ML19347D565

Requests Hearing Re Issues of Critical Importance to Ratepayers in State of Mo.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19347D565
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	03/17/1981
From:	Hearne T MISSOURI, STATE OF
To:	Gleason J Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8103260624
Download: ML19347D565 (5)

Text

.

s

[+

0(l/b

((

0 0'hl: C0 0']}l'lll b b ( 0'lli f... e.

//

g!.Y4@:*A.g Area Code 314 g

r 751 3234

- ! M

,s o

Q I4),. e

m N *e

.b P.O. BOX 360

\\**.,**'LN misscutl 6510:

JEFFERSCN CITY

+

March 17, 1981 h

g[

\\

c.

CH ARLES J. Fh 4 45 Q

@M y

cw..a Mr. James P.

Gleason, Esq.

.d g'g g Oj961 P $l Ananoo:uoRTsn Administrative Judge M

,gg Q L

/

L*MHi 5 M"8TY Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Ot},yingt. serb TEPH 4NIE 4. BR) 4NT United States MuClear Regulatory Commission g;;;ch N 0)

Y JOHN C. SH 4PLEICH 513 Gilmoure Drive Silver Spring, Maryland

?3901 cn Tr> -

. o. 4ticH set ut RsT

• =

Ret Docket No. STN 50 483 - In the matter of Union Electric Comp'ny (Callaway Plant, Unit 1).

a AENT M. R ACSD4LE 6"" C-""'

Dear Mr. Gleason:

On Septenber 22, 1980, the Missouri Public Service Commission intervened as the representative of the State of Missouri pursuant to Title 10, Section 2.715(c) of the Code of Federal Regulations.

That petition to intervene was granted on February 5, 1981 by the Atomic Safety & Licensing Board which will preside ever the Callaway licensing and of which you are Chairman.

While an interested State is allowed to intervene as a matter of right urdor Section 2.715(c), there is some question as to whether or not an interested State can requ'est a hearing and by that request require that a hearing be held.

However, the State of Missouri has determined that it is in the best interest of the public it represents to clearly state our positic.n.

The Missouri Public Service Commission requests a hearing in the above-captioned matter in order to publicly air the following issues of critical importance to the c1 g

G s

$~,e,,nih k 9gpj (9a % p n-16 -%.,A ff v

_/

s.,.

.I 810 3 2 6 Olo4Y i

G

Mr. James P. Gleason, Esq.

,Page.Two March 17, 1981 ratepayersofUnionElectricbcmpanyintheStateof Missouri:

The Public Service Cc= mission of Missouri requests that i.11 safety requirements necessary as a result of the Three Mile Island incident and all other design changes specifically re-quired by the NRC be expressly identified and the magnitude of these design changes be expressly identified.

Since the financial impact of such design changes are the primary interest of the Public Service Commissien, the Public Service Commission further requests that if the NRC requires a design change that an

- adequate cost / benefit analysis accompany each proposed design change and that that cost / benefit analysis be available for scrutiny by all parties.

Finally, the Public Service Cc= mission requests that the NRC assess the impact of each -

design change on the scheduled completion date of the unit and make that available to the parties at the earliest oppcrtunity.

Sincerely, s

j&n,l

&*Q Treva v.

Hearne Deputy General Counsel TJH:paz enclosurp i

6 m**

6

~

~

.q...

gs,-

N n

gy>H5 4

.m m-1 O

U/S 2 ^ 1981 > ~-

~

09;:e d the feJtiYf T 4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Ddt*22 EW NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

\\3 '

d N s,

,, \\

BEFORE THE-ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSIbG BOARD In the Matter of

)

)

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY

)

Docket Nos. STN 50-483

)

(Callaway Plant, Unit 1)

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of this letter in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following by deposit ih the United States mail, first class this 17th day of March, 1981.

James P. Gleason, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Board Panel 513 Gilmoure Drive U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cornissic.-

Silver Spring, MD 20901 Washington, DC 20555 Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

Atcmic Safety and Licensing Thomas A. Baxter, Esq.

Appeal Board Shaw, Pittman, Pctts & Trowbridge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cenmissici 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20555 Washington, DC 20036 Docketing and Service Section Mr. John G.

Reed Office of the Secretary Rt. 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccamissic:

Kingdom City, MO 65262 Washington, DC 20555 Barbara Shull Marjorie Reilly Lenore Loeb Energy Chairman of the League of League of Women Voters of Women Voters of University Missouri.

City, MO 2138 Woodson Road 7065 Pershing Avenue St. Louis, MO 63114 University City, MO 63130 m

m***

f

.r...___.

e-k

,b 4 -

Dan I Bolef Rose Levering, Member President, Board of Directors Crawdad Alliance Coalition for the Environment, 7370a Dale Avenue l

St. Louis Region St. Louis, MO 6267 Delmar Boulevard 63117 University City, MO 63130 Kay Drey 515 West Point' Avenue Donald Bollinge:, Member University City, MO 63130 Missourians f.or Safe Energy 6267 Delmar Boulevard John G. Reed University City, MO 63130 RFD #1 Kingdom City, MO 65262 1

/lJsH -

sA J

- e Treva J. Hearne Deputy General Counsel-O m"

• h r

n

o

(

h a

\\'

'd me Gate me.ep cf.,.g -.

