ML19350E415
| ML19350E415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1981 |
| From: | Dircks W NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Weiner R ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350E414 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106230020 | |
| Download: ML19350E415 (3) | |
Text
}
~;
N d
l f
W D!3TRIBUTI0ti:
Same as memo to Commissioner Bradford-fm. W. Dircks
( )
re: Green Ticket #10504 Docket flo. 50-239 Mr. Richard E. Uciner Director, Division of Power Supply and Reliability Department of Energy Washington, D. C.
20461
Dear Mr. Heiner:
Your letter of !!ay 15, 1931 to Mr. D. G. Eisenhut transmitted DOE's second monthly submission of estimatas of the cost of delays in granting operating licenses for nuclear plants.
Included in that sub-mission was Table 1, Data on fluclear Units with Operating License Delays.
Footnote 3 of that table states in part that "flP.C and the company. project the unit will mturn to service in October 1931".
While we do not disagree with the way the footnote describes the cocpany's expectations with regard to the restart of Unit 2, the return to service of TMI-1 is very much an issue in the ongoing nearing..Thus, the most that i:RC can pmdict is a decision date, not a return to service.
Please make appropriate changes in the wording of this footnote in your next letter on this subject.
Sincerely, Eqsed Eliam iDereks William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations r
h \\ l' f
DD:DL DD':flPD/
l RAPurple*
EGCise
- See previous 318 for concurrences.
6/05/81 J 6/k/81 D:k Rb
\\ kC Ed
~ORBJ4:DL C-0RB#4:DL AD-0R$bL DL HSilve 64b JStolz*
Tt;o va k*
DEisenhut" HD on LB t
WDircks 6/5/81 6/q/81
/81N 6/// /81 6/$
6/4/81 6/4/31 81062300
~
~
^
-~
~
~
v.5 s'
/
{
C/
DISTRIBUTION: Same as memo for Comissioner Bradford fm. W. Dircks re: Green Ticket #10504 Docket No. 50-289 lir. Ric rd E. Weiner
. Director,\\ Division of Power Supply and Reliability Copartment of Energy
\\
tlashington, D. C.
20461
Dear fir. Weiner:
Your. letter of May 1 4 1981 to l'r. D. C. Eisenhut transmitted DOE's second monthly suomission of esticates/of the cost of delays in granting operating licanias for nucl, car plants.
Included in that sub-mission was Table 1, Data on,Nuclea7 ' nits with Operating License Delays.
L I believe that footnote 3 of that Jable, which deals with THI-1, requires scoe clarification.
N/lN Cased on the present status of the TJfI-l hearing and projected schedules for events leading to the Conryiss on'8ecision on restart of T!!I-1, it appears that such a decision could be rMe in October 1901. However, if the Comission's decision were to authorize, restart of THI-1, this would not necessarily result in irkediate retum t'd service of U!I-l considering,
\\
among other things, restart' con itions that may e imposed which could affect the date of return /to service of the plant.
'1herefore, the footnote,in question might more properl flect the NRC's estimate of when the Comission's decision on restart wil e made, as well as the utility's estimate of when implementation of me ifications required to prepare tlie plant for operation will be completed.\\Please make appropriate changes in the wording of the footnote.
\\.
/
\\
Sincerely, i
f William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations
.sL DD:NRR-RPyple ECase 6/)/81 6/ /81
'yr a. a -L:', D:DL
.. ORB!4:DL C-CRB#4:DL AD-OR:DL-D:NRR OGC ED0 HSil ve JS TNovak c.
DEisenhut HDenton L8ickwit WD:rcks t
I 6/ -/81 '
6/_! /81 64 /81 6/ /81 6/
/81 6/ /81 6/381 u
m
- == : __=C::
d N u.s. Gov 2nNa41NT PRINTfMG OFFICra 1979 - 294*443 m
1 FROM:
ACTION CONTROL i DATES
. CONTRCI. NO.
C0twissloser trad hrd COMPT oEaot:NE : Q$/31
/'Il
-/
AC K NCW LE CG UE NT I DATE OF 00CLMlNT isTemV #EPLY
$[ ][hl a
h
'T O :
jooE?ARE FCR $lGNATURE
(
j s
/
Jircks CF
' ' " ^ " *
]
C CMa'au^N FILE LCCATION
"/
0 EXECUTIVE olRECTOR oTma:
GESCRIPTION O LETTER DMEv0 C REPORT CCTHER SPECIAL INSTRLCTIONS OR REVARKS 221 %C M asked ta cortcet featsota PWITY E'tC anJ the comany project the unit (T'8! I) will return to service in T*'s came fa attachment to 2 v111 latter.
October 1931 U.. tar to CCC and a s!mrt response.to 3radhrd fin circks esclesfag letter to CLASSIFIED DATA COE should suffice.
I.D2h CCCUVENT COPY NO NLVEE R C8 P AGES iCATErCRY e
- CSTAL RE GISTR Y NC
! C NSI O ao O sao l
i ASSIGNED 70:
DArE
!NFORMATION RCUTING LE G A L A E vi E','t C 5'N AL C CCPv l
{
-*Mht~1, NRR 5/22/$1
'MRis 0
cATE
, NC LEGAL 09;ECTIC'.S
- o.,sisicwEo o:
Case
- y c7,7 y FisM htst
$f;tL11 i Cornell pegg33 h* y l*T 7m m,gn _3 3;c 3y,y,,;;n2,3 g MM R8TJ 1.
PPAS w
3 7..
' faller 2.
nanaue' 6-EfM
=;'0"'
r 3.
MattsokPrFine-1
' ~-
-a C < c av :n
- ma,; a
,,m,,m, PR'NCIPAL CORRESPONDENCE CONTROL 9
O