ML19347D333
| ML19347D333 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bailly |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1981 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Shorb E NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347D334 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103170191 | |
| Download: ML19347D333 (2) | |
Text
.
Z 4
3
.c i
2 4-
.s cl.
DEisenhut JYouncblod DLynch N
5 1981 MRushbrook g
R edesc NRC/PDR
$e L/PDR Docket No.: 50-367
,iSIC SHanauer TIC RVollmer Northern Indiana Public Service Comoany TMurley ACRS (16)
ATTN: Mr. E. M. Shorb Dross First Vice President RHartfield, MPA 5265 Hohman Avenue OEl.D Hannond, Indiana 4632S OIE (3)
Dear Mr. Shorb:
Subject:
Acceptance of the Bailly Shorter Pile Proposal In our letter to you, dated February 11, 1978, we stated that Northern Indiana Public Service Comoany (NIPSCO) should not install any safety-related piles at the site of the Bailly facility which differ sicnificantly from those originally proposed in the PSAR until we had reviewed and approved the pile type and placement reouf rements for these revised piles.
In response, you submitted on March 8,1978, a prooosed oile design and pile driving requirements for the safety-related piles; these were sub-sequently modified during the course of our review. We have now completed our review on your proposal. The basis of our review and our conclusions are contained in the enclosed Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on this matter.
In surrnary, we conclude that you may drive the safety-related piles for the main pcwer block of the Bailly facility in accordance with your March 8, 1978, orocosal and your subsequent submittals on this matter, after you make the revisions to your 0A/0C manual as discussed l
in Sections 2.15 of the SER.
Our conclusion that the prooosed pile olacement program is acceptable does not extend to placement of concrete for the safety-related foundation mat since we may require additional piles to be installed or adjustnents made l
to the pile layout after we complete our review of the entire pile placement program. However, on the basis of our review, all other work effort that l
can be acccmplished orior to olacement of the foundation mat concrete is l
addep % 1e and may oroceed. Our ba-is for this is that such activities will not areclude either the addition of more oiles or the modification of the i
l pile layout in the event either modification is required.
NWN:,
l q ' ce., Y,.\\' s
. ) '3-.\\
k l
- C.' -
c t h %..
v,
.; ?
7
- u...
u.
u.
". x. -
ADN 82031 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS 70 N POOR QUAUTY PAGES
)
a w
y y-
~
3 g
Mr. E. M. Shorb MAR 5 f981 We have identified a limited number of outstandino safety issues associated with the Bailly oile foundation. These items, which are sumarized in Section 1.5 of our SER, do not effect our conclusion regarding the acceptability of the proposed pile placement program. We are prepared to review these items to oermit resolution of them in a timely manner.
In this recard, olease infonn us when you will be.able to submit additional infomation on these matters; e.g., the soecifications for backfilling around the foundation and your proposed desian for the safety-related foundations outside the main power block.
If you have any questions on these matters, please feel free to contact me or the Project Manager, M. D. Lynch at 301/492-8413.
Sincerely, Original signed by Darrell G.parrall G F,isenhut Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Bailly Pile Foundation SER, dated March 1981 cc w/ enclosure:
William H. Eichhorn, Esq.
Eichhorn, Morrow & Eishorn 5243 Hohman Avenue Hamond, Indiana 46320 Kathleen H. Shea, Esq.
Lowenstein, Newman, Reis, Axelrad & Toll 1025 Connecticut Avenue Washington, D. C.
20036 Robert J. Vollen, Esq.
109 Northern Dearborn Street Chicago, Illinois 60602
- SEE PREVIOUS WHIT g u1 ENCES - Retyoed per DGEisenhut
\\
IR C
DG ut:mj HRDENTON 33 1
//
f31
~
r Ir. E. f'. 5Fert
-?-
1:c have identified five iters of the Pailly fcurdetien chich do not affect cur cerclusien recardinr the acceptatility of the prcrosed pilo riacerert procrar; these are surrarized in Sectice 1.F cf the enciesed Pile Fourvatien TEr. Ve intere rersuirr trer with ycu se that we can resclve t'or in a tirely rarner. In tFis rcrard, we recuest you to sutrit additieral irferration en scre of these ratters; e.c., the srecifications for backfilline arcerd the fcundatien and ycur prcrcsed desien for the safety-related fcurvations cutside tFo rain rower bicck.
