ML19351G116
| ML19351G116 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/30/1981 |
| From: | Ahearne J NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Bevill T HOUSE OF REP., APPROPRIATIONS |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8102230142 | |
| Download: ML19351G116 (16) | |
Text
st68 "IC09 8
UNITED STATES i
~
E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION cc i
'l WASHIN GTON, D.C. 20S$5 Co[3 STON 4-
,/
SPo g c,
January 30, 1981
- OFFICE OF THE CHAIRMAN g
v-o>
The Honorable Tom Bevill, Chairman f
0 $ 19 6 F sik Subcomittee on Energy and Water d pEB
%p, f-Development 9,\\.
,,pji
//
Comittee on Appropriations
/.fm Washington, D. C.
20515 (v/7pTh
Dear Mr. Chairman:
This monthly status report is in response to the direction given in House Report 96-1093. 'Our third monthly status report is enclosed and covers the period from December 15, 1980 to January 15, 1981. This third report discusses the actions that were taken during the last month for operating reactors and on licensing eviews of new facilities.
A Sin erely,
]
/
k
/
John F. Ahearne Chairman
Enclosure:
NRR Monthly Status Report to Congress
(
i cc: The Honorable John T. Meyers l
l l
i I
l l
8102230/h
l3RMONTHLYSTATUSREPORTTOCONGRESS This is tne third monthly status report to Congress, in response to the direction given in Hause Report 96-1093.
The second NRR monthly status _.--_ _.
report to Congress was transmitteo by letter dated December 31, 1980 and covered the period from November 15, 1980 to December 15, 1980. This third report provides a brief discussion of the major actions that were taken on operating reactors and on' licensing reviews of new facilities during the period of time between December 15, 1980 and January 15, 1981.
Oceratine Reactors During the reporting period, the major issues on operating reactors receiving staff attention included issuing Orders for additional requirements for operating EWR plants to improve the reliability of SWR scram discharge systers and issuing Orders to SWR plants for Mark I containment modifications.
A discussion of each of these follows.
As a result of the staff's review of BWR scram discharge syste s, Orders were issued on January 9,1981, to 17 operating BWRs judged to have inadequate scram discharge volume to instrument volume hydraulic coupling.
Orders were not issued to the other 5 operating BWRs since the NRC staff concluded 1
I that they were already adequate in this regard.
The Orders require implementation, within 90 days, of a system to automatically shut down the reactor when control air pressure falls to within 10 psi of the pressure necessary te c mmence opening 19e scram outlet valves, which are held closed
. 8 by air pressure.
This measure is intended to prevent sustained Itw pressure in the control air system causing a potential loss of scram capability due to filling of the scram discharge volume, from leakage through the scram outlet valves.
On January 13, 1981, Confirmat'ory Orders were issued to the Licensees of 22 operating boiling water reactor facilities wnich utilize the Mark I pressure-suppression containment design.
These Orders require that the affected licensees complete modifications, as necessary, to conform to the Acceptance Criteria set forth by the staff in the Mark I Containment Long Term Program Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-0661) by schedules which have been established on a plant-specific basis. The schedules for completion of the last item on each of these plants range from October 1981 to January 1983 and were developed in consideration of the types of modifications needed, the availability of technicians and materials, and the schedules for plant refueling outages.
These Orders also extend an exemption from General Design Criterion 50 (required margins of safety in the containment design) creviously granted to the Mark I licensees upon the completion of a short-term assessment.
3-
'Oceratine License Aeolications During the past month, the emphasis on licensing activities continued to be with OL applications.
The standard assumptions used for projecting target schedules shown in ou-first two reports were stated in Attachment 4 of our first monthly report.
Since the hes.1ng process in the past has proven to
~ be longer in duration than we projected, the staff has re-examined the assumptions used in developing the target schedules for contested cases, for facilities with expected completion dates in CY 1981 and 1982. While the target schedules previously developed differentia:ted between moderate and heevily contested hearin'gs, the application of the etandard assumptions did not always realistically project the duration of the haring and as,ceal process.
The results of the staff reexamination indicate that the span, between the date when the staff's comoleted review is documented (e.g., issue the latest SER suppleTent) and the date when the hearing starts, should be increased from the previously assumed 1-2 months to 2-6 months for 9 of the 11 plants involved.
(The'sran for Waterford, Unit 3 is longer to allow for an initial decision on the environmental issues before starting the safety hearing. ) The magnitude of this increase was detennined on a case-by-case basis primarily to account, more realistically, for the prehearing process.
