ML19345D762
| ML19345D762 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1980 |
| From: | Charemagne Grimes Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8012160579 | |
| Download: ML19345D762 (59) | |
Text
- %q
[((T eqh UNITED STATES
, 5e". ' i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
C WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
)
2 s
o
\\...,.. /
Q
[
o
-.gc, 41980 a
Y
,,a 7-
\\ /a jU h
Docket No. :
50-461
.y
-a APPLICANT: Illinois Power Company y
,s 3
a FACILITY:
Clinton Power Station, Unit 1
SUBJECT:
CASE LOAD FORECAST PANEL MEETING
SUMMARY
On November 12-14, 1980 the NRC Caseload Forecast Panel met with representatives of the Illinois Power Company (IPC) in Clinton, Illinois to discuss the constructicn status of the Clinton Power Station, Unit 1.
The panel consisted of C. Grimes, Acting Project Manager, W. Lovelace, Licensee Operations Evaluation Branch, and H. Livermore, Resident Inspector.
Attendees at the meetings held on November 12 and 14,1980 are identified in Enclosures 1 and 2.
The meeting agenda is presented in Enclosure 3.
On November 13, 1980 the panel toured the plant to observe construction progress.
Documentation provided by the applicant during the course of the meetings are presented in Enclosure 4.
J. O. McHood, IPC Vice President, presided in the meeting for IPC and directed specific agenda items and questions to the personnel from the IPC staff, Sargent and Lundy (architect engineering group), and Baldwin Associates (censtruction grcup).
IPC generally described construction progress since the last forecast panel (December 1979) and indicated that, by their current estimate of the construction status, the plant is approximately 74% complete. The only significant schedular problem identified by IPC is a declining installation rate for electrical cable trays due to problems with changes to tray hanger designs.
IPC indicated that this problem is receiving significant attention.
Engineering activities are approximately 87% complete, which is approximately the same as that at the last forecast panel.
IPC and S&L indicated that the remaining work is primarily associated with maintenance of the project and ongoing evaluations of suppression pool hydrodynamic loads.
IPC and BA described procurement activities and material delivery status, as detailed in Enclosure 4.
BA indicated that vendors are stocking material to expedite future fabrication work.
In response to questions raised by the panel, IPC and BA indicated that (1) the present procure-ment summary is not strictly comparable to previous summaries because several earlier estimates have been converted to more accurate counts,
,py 4
2 1eo
0.EC 4 1980
_2-(2) there have been flucuations in material needs due to S&L and on-site engineering changes, (3) the procurement summaries do not reflect material needed for on-site fabrication work (e.g., non-safety pipa hangers), and (4) there are a number of errors in the computer listing of procurement status where material and equipment have either already been delivered or are no longer required.
BA described the construction staffing activities, as detailed in, and indicated that sufficient craftsmen should be available from the Central Illinois Pool, because no other major construction activities are expected locally.
In addition, a no-strike agreement was recently negotiated with the construction force.
IPC described the computerized dynamic scheduling techniques that are being used to facilitate plant construction. The techniques used allow IPC to focus on critical construction activities and readily adjust manpower and resources. The program status is reviewed each month and the baseline (i.e., work to be performed) is adjusted each qua rte r.
The short-term critical path work is the (1) control building, (2) radwaste building, and (3) turbine building. The long-term critical path work is expected to be in the containment.
IPC is currently evaluating the effects of a six to nine month delay in their targeted April 1982 fuel load date.
IPC described, as detailed in Enclosure 4, the status of the develop-ment of procedures for preoperational testing and startup. A number of systems have undergone acceptance tests (e.g., cranes and substations).
IPC indicated that they do not believe that implementation of the TMI Action Plan (NUREG-0660) will impact the schedule for Clinton.
IPC plans to amend the Clinton FSAR to address each of the tasks in the Action Plan.
IPC, through their participation in the BWR Owners' Group, has concluded that their existing design should satisfy all of the requirements that evolve from the Action Plan because of the advanced nature of the design.
Detailed schedules for resolution of the applicable Action Plan tasks are presented in Enclosure 4.
IPC expressed their concern that the NRC might not be able to provide regulatory criteria on a compatible schedule.
IPC indicated that the design deficiencies that have been identified since the construction permit was issued, and reported to the NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55(e), are being resolved and are not expected to impact the construction schedule.
Preliminary comparisons of the structural response spectra suggest that the error in the value of the soil modulus should not require significant rework. This deficiency will be resolved when the revised structural analyses have been completed and verified, including the accepted suppression pool hydro-
DEC 4 19M dynamic loads.
Control cabinet barriers containing defective plug welds have been removed and are being reworked off-site. The removal of these barriers is expected to facilitate electrical work in the control room.
IPC indicated that the company management has expressed a willingness to provide adequate resources to maintain the construction schedule for the Clinton plant. The project budget is currently being reviewed by IPC and they believe that adequate funding will be available.
