ML19345G440
| ML19345G440 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 03/31/1981 |
| From: | Garrity J Maine Yankee |
| To: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345G442 | List: |
| References | |
| FMY-81-51, JHG-81-128, NUDOCS 8104070251 | |
| Download: ML19345G440 (23) | |
Text
_
2.C.2.1 OHG 81-128 EDISON CRIVE
' 111 AIRE
-BARHEE AToml0POWERCOMPARS*
avaugra, up,na casas (207) 623-3521 O
eh c
5 % [,\\
9 S' 4-a ! @} E March 31, 1981 MD2 dI FMY 81-51 1
L.4
! c -
.L w
~
',?d$ :h ~
e<'$
/
- 4 ] r=
Y United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Attention: Office of roclear Reactor Regulation W. P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Division of Engineering
Reference:
(a) License No. DFR-36 (Docket No. 50-309)
(b) Letter dated JJ1y 9,1980, WMY 80-109 Mr. L. H. Heider to Mr.
W. P. Haass (c) Letter dated September 17,1980, WMY 80-134 Mr. Elwin W.
Thurlow to Mr. W. P. Haass (d) Letter dated December 18, 1980 Mr. Robert A. Clark to Mr.
Robert H. Groce
Subject:
Maine Yankee Operational Quality Assurance Program
Dear Sir:
Enclosed is the reply to your request for additional information (reference (d)) regarding the Maine Yankee Operational Quality Assurance Program and the accompanying revised pages to the Program.
In addition, Appendix B, Exception (f) wa3 added to clarify Maine Yankee fuel storage requirements.
The objective of the revised program submitted via reference (c) was to bring the organization depicted in the QA program into conformance witn the l
P C reviewed and approved organization depicted in the current Maine Yankee technical specifications.
Discussions with the $ C staff have culminated in agreement that this is an appropriate objective, and its attainment is of higher importance than other improvements wnich are the focus of your request for additional information. With this objective in mind, we have incorporated cnanges derived from your request for additional information where such changes have not necessitated undue celay or perturbation of the program now in effect.
8104070 M g
o t
2-We trust that this program cocument is acceptable, however, should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
We would appreciate an expedited review and approval of this Program.
Sincerely, MAItE YANKEE ATCMIC FCwER CCMPANY
~
[or John H. Garrity, Director Nuclear Engineering & Licensing JHG/plb u
March 23,1981 Page 1 MAINE YANKEE (50-309)
Request for Additional Information 1.
Request:
Identify the position that is responsible for managing the onsite QA program.
Reply:
As stated in the Policy Statement, the Director, Operational Quality Assurance shall be responsible for ensuring that the Q.A. Program is implemented for all activities requiring quality assurance.
The Plant Manager is responsible for the day-to-day implementation of the Program's procedural requirements at the plant.
2.
Request:
Identify the CA personnel who have the responsibility delineated in writing to stop' unsatisfactory work and control further processing, delivery, or installation of nonconforming material.
Reply:
As stated in the Policy Statement, the quality assurance staff shall have the authority and organizational freedom necessary to meet the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B.
Alsc stop work authority is granted in Section I, para. D.8.0 to the quality assurance department.
Control of further processing of nonconforming material is identified in Section XV.
3.
Request:
In Figure 1, identify the MYAPC onsite and offsite organizations including the Plant Operations Review Committee.
Reply:
Figure 1 will be, revised to reflect latest organization chart in section 5.2 of the technical specifications which identifies onsite and offsite organization. A reference to PORC will be added to the chart.
L
Maren 23, 1981 Page 2 4.
Request:
The qualification requirements in Appendix A for the Director Operational Quality Assurance Department are not satisfactory.
It is an NRC staff position that the qualifications and experience of the Director Operational Quality Assurance Department (offsite) be at least equivalent to those described in Section 4.4.5 of ANSI /ANS 3.1-1978, " Selection and Training of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel." In lieu of the above, ae would accept a commitment to the education and experience described in the following Section 4.4.5 of ANS 3.1-1979.
EDUCATION:
Bachelor Degree in Engineering or related science.
EXPERIENCE: Four (4) years experience in the field of quality assurance, or equivalent numoer of years of nuclear plant experience in a supervisory position preferably at an operating nuclear plant or a combination of the two.
At least one (1) year of tnis four years experience shall be nuclear power plant experience in the implementation of the quality assurance program. Six (6) months of the one year experience shall be obtained within a quality assurance organization.
i
_ Provide a description to satisfy this cosition, i
Reply:-
The qualifications of the Director, Cperational Quality i-Assurance (DOCA) nave been revised.
