ML19350C546
| ML19350C546 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000310 |
| Issue date: | 02/18/1981 |
| From: | Brown G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Strecker I SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORP. (SUBS. OF SCHLUMBERGER |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8104030740 | |
| Download: ML19350C546 (2) | |
Text
(VS 1 '
rp*f (g[
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- w
!J REGION IV S
f 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE SUITE 1000
'%,,'[, #
ARLINGTON. TEXAS 76011 y
18 rc.o G81 req. '%
9 v
License Nos. 42-00090-03 2
SNM-287 E "'8%MR g US8/ w ~
i b
YNW^%
9
\\
Schlumberger Technology Corporation 4
m Schlumberger Limited Attn: Mr. Ian Strecker, Vice President of Operations P. O. Box 2175 Houston, TX 77001 Gentlemen:
This ref9rs to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. D. B. Spitzberg of this office Ln February 4,1981, of the activities authorized by NRC Byproduct Material License No. 42-00090-03 and.NRC Special Nuclear Material License No. SNM-287 and to the discussion of his findings with Mr. C. E. Racster of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under the licences as they relate to the radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and the conditions of the licenses. The inspection, which took place at your Houston facility, consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews of personnel, independent measurements and observations by the inspector.
Mr. 3pitzberg also reviewed the action you had taken with respect to three (3) violations observed during our previous inspection, which was conducted July 1, 1976. He verified that the corrective action with respect to these items was implemented as stated in your reply of August 4,'1976 to our letter dated July 13, 1976.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the inspection.
Mr. Spitzberg did express concern about an inspector's ability to readily o n-firm that quarterly exposures to individuals greater than 1250 mrem but less than 3000 mrem are not reportable to NRC on the basis of existing Forms NRC-4 kept on each employee at your various administrative offices.
To avoid such confusion in the future, Mr. Spitzberg and Mr. Racster agreed that a simple solution would be to attach a copy of Form NRC-4' tc ;he routine exposure investi-gation report for any employee receiving. greater than 1250 mrem in any quarter when such exposures are not reported to NRC.
810408O M p
s Schlumberger Technology Corporation Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please let me know.
Sincerely, Glenk' drown,# Chief
~
Fuel Facility and Material Safety Branch 2