ML19350B684

Forwards Requests for Addl Info Re Environ,Safety & Financial Issues for Continuing Review of OL Application

ML19350B684
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	03/09/1981
From:	Tedesco R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Tauber H DETROIT EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8103230298
Download: ML19350B684 (26)

Text

~f

• ffSh 4

"g UNITED STATES

["

9.(

g, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/i 9

e wasmucros. o. c. 2osss

\\>

pp U

L

E

'MR 1719815 dl S.$ ** TEEL *"/IPb Docket No. 50-341 MAR 9 1981 uA

'* Pls tf m

Mr. Harry Tauber Vice President Engineering & Construction Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226

SUBJECT:

REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INF0PMATION IN FERMI 2 OPERATING LICENSE APPLICATION As a result of our continuing review of the operating license application for the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant Unit 2, we have developed the enclosed requests for additional information.

Please ' amend your application to comply with the requifements listed in the enclosure. Our review schedule is based on the assumption that the additional information will be available for our review by March 16, 1981 for Enclosure 1, March 31,1981 for Enclosure 2, and April 15, 1981 for Enclosure 3.

If you wish clarification of the requests or if you cannot meet these dates, please telephone the Licensing Project Manager, L. Kintner, within 7 days after receipt of this letter.

Sincerely, h <-44.-

l Robert L. Tedesco Assistant Director for Licensing l

Division of Licensing l

Enclosures:

Requests for Additional Information cc w/ enclosures:

l See next page i

i 8103280 M8 a

i 1

d Mr. Harry Tauber Vice President Engineering & Construction Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 Eugene B. Thomas, Jr., Esq.

David E. Howell, Esq.

cc:

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 21916 John R 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N. W.

Hazel Park, Michigan 48030 Washington, D. C.

20036 Mr. Bruce Little J

Peter A. Marquardt, Esq.

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Co-Counsel Resident Inspector's Office The Detroit Edison Company 6450 W. Dixie Highway c

2000 Second Avenue Newport, Michigan 48166 Detroit, Michigar 48226 Mr. William J. Fahrner Project Manager - Fermi 2 The Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 Mr. Larry E. Schuerman Licensing Engineer - Fermi 2 Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue Detroit, Michigan 48226 s

Charles Bechhoefer, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Panel U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

>g. ".

Dr. David R. Schink l

+ 4.i,.

Department of Oceanography,

M O#

Texas A & M University I'.:

s*.(('~

College Station, Texas 77840

.... C Mr. Frederick J. Shon a

,Ter Atomic Safety & Licensing Board SUA.

Pane'l

?,'$.-

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555 w <a ijgh '?

S. je,"gi.. '

.u.

.P,*

4 hg b

- {ll.

~

.e X.

. sae

• I, &

.=

• I

1 9

t A

i ENCLOSURE 1 REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION i

l IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341 i

.I The following requests are included in this enclosure.

Requests and l

pages are numbered sequentially.

Request No.

Paces 1 through 23 1, 2 and 3 i

-i T

~

.. e.

4 1-QUESTIONS AND REQUESTS OF APPLICANT (1) What is the percentage of construction completed at Fermi 27 (2) What are the Applicant's current plans for the proposed interppetiye center?

(3) Discuss changes in the configuration of transmission line corridors since the ER-OL. Were the lines from Fer-i ? to I-75 (5 miles) constructed as indicated in the ER-OL (page 3.9-1)? If they were not, provide details.

(4) What is the Applicant's projected fuel load date?

(5) The Applicant should supply current year total population estimates and projections for the year 2000 in the following format:

(a)16-224 sectors centered on the cardinal points of the compass, and (b) 0-1 miles radial distance 1-2 miles radial distance 2-3 miles radial distance 3-4 miles radial distance 4-5. miles radial distance 5 - 10 miles radial distance 10 - 20 miles radial distance 20 - 30 miles radial distance 30 - 40 miles radial distance 40 - 50 miles radial distance 50 - 60 miles radial distance 60 - 70 miles radial distance 70 - 85 miles radial distance 85 - 100 miles radial distance 100 - 150 miles radial distance 150 - 200 miles radial distance 200 - 350 miles radial distance l

350 - 500 miles radial distance (6) The Applicant should supply the letter written to Ron Zussman of ANL j

by Evelyn Madsen, on September 19, 1979.

