ML19351A585

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Viewgraphs Used in 891205 Presentation to Midwest Nuclear Security Assoc in Cleveland,Oh Re NRC Insp Program for Security Programs Mgt Effectiveness & SALP Process
ML19351A585
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  
Issue date: 12/13/1989
From: Creed J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Saunders B
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8912190377
Download: ML19351A585 (15)
v • d • e


Text

p,s

!;.t

. 1, 4

r.

DEC 131989 Docket No.~50-10 Docket No.,50-237 Docket No. 50-249 c;.

Commonwealth Edison company ATTN:

Barry Saunders

-Nuclear Security Administrator Dresden Station R. R, No. 1-Morris. IL 60450 t

Gentlemen:

' As you requested, attached please find copies of the slides used during my presentation-to the Midwest Nuclear Security Association on December 5, 1989 in Cleveland, Ohio.

My presentation related to the NRC's inspection program.

for security programs " Management Effectiveness" and our Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance-(SALP) process.

I appreciated the opportunity to address your distinguished organization.

. 'i :

Sincerely, y

James R. Creed, Chief Safeguards Section i'

l-

Attachment:

As stated cc w/o attachment C. E..Norelius B. Berson L. R. Greger

(< dk s

8 RII

- Cr e / asp L

12 D/89 j$h2igggg ggj$ go a

s...

., 3 9

a, A i'i 4

1 s.

SECURITY SYSTEM

~

f !!!

-i ih

'l 3

INSPECTION

~

s

.it 1.-

e

  • y.

,' al 2

i.

4 4

PEOPLE el}i i

i 1

3 C5

.lE i

N

.s-

,1 OBSERVATION RECORDS 4

.' [

_s s,

N' s

k.t e

s

. t,e.

s EQUIPMENT

.s PROCEDURES 2

o a

. d_

G o

.s g_

. 4

1. m 3

4.

g.

4
.r

'4 LIMITED na i

J

}i O

.:.uw TESTS-

.a:42 -

~f-

.,d r

4,.,.

' ' h-Igk

. - ~

=w=en= aa5=s.=*r*+-----

m=::=.2::pe mad==,,.~

am muu j.?

..$$i:I,$k.

,.y,.i

. J.![.

4,!:,.c,...,..... g.c :. t;gia Q.rs i:yp~M., M, W

,s s :!q:q.9,

nJT
o

> y.p -'.. n.;mr

j :.:: s.:;....

3

. g;.....;,,,..;.....:.a,g

a.,jj.:..

w!:p i;;

t a.

,,c, it..g,, n. -. i;p..g --

vt:

.t..

. i,....,.,,. c ;

p g;:3 g.

6 wi 3

a

i e h '

.$,.... i>t',,.0,rJ: v '.:. v.s:,;;..i

. n:...

. gt.
.e.. i
1,T;;' p : 'cqL*P... : i :

N>i.

a.:.. !: : : i.

'.. !. v.,. c,

'Y...

.: hj.. j..l. c[h:

'fy.

P > >:. J

.*: :9..:c. :.. 2 ib 1. * -

,j. c,.f.;: : : e,;:,

i 7 c,.

3, f.i;77; :s, c:f< i t" f%c

.s

y;c :,, :

j, f;.:

i.g

, e Pj:.. r. c,: > >,,. !

.: 4

.p :

vc p>: : bc, -

w-

.c.

.:c,,Li

... ;; cc:

c D,.3.. 2.:.:,y :; p c.ry s,.'.

.s

4. ::

c

.vs s ;,.- t s.. <1

,.g.

.s. g.,c: : j,. a.g' p. -

,8 3

.;.j. q p..

. q.:.

,, q ;,.. :., ri.

,7

.r.

c,.

.. ;c. c -.,

.,c.

,y..;.,....,.

i[:lic::,!!c J' :c,,A.. (':ENERALti;i l;c...:,;.;;:;. ; c:!p::.;;.%, :rp :M '.'i:c:'.i.,. M :. '.'iJ: n > '. >

. : Jp!,. /.. :, ;

" c.,

6:... k ' "

. :e.

5::i;:@,>.,y 16

. 3. 3 :..s..-

3;:::9.y

.g..

..'l3 -:q:

;4 o.;i: c6 :./f:: ?; + i ir.,.;

a

. j..
<. c. 7.,.

