ML19350D498
| ML19350D498 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1981 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Linder F DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350D500 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8104160040 | |
| Download: ML19350D498 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000409/1980013
Text
I~
tic
\\
'
[g* "84 I*g
UNITED ST ATES
9
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS10N
[
R EGION 111
o
L
f
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
(
j
=E~ E uv ~. .u,~o,5 a in
....<
m/r
' MAR 5
980
4'
o
Docket No. 50-409
O
f
fl
1
U
LQ f'
{[- ,gE 2 j fggg [g
'
Dairyland Power Cooperative
! --
ATTN:
Mr. F. W. Linder
General Manager
%
Q
2615 East Avenue - South
N%A
,* ' , .
La Crosse, kl 54601
iS
.
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter dated January 6, 1981, informing us of the steps
you have taken to correct the noncompliance identified in our letter dated
December 22, 1980 (IE Inspection Report No. 50-409/80-13). Your response to
item 1 of Appendix A of IE Inspection Report No. 50-409/80-13 is acceptable.
Your response to item 2 of the above referenced document does not
adequately resolve the NRC concerns in regard to the low number of tours
being conducted in the contain=ent area by members of plant supervision.
The initial NRC sampling showed that in ten randomly selected shifts that
zero containment tours were conducted by LACBWR Duty Shift Supervisors
(SS), and in eight randomly selected shifts that zero tours were conducted
by the Shift Technical Advisor (STA). In response to your statement in
the January 6, 1981, letter that our findings in this matter were not
sufficiently supported, our Resident Inspectors increased the sampling
size to a 31 day sample (October 1, 1980 to October 31, 1980) with the
following results:
1.
Of 89 shifts, no containment entries were made by the Duty Shift
Supervisor on 76 shifts,
l
Of 67 shifts, no containment entries were made by the Shift
2.
i
Technical Advisor on 61 shif ts (backshif t and week ends per LACBWR
Administrative Control Procedure 2.4).
l
Thus, it continues to be the NRC judgment supported by the site Resident
Inspector's observations of work activities and conditions inside of
containment, that plant management is not performing sufficient tours of
this area to keep appraised of work activities and conditions inside of
containment.
I
Please note that you were not cited for failure to tour the containment
I
area on each shift. You were cited for the failure to perform sufficient
l
tours of the area by plant supervisory personnel, to keep plant management
properly appraised of work activities (personnel performance) and condi-
tions inside of containra t.
This is contrary to your Administrative
.
Control Procedures 2.3 and 2.4.
!
l
l
810.4160040
&
.
.
Dairyland Power Cooperative
-2-
In your response to this letter, please identify your corrective act. ions
to resolve this matter.
k'e will examine your corrective action during a
future inspection.
Your cooperation with us is appreciated.
Sincerely,
RFLO' A
,
w~
R. F. Hej. can, Acting Director
Division of Resident and Project
Inspection
ec:
R. E. Shimshak, Plant
Superintendent
cc w/ltr dtd 1/6/81:
Central Files
Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
Resident Inspector, RIII
Local PDR
John J. Duffy, Chief
Boiler Inspector
Stanley York, Chairman
Public Service Co==ission
.