The specific matters conducted during this prehearing process include:
(i) additional discovery by the parties where appropriate; (ii) the filing of motions for summary disoosition by the parties and the boards ruling thereon; (iii)the filing of testimony by the parties and (iv) a second prehearing conference to further narrow the issues.
Also, the results of the case-by-case review indicate that, for most of the 10 plants, approximately two months should be added to the time scan between the end of the heari-
'd ?
issuance of the Licensing Board decision.
In addition, the ti7.
r the review process by the Appeal
_ Board and the Connission for most of the plants, regarding the effectiveness of the Licensing Board's initial decision, was increased one month to reflect the actual times allotted by the rules of practice.
As a result of the staff's re-examination of the hearing and appeal process, five plants have been added to the list of impacted plants with construction comoleted before licensing is co=oletW.
Details of the staff's re-examination of target schedules are presented in Attachment 1.
The licensing completion date is the earl'est date for a full power license if no stay of tr. init.ial decision by the hearing board is ordered by the appeal board. The licensing complete date includes' the appropriate time for Concission review.
The status of the impacted plants follows:
Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 - The nature of contentions filed on December 3,1980 are current'ly being reviewed to ascertain, among other things, how they will affect the length of hearings, the need for further aopeals, and the determination by the'Licens'ing Board concerning whether there is an advantage in separating low power and full power issues for hearing decisions.
Based on our current assessment of the contentions, an ASLB decision'regarding a low power license for Unit I would not be expected to be issued before November 1981, followed by a review by the Appeal Board and Cocnission, which leads to a February.1982 prospective decision date. New construction comoletion date estimates for both units have been received from the Licensee.
The impact on issuing a low power license for Unit 1 is estimated to be about eleven months.
An ASLB decision regarding full power license for both Unit 1 and Unit 2 is projected for December 1981 with a licensing decision issued in March 1982. This corresponds to an overall imoact of twelve months and five months for Unit 1 and 2, respectively.
Zimer - The Zimer target cates were revised as a result of the staff's re-exam 1mtion of the duration of the hearing process.
The Zimer hearings Er scheduled to be completed in November 1981.
An initial decision from the hearing board on a full power license is expscted in April, 1982.
A Comission decision on a full power license is expected in July 198: (a eight month imoact).
San Onofre. Unit 2 - The San Onof re target dates were revised as a result of tne staff's re-examination. The geologic and seismic Safety Evaluatien Reoort (SER) was issued on December 31, 1980.
The SER on other mz tters is scheculec :: ce comoleted in February 1981 with the start of hearing expected to be about July 1981.
A decision on a full power license is now exoected in April 1982, reducing the imoact from ten to nine months.
l l
Summer 1 - The Sumer target cates were revised as a result of the staff's 1
re-examination.
Issuance of the SER is now projected for February 1981 l
which is a slio of one month from the sar' v' scnedule.
Several reasons account for the slippage including laic "e / pt of a letter frc; the U. S.
l Geological Survey (expected December 15, 1980 but received DeM:er 30,1980),
awaiting further applicant inputs in a number of areas and f t; impact from several branches; e.g. equipment qualification, seismolzgy and emergency planning. Efforts are undemay within the staff te resolve the outstanding issues to issue the SER in February 1981.
Issuing the SER in February 1981 leads to a projected licensing comoletion date in June 1982; with a 1
(
current construction completion date of October 1981, a eight month impact is estimated.
l
. Another issue which could have a major impact on licensing of Summer is an antitrust petition which is pending before the Commission.
On Janua ry 31, 1979 the Central Electric Power Cooperative petitioned the Commission to find that "significant changes" have occurred since the last antitrust review of the Summer license apolication by the NRC and Attorney General.
Such a finding is a statutory requirement to initiate antitrust review at the operating license stage.
The Commission will soon decide whether or not to make the requested finding.
An affirmative decision on that issue will automatically set in motion a statutory 180-day review by DOJ culminating in a published coinion.
Subsequent to that opinion, any carty with an interest may recuest a hearing on antitrust. contentions. The current laws require the antitrust hearing to be complete crior to issuance of an operating l
license (unless all parties agree to pest-licensing review).
Such a l
hearing could delay by well over one year the issuance of an operating license.
i Last year Congressman Gramm of Texas prooosed an amendment in the FY 1981 Authorization Bill which would have authorized the NRC to complete its licensing of some plants notwithstanding the antitrust review.