(See Appendix A) The MY technical specifications only require qualification to ANSI I
N18.1.- 1971.
t e
( '
o Karen 23, 1981 Page 3 5.
Recuest:
A commitment is made in the Policy Statement that "The Program shall be consistent with... Regulatory Guides specified in Section II...."
Quality assurance programs snould reflect the degree of conformance to current regulatory and industry guidance.
Accordingly, Maine Yankee's CA program description should be updated to reflect conformance with the regulatory positions provided by tne NRC in the following regulatory guides for future operational activities including maintenance and modification:
1.8-Rev.1-R (5/77); 1.26-Rev. 3 (2/76);
1.28-Rev. 2 (2/79); 1.29-Rev. 3 (9/78); 1.30 (8/11/72);
1.33-Rev. 2 (2/78); 1.37 (3/16/73); 1.38-Rev. 2 (5/77);
1.39-Rev. 2 (9/77); 1.58-Rev.1 (9/80); 1.64-Rev. 2 (6/76);
1.74 (2/74); 1.88-Rev. 2 (10/76); 1.94-Rev. 1 (4/76);
1.ll6-Rev. 0-R (5/77); 1.123-Rev.1 (7/77); 1.144 (1/79); and 1.146 (8/80).
Section II should be modified to address this position.
To preclude any misinterpretation regarding the commitment statement, it is recommended that the first sentence under Part C.
Imolementation be revised as follows: Replace "where applicable... federal documents" with the following:
"with the Regulatory Position in the below listed Regulatory Guides as modified in Appendix 8."
Identify the Guides by number and revision numcer and/or date as noted above.
Recly:
Majne Yankee shall respond to this reOuest before October 1, 1981.
This period will provide for an adecuate review of tne impact of tne regulatory guides identified upon our existing CA Program and development of a program for implementation of these guides or appropriate pcrtions tnereof.
6.
Recuest:
In the Policy Statement, it is noted that "The Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Committee snali periccically review...."
Clarify if tnis means monthly, annually, etc.
o March 23, 1981 Page 4 Reoly:
The periodic review performed by the Nuclear Safety Auoit and Review Committee is semiannually as mandated by section 5.5 of the technical specifications.
The policy statement has been revised to state semiannually.
7.
Request:
The verbs " directs" and "provides" are used througnout Section I in describing QA program responsibilities.
Identify the specific individuals or groups who perform the act'vity when either verb is used.
Recly:
Section I has been revised to clarify responsibilities for specific individuals or groups who perform the activity when either verb is used as practicable.
8.
Recuest:
Provide a commitment that the development, control, and use of computer code programs will be conducted in accordance with the QA program and include a description of how the QA program will be applied.
Reply:
Computer Programs controlled by Maine Yankee, for items important to safety, will be developed, controlled and used in accordance with approved procedures.
The procedures will be prepared and controlled in accordance with Sections V, VI and j
XVII of the O.sality Assurance Program.
9.
Recuest:
Identify those personnel authorized to approve changes to the i
"Q-List" and describe methods for controlling its distribution.
Reply:
The "Q-List" (Q.A. Program, Appendix C) is controlled per the same method as the.Q. A. Program for review, approvals and distribution.Section VI. C has been revised to state this.
- 10. Recuest:
Provide a commitment that the fire protection program will be covered by the applicable criteria of Maine Yankee's-cperational CA program.
i
o Maren 23, 1981 Page 5 Recly:
Section III will be revised to include a statement that Fire Protection will be controlled in accordance with the YNSO, General Specification YA-CEN-9.
YA-GEN-9 specifies that Sections III, IV, V, VII, X, XI, XIV, XV, XVI, xvii, XVIII of the Q. A. Program will be applied as appropriate to provide the level of quality assurance warranted for design, procurement, installation, inspection and testing of fire protection systems and equipment.
- 11. Recuest:
Provide a commitment that special equipment, environmental conditions, skills, or processes will be provided as necessary.
Reply:
The commitement that special equipment, skills or processes will be provided as necessary is included in Section II.A and III.C.1.h.
Section II.A will be revised to include
" environmental conditions".
- 12. Request:
Give a brief summary of Maine Yankee's corporate QA policies.
Reply:
The Maine Yankee Quality Assurance Program shall comply with 10CFR50, Appendix B and all referenced documents specified in Section II of the CA Program.
The Quality Assurance Department will be responsible for assuring compliance with the QA Program requirements.
The Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Committee shall review the adequacy and effectiveness of the GA Program semiannually.
Each person involved in activities affecting quality shall be re'3ponsible for the quality of his own work.
The CA Program shall be adhered to by;all responsible
-organizations and-inolviduals.
I V
- 13. Recuest:
Provice a matrix of existing or propc ed QA precedures cross referenced against each criterion of 0 CFR 50 Appendix B.
-Recly:
See Attachment A for the matrix of CA brccecures cross referenced against each critefion of l'OCm50, Appendix B.
K 1
I A
L
o Maren 23, 1981 Page 6
- 14. Recuest:
Section II, page 4 - Modify note No. 5 to satisfy the following requirement:
Provisions are included for notifying NRC of changes (1) for review and acceptance in the accepted cescription of the QA program prior to implementation, and (2) in organizational elements within 30 days after announce: rent.
(Note - e 'itorial changes or personnel reassignments of a non-substantive nature do not require NRC notification.
Recly:
Section II, Page A, Note 5 will be revised to include the NRC requirements as stated.
- 15. Recuest:
Describa the provisions which assure that deviations from specified quality standards are identified and procedures are estaolished to ensure their control.
Reply:
The requirements for control of deviation from speci"lec QA requirements are included in Sections III.8.2.b.
- 16. Recuest:
Describe the provisions which assure that internal and external design interface controls, procedures, and lines of communication among participating design organizations and across technical disciplines are established and cescribed for the review, approval, release, distribution, and revision of documents involving design interfaces.
Recly:
Design interfaces are identified in Sections III.B.6 and III.8.1-4.
Design documents and document changes are controlled as specified in Sections VI.S.3.a & b and VI.8.4.a &
C.
- 17. Recuest:
Describe the provisiens which assure that guidelines or criteria are established for determining the methoc of cesign verification (design review, alternate calculations, or test).
March 23, 1981 Page 7 Reply:
The provisions which assure that guidelines or criteria are established for determining the method of design verification are specified in Section III.C.1.d.
- 18. Recuest:
Fo: design verification activities, describe the provisions which assure the following:
a.
The verifier is qualified and is not directly responsible for the design (i.e., neither the performer or his immediate supervisor).
In exceptional circumstances, the designer's immediate supervisor can perform the verification provided:
(1) The supervisor is the only technically qualified individual.
(2) The need is individually documented and approved in advance by the supervisor's management.
(3) CA audits cover frequency and effectiveness of use of supervisors as design verifiers to guard against abuse.
Reoly:
As stated in Section III.B.6.b, the YAEC Naclear Services Division will perform all design verification act"./ities.
Their design verification will be performed in 9.ctordance with their tEC approved QA Program.
- 19. Request:
The responsibilities of the verifier, the areas and features to be verified, the pertinent consid! rations to be verified, and the extent of documentation should be identified in procedures. Modify Section 3 to address this position.
Reply:
As stated in 18 above, the verification will be performed by YAEC NSD in accordance with their NRC approved QA Program.
- 20. Recuest:
Provide a commitment that the following prcvisions are included if_the verification method is-only by test:
a.
Procedures provide criteria that specify when verification should be by test.
March 23, 1981 Page 8 b.
Protot
<m, component or feature testing is performed as 4
early as r Isible prior to installation of plant EQtdoment, or prior to the point when the installation
.cid become irreversible.
Reply:
Section III will be revised to include the NRC statements in a
& b.
- 21. Request:
Procedures should be established to assure that verified computer codes are certified and specified for a particular use. Mcdify Section III to address this position.
Recly:
Presently, Maine Yankee does not utilize any computer programs, under its control, for design or modifica"lon. Computer programs, centrolled by Maine Yankee, for design, if developed in the future, will be certified and specified for a particular use.
- 22. Request:
Describe the organizational responsibilities, including tne involvemcat of the QA organization, for (1) procurement planning; (2) the preparation, review, approval, and control of procurement documents; (3) supplier selection; (4) bic evaluations; and (5) review and concurrence of supplier QA programs prior to initiation of activities affected by the program.
Recly:
Organizaticnal responsiDilities are included in the Q. A.
Program a.s follows:
1).
Procurement Planning - Sections IV.B.l.a & b, IV.B.2.a,&
b, IV.B.3.a & D,_IV.C.
2)
Preparation, review, approval and control - Sections IV.B.l.a & b, IV.B.2.a & D,.IV.S.3.3 & o, IV.C., VII.B.,
VII.C.