' s

,.~c, a

f.

c l ',

?

m :-,,;.,

~

o l

USE RITil 0 tiler IP!S-LOOK F0'R " ATTITUDE AND '

l EFFECTIVENESS" l

l c

'I 2.

ESTABLISilMENT'0F'ORGAl[12ATIONAL 'G0ALS s

3.

DELEGATION TO OUALIFIED SUBORDlHATES 4.

REVIEW AND FOLLOWUP ON DELEGATED DUTIES / TASKS 1

EdbnumT2p*M{g M"i NRLTliG REG'AR6TlWwhntRHATE METHODS, 9 i-- T

'^"D

      • ?.**{T I*1$Cd.dM'*"NN*h$$$dS2'.

OBJECTIVES AND M HEDULES

J.

r

.h.

.TECHN10 DES:

4.

... m M.... -

5%~ !Ndn.O' 'giinn sit %r :.'fi:{*fbS!!GQp" ; 60. Nh!f;;5.W ?....

s

'.V. '

AJi@@. P

' * :" '. f:

3:.

',]p. TMi$

  • T " ' O "

4~.. -_

..?

giE: gig ph li1HTENSIEIEDjlEVALUATIONT. p.S00RT~ TERM /0BsER s

g:-

....g,. ;....

..a

, :J :

L YV 1.

..i '

.s J.

2p
LONG. TERM ~EVALUAT:10Ho(TREND ANALYSIS) i....<.,-.
M[if'i $ [37 # COMP & RAT;lVEiSIUDY!!KPE ne.O 4

~

x

.s

  1. .adsf. c. b.3hi%...x. '... !iitt........ '..

p g

u.% Maii VM i.0l N L:$.f 3 6:p...," ' F Ai!!i".. W-d 7 ~M 3 M Pr$.$.. R...

e s

hiS% W W E M D R @i:!Nl$dli/ k N N.....d%M M MP @

$E 947B!FIELDf0BSERVATICHSR(P0llFDEFTNEDI

~

~

-c-

--, ~ -

--w-e

%.t.pp3.g e.u..o..u. w

...m

.. o

.......,....,~

ooo / ~. a.

.wo.m.e w s.wwuwou=*on.~u+e. mas.m4+.u >uoo.u.umamuemiasm.ae4

...w.m.

.. w w.w.

uovo owuou 3.-

8%bbt WWhWDMS.6ggJ J

. !::s i

'.i :

-l

...f

?J i:%,

g N ::....

jIjf!Iij f ' Iit

., hI i. p.>,f pp:..,,,.d;a.gp'...:rgW ' i'Aphhk;;,,:

... :. s tir. fi,,;,.,, d; 'i.:tf!,

.;h l

' '[k'[',7,.!!

~

?

f

. >. if:

i

.:.y:,

s

'.E'. 1

?c..

... g :

/ ; :#..-

?b.:::20.:!!!#',.' i@ d.

ri sj 2

U: o.. 'M;M Ms- - W

. Wp:"%

., [.. '.

,,g.

...c.

4 -

a f:

v.

. *:. :i @ef

i. :.. t r 2v:

.h,i

., '. ' : ! i.!.

.'j l

t 3,.

,t'

,,l'2 :,i

, 4 l!. '..,,:p:>,?:. j.ig.,.j:e '.;pi: : :3, r:g'$ 7..jf.. i{:,,;. : ;*g.y:;;'.,.; ::.i:!"J

).I 'l 3.,'.

g t, ;

.'-l

],..: !.:li:gif l,ig...,,.,..

..c Q. >. i.,':s..

g.,.:..

....."..'.....:l,T ;.(':g;,lp.,.

t.

g,:,i : c:,,,.. i ! I.I.'i'

.r.

,e..

s

.. t....,, r,,.

s.ls....

...e.,-

..:. g :....

... :.....,e.

.:>>>.-."m.

<s..

i3.

3'8::g,,. p+ : g i. fig::{;.g..:.. ;.... ;; c ; : -

.4 j'g p :,'

y].

gg,:.g..s.:

.. o

. hj,*1

.3

... {;gi.: :) y.;:

,,ji i>,.:;..

i i!

'I n.

.s,,,...>:....s..-,..,i

....,.,; ss..

., ib.t..:.., ::,,p' u 3.,

s..:',,- '

1

:. '.. c.{ ' :,. { : - -n'-

..! 'g;.

