ML19347B378

Revised Contention 6(a)(i) Re Qa/Qc

ML19347B378
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	10/06/1980
From:	SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COALITION
To:
Shared Package
ML19347B372	List: ML19347B371 ML19347B375 ML19347B378
References
NUDOCS 8010140533
Download: ML19347B378 (2)

Text

_

n

~./,-

. REVISED SOC CONTENTION 6 (a) (i)

[ 6. Quality Assurance / Quality Control Intervenors contend that the Applicant has not adequately developed and implemented a quality assurance / quality control program for the design, procurement, construction and in-sta11ation of structures, systems, and components for the Shoreham Nuclear Station as required by 10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix B, Criteria I through XVIII, and 10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix A, Criterion 1. Specificallf , Intervenors contend that based on the review of 30 ._le.gations of construction irregularities at the Shorehur site as described in NRC Investigation 50-322/79-24, an adequate level of. safety has not been achieved at the Shoreham site wirh regard to root causes of the irregularities as follows:

A. (Timeliness of Quality Assurance Procram) Failure of the Applicant and Applicant's contractors, agents, or con-sultants to establish and execute a Quality Assurance Program at the earliest, practible time in accordance with Criteria 1 and 2 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by allega-tions 14, 20, and 23.

3. (Quality Assurance Authority) Failure of the Applicant to assure that persons and organizations performing quality assurance functions have sufficient independence from cost and schedule considerations, ard adequate "stop work" authority, in accordance with Criterion 1 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by allegations 14, 21, and 30.

C. (Qualification and Traininc) Failure of the Applicant to adequately assure that the indoctrination and training of on-site QA/QC personnel has been provided as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and main-tained, in accordance with Criterion 2 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by allegations 7, 17, 19, 20, 21 and 29.

D. (Process Control) Failure of the Applicant to establism measures to assure that the special processes of welding, heat treating, brazing, nondestructive testing and cleaning are controlled and accomplished by qualified perconnel using 8 01014 a:53:5

/

qualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, criteria, and other special re-quirements imposed by the Applicant, or Applicant's con-tractors, agents or consultants, in accordance with Criterion 9 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by allegations 2, 10, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23 and 29.

E. (Construction Verification) Failure of the Applicant to establish measures to control materials , parts , or components which do not conform to requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use er installation, in accordance with Criterion 15 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by allegations 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 15, 22, 23, 26 and 30. 1 F. (Corrective Action) Failure of the Applicant to establish corrective action measures to assure that significant conditions adverse to quality are determined and that correc-tive action is taken to preclude repetition, in accordance with Criterion 16 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by Violation A and allegations 2 and 22.

G. (Follow-un Audit)_ Failure of the Applicant to take timely follow-up action, including reaudit, of deficiencies identi-fied in audits, in accordance with Criterion 18 of Appendix B, as demonstrated by allegations 1, 5, 6 and 14.

' A6 m-