- However, the amendment was being considered as part of the FY 1981 Authorization Bill which has not been passed by Congress.
i l
i i
_,... _.. _ _ ~. _. _,
As a result of the staff's re-examination of the duration of the hearing and acoeal process, the following plants have been added to the imoacted clant list.
Enrico Fermi Unit 2 - The SER for Enrico Fermi, Unit 2 is scheduled for December 1981. Hearings are scheduled for completion in October 1982.
A decision on a full power license is expected in June 1983.
(Aseven monthimpact).
Suscuehanna, Unit 1 - The SER for Suscuehtnna is scheduled for Aoril 1981.
An initial decision on a full power license from the hearing board is expected in August 1982.
A decision on the full cower license from the Commission is expected in November 1982 (a seven month imoact).
Waterford, Unit 3 - The SER for Waterford, Unit 3 is scheduled for July 1981.
Construction comoletion is estimated in October 1982, A decision regarding a full power license is expected in April 1983. This corresconds to an imoact of six months, Comanche Peak, Unit 1 - The SER for Comanche Peak is scheduled for June 1981.
Construction completion is estimated in December 1982.
A decision regarding a full power license is exoected in February 1983 (a two month imoact).
Shoreham - The SF.R for Shoreham is scheduled for July 1981.
Construction completion is estimated in September 1982.
A decision ?qarding a full cower license is expected in October 1982 ( a one month imoact).
O 8-An updated summary for the imoacted clants is presented in Attachment 1.
_ The status on plants which have been issued a. low or zero power license and for which a full power license is pending (Salem, Unit 2, Farley, Unit 2.
and McGuire, Unit 1) follows:
Salem. Unit 2 - Issuance of a full power license continues to be delayed due to the status of development of emergency plans.
The NRC Safety Evaluation Report on all other mstters is complete.
A~ full ~ cower license cannot be issued until first, the affected states (Delaware and New Jersey) have an adeouate emergency response plan, and second, an emergency response exercise is conducted and NRC receives an assessment of the exercise from FEMA. Our current assessment of the status of the state and FEMA review indicates that the expected date for the conduct of this drill is March or April,1981.
Farley, Unit 2 - A full power license for Farley, Unit 2 is still projected for March 1981.
c l
McGuire, Unit 1 - The SSER for low power operation at McGuire, Unit 1 was issued January 8,19B1.
A fuel loading and zero power testing license was issued January 23, 1981. The Carolina Environmental Study Group filed a scief on January 21, 1981 in support of two additional contenti0ns to the reopened operating license hearings.
If these contentions are accepted a oecision on a full power license is exoected in March 1982 (a thirteen renth impact).
If these contentions are not accepted a decision on the full power license is expected to be issued in October 1781,.
(a nine month imoact).
0 Licensine - Construction Permits The staff has continued its effort to propose the manner and extent to which the TMI Action Plan should be applied to pending CP applications.
(There are 6 construction permit applications for 11 units pending and one manufacturing license fer 8 units.) The staff has assessed the public comments received and has developed a proposed revision of NUREG-0718, Proposed Licensing Requirements for Pending Applications for Construction Permits and Macufacturing License.
The staff met with the ACRS and presented staff recommendations to the Commission (Policy Paper SECY 81-20) in January 1981.
At the request of one construction permit aoplicant, further discussion with the 'ACRS and the Commission has been scheduled in February.
Following a Commission decision on the staff recommendations, further case-specific action to include TMI-related requirements can be undertaken for the pending CP applications.
Attachments:
1.
January Report - Updated Summary for Impacted OL Plants.
2.
Target Dates of Licensing Steps for Plants Seeking Operating Licenses in the Next Five Years r,4.
1 1
l ATTACHMENT 1 i
+
1 e
,o,+n, y,w,,w,
- we,
..na,-,
,-,mn--
-,w--
JANUARY REPORT UPDATED
SUMMARY
FOR IMPACTED OL PLANTS WITil CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION ESTIMATED IN Tile NEXT TWO YEARS DECEMBER REPORT JANUARY REPORT Licensing Licensing Construction E f fort Delay Construction Effort Delay **
Conplete (Honths)
Compiete Conplete (Months)
P1 ant Complete
- o Suniner 1 8/81 10/81 2
10/81 06/82 8
' Diablo Canyon 'l 1/81 9/81 (LP) fl 3/81 02/82(LP) 11 12/81 (FP) 11 03/82 (FP) 12
' Diablo Canyon 2 6/81 12/81 (FP) 6 10/81 03/82 (fP) 5 San Onofre 2 7/8!