(7) Has the Applicant revised estimates for operating workers (see ER-OL, Supplement 5,. Table 2)?

I (8)' The Applicant should provide updated estimates for operating personnel who will reside in Monroe County (see Supplement 5, ER-OL).

l (9) The Applicant shecid provide updated estimates for the annual value l

of taxes to local governments and the State.

(10)

Is the manual dechlorination system.still planned? If.not, describe chlorine effluent quality objectives.

?

i l

t

i I

i +

(11) The Applicant should indicate the status of all Federal and state pemits, approvals, p.tc.

The Applicant should provide y

the current NPDES Pemit a;.c 401 Certificate.

.s 4

{

(12) The applicant should identify changes since the ER-OL in the following:

4 (a) The site layout of buildings and structures, including the proposed educational center and the operations support center; f

(b) The design of individual buildings and structures; (c) Operating features (for example, flow rates, chemic.sl

~

)

usage, cooling tower characteristics, etc.); and monitoring programs.

e (13) The Applicant should provide the infomation previously requested on flood plains.

(14) The Applicant should provide one copy of the following report:

Detroit Edison Company. July 1976.

"Enrigo Femi Power Plant No. I, Study Report on Cooling-Water Intake," plus copies of any subsequent reports on impingement and entrainment at Fermi I.

(15) The Applicant should provide one copy of the 316(b) study of fish impingement and plankton entrainment at the Monroe power plant.

(16) What is scheduled comercial operating date for Femi 2?

(17) What was the average annual co7und growth rate in peak load decand i

and energy for Detroit Edison and Michigan Electric Coordinated i

System for the period 1970.to 1980? What u s actual peak load demand and energy for DE and MECS for the years 1979 and 19S07 (18) What is the latest official 10-year forecast for peaA load demand and electrical energy sales for DE and MECS?

(19) For the latest year data is available show a breakdown of electrical

.l energy generated by fuel (i.e., coal, nuclear, oil, gas, hydro, etc.) for (a) the Detroit Edison System, and (b) the Michigan 1

Electric Coordinated System.

(20) Calculate system production costs during the first five years of Femi 2's assumed life for the Detroit Edison System and the Michigan Electric Coordinated System with and without Fermi 2 in operation. The analysis should be performed for varying growth rates in energy requirements (i.e., latest official forecast, one-half the official forecasted rate of-growth, and zero growth from 1930 forward.) Show all underlying assumptions used in the procuction cost runs. Specifically, identify the capacity factor assumed for Femi 2, the fuel. cost for Femi 2 and all sources of replacement energy (provide average values by fuel type) and escalation costs assumed for all relevant costs.

a

I i

i I

I 3-i (21) Provide latest estimate of the completed capital cost of the l

Fermi 2 unit, and your estimate of the fixed charge rate on this investment. Estimate first year fuel and 0&M costs j

for the Fermi 2 unit (in mills per kWh)--also levelized values over the assumed 30-year operating life for these

{

same cost elements (i.e., fuel and O&M).

t (22) For the first five years of Fermi 2's operation show system peak demand, capacity and resulting reserve margins for DE and f

MECS.

Identify all adjustments for such transactions as outside sales and purchases, interruptible loads, etc.

(23) Because of the concern for potential bird kills, please provide a description of the types of lights used on the cooling tower.

This description should include the following:

(1) Color of lights; (2) Ccntinuous or intermittent lighting pattern; and (3) Changes in lighting pattern with changes in weather conditions.

4 1

1 1

1 I

y ep er 1m y

v

-et w

-<y-N

---T p-

~

i A

ENCLOSURE 2 R.EQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE SAFETY REVIEW ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341 Requests by the following branches in NRC are included in this enclosure.

Requests and Dages are numbered sequentially with respect to oreviously transmitted requests.

Branch Pace No.

