ML19346A125
| ML19346A125 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Bailly |
| Issue date: | 05/29/1981 |
| From: | Eichhorn W EICHHORN, EICHHORN & LINK, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. |
| To: | BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE FOR THE PUBLIC INTERES |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8106050195 | |
| Download: ML19346A125 (15) | |
Text
r .
@TED CORRsspo,qq .g.,
CCcx n : .
ll9 r- . . . , ,_
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA /UN: 11981.:$.
- 2 _etupiZ ~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L\(4 -
3 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
' , .y/ ~ '
, s' In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-367
) ~'
NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC ) (Construction Permit -3 M ' j/4 ,
SERVICE COMPANY ) Extension)
?[gi N (Bailly Generating Station,
)
) April 23, 1981 Refiled:May 29, 198 2-y [Lg\g i \,gLV C %;\
i.
Nuclear-1) )_ ..
~ gp f5 0 to**
-NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY'S X- \ **' s/
SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO \h /
gh/
BUSINESSMEN FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.
To eliminate any possible confusion which may have arisen as a result'of Northern Indiana Public Service Company's ~(NIPSCO) service of interrogatories on' Porter County Chapter Intervenors rather than the three organizations and two individuals which make up that group of intervenors, NIPSCO is again propounding its Second Set of Interrogatories to each organization and individual included in the group of intervenors known as "PCCI."
NIPSCO hereby again serves its Second set of Interrogatories to Businessmen for the Public: Interest, Inc. (hereinafter "BPI"), pursuant to 10 C.F.R. S 2.740b. Each interrogatory is to be answered fully in writing, under oath or affirmation, by an officer or agent of BPI and is to include all pertinent DSV- r information known to BPI. Each answer.should clearly indicate Oll the interrogatory to which it is intended to be responsive.
8106050.I 95
__.--w ..
w eyw=* yy--, - # w-y -ya e -+-eW-- dcr- 4y w- weh e y- e e
a Under NRC regulations (10 C.F.R. S 2.740 (e)) parties are required,to. supplement responses to interrogarories under cer-tain circumstances when new and/or different information becomes available.
In responding to these interrogatories, please include-all information available to agents, employees, attorneys, investigators, and all other persons directly or indirectly subject in any way to the control of the person or organization to,which these inter-rogatories are directed.
" Documents" means all written or recorded material of any kind or character known to BPI or in its' possession, cust,ody or control, including, without limitation, letters, correspondence, telegrams, memoranda, notes, records, minutes, contracts, agree-ments, records or notations of telephone or personal conversa-tions or conferences, inter-office communications, microfilm, bulletins, circulars, pamphlets, studies, notices, summaries, reports, books, articles, treatises, teletype messages, invoices, tape recordings, and work-sheets.
When used with respect to~a document, " identify" means, without limitation, to state its date,Jthe type of document l
e d --w, w . -- y , ,,,,y ,, , , , _
e (c.g., letter, memorandum, telegram, chart, photograph, sound reproduction, etc.), the author and addressees, the present location and the custodian, and a description of its contents.
When used with respect to-a person, " identify" means, without limitation, to state his or her name, address, occupation, and-professional qualifications.
If BPI cannot answer any portion of any of the Interrogatories in full, after exercising due diligence to do so, so state, and answer to the extent possible, specifying the inability to answer the remainder and stating when BPI expects to be able to answer the unanswered portions. ,
l NIPSCO'S INTERROGATORIES /
l
[
- 9. (a) For what. period of time do you contend that the Bailly site will be dewatered during the extended period of construction?
M Numbering of the following Interrogatories continues from NIPSCO'S First Set of Interrogatories to PCCI (April 10, 1981).
e
- + , -.m - wwn y ,, . , _ _ _ _ , . _ _ , , _ , _ _ _ , , _ _ _
~
(b) ?or what period of time do_you contend that the 2ailly site was-dowatered between May 1, 1974, and September 1,:19797 (c) What period of dewatering of the Bailly site was assessed in connection with issuance of Construction Permit No. CPPR-1047 O
(d) By what incremental' period does the sum of your answers to 9(a) and 9 (b) exceed your answer tcr 9 (c) ?