3)
Supplier selection Section VII.C.l.a.
March 23,1981 Page 9 4)
Bid Evaluations - Section VII will be revisec to accress ANSI N45.2.13-1976, Sectico 5.
5)
Review and concurrance of suppliers CA Programs - Sections VII.B.a & b & c, VII.C.1.a & b.
- 23. Recuest:
Describe the provi Is s which assure tnat maintenance, modification, and inspection procedures are reviewed by quallr;'d personnel knowledgeable in CA disciplines (normally the QA organization) to determine:
a.
The need for inspection, identification of inspection personnel,. and documentation of inspection results.
b.
That the necessary inspF th q requirements, metnocs, anc acceptance criteria have been identified.
Recly:
The provisions which assure that maintenance, modification and inspection procedures are reviewed by quality assurance are contained in Section V.S.I.
a.
Identification of inspection needs - Section X.B.l.d-f.
b.
Identification of inspection requirements, methods and acceptance criteria is identified in Section X.B.l.a & f.
NOTE: Because of the number of procedures involved, Maine Yankee does not intend to backfit any reviews.
Quality Assurance reviews of maintenance, modification and inscection procedures will De performed on a review cycle basis.
- 24. Recuest:
Provice a commitment that procedures are establishec and described to assure tnat obsolete or supe;seded cocuments are removed and replaced by applicaole revisions in work areas in a timely manner.
Reply:
The commitment that procedures are estaulishec to assure tnat cbsolete or superceded cocuments are removed _and replace by applicable revisions is specified-in Section VI.B.l.e, VI.B.3.0
& c, VI.C.l.c.
Maren 23, 1981 Page 10
- 25. Recuest:
Cescribe the specific organization (s) at Maine Yankee responsible for the control of purchased material, equipment, and services including interfaces between design, procurement, and QA organizations.
Recly:
See item #28.
- 26. Recuest:
Describe the provisions which assure that procurement of spare or replacement parts for structures, systems, ano components important to safety is subject to present CA program controls, to codes and standards, and to technical requirements equal to or better than the original technical requirements, or as required to preclude repetition of defects.
Reply:
Procurement of spare and replacement parts important to safety are controlled by current requirements as specified in Sections IV.C.1.a and IV.C.l.e for technical requirements (equal to or better than).
The provisions-to precluce repetition of defects are specified in Section XVI.
- 27. Recuest:
Describe the provisions which issure that suppliers' certificates of conformance are periodically evaluated by audits, independent inspections, or tests to assure they are l
valid.
Recly:
Suppliers certificates of conformance are evaluated during receipt inspections as specified in Section VII.C.l.e & f.
In addition, tne Maine Yankee Audit Program provides for an avoit of " Procurement and Material Control" which will provide for an evaluation of material certifications on a spot-check basis.
- 28. Recuest:
Describe the specific organization (s) at Meine Yankee responsible for. identifying and controlling materials (including consumaales), parts,'and compenents including partially fabricated subassemolies.
March 23, 190.
Page 11 Reoly:
The stores department is responsible for the icentificatie. and control of material, parts ano components in storage per Section VIII. All other departments are responsible for maintaining tratability of items when the items are issued from stores (Examples: cuting pipe, plate, fabricating subassemblies,etc.).
- 29. Request:
Describe the criteria for determining those processes that are controlled as special processes.
Reply:
Special processes are those as defined by ANSI N18.7-1976, Section 5.2.18.
"Special Processes are those that require interim in process controls in addition to final inspection to assure quality including such prccesses as welding, heat treating, cleaning and noncestructive examinations."
- 30. Recuest:
Describe the processes which assure that when inspections associated with normal cperations of the plant (such as routine maintenance, surveillance, and tests) are performad by individuals other than those who performed or directly supervised the work, but are within the same group, the following controls are met:
The quality of the work can be demonstrated through a a.
functional test when the activity involves breaching a pressure retaining item.
b.
The qualification criteria for inspection personnel are reviewed and found acceptable by the CA organization prior to initiating the inspection.
Reply:
Under normal circumstances, inspections will te performed by the QA Department.
Inspections may be perfor wd by qualified individuals not witnin the same group that performed the work.
If inspections are performed ty indiviouals other than those who performed or directly sup6rvised the work, but are within the same group, the following will be met:
1:
March 23, 1981 Page 12 a)
The quality of work can be demonstrated through a functional test when the activity involves breaching a pressure retaining item.
b)
The qualification criteria for inspection personnel are reviewed and found acceptable by the QA organization prior to initiating the inspection.