Chemical Engineering Branch -

021-21 throuch 021-26 Fire Protection Review l

fiaterials Engineerina Branch 121-11 through 121-15 Chemical Engineering Brinch -

281-2 Chemical Technoloov Section 4

4

,y o_ _, _

~

w_-__

021-21 l

021.0 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH - FIRE PROTECTION PEVIEW 021.32 In accordance with section 9.5.1, Branch Technical Position ASB 9.5-1, position C.4.a.(1) of NRC Standard Review Plan and section III.G of new Appendix P. to

{

10 CFR Part 50, it is the staff's position that cabling for redundant safe shutdown systems should be separated by walls having a three-hour fire rating f

or equivalent protection (see section III.G.2 of 'ppendix R). That is, cabling required for or associated with the primary method of shutdown, should be physically separated by the equivalent of a three-hour rated fire barrier from cabling required for or associated with the redundant or alternate method of shutdown. To assure that redundant shutdown cable systems and all other cable systems that are associated with the shutdown cable systems are separcted from

\\

each other so that both are not subject to damage from a single fire hazar'd, we require the following information for each system needed to bring the plant to a safe shutdown.

s 1.

Provide a table that lists all equipment including instrumentatio.n and vital support system equipment required to achieve and mahta1n hot and/or cold shutdown. For each equipment listed:

a.

Differentiate between equipment required to achieve and maintain hot shutdown and equipment required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown, b.

Define each equipment's location by fire area, c.

Define each equipment's redundant counterpart, 1

~

r

./

6

021-22 d.

identify each equip ent's essential cabling (instru=entation,

~

control, ar.d power). For each cable identified: (1) Describe the cable routing (by fire area) fr:: source to ter=inatien, and (2) Identify each fire area 10 cation here t.5e cabies are se;arated by less than a wall having a three-hour fire rating frc: cables f:r any redundant shutd:wn syste:. and e.

List any proble: areas identiff'e'd by ite: 1.d.(2) above that will be : rrected in ac: rdance with Section III.G.3 cf A;;endix R (i.e., alternate er dedicated shu-d:-'n :a; ability).

2.

Fr: vide a tatie inat lists Class 1E and.N:n-Class,1E caties that are associated witn the essential safe shutd:an systa=s identified in ite: 1 a bo ve.

F:r each cable listed:

a.

Define the cables' associati n to the safe t 2 d:wn ;yste: ( ::::n

wer I

ur

e, c:= mon raceway, separaticn lits than Regulat ry 5;fde 1.75 guidelines, cables for equi;=ent whose spuricus c;eration will adversely affect shutd:wn syste s, et:.),

b.

Describe es.n associated cable routing (by fire area) fr = s ur:e to terr.ation, and c.

Identify each 1 cation where the associated cahies are separated by less than a wall having a three-h:ur fire rating fr:= : ables required for er associated with any radandant shutd:wn systas.

1 l

t 021-23 3.

Provide one of the follcwing for each of the circuits identified in item I

t 2.c above:

~

1 1

(a) The results of an analysis that demonstrates that failure caused I

by open, ground, or hot short of cables will not affect it's associated shutdown sy' stem, I

l (b) Identify each circuit requiring.a solution in accordance with i

section III.G.3 of Appendix R, or (c) Identify each circuit meeting the requiremer'.s sf section III.G.2 of Appendix R (i.e., three-hour wall, 20 feet of clear space with aut =atic fire suppression, or one-hour barrier with autocatic fire suppression).

s 4

To assure compliance with GDC 19, we require the following information be provided for the c:ntrol room.

If credit is to be taken for an alternate or dedicated shutdown method for other fire areas (as identified by item j

1.e or 3.b above) in ac:ordanc: vith section III.G' 3 of new Appendix R

~

to 10 CFR Part 50, the following information will also be required for each of these plant areas.

i a.

A table that lists all equipment including instrumentatien and vital support system equipment that' are required by the primary method of achieving and =aintaining hot and/or cold shutdown.

/

4

021-24

/

b.

A table that lists all equipment f*ncluding instrumentation and vital support system equipment that are required by the alternate, dedicated, or remote method of achieving and maintaining hot and/or cold shutdown.

c.

Identify each alternate shutdown equipment If sted in item 4.b above with essential cables (instrumentation, control, and power) that are located in the fire area containths the primary shutdown equipment.

For each equippent listed orovide one of the following:

(1) Detailed electrical schematic crawings that show the essential cables that are duplicated elsewhere and ar,e electrically isolated from the subject fire areas, or s

(2) the results cf an. 'alysis that demonstrates that failure (open, ground, er ho. short) of each cable identified will not affect the capaoflity to achieve and maintain hot or cold shutdown.

a.

Provide a table that Ifsts Class 1E and Non-Class 1E cables that are associated with the alternate, dedicated,or remote method of shutdown.

For each item Ifsted, identify each associated cable located in the fire area containing the primary shutdown equipment.