(e)- Please provide the b,ases for your answers to 9 (a) ,
9 (b) and 9 (c) . ,
- 10. (a) What' total volume of water do you contend will be removed from the Bailly site as a result of-dewatering during the extended period of con-
, struction?
(b) Whal total volume of water -do you contend was -
~
removed from the Bailly site as a' result of de-watering between May 1, 1974, and September 1, 1
19797 (c). What was the total volume of water removal from l
the Bailly site which was assessed in connection with issuance of Construction Permit No. CPPR- ,
104?
(d) By what incremental volume does the sum of your answers to 10 (a) and 10(b) exceed your answer
! to 10 (c) ?
, .-+ - , , - ,,,-, .,,, --,-- ..,-,.--.n-.- , , . , , . - - - - - , - - , , . . . . ~ , , , . - , . - , .- ,e----- , ,-- - - , . - - , - - - - - - - , , .
(e) Please provido the bases for your answers ' to 10 (a),
10 (b) an'd 10(c).
- 11. (a) The~ environmental assessment at the construction permit stage contemplates dewatering to what elevation?
(b) For'what period of-time is dewatering to the elevation specified in your answer to 11(a) contemplated?
(c) Please provide the bases for. your' answer to ll(a) and 11(b) .
- 12. (a) If the Bailly site is continuously dewatered to the elevation specified in your answer to ll(a), -
how long after the onset.of such dewatering will the groundwater levels in the Bailly site area reach equilibrium as a result of dewatering (dis-counting ' variations in the groundwater l'vels e -
from factors other than dewatering)?
(b) Please specify the depth of drawdown of the ground-water levels in the area around the Bailly site which you contend will result from continuous dewatering to the elevation specified in your
- answer to Interrogatory ll(a) at distances of 700 feet, 1/2 mile, and 1 mile from the e cavation.
(c) Please specify the rate of d'ewatering (volfmia.)
which you contend will occur as a result of con-tinuous dewatering to the elevation specified in your answer t,o Interrogatory ll(a) . ,
I I
_.-s---.,. . .-n,, , , , , , , . , , nc -- - . , - , - --v,-, , . ~--,, ,,,,,nn.w,, ,w,--gm- .na--. ,-ev,-,ap.--- - , - , - ~ , . , , - - -, , ,
..g.
l' 3 . If the Bailly site is continuously dewatered to the-P elevation specified in your answer to Interrogatory 11(a), how long.after the onset of such. dewatering will the environmental impacts as a result of-such
~ dewatering reach an equilibrium (discounting variations in environmental impacts from factors other than de-watering)?
- 14. Do your answers:to Interrogatory 12(a)~, 12 (b) ,.12 (c) ,
and 13 bound the results which would be obtained if the.Bailly site is dewatered to an elevation higher -
than that.specified in your answer to Interrogatory 11 (a) ?
- 15. (a) Do you contend that an incremental environmental.
impact during the extended period of construction will result from -
~
(1) dewatering during the incremental period specified in your answer . tx) Interrogatory 9 (d) ?
l (2) dewatering of the incremental volume of' water specified in your answer to Interrogatory 10 (d) ?
(3) other cau'ses? If yes, please specify the cause(s].
(b) Please describe in detail the incremental environ-mental impact which will result from each of the causes specified in your answer to Interrogatory
.~
15 (a) . ,
z l
l
- 16. Are the incremental environmental impacts doncribed in your answer-to Interrogatore 15(b) i rreversible in whole or part once dewatering during the extended period of const'ruction is completed?
- 17. If your answer to Interrogatory 16 is yes, please specify which. impacts are irreversible.
18.