5/82 10 NO CilANGE 04/82 9
, Zininer 11/81 1/82 2
NO CllANGE 07/82 8
McGuire 1 1/81 2/fl1 (ZP) 1 CC'1PLETE Issued 1/23/81 0
6/81 (fP) 5 2/ 81 * *
- 03/82 13 I
11/82 06/83 7
Enrico fermi 2 Not in Decen6er Report Susquehanna 1 Not in Deceneer Report 03/112 ll/fl2 8
Waterford 3 Not in Decenher Report 10/82 04 /113 6
Shoreham Not in December R.7 port 09/82 10/82 1
Comanche Peak 1 Not in Decen6er Report 12/82 02/83 2
- Staff Estimate
- Changes are due basically to the staf f's reexamination LP-Low Power License fr-full Power License g-7eroPower Construction Complete for l'ull Power 1,1 cense
ATTACHME.iT 2 s
l I
I I
I l
l 1
I t
1 1
O.
m-
.~
c 3
i I
-D**
i WW W
e e a
e e *
,e e
- e 4
e e e
== ~
. -e e
C$
=*C
- 3 #h-C * *. *
- N "_ -
N W
.. t = -
=C*NS
-NMAM 90 9 9 '*
N
" ' 4 6* r
- r.=2 :
'4 2 ". ~:
.- n :.
x-
..: =..
= -: - : _
\\\\\\\\\\ NNNN\\ N\\NN\\ \\\\\\\\N \\\\N
\\\\
\\\\NN\\ \\\\\\\\\\ NNN\\N N
.. N.e rNoN; NN-c=
- mr.:
G*N ew CN= #6 ca=ON
= ? % c *a e
g.-
- e *
-*E N
2
=CCF C TC=CO
==Ca*
CPCCC CafCC
==CCC
- CC=C O C y s' =
=
k M
3e
.g M
sk m: ~ N&
N r
N9wN*
%C*r*
?=N 4e
=N
- r=
N D
=k r.*
z
.*=
A=
TI L
AC=1T e c%=m 21 g=C e=
- 7. =
CeteC a z b
st
=Cz z
N N N N 's N N NNN NN NNNNN N
N N NN N,N N N
N N.N N N
,N N N N. N N
2.
N N
-~=s e-eC eNeer e-m N
~
e N
- - =
4 OO C C O
- L' C=C C"
==CCC
" ClO P C C
SC=
h C
- m n[{
N.
=t
- CL f *=f
=
A a
A M
a L
=
9e***
?
NM*
N'= = =
N
=
=
= *.
N
=
=
r 9 =# =
.=
p
N=
e 2
T
- r. :
=t==Z
% T & T T
= st CSCm1 2
C LE
={r r t
=
e t*
NesNN NNNNN N N N NN d edN4 4%
N N NNNNN NdN N
4NNNN
\\
=
=r NN\\rN Nzm%p
=O99#
2N-we N%mm C m
M
- * =
O N N N *4
- a N = L&
p-C E330s BCerc C=CSC O F-C40=
E C'C O =
C
=Ett e
=TCC
=
e}
C
=
E a
t
=
.-4 sN NN***
i.
N 9
- =e=lN N#NNM p
=*9 M9=9
=
= i.
%t
- LTir NN"#T T
=i2
=SLZT
=
L%2 xt% % 2 C
\\\\\\\\\\ (k N
844\\E GN NN
\\\\\\\\N Nd\\\\\\
4NNNN N
=
du NedNN
==
- NNr*
-eneN mm-e N N N 'a N N = ocN NJ*==
rNmme N
~~4 O E J J. C
- C OC O O O O cto EEE**
E c tie t=
"O==F OECCC 3Crec e
.= =
NN;
~
~
-N ae.* === N
- a E -== N
- 4*e*
=
.; y.;
=N4 %
.==
c
-.: z e. = _- : : = :. *
r e- = - - :====
tr
- _-= =
m e.* :. N N\\NN s
NNNNN NNNNN NNNNN NNNNN N\\NNN NNNNN NNNNN
=
t
.- r
-4.-
g N : -
&%..eN
'd % e - = =
==aae
- 4..**aN%
==.i;; N
- a N N
N
=
-===O 00C0=
-OC==
===CC e
==c
==CCO O-CC" C
3 M
e a
1
.., p.4 N.4 - = =
====N
=
NN==N N p =1 N N
.= = = = 9
==
=l g
ta%A J Itxt:
L : LIE
====T CO laic C
=3:
T441L T=202 '
NN sNN NNNNN NNNNN NNNNN N N N NN NNNNN NNNNN NNNNN N.