For each cable so identified provide the results of an analysts that demonstrates that failure (open, ground, or hot short) of the associated cable will not adversely affect the alternate. dedicated.or remote method of shutdewn.

emm e

+

ns m

j 1

I l

021-25 I

i i

5.

The residual heat removal systed is generally a 1cw pressure system that l

interfaces with the high pressure primary coolant syste:. To preclude a LOCA through this interface, we require c ;11ance with the re::nmenda-

' tions of Branch Technical Position RSS 5-1.

Thus, this interface ecs: likely f

consists of two redundan5 and inde;endent s:::r ;erated valves with diverse interlocks in acc:rdance with Branch Technical position ICSS 3.

These two motor operated valves and their associated cable may be subject to a I

t

~

single fire hazard.

It is cur c:ncern that this single fire c:uld cause the two valves to open resulting in a fire-initiated LOC

• thr:ugn :ne subje:: high-1:w pressure syste: interft:e.

To assure that this interfa:e and other high-low pressure interfaces are adequagely ;rctected frc: the i

effe:ts of a single fire, we require the following inferrati:n:

a.

Identify each high-low pressure interface that uses redundant electrically ::ntr:11ed cevi es (such as two series motor c;erated

-valves) to isolate cr-pre:lude rupture of any ;ricary c:clant boundary.

b.

Identify each device's essential cabling (pewer and c:nt.ci) and describe the cable r:uting (by fire area) fr:m s:ur:a to i

ter=ination.

Ii c.

Identify each location where the identified cables are separated x

by.less than a wall having a three-hour fire rating from. cables f r the redundar t device.

e i

i i 1-I

1 O

021-26 d.

For the areas identified in item 5.c above (if any), pr: vide the bases and justification as to the acceptability of the existing design or any proposed-cdificati:ns.

e i

t i

I i

t I

(

l l

l 1

t e

l

.. -... - -.. = - -..

o

121-11 121.0 MATERIALS ENGINEERING oraNCH I

i 121.15 FRACTURE PREVENTION OF CONTAINMENT PRESSURE BOUNDARY Our safety evaluation review assesses the ferritic materials that constitute i

the containment pressure boundary in the nuclear plant containment system to i

l determine if the material fracture toughness is in compliance with the requirementr of General Design Criterion 51, " Fracture Prevention of Con-1 l

tainment Pressure Boundary".

GDC 51 requires that under operating, maintenance, testing and postulated accident conditions, (1) the ferritic materials of the e

inment pressure boundary behave in a nonbrittle manner and (2) the i.

.,..ity of rapidly propagating fracture is minimized.

The Enrico Fermi Unit 2 primary contairanent includes a ferritic steel contain-(

ment vessel (drywell), a ferritic steel suppression chamber (torus) and vent pipes providing the connection between the drywell and the torus. The ferritic materials of the containment pressure boundary, which are con-sidered in our assessment, are those which have been applied in the fabrica-tion of the drywell, drywell head, torus, vent pipes and primary containment equipment hatch, personnel lock and penetrations and piping system components including the valves required to isolate the system. These components are the parts of the containment system which are not backed by concrete and must sustain loads under the conditions cited by GDC 51.

l t

The Fermi 2 containment pressure boundary is comprised of ASME Code Class 1, 2, and MC components.

In late 1979, we reviewed the fracture toughness l

requirements of the ferritic materials of Class MC, Class 2 and Class 1 i'

components which typically constitute the containment pressure boundary.

Based on this review we detemined that the fracture toughness requirements contained in ASME Code Editions and Addenda typical of those used in the design r

/t

121-12 of the containment may not ensure compliance with GDC 51 for all areas of the containment pressure boundary. We initiated a program to review fracture toughness requirements for containment pressure boundary materials for the purpc:s af defining those fracture toughness criteria that most appropriately 4

address the requirements of GDC 51.

Prior to completion of this study, we have elected to apply in our licensing reviews, as an interim requirement, the criteria identified in the Surrrner 1977 Addenda of Section III of the ASME Code for Class 2 components. Because the criteria which have been applied in construction differ in Code classification and Code editions and addenda, we have c..csen the criteria in the Summer 1977 Addenda of Section IlI of the Code to provide a unifonn review, consistent with the safety function of the containment pressure boundary materials.

i The FSAR for Fermi 2, however, does not provide the infon. ration necessary to characterize the fracture toughness of the materials of the reactor contain-ment pressure boundary within the context of GDC 51. We request, therefore, the following infonnation be p rided the Materials Engineering Branch for f

review:

1.