If the incremental environmental impacts described in your answer to Interrogatory 15 (b) are reversible
~
in whole or part once dewatering during the extended period of construction is completed:
in (a) please specify which impacts are reversible 1
whole or part; (b) please specify the degree to which the impacts f .
are reversible;
{c) Please specify the time required to completeLthe reversal process for each impact.
- 19. (a) Are you contending that dewatering of Bailly during the extended period of construction will cause
[
different groundwater levels at distances of 700 feet, 1/2 mile, and 1 mile from the excavation than occurred as a result of dewatering prior to September 1, 1979?
(b) Are you contending that dewatering of Bailly during
' ' the extended period of ' construction will c'ause ,
flow different direction or rates of groundwater . :-
at distances of 700 deet,'
. , .} <
1/'2 mile,)and
~
. . .: .y. . 1 mile. ..
f.
- * . ~
result .
from the excavation than' occurred as a * ~
of dewatering prior to September 1, 1979?
,=--,e--,ww. - - -we.,-swo:-'..,w-,.w
- y -
e . + ,e,r-+-~s,w--'gvT-+--+% ^ - - - *=egrwr
-~ c)
, - Arc you contending that do the extended period of constwatering of Bailly du the groundwater at distanc ruction will cause i es of 700' feet, 1/2 mile, and 1 mile from the excav a ti on to exhibit different chemical characteri as a result of dewatering priostics than occurred 19797 r to September 1,'
\
\
(d) 1 Are you contending that dew t the
( extended period of constructioa ering of Ba the groundwater to be diff n will cause than occurred as a result erent in any other respects to September 1, 1979? of dewatering prior (e)
If your answer to Interrogat 19 (c) or 19 (d) is yes, ories 19 (a), 19 (b) ,
(1) ,
please describe each difference e.g., its , specifying, duration; magnitude, geographic extent , and
,,(2) please describe the bases for co t n ending (3) that each difference will cur; oc please describe the incremental i .
impact
.....g. which will be caus d b environmen'tal (f) If your answe. ,.
- ...- e y each difference.
rs to Interrogatories 19 (a) 19 (b) ,
19 (c) , and 19 (d) ,
en.v.ironmental impacts attributablare no, ple e
during the extended period e to dewatering Bailly will differ in kind. of construction of .
any, which{d. or degree
. . m./ .- ~. S.'s ._. . . .'- from those impacts, .- : if
- ~~
- ~-
- 4 ,-]q.
?,
. :. occurred
- .,;4 7 dewatering prior ,..)_. " a .s.
- ' .na .r. esr . tG t of. -
to September 1, 1979.
...~.'*
~
_ .T l _
_ _ _ _ _ - . , _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _._ _ . _ ~ . _ . . . . . _ . . - _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
20.-
(a) Are you contending that the extra period of de- ;
watering of Bailly (as distinct from any changes in the parameters of the groundwater.which.will l allegedly occur after September 1, 1979,~as a result of dewatering during the. extended period of construction) will cause an incremental environ-mental impact?
(b) If yes,
- i. Please describe the impact, ii. plaase provide the bases for your contention.
- 21. You have' contended that the " additional period of con- .
struction time [ sought] is sufficient to cause some of the rare species, particularly the Bog Indicator'
[ Indicator] plants to disappear from the dunes eco- ,
system."M ,
(a) Please identify the " rare species" mentioned above.
(b) Please specify the periods and rates of dewatering t
! of the Bailly site which are required to cause l
the above plants "to disappear."
(c) Please provide the bases for your contention.
. 2 2. . You have contended that the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore would be adversely affected by "a deficiency of water, or a surplus of water; a change in water l
l 1 .
t .
! " Joint Intervenors' First Supplement to Peti
- ion for Leave to Intervene," Contention 4, - rp.-:*10\ ?'(Feb.
- i -
26,
- 1980). -
~
-.3 a r... . .
, .y .,...._, ..
- 4. . 9 ,e . .- .
