vice President 4,,%
w
'j Midland Project 1945 West Parnall Road
'(,
s \\,
Jackson, MI 49201 Qig y Gentlemen:
Based on Discussions between Mr. J. W. Cook and Mr. R. C. Knop on May 22, 1981, we understand that you will not issue fabrication and construction drawings for the installation of the safety related small bore pipe and piping suspen-l sion systems until steps one through four below have been completed and audited.
1.
MED 4.37-0 will be revised to include requirements that the specific revision number of the specification or procedure, of which the calcu-lation was based on, is identified in the calculation package.
(Note:
This action was completed on 5/21/81 by issuance of Revision 16 of MED 4.3 7-0).
2.
Conduct document control review to ensure that all the applicable up-to-date specifications and procedures are in place in the work locations.
3.
Conduct training on MED 4.37-1 (Design Calculations), the importance of following QA procedures in general, and use of specification M 343 for all personnel within the small bore piping design group perform-ing stress analysis for safety-related piping.
4.
Establish plans and scuedules to review all small bore piping isomet-rics that have been issued without supporti.tg calculations properly l
packaged to the revised MED 4.37-1 requirements.
I l
l 5.
Perform the reviews identified in Item 4, above, to accomplish the following:
a.
Bring the calculation documentation up to the level required by MED 4.37-0, Rev. 16.
b.
Ensure that the calculations are technically adequate.
In conducting those reviews, the highest priority shall be given to 8.1060305?T IMMEDI ATE l.CTic"' LETTER 1
t 1
~
._. ATE ~jCTfC.'l. LsTTER ay M
22, 1981 C:nsumera Power Comp piping isometric drawings issued for construction but not yet installed, in the order of installation.
6.
During the conduct of the reviews, identified in items 4 and 5, you will doc nent all discrepancies and will notify cognizant NEC Region III staff of any significant discrepancy.
(An example of a significant discrepancy is if the reviewed calculation indi-cates that stresses in the pipe that is depicted on an isometric drawing issued for constructio-exceed code allowables).
7.
Audd.ts will be conducted at completion of steps one through four, and periodically during steps five and six, to ensure adequacy of the program.
Please inform us inanediately if your understanding of these items is different from that stated above.
Sincerely, s
%M James G. Keppl Director t
cc: Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR
(
TIC Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Cocnission Myron M. Cherry, Chicago i
L i
l i
i i
Y l
1.M.M. EDI ATE ACTiC.! LETTER l
--