ML19350B655

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised IE Bulletin 81-01, Surveillance of Mechanical Snubbers, W/Corrected Pages 5 & 6.Change in Identification of Facilities W/Cps to Which Bulletin Is Applicable Does Not Affect Util Requirements
ML19350B655
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 03/04/1981
From: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Pollock M
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
References
NUDOCS 8103230196
Download: ML19350B655 (1)


Text

d***:0 QC

<,*p 9,'

UNITED STATES 8 ],)

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

* \\ g / [E REGION I 9, A[D 631 PARK AVENUE KING OF PRUSSIA,PENNSYt.VANIA 19406

,# f_ N g LL /.p N

4198 b "34 @Vth Docket No. 50-322 MAR Q /,fg.l 3,rgOl A Long Island Lighting Company 6

ATTN: Mr. M. S. Pollock

-3 g $*wdE%

)

Vice President - Nuclear

/

175 East 01d Country Road 9

r Hicksville, New York 11801

%Q*\\r/

Gentlemen:

IE Bulletin No. 81-01, " Surveillance of Mechanical Snubbers," transmitted to you on January 27,.1981, has been revised to change the identification of the

. power reactor facilities with construction permits to wnich the Bulletin is applicable. This change does not affect your requirements with respect to the original Bulletin. As a result, the enclosed revised pages 5 and 6, are forwarded to you for information.

If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.

Sincerely, Ce (eH.Grier Director

Enclosures:

Revised pages 5 and 6 of IE Bulletin 81-01 and List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins i

CONTACT:

D. L. Caphton

.(215-337-5266) cc w/encis:

J. P. Novarro, Project Manager Edward M. Barrett,. Esquire Edward J. Walsh, Esquire T. F. Gerecke, Manager, Engineering QA Department

$108230\\%

4

SSINS No.: 5520 Accession No.-

3005050075 IES S1-01

((

ih' ' QfD j ""lf UNITED STATES

,{

NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCNiISSION 3,j OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFCRCEMENT WASHINGTCN, D.C.

20555 January 27, 1931 c..

-IE Bulletin No. 81-01:

SURVEILLANCE OF MECHANICAL SNUBBERS Description of Circumstances:

Several instances of failures of =echanical snubbers supp' lied by International Nuclear Safeguards Corporation (INC) have been identified that indicate possible deficiencies in these snubbers. A su==ary of the failures that have cccurred is provided below:

1.

On August 9,1974, the Tennessee Valley Authority submitted event repcrt BFAO-50-260/741W identifying 11 of 14 INC Model MSVA-1A snubbers that were found inoperable en Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 and subsequently identified 5 of 14 inoperable units on Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Unit No 3.

All of these units were found to be fro:en, and the cause was attributed to a failure to lubricate the parts during asse:51y.

The failed snubbers were replaced with new units produced by the same manufacturer.

2.

On April 12, 1976, the St. Lucie Plant Unit 1 facility of Florida Fewer and Light Corporation submitted event report No 50-335-76-9 wherein five

NC Model MSVA-1 snubbers were identified as inoperable because they were found to be fro
en. The failures were caused by exidatien en the internals and by improper assembly. All INC =echanical snubbers were replaced with units produced by another manufacturer.

On April 8, 1977, Icwa: Electric Lignt and Pcwer Company submitted event 3.

report No. 77-23 for the.Duane Arnold Energy Center facility that identi-fied 13 INC Medel IMSVA-1 Type AS snubbers to be frozen; the cause of failure was attributed to large a=ounts of interior oxidation. The units were replaced with those produced by'another manufacturer.

4 On December 5,1979, personnel frca the Nuclear Regulatory Cc= ission visited Department of Energy (DOE) facilities at Richland, Washingten, to obtain information on DOE experience with INC snubbers at the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF). The DOE-owned FFTF was equipped with more than 4,000 cechanical pipe restraints (snubbers) supplied by INC.

In 1973, FFTF exa=ined more than 800 of these =echanical snubbers by removing the=

from their installation-and found that 43, or about 5% of those exa=ined,

.were. frozen. The plant was still under construction so the snubbers had seen no service and had been subjected to only normal construction environ =ents for 1 to 2 years.

Attachment:

Recently issued IE bulletins A