=t sotiie teim Cam.,

e 3/fy* 3. -4g

}

nr. J. J. Seetse es. set *P arte,eine

.e.

u. aeon. seu aserettm,nr.2 um mie isia.e airs.1.c.

ew p

=treessite tetsee Cameu P 9.iete. P.

23.Se=tn 21s,t street.

on. %. % Q, e.. See 440

. ri se,g. a iris m,

Me 4,.: 5aw

(

. em. ase: cie e. asseet k" ar,

.3 nr. t. 3. r fier

- s. s. es 9

e

'#.2 L+cmia, s e.e,s..,

Caste etiie.,a im

.ireeeiium ime C o.,e,,

P C. See 400 et, s.eeen Shelsen a

c stestete.e. 74 f 705T seeiese, w.a. netmea i me.u c7 f fk 1775.ia,t.eet, a e.. lette 6Je 1 Str ar. 8. 4. s,a,line,e, no

. x.w P.e L sons a ~~

GPW ner**ce Coevere.t, ten

[erf 8. asffee, 100 late eece Pere.

Sousa's Cedrtr Ceee'ssieaer Pergiessay. *J 07054 prent 4.i.amty Cev,tneuse Oe.se t s r

s more,g st ng me, J. 3 gine,ees, gn,e,,,,

enteriseu s. Pa 17101 r

teetect. Israels, Leme ee 24 Deseems, 88' eras *at pwtiteettens Sec.t.'en es vere. 99 1000s State of unrecy e# Peans,t.i e Bee 1601 towcetus toileing nr. 4. F. Tre.oetage, Ese,i,,

"**'*seeg. 84 17127 lase. Pittasa. Petts & Tremertepe 1000 # St*oet, n.e.

Dr temere 9. $=erts ounsattaa. DC '003g Beert of 5.eervisers Leasoneercy To.asnie Oe. setter a werese af3 #1 sey,cs Cn.ece toes Sal e. 0. tee or,,e "1eeleteam. Pa 17067 oss stage. To 17tJ0 W. 5. Ene'ressental Protection seeacs 3r. Linee s. Little e.gtes ill of'ise 6000 meceiuge Ort e ATTE: IIS Caeeetmeter se1stge, eG 21672 Cetis toileing fliath Flese)

Eta eae estnut streets marte W. Cocter. Isentre Petteeelpeia. 74 fptos 509 Esecetive nevse P. 9. See 2:57 Oswen's Cav ty Office toergexy a

meertsew g. Pa 17120 e

Presereemee s meaersete %es Canee Cowet nowse, sees F freat one %eset Streets 112 E.3 mois C4Pitet Sebleing

=sretseerg. Fa 17120

• sertsew g. #e f ttet e

sometpeat s tastee.weetal sesswetes e

(19 4 me'sa. (seetre 7

AT'e: Director. C" ice of laelees. mereon, asisese a.eens 1729 i Street. a s.. sette 606 easielettsel asalte

7. 6. See 2:e3 isuaiagten. OC 20006

1. err 9sti.eg. 8a 1 F'06 nr. Steve

• C. Ine117 Goveeaer's affice af State 30e 1. merset st vel P'awag and 3eveieaseet mechanisators. Fa I?oll attn: Caereinstee. Feas:1.en t e Clee tag %se P. $. See lji) er, Theats Geeksk) macetsesg. 74 17120 getee of Reatelles Pegtettien P. 6. Ses 2363 heretsnet. Fa 17123 arg. ansee 3. Care lect Esreme artoe er. moette !. Lee's marrisavg. Pa If1Cg d504 lesefore Teerece PeeleJelenia. Pa 191e9 er. s'sas*e Geeerta fu Petreet as. Jeae Lee 412 merset 5treet

a. 8. 3. bee 3521 asertsevg. Fa 11106 Itters. PA 17319

.s er, assert 3. ters.a.

Walter D. Cemeg, leatuser aseeEste leeceta 8 vilces teseter t of Justice sweleer Pe=ee Geaerettee Diettlee e

Stre.wery $eware.14tn Floor htte e20,1735 als Geeepetsen asse moretsev g. Da 17127 setncses, at 20c,14 r

e aseeet L. acues, tsevice lese e. Setin. (seufre atesit $efety ead,.ticeassag board assistaat leitetter v.1. owsleer me 1stery Caamisstee anwee ead anorows P. O. Dao P ne=htasten. DC 23555 407 m f remt Street moretstw g. Fa iF138 ateeis Safety eaj Ltemf ag seere Penel e

u. s. =. cine m,.laury C-uies e

Jehe I. fHaatte. Oei'verlea negaf asten. K 20nl Dawense Co. leerd e' Canaisstemer1 Oswente Cou ty Cav the se n

e f ront ene mortet Streets ateetc la'ets see Licenstag esseel Peaet meer1sau g. Da 17101