Penetrations Listing of all containment process line pipe penetrations and related j

a.

supplemental infonnation which identifies penetration assembly sleeve, process pipe and end closure materials by specification, final heat treat condition, nominal OD, and schedule, wall or section thickness, b.

Full size assembly detail drawings showing as built configurations and dimensioning of hot and cold pipe penetrations.

2.

Ecutoment Hatch Full size assembly drawing and detail drawing of the hatch head a.

assembly (barrel,. drywell bulkhead, door).

i I

121-13 b.

Supplemental information identifying the materials of construction of the hatch head assembly by specification, final heat treat condition and section thickness.

3.

Personnel Access Lock a.

Full size assembly drawing and detail drawing of the door bulkhead assembly (barrel, drywell bulkhead, door)

I b.

Supplemental infomation identifying the materials of construction of the door bulkhead assembly by specification, final heat treat condition and section thickness.

4.

Main Steam, Main Feedwater, Auxiliary Feedwater Systems a.

Full size piping diagrams and related supplemental pipe line lists and pipe line design / class specifications which identify the systems

\\

of interest by line designators, pipe size and schedule, and pressure boundary materials specifications in addition to valve type, number and pressure boundar;..uerials specifications.

b.

Piping diagram 1, d infomation.

l 5.

3rywell/ Torus / Vent Pipe Full size assembly drawing and details of drywell/ vent pipe and a.

i i

Torus / Vent pipe connections b.

Specifications and heat treat condition of materials at these connections

\\

6.

Drywell Head 1

j Full size assembly drawing and details of flange area a.

i b.

Supplemental information identifying the materials of construction by specification, final heat treat condition and section thickness.

7.

The lowest service metal temperature to be experienced under the k

conditions cited by GDC 51.

E,'/

,a

121-14 We request thr.t fracture toughness data be provided for the ferritic materials of those o. fts of the above components which, in the performance of the con-tainment function under the conditions cited by GDC 51, provided a cressure boundary.

For those ferritic materials identified in items 1.through 6 for which fracture toughness data are unavailable the following information is requested:

Seamless Pice:

1.

Billet heating temperature prior to piercing 2.

Intermediate reheat temperatures 3.

Stock wall thickness prior to final sizing 4.

Reheating temperature prior to final sizing 5.

Pipe final heat treatments or pipe assembly heat treatments Seamless Fittings:

1.

Stock heating temperature prior to hot forming 2.

In process reheat temperatures 3.

Final heat treatment or pipe assembly heat treatments.

Weldqd Pioe:

1.

Metallurgical heat treat conditien of plate stock as entered into fabrication 2.

Plate stock heating temperatures prior to hot forming 3.

In process reheat temperatures 4.

Pipe final heat treatments or pipe assembly heat treatments.

I f

121-15 Welded Fittings:

1.

Metallurgical heat treat condition of stock as entered into fabrication 2.

Stock heating temperatures prior to hot forming i

3.

In process reheat temperatures 1

4 i

4.

In process heat temperatures i

5.

Final heat treatment or pipe assembly heat treatments I

l Valves:

1.

Final metallurgical heat treat condition of the materials of those valves parts which constitute parts of the pressure boundary 2.

In-process post-weld recair and intermediate heat treatments of the iaterials of those valves parts which constitute parts of the pressure boundary.

.s i

e t-e

/

l.

i

r 281-2 281.0 CHEMICAL ENGINEERING BRANCH - CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY 281.3 Establish and state appropriate limits for the conductivity of the (5.4.8) purified condensate to the reactor vessel in accordance with Regulatory (10.4.6)

Position C.1 of Regulatory Guide 1.56, revision 1 Also, describe the sanpling frequency, chemical analyses, and established limits for dissolved and suspended solids that will be performed and the basis for these limits.

281.4 Establish and state the sequential regeneration frequency in order to (10. 4. 6 )

naintain adequate capacity margin in the condensate treatment systen (Regulatory Position C.2 of Regulatory Guide 1.56, revision 1).

Include the basis for the resin regeneration frequency.