1 c: g g g r.

m.,..:s,... u. :., g,:.....s>

.s..

i. y.., -.. -

s f.r.,,..

i : y...,.. :;.v.., ;.3...

v.....

i d

J.

POLICIES.

1 y; a....m..,, m..:m y

l

't l

i 2.

RESPONSIBILITIES (DELEGATIONS) l 1

1 3.

MANAGEMENT ATTITUDE i

4.

AWARENESS - COMMUNICATIONS o;m..z.w.

,,A.,.:

w; w. m.._...;,,

,,u,,2

a..i ;,.gu,

,,.:.u w;.m A. wa

.,m w.......

w.;.w ;w...w m.*

.u.:. um 5.

OVERA. LL. PERFORMAN.C. E l

l e

l 8

1

(

r I

/C 6:q;.M '. e..,

..,. >:;;g g.[i '.y':' 3

_".p3.q ;3.g.;;ft ;
g,er)g,t:pp,,pgg:< ti.w.......g,:3,; @. g...; my.':y. i,.

.y s

%i I

,., % i.

e

~...

s

,,e w; np !

c.n L

.$ywr 9,.~, ' 'i gc..g':

L.

g.

,..f:.r.

3...

. c.c s

e,_

sv -

b j

I.

L.;

r

?

.u

.. *...'). !.

.N.

.y.. :

.. m s

.s.8 A::

a

',!h'f: -

.! '*,k 3

?

pw x :r

9n:w..

-p i

s.

,.. i. f* <

s -

4c!,,::e:cc i U N.

y..

9

  • p ' ' GM :: :

iD dj:.7.::.:

mi:.,k

.....,. : gb.

- i.:ffA.

MS' ' @:4

iM a..

t i

1

h M;!>!!! N s C

'r-3

!!!!il k

'iy,[

i j

1/itr Phigi N,

'.h f.

!g ' N, MNi','?l[II,f I ';.i f 3....

.: t

...m, b.

'k[; kh.

~

=.=...-n n,=_=..=_======= = -

=

e

.r 1.; '. w; a,;{ #, q.l:. 4 s,,;

<P'

" t

-pf,..,, i.,

4'"

.;,,, u p A.,,. M k 5 ' ".,... ~

. x..%.... -...

7

.'~

g.< a :;q.c.,.

p>... g., -

.n.

~,

T,.

jf.,

. SALP OBJECTIVES 3a

,l.C;.J-(MC 0516)-

I L

To collect available observations.....and evaluate o

Licensee Performance.....through an integrated NRC staff effort.

Positive and negative attributes....

i are considered.

Emphasis is placed upon understanding g i

the reasons for..... performance.

The SALP process is f.

oriented toward..... assuring plant safety.....and.....

1

.i, c resources are....... applied.

j 4>

Q

~ Diagnostic.....rqational basis for allocating NRC resources and to provide meaningful guidance to k4.

Licensee Mana9ement.

=

l

  • 1.

1

, 4c3 -

fPr i [" '

e

..m_ e.....j.,..,y..,~_.%..... m..-,,

=.,. _

-=,.=.,

.,..=,=g,,.,_.,._

_n.m.

.yn

. m., _ _ _

m t a.1,'

T* *f!N f ***F Y*F fes43 _.,,

y,

t a

't

'L Vn,:tqu,) t:

9,ye bigg'flyg

.f1LS *..t et.15 g:.

.org a t t...

. a n.,.

. 7 O' e,..ad. -

SYSTENATIC ASSESSMENTi.0Fs.

3 LICENSEE PERFORNANCE i

i-OBJECTIVES:

I' IMPROVE NRC REGULATORY PROGRAM

~

DECISIONS ON NRC RESOURCE ALLOCATIONS IMPROVE LICENSEE PERFORMANCE i

COLLECT AND EVALUATE OBSERVATIONS PERIODICALLY ON j

INTEGRATED NRC STAFF BASIS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE ATTRIBUTES CONSIDERED 3 -

EMPHASIS ON UNDERSTANDING REASONS FOR PERFORMANCE FURTHER UNDERSTANDING OF (A) MANAGEMENT DIRECTION AND (B) RESOURCE UTILIZATION j

i i

h a

1

~v ~~;; wg m--..:rgw;;;=emx.. 37- -..~m :=~~~_-- ~u ggm_ z P]

,4

. -w or u;,:. w.t 3.7,.