Section X will be revised to include this criteria.
- 31. Request:
Provide a commitment that inspection procedures, instructions, or checklists provide, as required, for the following:
a.
Identification of characteristics and activities to be inspected.-
b.
Acceptance and rejection criteria.
c.
Identification of required procedures, drawings, snd specifications and revisions.
d.
Specifying necessary measuring and test equipment including accuracy requirements.
Reply:
Preparation and approval of inspection instructions and checklists is specified in Section X.B.l.f.
Section X.C.l.b referencesSection XVII.C l.a which has been revised to include items a-d. -
- 32. Request:
Describe the provisions which assure that inspection results are documented, evaluated, and their acceptability determined by a responsible individual or group.
Reolys Inspection results are documented and reviewed as specified in Section XVII.C.l.a.2, 3 & 5.
33.~Requeet:
-Describe the provisions which assure that procedures provide criteria for. determining the accuracy requirements of test equipment and' criteria for cetermining when a test is required or how and when testing' activities are cerformed, u:
Msrch 23, 1981 Page 13 Reply:
Section XI has been revised to include provi:lons wnich assure that critt ia for determining when a test is requ! red and provisions to assure that procedures provide crit tria for determining the accuracy requirements of test e
.pment.
- 34. Recuest:
D:! scribe the provisions which assure that test results are documented, evaluated, and their accc,ntability determinea by a responsible individual or group.
Reply:
Test results are documented, evaluated and their acceptability determined as specified in Section XI.C.l.b, XVII.C.l.a, and XI.B.2.b.
- 35. Recuest:
Describe the specific organization (s) at Maine Yankee responsible for establishing, implementing, and assuring effectiveness of the calibration program.
Reply:
The Plant Engineering Department is responsible for estaclishing the procedures for control of measuring and test equipment.
All departments are responsible for the implementation of the calibra*. ion for their equipment.
The Quality Assurance Department S responsible for the surveillance and audit of the calibration program. Sections XII.B.l.a & b, I.D.6.b specify these requirements.
- 36. Recuest:
Describe the provisions which assure that calibration of measuring and test equipcent should be against standards tnat have an accuracy of at least four times the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated or, when this is not possiele, have an accuracy that assures the equipment being calibrated will be within required tolerance and that the basis of acceptance _is documented and authorized by responsible management.
u
Martti 23, 1991 Page la i
Realv:
Section XII will De revised to incluce accuracy requirements of four times the required accuracy of tne eceipment being calibrated, when accuracy recuirements cannot ce attained, an accuracy that assures the eculpment being calibrated will be within required tolerance and that the basis of acceptance is documented and autnorized oy responsible management will ce provided.
- 37. Recuest:
Descrice the provisions for the storage of chemicals, reagents (including control of shelf life), lubricants, and otner consumable materials.
Recly:
Section VIII.B.2.s will be revised to include luoricants, consumables, enemicals and resqents (including shelf life).
l
- 38. Request:
Describe the provisions which assure that the application and rer.3 val of inspection and welcing stamps and status indicators such as tags, markings, lacels, and sta os are controllec.
'Recly:
The provisions for application and removal of indicators such
+
as tags, markings, lacels and stamps are specified in Section XIV.c and the Maine Yankee Tagging Rules.
- 39. Request:
Describe the provisions which assure that the status of nonconforming, inoperative, or malfunctioning structures, systems, and components is occumented and icentifiec to prevent inadvertent use.
Reply:
The provisions whicn assure that the status of nonconforming, inoperative er malfunctioning structures, systems and components are docueented are specified in Sections XIV anc xv.
- 40. Recuest:
Icentify those individuals _or groups resocnsible for the disposition of nonconforming items.
March 23, 1981 Page 15 Reply:
Individuals and/or groups responsible for the disposition of nonconforming items are identified in Sections XV.B.1-4 and XV.C.1&2.
These sections were revised to clarify responsibilities.
ATTACINENT A 10CFR50, APP.D CRITERIA VS. MAINE YAtKEE PROCEDURES
' CRITERIA TITLE PROCEDURE TITLE I
ORGANIZATION l
- 1. Scope-QA Program Policy & Sect. I.A Organization
- 2. Authority & Responsibility-QA Program sect. I Organization
- 3. QA Functions:
- 1. Program.
QA Program 1
- 2. Audit 0-00-3 QA In-Plant Audits
- 3. Inspection 0-00-7 Independent Inspections
- 4. Organization QA Program Sect. I Grganization
- 5. Qualifications Tech. Specs.