-s : .> . .~.:s.: - s: c. cy.. .: -
. ,. ~ y ; ' > . .. ==== c =.: , ; ., ~ ;. --? .~. p l
l 1
.n -+v- -- gg 9 e- - - - . <- .gs -w,- - _----y-ir e- -,,--%.,=+e.,p6 cm,.w--m -
. . + - - y e. ya w---
characteristics; an increase.in the rate or direction
/-
of water flow; dilution of existing water. . . .
1 (a) Please specify the " water" to which you are re-ferring.
(b) Please specify the numerical values for the para-meters of the water which you are using as a re-ference in order to determine wh' ether a deficiency, D surplus, or a change in the water occurs.
(c) Please describe the adverse effects upon the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore which will result from a ,
- i. deficiencies of water; ,
i i '. surpluses of water; iii. changes in water characteristics; iv. changes in water flow direction;
- v. changes in water flow rates; and .
vi. dilution.
l l (d) Using the values specified in your answer to Inter-
)
i rogatory 22 (b) as a reference, please specify I
the magnitude of change in the following para-
~
meters of' th'e groundwater of the Indiana Dunes ,
National Lakesho.re which can occur before.any --
c., . . . .
l adver'se impact will result in the Indiana Dunes National Lake' shore: .. .
- i. groundwater' level; .
x :..:~.: - -
- 11. groundwater flow rate; .
iii'. 'rjr'oundwater flow direction; ~
.._-l==<-'* -
' .: .. ./.,k .P ' ..? .95 {, .l-; 15 b * ? ' .1 . " -
M'il . ' ' ' '
~iv. l aroundwater characteristics
- 2 ' -
.. - v- - T.?:y. W.%.* s -:-=-Q .'.n y!.~ f -
~ ~ -
~--.-
. . . . . ' .~- Q 'U :} ' ..-Y ' Y .
I/ " Joint In.ervenors' First Supplement to Petition for Leave to Intervene," Contention 4, p. 10 (Feb. 26, 1930).
I t
l v _.. _= .- ,.,,---=,.m.-, v,- -. --.r -w- , - - . . - , .- -e%4.m ---w,.,--- .,,..rei--=e- w e ' -v e es *e-us--'-*-w4--~ er**-.r-V-=
(c)'~ Uning the values .qpecified in'your 'ancwcr Ro l e er-togatory 22(b) as a reference, plence upt.cify the magnitude of change in the following parameters of the groundwater in the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore which you allege will occur as a result of dewatering during the extended period of construction:
- 1. groundwater level; ii. groundwater flow rate; ,
iii. groundwater flow direction; iv. groundwater characteristics.
(f) Please describe the environmental impact which you allege will result.from the change in items specified in Interrogatory 22(e). ,
(g) Please identify all documents upon which you relied and persons whom you consulted in answering Inter-rogatories 22(b) through 22 (f) .
(h,) Please provide calculations upon which your answers to Interrogatories 22(b) through 22(f) are based.
- 23. You have contended that "had NIPSCO, and its contractors and subcontr' actors, known more about what they were doing, much of. ..the delay-lin construction] could not have occur r ed . ".../..-:.. ,. - * -
(a) Please identify the tasks associated with construction i of Bailly which you contend were performed in an incompetent manner by NIPSCO, its contractors,
. . . . ' . - ' .'.....;:.'.:.*.y.:i:1 2 l..
. .~..' :.. . .
'or 'i't's'~sub' contractors'; and which thereby resulted
. .v.: . - h ".;.T . . . .:
'~
in a delay of construction of Bailly.. .
=
. = = . . , , . ,* 1. ' : . * '+; .'. .= y .= .R*
l.
. j ' n +':W).N.5,5L
- l - ~&ie +th .
v., . .. . f.' .iq .:.'
).% . .
~.
p , .,....,;,.,,,......o.. . 3.y . n .g.,g ,, ;,3 . ,. ,., .y,.--;-j,I,.Qi . .,.( , ,.j f; I "Jc i.%- Intervenors' First Supplemqnt to Pe.tition.for '
Leave to Intervene," Contention 7, p. 14,,( F,,e b . 26, 1980). _
4
w (b) For each t'ask identified in the answer to. Inter-rog-atory 23 (a) :
(1) Specify the period of delay associated with the task.
