ML19350E155
| ML19350E155 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000083 |
| Issue date: | 06/02/1981 |
| From: | John Miller Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Diaz N FLORIDA, UNIV. OF, GAINESVILLE, FL |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350E156 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106170067 | |
| Download: ML19350E155 (4) | |
Text
,
'f.
d-d JUN 2 1981 Docket No.: 50-83 g\\ 'D Or. Nils J. Diaz f
8[
[L. h
[
Professor 3 Director of i -'
- 0 3 79OI A,
4 Nuclear Facilities Department of Nuclear Engineerino o
hj
- a. %ecEId$ rose/
University of Florida 102 Nuclear Sciences Building
\\;\\
q
$'[D Gainesville, Florida 32611 b
Dear Dr. Diaz:
By letter dated August 7,1980 as supplemented by letter dated April 27, 1991, you submitted a revision of the University of Florida Physical Security Plan for your Argonaut reactor, l.icense No. R-56.
We have reviewed the submittals and have concluded that the revision meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.67 for the protection of special nuclear material of moderate strategic signifi-cance. Since the cF;' rent NRC-approved physical security plan should properly be reflected in the license authorization for your facility, we are herewith issuing Amendment No.12 to Facility License No. R-56 which identifies your currently approved physical security plan.
Changes which would not decrease the effectiveness of your approved physical security plan may be made without prior approval by the Comission pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.54(p). Changes which do recuire prior HRC approval should be submitted and identified as license amendment requests.
Based on the fact that this license amendment applies to the physical security plan and incorporates into the license the latest requirements of your updated physical security plan, we have concluded that:
(1) the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequence of accidents previously considered, does not involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, and, therefore, does not involve a significant hazards consider-ation; (2) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the oublic will not be endangered by this action; and (3) such activities will be conducted in conoliance with the Comission's regulations and the issuance of this amendNnt will not be inimical to the comon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
81061700by f
- e... 5l.............
I SunesoME) i i
.I..................
.i oon p....
e.
p
. ~.
nac scau sis oa.an secu am OFFICIAL RECORD COPY uscwen-m.e p
g
.w
.y
,7
.~,m
Dr. Nils J. Dia:
-2 JUN 2 1081 We have detemined that this amendment will not result in any significant environmental impact and that it does not constitute a major Comission j
action significantiy affecting the quality of the human environment.
j We have also detemined that this action is not one of those covered by j
10 CFR 51.5(a) or (b). Having made these determinations, we have further concluded that, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.5(d)(4), an environmental impact statement and negative declaration need not be prepared in connection with issuance of this amendment.
The documents comorising the currently approved physical security plan for the University of Florida Argonaut reactor and our evaluation findings have been placed in the Comission's files. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790(d),
this infomation is being withheld from public disclosure.
It is required that this physical security plan be inplemented within 30 days from the date of issuance of this amendment.
I Since ely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:
James R. Miller, Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing l
Enclosure:
AwndnPat No.12 l
cc w/ enclosure:
See next page DISTRIBUTION:
Docket F les I&E (3)
NRC PDR G. Deegan (4)
Local PDR J. Wetmore l
TERA G. McCorkle NSIC J. Gibson SSPB Reading ACRS (10)
Gray File C. Miles, CPA D. Eisenhut R. Diggs
.j, R. Purple H. Denton
./
R. Tedesco J. Hel temes,', AE0D
,,.e
- #, b ( "/
L. Tremper J. Wiison jy g
- OELD,
~i DL:SSPB DL:
DL:SSPB DL:SSPB-
- 3.
.4 cmce >
1 suoucus i..NW.i..l.sog/cc,
LTrempe,r '
JMil l e,r,,
,, rte,,esco
..J...../ 81....
2,/2.j/.81
./,..../ 81
. f/.//.81
. l.
oar.,
' uc *cm rs.osci.v:v mo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
. m w-n_. m
s% KEtug y
UNITED STATES y g[c( 3 g
NUCLdAR REGULATORY COMMISSION aS WASHINGTON,0. C. 20665 e
JUN 2 881 Docket No.: 50-83
~
Dr. Nils J. Diaz Professor & Director of Nuclear Facilities Depart 2nent of Nuclear Engineering University of Florida 102 Nuclear Sciences Building Gainesville, Florida 32611
Dear Dr. Diaz:
By letter dated August 7,1980 as supplemented by letter dated April 27, 1981, you submitted a revision of the University of Florida Physical Security Plan for your Argonaut reactor, Licer.se No. R-56.
We have reviewed the submittals and have concluded that the revision meets the requirements of 10 CFR 73.67 for the protection of special tuclear material of moderate strategic signifi-cance. Since the current NRC-approved physical security plan should properly be reflected in the license authorization for your facility, we are herewith issuing Amendment No.12 to Facility License No. R-56 which identifies your currently approved physical security plan.
Changes which would not decrease the effectiveness of your approved physical 1
security plan may be made without prior approval by the Commission pursuant to t.te authority of 10 CFR 50.54(p). Changes which do require prior NRC ap'roval should be submitted and identified as license amendment requests.
Baed on the fact that this licen$e amendment applies to the physical security plan and incorporates into the lice %& the latest requirements of your updated physical securit:; plan, we have concluded that:
^
(1) the amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequence of accidents previously considered, i
does r,at involve a significant decrease in a safety margin, j
and, therefore, does not involve a significant hazards consider-
)
ation; (27there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by this action; and (3) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendstent will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.,
=
e
+,e e,--
.--,.--.--,-.-.,---.e---.r-m r.w--
,.e--_..--
,,,,...vw,..,,,-w.,._,-,_
2E Dr. Nils J. Diaz We have determined that this amendment will not result in any significant environmental impact and that it does not constitute a major Comission action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
We have also determined that this action is not one of those covered by 10 CFR 51.5(a) or (b). Having made these detenninations, we have further concluded that, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.5(d)(4), an environmc-ntal impact 3
statement and negative declaration need not be prepared in connection with issuance of this amendment.
The documents comprising the currently approved physical security plan for the University of Florida Argonaut reactor and our evaluation findings have been placed in the Commission's files. Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.79C(d),
this information is being withheld from public disclosure.
It is required that this physical security plan be implemented within 30 days from the date of issuance of this amendmenc.
Sincerely,
/
$5
' James R. Miller,' Chief
/'
Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Amendment No. 12 cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
' C
~
ga g
m
.q
--e
,,e,-
~.m
---v-,
.,.-,--q y-,
s-
--- + - - -
p.
e v-
-