ML19345G573
| ML19345G573 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/18/1981 |
| From: | Aamodt M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345G563 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8104070543 | |
| Download: ML19345G573 (2) | |
Text
Aam - 3/18/31 I
co '
-(( ' *< ~
cc =T ;,1. m United States of Ameri*ca PROD. & UTIL F.ic.N.~.2..i....
W gg.
d Nuclear Regulatory Com=ission Before the Atomic Safety and Licensine Board Q. "
In the hatter of Metropolitan Edison Company, Three hile Island Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1 Docket No. 50-289 Request for Clarification of Transcript 2/11/81 through 2/18/81 re Examinations of Control Room Personnel Counsel for Licensee Ernest L. Blake, Jr. callen Earch 16, 1931 to request concurrence of Intervenor for a change in the Transcript, page 12709, line 3 regarding test results.
lhe change was agreed to by this Intervenor and was to be that one previcusly-licensed SRO failed the RO exam rather than none as reported.
There have been five differing reports of the results of the Kelly (P4S) examinations:
the OARI review, page 67', the Transcript, pages 12608 - 12615, pages 12705 - 12711, pages 13212 - 13218, and telephone call of Mr. Blake 3/16/81.
After careful study of the transcript, itEis not po.ssible.
to summarize the-results of the testswith any certainty.
For instance, regarding how many instructors took the' examinations:
A close reading of the transcript.of 2/18/81, Dr..Long reports the number of licensed instructors who took the exams, but avoids providing the number of non-licensed instructors who 'took the exams.
Tr. 13215, 1. 5,6:
long - So out of the 31, the 31 who took the exam, three were full-time licensed instructors.
Tr. 13214, 1. 2,3:
Aamodt --And who were the other people 8104070543
who took it?
Long - I did not identify all of the others...
In concurring with Mr. Elake on the change noted above in the transcript, Intervenor asked for the four previously-unlicensed candidates to be identified as instructors or operation personnel.
fir. Blake left a message 3/17/81 to refer to Ir. 13212, 1. 23,24 which again avoided the question:
Long Ihere were three of our instructors who were licensed personnel who did take that Category T Intervenor was also not given information requested ir. 12615,
- 1. 16 - 21 regarding retests scheduled for January, 1981, as was promised by Dr. Long.
lack of candor of the licensee's witnesses anc counsel, difficulty in hearing during the cross-questioning 3/11 - 3/18, and participation of Intervenor without counsel have denied Intervenor's right to important information needed to develop findings.
Intervenor, therefore, motions that Licensee provide
-complete information on examinations given after the OARP and its revision, and on examinations given as retest *,
101at this information be given individually, stating work status in the control room or as an instructor, whether previously licensed (RO or SRO) and the most recent date, what examination was taken (RO, SRO, Oral, Category T),
the date'taken, grades as Fass or Fail.
Respectfully submitted, Dr?(.k f
harch 18, 1981 (jf
.