7 4, y g,,2

./4,:ene.

i FUNCTIONAL AREAS RATED

A u.

~

OPERATING PHASE PLANT OPERATIONS RADIOLOGICAL' CONTROLS MAINTENANCE SURVEILLANCE FIRE PROTECTION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SECURITY:

INCLUDES ALL ACTIVITIES WHOSE PURPOSE IS TO ENSURE THE SECURITY-AND CONTAINED OPERABILITY OF THE PLANT.

SPECIFICALLY, IT INCLUDES ALL ASPECTS OF

-j THE LICENSEE'S SECURITY PROGRAM (E.G., ACCESS CONTROL, SECURITY CHECKS, BADGING) i

-REFUELING QUALITY PROGRAMS (QA)

LICENSING ACTIVITIES OTHERS t

i CONSTRUCTION:

l' l

9 AREAS NOT INCLUDING SECURITY l:

OTHERS AS NEE 0E0 (SECURITY INCLUDED FOR NTOL)

\\

l l

i 1

b.traq'!.%2C 4.h';*.bjdN.; J,b"I.......l."bkh,' "'* * *

'A"*h.'.

f.

d O

f

..W

-.. a.m.m e

' ~.

.4 E '.'.i 'e '.* li

  1. d.- / i.

$ f'.' 'i,eb'.

/ ; /s X.*y*Ac30b1.-"

l.-

NVdLUATIONCRITERIA.

n!- ?-:'

cr.c

 ! ~

':Mim't% ~

i

,,t t r g.

s..

ELEMENTS WICH MUST BE CONSIDERED WHEN ASSESSING A LICENSEE'S PERFORMANCE.

~~

~

~

IN A FUNCTIONAL AREA.

MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN ASSURING QUALITY APPROACH TO RESOLUTION OF TECHNICAL ISSUES FROM A SAFETY STANDPOINT RESPONSIVENESS TO NRC INITIATIVES ENFORCEMENT HISTORY REPORTING AND ANALYSIS OF REPORTABLE EVENTS STAFFING (INCLUDING MANAGEMENT)

TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS AND QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CRITERIA GUIDANCE l-1

1 &.. W,.e.v.s.%itSddiMEGEL@ "..uai555sE5kW M 5 555 555G="

555?.

-*2~

v.

w. 4,,-,.n

,.y

,,. c.

r.

e

s:. e...

.. 1;, c;,w.6

..i.

EVALUATION PROCESS : '

e' i

i...

1.

-INPLli FORMULATION DRAFTED:

SG PROJECT INSPECTOR / SCHEDULED INSPECTORS 2.

SAFEGUARDS INPtlT REVIEWED:

INSPECTORS, SECTION CHIEF, BRANCH CHIEF 3.

INPUT-SUBMITTED TO OPS:

RESIDENT REVIEWS (OPS MANAGEMENT) i.

DRAFT SALP BOARD MEMBERS REVIEW:

INTER-DISCIPLINE /MGMT REVIEW 5.

SALP BOARD MEETING:

QUESTIONS RESOLVED / CONCLUSION CONCURRED / CHANGED I

I 6.

REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW:

CONCURS / CHANGES 7,

FINAL SALP REPORT ISSUED:

TO LICENSEE. MADE PUBLIC i

8.

SALP MEETING HELD:

PUBLIC BUT NO INPUT

~'

10.-

LICENSEE RESPONOS:

IN WRITING w-11.

APPENDIX TO REPORT ISSUED

-s

A,

..w c

us

- m_.&

=

== m--"m=rrma:,",=r-7 N**'sm,'n i,'* ~

w,e ;

.SALP Board for Palisad s was composed oft.

t t

.. !w,.

7 ' g. ' x; 3.ig..chuf.64
:.

h av:A-in en.:

, Oc m,,

S.c:.