If you have any (;ucstiers en these ratters, please certact tFe Prc,iect l'aparer, F. D. Lynch, at 301/o92-Fa13.
Sircerely, rarrell C. Eisertut, firecter Divisier cf Licensiro Cffice of ruclear reacter reculation Enc 1csure:
Feilly Pile Fcundatien SEF, dated March 1981 cc r/crclosero:
Pillier F. EictFcrn, Tsc.
Eicttorn, Ferreu / Eishbern EN3 I cFran Av'enue qT 5{ 11 h
1:arrerv, Irdiana /6320 Vatbleen F. Shea, Esc.
Lcterstein, Ectran, Peis, Aye1rsd E Toll 102F Cernecticut Avenue Pashington, D. C.
20026 y
(h Petert J. vc11en, Eso.
f r
106 t'crth feartern Street uk Chicare, Illfreis 6060<
,9
(
( ')'
I o@#
yf;f g T
- SEE PREVIOUS WHITE FOR CONCURRENCES E
retyped per OELD t
\\
\\fp DL:LBd1 DL:LBd1 -
DE:AD/CSE DL:AD/L.
OELD DL:DIR
. MDL;/nc.
BJYoungblood*JKnight*
RLTedesco SGoldberg*
DEisenhut
. 1 / -
l1/30/81 2/2/81 2/; /81 2/4/81 2/ /81 dN
y 4
)
g 4
s' Mr. E. ii. Snora 2-
.e have i:entified fiva 1:aas of the sailij f;;nJaticr..nica cc r.0 affect car ccr.clasica regarcin; :n2 ac:e;;40111:, af tre pre;cse sile pla:enent prc;rin; nese are sa:carized in Sectica 1.5 cf iu;;le:en: :.o. 2 a
.;e si...
We intend pursuing tr.ec witn ycu sc tr.at we caa resche.ner ir. a tic.ely canner.
In tnis re33rc, e request you ta sa0ci 3:Giticnal ini;rraticn on sace of tr.ese na::ers; e.g., tr.e s;ecificaticns for ca:Afilling are.r.:
the founcati n and ycur propcse: cesign for tr.e safe:f-relatec f0 ncaticns ca: side tne tain ;cwer bicc(.
If you have any questions en these.ma crs, please cer. tac: :.ne Pre ect ;anager, ii. D. Lynch, at 301/432-E*13.
diacerely,
.N
.arrell u. itsenna:, Jire::ar Civisten of Licensin; uf rica ;f 'v. clear.-:ea:t:r Ae;;1att en
Enclosure:
5:.A 5 ssle.;ent : o. 3, catec Fenr ary 1951 a J) O9 0 ' h I fj [
Vn;ulon
.i,:,-..1
- m. ;:r.1
- 3. :.,.,f..e :,c.
,. a n n_
c _ri.,.
....m s
F Lvnch/Is SJYounc51ced JKni:n OLTedesco CEisennut 1/25/31
- /. /51
'- /- 751
/ /51
/- /31
/ /31
3 t
4 g
o' 4-f DISTRIBUTION: w/ enclosure Docket File RHartfield, MPA LBd1 Rdg 0 ELD DEisenhut 0IE (3)
JYoungblood DLynch bec: TERA MRushbrook NRC/PDR RTedesco L/PDR Declet I:c.: Fr-3f7 SHanauer NSIC RVollmer TIC SHanauer ACRS (16) rertbern Indf ara Public Service Cerrary ifVollmer ATT!!: f r. E. f;. Sborb TMurley First Vice President Dross EPCE Ferran Avenue Perrend, Indiana 4 32S tear Fr. Sherb:
Subject:
Acceptance cf the Pailly Sbcrter Pile Prorcsal In cur letter to you, dated February 11, Ic78, we stated thet rertberr Irciana Public Service Cerran?/ (PIFSCO) sbculd not install any safety-related piles at the site of the Bailly facility >: rich differ sicnificartly frer tbcse cricinally prcpesed in the PSAR urtil we bad reviewed and arrreved the rile type and placerent recuirerents for these revisee piles.