Parsonnel Qualifications Sect. 5.3 II.
QA PROGRAM
- 2. Identification of Structures, Systems, QA Program and Components App. C Classification of Components
- 3. Qualified Personnel Tech. Specs.
Personnel Qualifications Sect. 5.3
- 4. Training 0-00-5 Operation Qualification &
Requalification i
0-00-6 General Plant Training Program Department Training i
Procedures
10CFR50,. APP, B CRITERIA VS.-MAINE YANKEE PROCEDLRES CRITERIA TITLE PROCEDURE TITLE III DESIGN CONTROL
- 1. All Requirements 0-01-1 Design Change & Alteration IV
- PROCUREENT 00CLENT CONTROL
' l; All Requirements 0-02-1 Material Equir xnt & Service Purchase 0-03-1 Material Receipt, Handling & Storage.
V INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES & DRAWINGS
- 1. All Requirements 0-06-1 Procedure Preparation & Distribution 0-06-2 Procedure, Review, Approval &
Distribution Procedure Index 0-07-1 Installation & Maintenance of Safety Class Systems, Components & Structures 0-07-2 Control of Special Processes 0-07-3 Maintenance Requests 0-08-3 Administration of Non-Routine Corrective Maintenance 0-10-2 Surveillance, Tests and Records 0-00-4 Safety Classification of Systems, Components and Structures 0-00-7 Independent Inspection 0-01-1 Design Change & Alteration 5-200 Administration of the Preventive Maintenance Program VI DOCtNENT CONTROL
- 1. All Requirements 0-01-2 Document Revision Procedure 0-05-2 Document Control 0-06-1 Procedure Preparation & Distribution I
0-06-2 Procedure Review, Approval & Distribution Tech. File Index i
4
10CFR50, APP. B CRITERIA.VS MAIE YAWEE PROCEDURES
. CRITERIA TITLE PROCEDURE TITLE VII CONTROL OF PURCitASEO MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES
- 1. All "equirements 0-02-1 Material Equipment & Service Purchase 0-03-1 Material Receipt, Handling & Storage Approved Vendor's List VIII IDENTIFICATION AIO CONTROL OF MATERIALS, PARTS AM) COMfWeiNTS
. l.- All Requirements 0-04-1 Material Identification & Control IX CONTROL OF SPECIAL FHOCESSES
- 1. All Requirements 0-07-2 Control of Special Processes 0-07-5 Cleaning Procedure YAEC tOS Procedures X
INSPECTION
- 1. All Requirements 0-03-1 Material Receipt, Handling & Storage 0-00-7 Independent Inspection XI TEST CONTROL-
- 1. All Requirements Tech. Specs Surveillaace Sect. 4.0 0-06-3 Preoperationas, Opera'.ional & Special Tests 0-07-1 Installation & Maintenance of Safety s.
Sect 5.13 Class Systems, Components & Structures 0-10-2 Surveillance Tests & Records X1I CONTROL OF MEASURING & TEST EQUIPMENT
- 1. All Requirements 0-06-5 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment 0-10-2 Surveillance Tests and Records Tech Specs.
Instrumentation and Controls Sect. 4.1
10CFR50, APP. B CRITERIA VS. MAINE YAFEEE PROCEOURES CRITERIA.
. TITLE PROCEDURE TITLE-XIll HAf0 LING, STORACE & SHIPPING
- 1. All Requirements 0-03-1 Material Receipt Handling & Storage
~~
0-07-5 Cleaning Procedure
,XIV INSPECTION, TEST Am OPERATING STATUS
- 1. All Requirements 0-04-1 Material Identification and Control 0-08-1 Non-Conformance, Materials, Parts &
Components 0-10-2 Surveillance Tests & Records 0-10-3 Maintenance of Operations Department Logs MY Tagging Rules XV NONCONFORMING MATERIALS, PARTS Ato COMPONENTS
'1 All Requirements 0-08-1 Nonconformance, Materials, Parts &
Components
.XVI CORRECTIVE ACTION
- 1. All Requirements 0-00-3 Quality Assurance In-Plant Audits 0-07-3 Maintenance Requests Section 5.10 0-08-1 Nonconformance, Materials, Parts &
Components 0-08-2 Corrective Action 0-09-2 Reportlable Occurrence Reports XVII QA RECORDS
- 1. All Requirements 0-05-1 Occument Control Tech File Index XVIII AUDITS t-1.'All Requirements 0-00-3 Quality Assurance In-Plant Audits
<