281.5 Indicate that the initial total capacity of new demineralizer resins (5.4.8) will be measured and describe the method to be used for this neasure-

- (10. 4. 6 )

ment (Regulatory Position C.3 of Regulatory Guide 1.56, revision 1).

281.6 Describe the method of determining the condition of the demineralizer (5.4.8) units so that the ion exchange resin can be regenerated or replaced (10.4.6) before an unacceptable level of depletion is reached (Regulatory Posi-tion C.4 of Regulatory Guide 1.56, revision 1).

Describe the nethod by which (a) the conductivity meter readings for the condensate cleanup system will be calibrated, (b) the flow ates through each demineralizer will be measured (c) the quantity of the arincipal ions likely to cause

'demineralizer breakthrough will be calcula ud, and (a) the accuracy of the calculation of resin capacity will be checked.

281.7 Indicate the control room alarm set points of the conductivity neters (5.4.8) at the inlet and outlet demineralizers in the condensate and reactor 10.4.6) water cleanup systems when either (Regulatory Position C.5 of Regula-tory Guide 1.56, revision 1):

The conductivity indicates marginal performace of the deminerali er a.

l systems; l

b.

The coaductivity indicates noticeable breakthrough of one or more demineralizers l; 281.8 The reactor coolant limits and corrective action to be taken if the 9.4.8) conductivity, pH, or chloride content is exceeded will be established

@ 4.6) in the Technical Specifications.

Descrioe the chemical analysis methods to be used for their determination (Regulat9ry Position C.6 of Regulatory Guide 1.56, revision 1).

p[281.9 Describe the~ water chemistry control program to assure maintenance o 4.6) condensate demineralize influent and effluent conductivity within the limits of Table 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.56, revision 1.

Include con-ductivity meter alarm set points and the corrective action to be taken if the limits of Table 2 are exceeded.

i ENCLOSURE 3 1

ENRICO FERMI ATOMIC l

POWER PLANT UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341 I

HOUEST FOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION i

t I

'j 1.

a.

Indicate the estimated annual cost by year to operate each unit of the subject facility for the first seven full years of each unit's commercial operation.

The types of costs included I

in the estimates should be indicated and include (but not necessarily be limited to) operation and maintenance expense (with fuel costs shown separately), depreciation, taxes and a reasonable return on investment.

(Er. closed is a form which should be used for each year of the seven year period.)

Indicate the projected plant capacity factor (in percent) for each unit during each of the seven years.

Provide separate estimates using 50 percent and 60 percent plant capacity

factors, b.

Indicate the unit price per kWh experienced by each applicant j

on system-wide sales of electric power to all customers for l

l the most recent 12-month period.

2.

Indicate the estimated costs of permanently shutting down each unit l

of the facility, stating what is included in such costs, the assumptions 6

i

./

o

2 made in estimating the costs, the type of shutdown contemplated, and the intended source of funds to cover these costs.

3.

Provide an estimate of the annual cost to maintain each unit of the shutdown facility in a safe condition.

Indicate what is included in the estimate, assumptions made in estimating costs, and the intended source of funds to cover these costs.

4.

If the facility is jointly-owned provide copies of the joint participation agreement setting forth the procedures by which the applicants will share operating expenses and decommiss".oning costs.

The following financial information is required for each investor-owned participant:

5.

provide copies of the prospectus for the most recent security issue and copies of the most_ recent SEC Form 10-K and 10-Q.

provide copies of the preliminary prospectus for any pending security issue. Submit copies of the Annual Report to Stockholders each year as required by 10 CFR 50.71(b).

6.

Describe aspects of its regulatory environment including, but not necessarily limited to, the following: prescribed treatment of allowance for funds used during construction; rate base (original cost, fair value, other); accounting for deferred income taxes and

j >

investment tax credits; fuel adjustment clauses in effect or proposed; I

historical, partially projected, or fully projected test year.

7.

Describe the nature and amount of its most recent rate relief action (s). In addition, indicate the nature and amount of any I

4 pending rate relief action (s). Use the attached form to provide j

this information.

Provide copies of the submitted, financially related testimony and exhibits of the staff and company in the most j

recent rate relief action or pending action.

Furnish copies of the hearing examiner's report and recomendation, and final opinion last issued with respect to each participant, including all financially related exhibits referred to therein.

8.

Complete the enclosed form entitled, " Financial Statistics," for the most recent twelve-month period and for the previous three calendar years.

l t

./

The following financial information is required for each cooperative applicant:

1.

