ML19351A311
| ML19351A311 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 10/06/1989 |
| From: | Wilson B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19351A310 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-327-89-21, 50-328-89-21, NUDOCS 8910200009 | |
| Download: ML19351A311 (2) | |
Text
_
}
- f. nQi; ~ q l
'I o.
l h
i i
[NCLOSURE 1
(
(~
c
(
Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos. 50-327, 50-328 Sequoyah License Nos. DPR-77, DPR-79 h
l During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted August 6
- September 8,1989, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accurdance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below:
i 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, states that activities affecting l
r quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions.
L 1.
Work Plans M/60401 and M/60501 required that circuit board soldering activities have an "in-process" QC inspection.
[
Contrary to the above, an "in-process" QC inspection was not i
performed for all soldering activities.
[
t 2.
Work Request B794653 and Maintenance Instruction 11.7.1, Hand Operated Grinnel or Saunders Type Diaphram Valve, establish the required steps to be performed during the repair of valve 62-946.
j r
Contrary to the above, steps 6.2.1 (3) through (6) were not performed and were indicated as performed on the MI 11.7.1 check i
sheet.
i This is a Seve"ity Level IV violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Tennessee Valley Authority is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555, with a copy to the Associate Director for Special Projects, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and a copy to the Resident Inspector, Sequoyah, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a "Rcply to a Notice of Violation" and should include [for each violation):
(1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reason for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and j
the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
$ 02$$$$k b
[
o
Tp,;
a 4,,
h) h
- " v'II'Y Authority ~
EfE'e"#;.5!;!!l;,5!;;!s, Segu ah
.t Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the i.
response time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified P
in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the license should not p't
'be modified, suspended, or revoked or why s.uch other action as may be proper
?'
should not be taken.
t L
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY Co MISSION
/
Bruce A. Wilson, Assistant Director for-Inspection Programs
'1 TVA Projects Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i'
Dated at Atlanta,. Georgia L
this 4A day of October:
1989 i
I,..
(
e i
I i
t i
. _, _