. =..~ 2 w
===.
?" = ~.
Nt : =.
- m=N N2
? ? C 3 *e
=NotN 4
NN+
s 44 O*??C
.00*CC COCCS CCC=C.
$
- C;Ct"
=O***
COCCO COCCC C;
m
=
LU b
wt b
4
=;;Z :
Atr==
- 2e*C
-#==**
alN =
=N N#NNN er==N
- mNN"
- zsNN
- a N N NN
=a y
T IT:
%}T *
- T CTE tm=ST eqtt:
Zi
\\\\\\NN NN\\\\\\
\\
NNN NN\\NN NNN\\N NN\\NN \\NN\\\\ \\
M N. *N N N, N
.a -r 4N
. 2 OcN e o A : *e Nia * * * * *s * % i N O N 'N== = m== = *w N
. +..
CCCOC CC===
CC=""
C
00==O O'
3 uw J
-J L.
U J GJ.
L a%^a J
s.
J.
.' a
- a w
- t
- L
- C==*
c." " = (.
Z%=>
m=T e3 2"CC*
=* >
4=t=
4 th= % =
MLTOT e**=>
Mmm==
ME*Nm
- 21C=
Lo%> M W%P t
\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\NN N\\\\N\\ NNNNN CN\\\\\\ \\
=
.4 N\\\\\\\\
N'NNNN
=
- ==~e N==*
=
N a
===a r+
24 c 9 c.: e eNece N.
- = =
=N.N O
ccC==
==O*C Ot==C C CCCC CdCCO COCCD C=CCe BCCCC C
3 7
M W
- ) )
g.'
d
- e W
.==- ~=.-~
r-CC-
---m-
==- m
_===C m. - ~.
~
Fet:
&~~%
=F-
=m
=r
=== mtssT T&*mT
- 2
~
- T.~
,ag[
- d== =
NNNNN NNNNN NN
\\NN \\\\\\NN N\\\\NN NNNNA \\
g
- s N\\N\\
N.NNNN
. erte
- -4
- e 0*
n- =
"N44=
c="**.
=="*"
N
=
N N:
N
- =
' c
-OCO CT***I COOCC OCCC=
-CSCO COCCC COOCC C
3
=
e y=
4 N
4632
=N 4== f 4 4 *8 O **
= *e
=N
=
- 4
- M t*
=
4=*w C g
wA4
=
a=REE b6 4J C
WJa N
edN
=,
q sp>O
Na med d
=
N
N
N *J 33 2
r w ww pes 0 w
M 4 *J Q b N=7=
'd W ar 4
bku
=CM44
=
4% JTS 30-4=
4 *i LOC mmh-=
- g;=
N.
- W R T=
'.*'J a=
4E E=>>
P10
==
U d
e a%z 1 350 WUTOO Me T3"&
- m=CC W
=duaR Am B 3m K#dd J mSO*d 4G==4 4 M
.JM 0 4.. e 4 C
g===;
OJd 4A 44 44p JE 2w d 4 4254 J 'j ".
C 9 ** '
3dd=*,
>=4Me
%C27 C
y==
KCMM a=Ja=
,=g e 4 J
- O==P
.eg - de
<= V
'J a
== de G
=wwWW n=3.**
2
..g+y
.MMMM M M M ',$ 'i
- A L3C3C 2 *J d V V WVOEM b * * *: Ed J=CEE ECEEb e
w
\\/
[ A:
g e
m a,m :.
t.
,.,.N
.m, N - --
11 1 n 1 ~ 3 *.
n :.
l
~
NNNNN NNN\\\\
NN iy U +M
-erNm NNeme N-ei
=
eee-e
---oe 20 e
- a SW
'O
==
NM.* F N
.* # 9* "
"N O
SL N N\\\\\\
N N NN
\\\\
k aC - mc1Nn N%
=a
%m e
-pl C
'.. O -mme-C
=?
=
=J J
T.
f Th g
=
4 L-O eff SL.
_n sse s\\ <<
\\
s 4
n=
OC\\
CC-N\\
Ck m
cu c.
te - a
--o==
ci e
3 m
2 I
g
=
. 8
[ @
b
$8 E N
T CO T *. {
=
42-h \\\\W
\\\\
de
\\\\
E ew NN
=c, a
--==
CsC.%
N c e 83 2 e
c.
o
.e = =
l l
e
\\
5
- 3 -=u Ne m
b
--ce-
.2A T**
M *-
M wbS
.L
\\% %NN N N 's \\ \\
\\ % - ""
Q
- z a - -. *
- r TNN
- .s t* C C T C CCC**
- C m
J e
1 L
-4 4 C.* N r* r - Q h M
.* : :lcic = t t r e mic
N NN\\NN NNNNN
\\\\
C N
oc
?.e--
.*c
=
'A
?