In sur:marizing, the forecast panel indicated that the following information had been carefully reviewed and considered in order to estimate the fuel load date for Clinton Unit 1:
- 1) the status and progress of plant construction, including the status of bulk commoditics and impressions of construction progress from the panel's tour of the plant;
- 2) the dynamic scheduling methods and the capability for schedule recovery when there are perturbations in the material deliveries;
- 3) the status of plant design changes, correction of design deficiencies, and parallel generic activities relating to plant design;
- 4) the effectiveness and application of IPC management information systems, decision making processes, and use of experience feedback from other plants;
- 5) the involvement of key IPC management; 6) the staffing program, labor relations activities, and dedication and qualification of construction workers (the panel independently verified the availability of journeyman electricians for staffing in early 1981); and
- 7) the remaining construction work that must be compl:ted prior to loading fuel.
Based on this information, the panel concluded that the critical factor in estimating the fuel load date for Clinton Unit 1 is the remaining electrical work.
From the panel's experience with plant construction, and using the same techniques that have been used to estimate the fuel load date for all other domestic facilities, the panel estimated that Clinton Unit I will be ready to load fuel in August 1983.
DEC 4 1980
_4_
In making this estimate, the forecast panel noted that, although they could not be factored into this estimate, there are several issues that could potentially delay the fuel load date. These are:
- 1) resolution of the supprest, ion pool hydrodynamic loads and related corrections for the soil modulus in the structural / equipment analyses;
- 2) resolution of the applicable tasks in the TMI Action Plan (NUREG-0660);
- 3) resolution of the environmental qualification of equipment (NUREG-0588); and
- 4) impact of the Hilti anchor bolt design deficiency and similar design deficiencies that arise in the future.
The panel further concluded that the estimated fuel load date depends on agressive construction progress, high quali ty work, and avoidance of major electrical installation problems.
IPC indicated that they would refrain from contenting on the panel's estimated fuel load date until they had an oppor; unity to review :;1e meeting summary and reassess the construction schedule.
g)
L C. I. Grimes, Acting Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
1.
Meeting Attendees, 11/12/80 2.
Meeting Attendees, 11/14/80 3.
P,eeting Agenda 4.
IPC Documentation cc:
See next page.
bcc:
Mr. L. J. Koch, Vice President Illinois Power Compary 500 South 27th Street Decatur, Illinois 62325 Mr. Peter V. Faxio, Jr.
Schiff, Hardin & Waite 7200 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 Mr. George Wuller Licensing Coordinator Illinois Power Company 500 South 27th Street Decatur, Illinois 62525 H. H. Livermore Resident Inspector /Clinton NPS c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR3, Box 229-A Clinton, Illinois 61727 Mr. K. Costello Illinois Commerce Commission 527 East Capitol Avenue Springfield, Illinois 62706 Mr. R. L. Bertschi Illinois Office of Consumer Services 320 West Washington, 5th Floor Springfield, Illinois 62706
)
Mr. R. Plant Prairie Alliance Box 2424, Station A Champaign, Illinois 61820 l
l t
l l
l MEETING ATTENDEES CLINTON UNIT 1 CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL NOVEMBER 12, 1980 C. I. Grimes NRC/NRR W. H. Lovelace NRC/MPA H. H. Livermore NRC/01E W. C. Gerstner IPC J. O. McHood IPC L. J. Koch IPC J. D. Geier IPC G. E. Wuller IPC G. M. Brashear IPC T. Plunkett IPC D. L. Holtzscher IPC J. F. Hampton IPC J. S. Spencer IPC J. R. Murray IPC J. Greene IPC J. Tonias IPC H. Treckler IPC J. Jonen IPC B. Rasho IPC R. C. Heider S&L H. M. Sroka S&L W. Harrington Baldwin D. E. Stephens Baldwin A. Neeb Baldwin R. L. Bertschi Illinois Office of Consumer Services D. Senn Illinois Office of Consumer Services i
l MEETING ATTENDEES CLINTON UNIT 1 CASELOAD FORECAST PANEL NOVEMBER 14, 1980 C. I. Grimes NRC/NRR W. H. Lovelace NRC/MPA H. H. Livermore NRC/01E W. C. Gerstner IPC J. O. McHood IPC L. J. Koch IPC G. E. Wuller IPC J. D. Geier IPC A. J. Budnick IPC W. T. Hart IPC L. Brodsky IPC J. Hampton IPC J. Greene IPC D. L. Holtzscher IPC J. Tonias IPC J. R. Murray IPC G. M. Brashear IPC J. S. Spencer IPC M. Zar S&L W. Harrington Baldwin D. Stephens Baldwin G. B. Broinne Baldwin R. L. Neeb Baldwin T. Yearick Baldwin R. Bertschi Illinois Office of Consumer Services K. Costello Illinois Commerce Commission K. McDermott Illinois Commerce Commission R. Plant Prairie Alliance N. Lewis Decatur Herald & Review J. Whi te Clinton Journal R. Hurt Clinton D. Plitman Bloomington Pantagraph M. Mintz WAND-TV G. Heflye WAND-TV W. Mason WCIA-TV l
J. Paul WCIA-TV A. Welch WICD-TV L. Jansen WICD-TV i
1 CLINTON POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1 CASEL0AD FORECAST PANEL SITE VISIT PR_0 POSED AGENDA 1.
