ML19350A444

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Staff Requirements Memo Re 810305 Affirmation Session 81-9. Directs Fr Publication of Rulemakings Re Therapeutic Treatment of Cardiac Dysfunction by I-131 & Environ Radiation Protection Stds
ML19350A444
Person / Time
Issue date: 03/06/1981
From: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
To: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
References
FRN-45FR45302, REF-10CFR9.7, RULE-PR-20, TASK-OS, TASK-RH-905-1 M810305D, NUDOCS 8103160201
Download: ML19350A444 (3)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. IN RESPONSE, PLEASE f t'c REFER TO: M810305D - og UNITED STATES

o,,

[- g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 jj W ASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 / .o' March 6, 1981 ' 8S OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY g 2 hfAR 10198 MEMORANDUM FOR: William J. Dircks eration } "#' g g g; 6 Executive Director for FROM: Samuel J. Chilk, Secr 7y4 g

SUBJECT:

STAFF REQUIREMENTS - F RMATION SESS 4:10 P.M.,

THURSDAY, RCH 5, 1981, COMMISSIONERS' CONFERENCE ROOM, D. C. OFFICE (OPEN TO PUBLIC ATTENDANCE)

I. SECY-81 Therapeutic Treatment of Cardiac' Dysfunction by Iodine-131 (Rulemaking Issue--Affirmation) The Commission by a vote of 4'-0 approved for publication in the Federal Register a notice of NRC's intent to unconditionally retain the exis!ing regulations on therapeutic treatment of cardiac dysfunction by iodine 131. (Alternative 2 of the Staff paper.) (SD) (SECY Suspense: 3/23/81) The Commission requested: 1. A copy of the Federal Register notice be mailed to interested byproduct material licensees and other interested persons; and i (SD) (SECY Suspense: 3/23/81) l 2. An analysis of public Comments be placed in the Public Document Room. -{ SD) (SECY Suspense: 7/15/81 ) l II. SECY-80-545 - NRC Rulemaking to Implement EPA's " Environmental Radiation Protections Standards for Nuclear Power Operations" (40 CFR 190) (Rulemaking Issue--Affirmation) The Commission by a vote of 4-0 approved for publication in the l Federal Register final amendments to 10 CFR Part 20 incorporating in the NRC Regulations the current EPA requirement for certain uranium fuel cycle licensees to comply with EPA standards. The Commission requested: 1. That a Footnote (httached) be incorporated at Enclosure l B, page 3, 3rd paragraph; (SD) (SECY Suspense: 3/23/81) l 8103160201

- 2. Requests clearance from the General Accounting Office for these amendments, because they include a reporting require-ment that licensees must notify NRC of violations of 40 CFR 190; a "Value-Impact Assessment and Report Justification Analysis" (Enclosure "C") has been prepared which will be u ed as the basis for obtaining this clearance; (SD) (SECY Suspense: 3/23/81) 3. That appropriate Congressional Committees and affected licensees be notified of the Federal Register publication. (SD/OCA) (SECY Suspense: 3/23/81)

Attachment:

As stated cc: Chairman Hendrie Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Bradford Commissioner Ahearne l Commission Staff Offices PDR l-r l d o

'5 Attachmsnt to SRM Mar.6.81 OGC Footnote to SECY-80-545 In October.1980 approximately four months after the coment period closed, several operators of uranium mills jointly filed late coments on this proposed rule. They basically requested the Commission to defer implementation of the. NRC program to enforce Part 190 at uranium mills. Recognizing that their coments were late, these operators requested in the alternative that their filing be treated as a petition to rescind any NRC regulations imposing Part 190 requirements on uranium mills. In a separate action, the American Mining Congress also moved the Comission in October,1980 to stay implementation and enforcement of Part 190 at NRC licensed uranium mills. The Comission is currently considering these filings. However, the issuance of these amendments as a final rule needs not be delayed. For the most part, these amendments simply incorporate into 10 CFR Part 20 the NRC's already existing responsibility to enforce 40 CFR Part 190 at fuel cycle facilities including uranium mills. Issuance of these amendments as a final rule does not modify that responsibility. Thus, because these amendments do not change the status quo regarding the Comission's authority, they can be issued before the Comission reaches a decision on pending requests to delay enforcement of Part 190. 1 e}}