8. 5. hotteem neg.tetery Cessesslee r

M lten. 3C 22556 Beneet 4.. Pelle's

[

Cnen.e taersy sittaace eeti., we se.iu sectt.

ece moeteette Stooet

. $. tuelee, tes.1 story Cassinstem telttaere. *t) 21214 sesalagten. DC 20Sia Cnsvace, aeotece Jeetta et. Muerte IH119ee Lectstet leviaesweatal Cesatties en encteer Pose, IO' 3* *8 ke8 433 Ortaaes a,w Pwsy'temate State sn seesity lute Cellege. Fa 168Cf ietweestty Pese. Persispleeste 16802 as. Friede te**yet11. Che k serses teelttien fee tuslese Pene* Pipt giegiate $setnere. Cnetense Cittases fee e Safe teeteviesat Postsomoseet file Ervasea Sr$se its selten Street siistagten. M 19e00 Leasyme. Pa 17043 leetly 1 seta aatt.4melese (cews teereseattag feet e

246 e. Pelleseleone Street teet, Pa 17eos Jens Leete. (seet**

Psamorteente Pvette utstettes Commissies P. 8. see 3265 meretstu s. Pa 17120 e

Jeroes $. Ca atathee, ts eire n

fee, r er see Cuaninenes o

2320 e. Second $tetet g

newtsevrg, Pa 1F110

=

y.

'?

.. a n%jo, UNITED STATES

, y, g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 i

g y;

s, j

MAR 2 01S81 Docket No. 50-320 1

Mr. Gale K. Hovey Vice President and Director of TMI-2 Metropolitan Edi. son Company P.O. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057

SUBJECT:

TMI-Unit 2, Recovery Quality Assurance Plan

Dear Mr. Hovey:

We have reviewed the TMI-2 Recovery Quality Assurance (QA) Plan and the organizational changes made since the TMI-2 accident as submitted in your October 30, 1980 letter and found that the concepts described therein pro-vide sufficient QA controls to carry out the planned decontamination effort and Recovery QA Plan for TMI-2 in an effective manner. The plan is commen-surate with the TMI-l Restart QA Program and satisfies the requirements of Appendix B of 10 CFR, Part 50, and is therefore acceptable with the exception of the outstanding items noted belcw.

The criteria to be used to identify the systems, structures, and components to which the TMI-2 Recovery QA Plan applies were presented in Section 2.1.2, but the complete listing of systems, structures, and components was not pro-vided.

It is our position that the listing (Q-list) of structures, systems, components, and other safety aspects (e.g., meteorology, olant security) to which the QA program applies, be included or referenced in the TMI-2 Recovery QA Plan, and include all items affecting safety.

These items can be derived from the General Design Criteria given in Appendix A to 10 CFR, Part 50 and frca other pertinent regulations, as well as the items included in positions 1 through 4 of Regulatory Guide 1.29 plus spare and re-placement parts, and consumables and expendables needed for the various activities performed in connection with those items. The TMI-2 Recovery QA Plan would then be applicable to all future activities (backfit not required) conducted in con-nection with these items such as maintenance, mcdification, repair, performance testing, surveillance testing, and Feplacement. As required by Criterion II,

" Quality Assurance Program;" of Appendix B to 10 CFR, Part 50, the QA pr'ogram shall provide control over all activities affecting the quality of the identified items to an extent consistent with their importance to safety.

In this regard, the extent of applicability of the 18 criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR, Part 50 and related requirements given in the SRP, Regulatory Guides, and endorsed standards to a specific item to assure that the specified design requirements and subsequen.t activities for the item are properly implemented shall be deter-mined through a technical evaluation conducted by your Engineering and QA organizations. We request that this list be submitted for NRC staff review within 90 days after receipt of this letter.

39 y

• s>-

/ siomew f

9

l

\\

/

Mr. Gale K. Hovey ).

In Appendix C, Part 2 of the TMI-2. Recovery QA Plan, a commitment is made (with certain exceptions) to comply with Regulatory Guide 1.58, proposed Revision 1, July 1979, " Qualifications of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel," which differs somewhat from the current NRC approved issue of Regulatory Guide 1.58, Revision 1, dated September 1980.

It is our position that the guidance given in the Revision 1 of this regulatory guide, noting in particular the implementation guidance, should be followed.

It is also our position that you commit to implement Regulatory Guide 1.146,

" Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants", (August 1980) for the TMI-2 Recovery QA Plan.

Accordingly, we conclude that your description of the quality assurance program for the TMI-2 Recovery Phase, subject to resolution of the above outstanding items, indicates that an effective QA program in compliance with applicable NRC regulations can be established and implemented.

Sincerely, MM

.4A Bernard J. Snyde Program Directoi TMI Program Offi e Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:

See attached 9

e 4

6 O

6 e

e r

s

.