(2) Identify the companies which are responsible for the delay associated with the task.
(3) Identify the individuals within the companies identified in your answer to Interrogatory
- 23 (b) (2) who'are responsible for delay associated
~ with the task.
(4) ~Specify which actions associated with the .
tasks were performed in an incompatent manner.
(5) Specify those actions which a competent person would have performed but which were not.
performed in connection with the,kask.
(6) Specify those actions which a competent person - . . . .
would not have performed but which were performed in connection with the task.
(c) For each individual identified in your answer to Interrogatory 2 (b) (3) , .
(1) Specify the info'rmation which - -
.h,e,_did not n : ..-:. ...c.... - . . . . . -
-:. n:.:
..,v.
- . . . .c... M . .e ....
know'but should have known in order to perform the task competently. h.' . ,- .
. :.: :;..<:.t ... e ;.; .. . .
.: ....n.........-;.:...... ~. . . . . . . . ..
Specify'th'e training which he did'not receive l . .(2) -
. .:. ;. . g p. 3 9 .,.g._u..:.g .ge:,_f y- a .....
. . . . . . . . , .. . . . . . ; .g.y. . . c . . .
. 'but' should .~hav.e ,.
rece'ived in ord. er to perform.'
. : . . c. a a,c ........:..m..- *-
..;..' : .. :. . .:. ~ s:x ~~. . c
.s...- r.....n.:.- . w ;.. .-
ri . s: s : f F '. . '
. , .. : ~ ..b.:-.:.:':. mE.hwf. .:':.:.%. ,~. C.5. Q ,:.:the , . , task. . . , . ' compe
' - . - : . .~i-
. :+W.v:.
, ..r..:.).,.
, ' .. .--N..
. .- . ... :c, ~..r
. r. :n :. ~ - . r .,- . -g.. %. .. ...
...n.. 5- -:.. .~:~. ..--: ,.:. . . .: -. . .
. ... ..~. .
..:*T.-n* . . . .: i.
.1 *. . . . -. .
.. , . < . .'..? - f .~.;. . .. a;; m. :q;. ; . ;m -.:tyx,,;.g.
c.. : ~g:J.- k.y. :.:c
- p*.C.'.?< . . ,
--.-m..
. - . .y c..n.;7,y'.n... :. .;
. ~...-.:.
.; s . .; . . ; . -. .
. . . v,
.s . , . ,
l ..* e.
- l .%.'.'*.-*-l.' ,
, - - . - - ~ v , _ , . ,. . . . - ._ . . - - _ . - - - .,.--..._..,..--r..,,.-.. . . . , - - .-..--....c... . - - - . . . . . . . . . , , - - - - . . - , - - - . _ . .
(3) Specify the ability which he did not poccenc
- but should have posseesed in order to-psrform
-the task competently.
(d) For each task identified in your answer to Inter-roga tory 23 (a) ,
(1) Specify whether or not the delay.is attributable to the.need to repeat actions which were initially performed in an incompetent manner.
(2) Specify whether or not the delay is. attributable to the failure to perform actions as quickly as a competent person would have performed
- the actions.
- 24. With regard to each of your contentions admitted in this proceeding:
(a) Identify each person whom you expect to call as an expert witness in respect of'each* contention.
j (b) State 5he subject matter on which the expert witness is expected to testify.
(c) State the substance of the facts and opinions
. ..m to which'the expert witness is expected to testify
.. . ~. ;.
. .. 1, .. . ; t .. ./.. w . .. .
and s6mmarize the ground for each opinion.
.T :~. .r._: *.k. .~ 1: . :, .;... . . .. .. ,, .- .7. . .
Identify all documents'reli~ed upon or~ examined-
~
i (d) i by the expert witness in answering subparagraph . . .
[ . .~ . m e .. , .. . . . . . . . . ..