...v,.;i:.;y rg g,, g q yp s e S&p

.g;

.. ' ~c

'i'. :s f

DeputyRegio'm.g..g&:.3

., ~

t.} g.*5;_

maz

_. 'W.e en.q}en[ ;~

.a

...y.,. ; -

e 1g ).t

_,w C. J. Paperiello nallAdniaistratdrJ' GW_

  • E. G. Greenaan SALP Board Chairman.4Directo6tDivision of m Reactor Projects (DRP)
  • "C. E. Morelius Director, Division of Radiation Safety and and Safeguards (DRS$)
  • H. J. Miller Director Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
  • W. L. Axelson Chief. Projects Branch 2 DRP
  1. R. W. Cooper 11 Chief. Engineering Branch, DRS
    • L. R. Greger Chief, Reactor Projects Branch, DRSS
  • J. O. Thoma Acting Project Director, Project Directorate-III-1, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR)

B. L. Burgess-Chief, Projects Section 2A, DRP

    1. W. Snell Chief. Emergency Preparedness Section, DRSS

. ###J. R. Creed Chief, Safeguards $cction, DRSS M. Schumacher Chief, Radiological Controls and Chemistry Section, DRSS

    • M. P. Phillips Chief, Operational Programs Section, DRS E. R. Swanson Senior Resident Inspector, Palisades
  • A. V. DeAgazio Project Manager, NRR J. R. Kniceley Security' Specialist, DRSS
0. J. Damon Operator Licensing Section, DRS H. C. Choules Reactor Inspector, DRS C. F. Gill Radiation Specialist, DRSS T. E. Vandel Reactor Inspector, DRS A. S. Hasciantonio Project Engineer, Project Directorate-III-1, NRR 4

J. K. !ieller Resident Inspector, Palisades D. L. Schrum Project Inspector, Section 28, DRP

  • Denotes voting members.

"* Denotes voting membe.r for Plant Operations, Haintenance/ Surveillance, and Security functional areas.

      • Denotes voting member for Engineering / Technical Support, Radiological Controls,-Emergency Preparedness and Safety Assessment / Quality Verification. functional areas.
  1. Denotes voting member for Maintenance /Surveillanc,e functional area.
    1. Denotes voting member for Emergency Preparedness functional area.
      1. Denotes voting member for Security functional area.
    • Denotes voting member for Engineering / Technical functional area.

t P

W w--

_. _. _ -..,. - - - ~ -

-m..- -. - - -

.~.

e

-f TABLE 1 EVALUATION CRfTERIA AND ATTRTBUTES FOR ASSESSMENT OF LfCENSEE PERFORMANC

'TU 1.

Assurance of Quality, Including Management Involvement and Control m

,pf Category 1 Category 2 Category 3

'ti QI L

    • 3 a.

There.is consistent evidence a.

There is evidence of prior p!

- g a.

There is little evidence of

.^

of prior planning and planning and assignment of prior planning and assignment g

Ii!

assignment of priorities; priorities; procedures for of priorities; procedures for-

f. EC !!!

procedures for control of control of activities are control of activities ~a're.:poorly[

L 8

activities are well stated, stated and defined.

controlled, and explicit.

stated or not well understood.

L 4)

~

i b.

Policies are well state'd, b.

Policies are adequately stated b.

Policies are poorly stated, f

disseminated, and under-and understood.

g

.standable.

poorly understood or

' g

{[

nonexistent.

i..

c.

Decisionmaking is consist-c.

Decisionmaking is. usually at a c.

Decisionmaking is'seldon'at a

.O ii

'ent19 at~a level that ensures level that ensures adequate level that ensures adequate 3

Ij adequate management review.

management review.

management review.

f j!

wa 4.

p d.

RCorporate management is fre-d.

Corporate management is usually d.

Corporate management is. seldom

,h quently and effectively involved in site activities in or ineffectfvely involved-in M

M tinvolved-in site activities, an effective manner.

site a'ctivities.. y y.

.p di mira s p

&. g a.

g in e.

Enginsening evaluations are e.

Engineering evaluations are e.

Engineeringeval'uationsfare fy i

' con ~sistently technically

' generally adequate end records frequentTy inadequate.and

'adeqUnts and records and and plant performance data are records and plant performance E ji o,

plant pdrformance data are

' generally complete, well dataarenotcolipleQ,'well

'}

completii, well maintained, maintained, and available.

maintained, or available.i; and available.

' f

"$ p]

4E'Wf6'b z

r8.1.. 7.N 3

f.

Corrective action is f.

Corrective action is usually f.

Corrective action is not timely

2 i

effective as indicated by taken but may not be effective or effective a~nd generally,ad-Ef i y}

~

1ack 'of. repetition: of in correctini the root'cause dresses symptoms rather'than h-events.:

of tF m, as indicated by rootcauses,as.indicatQby J

C occa:

epetition of events, repetition of evefjts.]-g n.;}

=

A

. z. '

v: <

ig_

l g.