=
e
--e
=N
.a v-M-
- eg
'd f
1
- 1 0%
i _ ~ tt 'L
- S P=
N F
b
\\\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\NN
\\\\
E Q
a 7
rON
N N N cl e m-
=
e=-==
- sem-CC C
e O
s%
a o
. e
% c *t N N
- NtJc c s?.
U a
- 4 N% CDS STNFM TM C
-,\\
k.
\\\\\\\\,\\
\\,.\\ \\ \\ \\
\\
'4 4
-e-N--.
O O
C O - ?. O OC**-
- C C
"J 3
a a
L 'J U
% *.)
b 3e TTNN:
- *4 % J C CC H
<W 5%CCN TTMM A TM 4
'.i M
- g\\\\\\\\
\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\
Lu ~ ~cN o NNNcc ze w
t a
- C-CC C?---
OC C
7
=
1
- s Kw
- =
M M
/n L
a
- e. --
J
= d p2 g'
m 4
- J J 44
. ' =
'd J Yd 5
-N
= =
- r. u h
za za 6
M3 C
f h
g d M-N b M J
E RE T E EE 3
M
-P d
d 22 00 O O.C.
u-
-u
- w a
aa---
- O f.
', d to Q
O=
w N
'*3 2 2 EJ6 6.4
< L T
E
== a--
-. an a
Zs w
O DON==
==MWe WC d
.i * *: 3 M **
i '.* e== b E
W C
TE Oes a 44 7 4 O=
ee a
M *,* > 3 3 J23J J SM e
b A_
,a
)
T 4 ~ C ET U A TE3 0 r L I CENS 1 W G ST HPS TH PLA N TS 3t E E I NG
( '.
)
C0 N S
",N U C T IO N P gR M i T S 1 M T 18 F.
N F I f F 1 W E 1 E A B
')
I F S A'l F.I' ACHS
- 3. A T EST STAPT ASlH I.IC EN:il pi; PIANI bt'C K t,T ED Un(' A t14:p SER M EE E I Nt; SEN S H l' P L.
FE3 ilE A N I Nii l)FC E SION t'llM I'l l'T F
)
U Al.t ENS C* t:t:K I 12/73C I J/ I IC l l/14C I?/74C 01/!9C IJ/ADC Gl/81 h/3 N/S 01/77C 08/770 N/S N/S HI. ACK FOX 1 12/75C 14/FSC 06/7FC 07/77C N/s 111, A C K FOE 2 12/75C 12/75C 06/77C 07/77C N/S O2/flC 08/77C N/;
N/S
.I N/:;
8
'NEW tl At EN I 12/78C Ol/7?C N/S N/3 N/S N/S N/S N/S
/
- NEW HAVEN J 12/78C Ol/79C W/S N/3 N/S N/S N/5 N/S N/S
)
I Prnitt.E SP!Il NGS l 10/74C 08/74C Ol/76C 02/76C N/3 04/750 05/70C N/S N/4 P f DDI.F. Srill NGS 2 10/74C 00/ F4C Ol/76c 02/76C W/s 04/750 05/ FilC N/S N/S PenKiss 1 05/74C 06/74C 01/77C 04/77C 07/FIC 10/750 04/76C N/S N/S 7
PENKINS 2 05/74C 06/74C 01/7/C 04/77C 07/f7C 10/750 04/76C N/s N/S P E1 N I N :3 3 05/74C 06/74C Ol/ffC 04/fic Of/iFC 10/FSC 04/76C N/S N/s
)
I P f l.GR I M 2 12/73C 12/7 )c 06/75C 11/75C Ol/79C 10/74C 10/75C N/S N/S SRAGIT l Ol/75C 09/14C 08/11C ll/ F JC 10/1HC 06/l5C 07/75C N/S N/S SRAGIT 2 Ol/75C 09/74C OR/77C ll/77C 10/7BC 06/75C 07/75C N/S N/5
)
(*
- A
- ANACTifE STAT 05
- IMPACTRID PI A N15
)
(
)
(
gg e
('
Ug o
b cd t
o W
c.
r 1
O C
o
.