2 4 (c ) ' above . ". ".M.f. t -r';'
1 "W- -
f-GM:uf.3.4mt:Wi-;$ U2)i': .& :'*-: -?'4. .'~k. % ':~. .-
~.- -
(e) Identify'all documents not identified . in answering.: - " '
4.:
' : 9.i q W .=.*: n : ; p +r . . .:f - :
s u bp a r a g r aph 2above 4 ( d )f.r.* whichif; .~.;-=:.: 'g. :.n ~ M.y X.2 .:the' exp
.,:).::. ??fR.:fy.]Q.l.fg.Q&.:.?9.1,$d.i.?.yp.,;-fd'2lg.'.Qf.C- :yy . ; { . e xpects to put.. . . .:, .; into evid m , .w. or. to rely upon in .. '- ,-
~~..n .
.-c a; . = :.5 .,.: :n.:n.e n c e.e :.e; .:g .. :: s u;:, , . . - . , :
- c.' t .u um . .x-;w vain.::.n .:. r . .v ..w. . ...,
. . ' suppo r t', o f, h is '. o r he r"_.te s t imony this proceeding. -
, . . . ,in . ,g:n.
,. -~.. ..; . :
~
.-. .- - . . - ~ . . _ . . , _ . . , _,..__.__..-,..r. . , . . - - e-.,.. . . . . _ , . , , - . , - , , . - .
_.......,,,+m...rw,, _-,se.m-..,-_,,,.r,. -4 w ,_._.-
25.. With rocpIct to occh of your contentiano cdmitted in thic
- procc: dings (a) Identify any person having knowledge of the facts relating to each of.your contentions (other than the expert witnesses identified in response to Inter-rogatory 24 (a) ) . This question is limited to those persons whom you expect to call as witnesses other than expert witnesses in this proceeding, or with whom you have consulted or expect to consult in connection with this proceeding.
(b) For each person who has been consulted, state when he or she was consulted and by which representa-tive of yours and summarize the substance of any facts or opinions communicated by such person to the representative of yours relating to the subject matter of each of your contentions. (c) If you expect to call any person identified in response to Interrogatory 25 (a) above to testify, state the substance of his or her testimony, summarize the basis for any opinions contained in such testimony, t l and identify all documents which will be introduced 1 as evidence or relied upon by such person in support of such testimony. . ( . . I 26. Please identify all documents which you expect to
.....-~.....g.....
. :. .a......
- - introduce in evidenc.e or. usd f.or 'impeachmeHt'.or'.other
. 9.~.g;;. .: . ._ .
;. s .s cross-examination purposes in this.. proceeding',s.,,other ~.
. ..:,:..- .. ; .:.~.~:.. --. -.-
t he ;;pr ev ious e . thah those identified in.-.the.. 9.n.....ponses to res
. .;., . q
. . ;.;~. .. ..
.1
,.. . .. s : ~ . . .qv,: :-.. . .. . . .
.S . , .
In b::r r oqa ta. r. i,e s*. .. :
. .. ::AG,
.-a f. . :.t2 .,.5,. .i.m*.T, . ".;-?%_s .".
.,-;- -' ., ' v"C:.., .4 :..;.:y i..-i. -4 :. , 4. . -
, .. .. c.
..i_-- .. m.
6
. . . .I- . .. . g
=
,--9 .
m.v. re-+ w g - -- = rg , , . . , - - .e.,g,-w. g- .v.,.9- ,ye,,- - -w+,e.-w--
. -g-
'27. Please idantify ths documenta upon which you roly which relate to each of your contentions admitted in this proceeding, other than those documents idsntified in. responses to previous Interrogatories. .
Respectfully submittede EICHHORN, EICHHORN & LINK 5243 Hohman Avenue Hammond, Indiana 46320 s - By
'- - "' Ih William H. Eichhorn Attorneys for Northern Indiana Public Service Company LOWENSTEIN, NEWMAN, REIS
& AXELRAD 1025 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 e t l l l l - A
~ -
@}}