Safety review committees g.

Root

_se analyses and self-g.

Corporate management does',not "t

(ISEG, onsite, offsite, assessments are occasionally appear to rely on'se.1ffassessment $ -

l l

etc.) and feedback from evident and sometimes result to ensure quality in2activ.ities.J l

r QA/QC activities are used in improvements.

8 to provide critical self-

.n-e

~

W assessments to the corporate er management and to improve 3

work activities.

y 4

g 2

..- ~

p y

~~ ^~

E5.h*=:5?*.5:==.?; (4Y 5 ** *5hs

ges.ce:1.ews=Eren:=:n=== =dn=3Ftte--- c'--+"===;-e---

"F-~"

^

r' o '

W-%e,w.

.em.

,g,,,,g:,.g 7

y,.

y

~

t i

.i r.

t-

.,: ;.e.;;:,

PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES.

ct -ic 3sc z.-

.;-4.a.

.
t t :

c:.

LICENSEE MANAGE E NT ATTENTION AND INVOLVEMENT ARE EVIDENT AND ARE CONCERNED WITH NUCLEAR SAFETY: LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE ADEQUATE AND REASONABLY EFFECTIVE S0 THAT SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SetTY OR. CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACNIEVED g

4 1

LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION OR INVOLVEMENT IS ACCEPTABLE AND CONSIDERS NUCLEAR SAFETY, BUT WEAKNESSES ARE EVIDENT: LICENSEE RESOURCES APPEAR TO BE STRAINED OR NOT EFFECTIVELY USED S0 THAT MINIMALLY SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.

il I

-LICENSEE MANAGEMENT ATTENTION AND' INVOLVEMENT ARE AGGRESSIVE AND ORIENTED TOWARD NUCLEAR SAFETY; LICENSEE RESOURCES ARE AMPLE AND EFFECTIVELY USED 50 THAT A HIGH LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONAL SAFETY OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING ACHIEVED.

3

'l s

.I

>p-. e -w.. -..w

.,%.m..u,

. sx,... a m.

.. m. met =:=:====;...

_.. = --

m3,.9.r,- A*

y,. u.....,r r.

'.. t. v.

[

j 9t!.. J C D-n-;.1 fir.t 7,c.cl j gy,g.

.in : :.

i3 or if

q;od l

y**u 1:

pygg g r.-

r. _

i r

t i

t NRC' ATTENTION SHOULD BE MAINTAINED AT NORMAL LEVELS i

CATEGORY 3 r

v BOTH NRC AND LICENSEE ATTENTION SHOULD BE INCREASED

_ CATEGORY 1 i

,t t

REDUCED NRC ATTENTION MAY BE APPROPRIATE 4

en i

= -:.

.... -.+-

,-,,w w u m e.: = =. =, u..... - -

w.%.

s m.~,.

.....,. m y..

nr,,

I o

, s e:,0 9 :...

~

\\

pggg g g g g n-: -

9-

... t. iip.tinf.

e u..

s

c. m E7 ::";

j

~l s,

THE GENERAL OR PREVAILING TENDENCY (THE PERFORMANCE GRADIENT) i j

0VER THE COURSE OF THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD.

THE DETERMINATION OF THE TREND SHOULD NOT BE FORCEO.

1 I

IMPROVED:

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS GENERALLY IMPROVED OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD i

SAME:

LICENSEE PER'f0kMANCE HAS REMAINED ESSENTIALLY CONSTANT OVER THE COURSE Of THE SALP ASSESSMENT PERIOD i.

DECLINED:

LICENSEE PERFORMANCE HAS GENERALLY DECLINED OVER THE COURSE OF THE SALP A.SSESSMENT PERIOD 4

I l

=q p

l 1

i l

c..-t t.s:c;t'z i, n :.:ah. al. ep) chi v:.' ~t,osospw. -

4 i

  1. . N k b),* h..

e i

i i

i 3 E03 _E 3R03_EVS t

Com a acency A3a':1y i

ai ure

o So ve cen:...nec roa ems 3

I

_ac< o" Vanacemen~: Voni:orinc 1

1 I

4 l

1

........ -.......

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19351A585&oldid=4693675"