In resrense, you subritted en Varch P, jo7P, a propcsed pile desier anc rile drivine reentrererts for the safety-related piles; these were sub-secuently redified durf re the ccurse of our review. Ue have rcu larcely corrieted cur review on this propcsal. The basis of cur review are cur cenclusiens are certair.cd in the erclosed Safety Evaluatien Eercrt (SER) en this ratter.
Ir servary, we cerclude that you rey drive the safe +y-relat*d f les fer the trein rewar block of tha Pailly facility in acccrdarce i
with ycur Ferch 6, In7R, preresal and your subsecuert subrittels en this ratter, after you satisfy cur recuircrent recardine the revisico cf the C//rc ranual at discussed in Sectices 2.15 of the Pile Foundation SER.
rur cerclusien that the proposed rile placerent procrar is acceptable except es roted above, dces net exterd to placerent of concrete for the safety-related foundatier ret sirce we ray require additicnal piles te be installec cr adjustrents rede to the pile leycut after we ccrplete cur revice of the entire pile placerent rrcerar. Hcwever, en the basis of eur review, all other werk effert that can te accorplished prict to placerent of the fcundaticn rat cercrete is acceptatle and ray proceed. Cer basis for this is that such activities will ret preclude either the additicn cf rcre piles or the redificatier of the pile laycut in the event either redificatice is recuired.
P003OlMNAL
a e
e' l
l DISTRIBUTI0ti:
Docket File RHartfield, MPA LBd1 Rdg 0 ELD DEisenhut OIE (3)
JY?ungblood MDLynch bcc: TERA MRushbrook NRC/PDR-occxet 4.o.:
50-367 RTedesco L/PDRf SHanauer NSIC' RVollmer TIC liortnern Indiana Public hervice Coupanj TMurley
,ACRS(16)
ATTh: Nr. E. it. Shori)
Dross First Vice Presiaent 5265 hoh. nan Avenue f
Hamond, Inaiana 46325
/
/
Gear.ir. Shorb:
Suoject: Acceptance of the isailly Shorter Pile Proposal
/
In our letter to you, dated February 11,1978,.ve stated that Ziorthern Indiana Public Service Coapany (:ilPSCU) should not install any safety-relatea piles at the site of the Bailly facility which differ significantly froa those originally proposed in tne PSAh until we had reviewea and approvea the pile tjpe and specifications for placement of these revised piles.
In response, you sub.:itted on liarca 6,1978, a proposed pile design and pile driving specifications for the safety-related piles; these were sub-sequently socified during the course of our review. We have now partially coupleted our review on this proposal; the basis of our review and our conclusions are containea in Supplement f40. 3 (Enclosure 1).
In sumary, we concluce that you may crive the safety-related piles for the main power block of tne i;ailly facility in accordance witn jour :: arc!. 0,197o, proposal and yvur subsewent submittals on this..iatter, after you satisfy our requiracent regarding the revision or tne yn/QC.aanual as discussed in Sections 2.15 ana 3.2 of Supple:aent lio. 3 to the SLA.
Our conclusion tnat tne proposed pile placement prograa is acceptable except as noted above, does not extend to authorize placer ent of concrete for the foundation raat since we uay require accitional piles to be lastalled or adjust:aents.nade to the pile l Ayout after we couplete our revie> of the entire pile placement program. However, we do authorize placeaent of the foundation L.at reinforcing steel bars, tne placecent of the steel anchors at the top of the piles ano all otner work effort requireo,,rior to placement of the foundation a:at concrete. Our basis for this latter autnorization is that such activities will not preclude either the addition of nore piles or the modification of the pile layout in the event either uodification is requireo.
t
/
P00RBRGNM N.
-