!s each participant's percentage ownership share in the facility eaual to its percentage entitlement in the electrical capacity and output of the plant? If not, explain the difference (s) and any resultant effect on any participant's obligation to provida its share of operating costs.

2.

Describe the rate-setting authority and rate covenants of the co-operatives and how that authority will be used to ensure the satisfaction of financial obligations in relation to operation and eventual shutdown of the facility.

3.

Describe tne nature and amount of the cooperative's most recent rate relief action (s) and its anticipated effe'ct on net margins.

In addition, indicate the nature and amount of any pending rate relief action (s).

4.

If membership cooperatives are involved, explain the contractual,

arrangements between the cooperative and its members that will provide funds for operation and eventual shutdown of the facility.

Provide representative copies of such contracts.

l S.

Provide copies of the latest annual and interim financial statements.

Also provide copies of similar statements for the corresponding periods ended in the previous year. Continue to submit copies of the annual financial statementst each year as required by 10 CFR 50.71(b).

1 i*

ATTACK;ENT FOR ITEP, fi3.

1.a.

ESTlf ATED ANfiUAL COST OF OPERATIfiG fiUCI EAR GEliERATIfiG UNIT:

l FOR THE CALEliDAR YEAR 19__,

l (thousands of dollars) 9 6

Ooeration and maintenance expenses fiuclear power generation to: lear fuel expense (plant factor i)..........

5 Other opera ting <_xpenses.....................

Maintenance expenses.......................

Total nuclear power generation.............

j Transmission expenses.........................

Administrative and general expenses Property and liability insurance.................

Other A.&G. expenses.......................

Total A.&G. expenses....................

• \\

TOTAL 0&M EXPENSES.....................

Depreciation expense..........................

I Taxes other than income taxes Property taxes...........................

Other................................

Total taxes other than income taxes...........

-Income taxes - Fed eral........................

I Income ta x es - _ othe r.........................

Deferred income taxes - net......................

1:

Investment tax credi t adjustments - net................

Return (rate of return:

%)..................

l TOTAL ANtiUAL COST OF OPERATION

'l 9

5 l

/,

I t

+

i ATTAEK'ET.T FD?. !Ti'*...

7 RATE DEVELGTi:E.TS Electric Gas Steam Granted Test year utilized A nJa1 amount of revenue increase requested-test year basis (000's)

Date petition filed Ar.r.ual amount of revenue increase allowed-test year basis (000's)

I Percent increase in revenues allowed Date of final order Effective date Rate base finding (000's)

Construction work in progress included in Rate base (000's)

Rate of return on rate base authorized Rate of return on common equity authori7e/

Revenue Effect (000's)

Amount received in year granted Amount received in subsequent year (If not available, annualize amounts received in year granted) a i

Pendino Reouests i

Test year utilized Amount (000's) l Percent increase Date petition filed l

Date by which decision must be issued Rate of return on rate base requested Rate of return on common equity requested Amount of rate base requested Amount of construction work in progress requested for inclusion in rate base l

1 i

i

ATTAur'E.'.i TOR 17; C.

E f! NAN !/.*. STAT.'." iCS 12 r:ntns' ended

~ ~ ~ ~

(cc11ars in c1111cns )

Earnings available to common equity Average c:7 On ecuity F. ate of return on average common equity Times total interest earned before FIT:

Gross ir.:::e (both including and excluding AFDC) + current and deferred FIT + total interest charges + amortization of debt discount end expense Times icng-term interest earned before FIT:

Gross in: cme (both including and excluding AFDC) + current and deferred FIT + long-term interest charges + amortization of debt discount and expense Eond ratings (end of period)

Standard and Poor's Moody's Tices interest and preferred dividends earned after FIT:

Gross inccme (both including and excluding AFDC) + total interest charges + amortization of debt discount and expense + preferred dividends.

AJUDC Ket income af ter preferred dividends Market price of com:on Ecek value of common Parket-book ratio (end of period)*

Earnings avail for cc=non less AFDC +

depreciatior and amortization, deferred taxes, and ii; vest. tax credit adjust.-

deferred.

Conr. n dividends Ratio

'acrt-term debt Sank loans Comm.ercial paper Capitaliza.non (Amount & Percent) long-ter= debt Freferred stock Cc7:on cavity

• If subsidiary company, use parent's data.

._