Overview of project construction schedule including progress and major mile-stones completed since December 1979, current problems, and any anticipated problem areas that may impact the fuel load date schedule.
2.
Detailed review and current states of design and engineering effort including any potential problems that may arise from necessary rework.
3.
Detailed review and current status of procurement activities including valves, pipe, instruments, cable, major components, etc.
4.
Actual and proposed craft work force (by major craft), craft availability, productivity, potential labor negotiations and problems.
5.
Detailed review and current status of all large and small bore pipe hangers, restraints, snubbers, etc, including design, rework, procurement, fabrica-tion, delivery and installation.
6.
Detailed review of project schedule identifying critical path items, near critical items, amount of float for various activities, the current critical path to fuel loading and methods for implementation of corrective action for activities with negative float if any. Estimate percent complete for Unit 1 and needed common facility as of October 31, 1980.
7.
Detailed review and current status of bulk quantities including current total estimated quantities, quantities installed to date, quantities sched" led to date, current percent complete for each, actual vs.
forecast installation rates, and basis and documentation for these figures.
(a) Concrete (CY)
(b) Process Pipe (LF)
- Large Bere Pipe (21/2" and larger)
- Small Bore Pipe (2" and smaller)
(c) Yard Pipe (LF)
(d) Large Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints, snubbers, etc. (ea)
(e) Small Bore Pipe Hangers, Restraints, etc. (ea)
(f) Cable Tray (LF) l (g) Total conduit (LF)
(h) Total exposed metal conduit (LF) t (i) Cable (LF)
- Power l
- Controi
- Instrumentation
- Plant Lighting i
- Security (j) Terminations (ea)
- Power
- Control
- Instamentation
- Plant Lighting
- Security (i) Circuits (ea)
(1)
Instrumentation (ea.).
8.
Detailed review and current status of preop test procedure writing, integra-tion of preop test activities with construction schedule, systems turnover schedule, preop test schedule, current and proposed preop test program man-power.
(a) Total number of procedures required for fuel load (b)
Number of draft procedures not started (c) Number of draft procedures being written (d) Number of procedures.pproved (e) Nember of procedures in review (f) Total number of preop test required for fuel load (g)
Number of preop test completed (h) Number of preop test currently in progress.
9.
Detailed discussion of potential schedular influence due to changes attributed and ottar recent licensing requirements.to NUREG-0660 (NRC Action Plan De 10.
Detailed discussion of potential schedular impact due to the use of an incorrect soil characteristic value as design input to a computer model for developing building responses spectra which may attribute to additional work and rework.
11.
Current status and discussion of design assessment for hydrodynamic loads.
12.
Comments on the notification of a potential construction deficiency of defective plug welding on the swing dividers on some CPS control room ter-mination cabinets regarding the impact it may have on the construction schedule if any.
13.
Site tour and observation of construction a tivities l
14.
Comments on the notification of a potential construction deficiency of CR0 penetration welds at inner and outer drywell plates regarding the impact it may have on the construction schedule if any.
l 15.
Applicant coments of financial comitments to coinplete facility.
l l
l
I i
l l
I
~
,G ~* d
. >r
.r.
a.
t f
Af _'
9 i
g, 9 41-
-~~
s
. <>.s....
y Q
- ~
\\','.
.c...
-r a
. e,.-
,..,7
.,,.,..y.
t..
s I i
~. w r
l
... 6.
B. A. OCTOBER % COMPLETE
l I
..ws.._.;-;,6 u,
t
..Y ff +
,5*-
- $ *'N
*y-W 4
DISCIPLINE
% COMPL.' '
fir,. 7.
- 7. OF PROJECT:
A...i'. 6.
s,,. -
. v. P; '
- r....
Civil 91.05 52.14
' 47.47
.. ' 77 T. ',.
- v... e,
- 3
~
'['
Mech 64.46 6.18 3.98 o:.
~~ '
Pipe 63.54 i
21.82 13.86
^
Elec
. 42.33 19.86 8.41
.. ~,....
I,-
100.00 73.72 i -
'. *d
- j e' e r _._.
,.,.N. - - -
4
'g-
,..,.',:4,
[.
- .4*
4 s
g.'*.
"L E Q..' T:,
a.
e a
7 i
Q,, r -
'J '
.s.
se
- t*.
.o
~
.ta s
.a
..,.r
.a
.a y
.1-
.-^6 s,
6..
sa
-=*
g_
.s..
's-*4 y
.t--b t
..e
,4..
s.
.s
'. n i..'.; -
~
~
.~
s, 4 j.,j,.*
=
,s
,c..
s s
. e. ', g }h k..
s
-g
. %. 4 4 c..
- 2
,e
. ;, g.j.,
/,
+.
,s,.,
. * ** 4%, -
r 9'
..ss r
., s,.,r e s;. a.
,...s.
,.. * ?;*
- t a
- e
- 1
~~
g
?
.lO' $*j $".-...---..'s * '_i l,.&,_.
. Q%~l.
\\
Commodity Estimate Installed
- 7. Comp.
- /. Sc h e d.
Avg. Rate */Mo.
Reg 'd.
Rate /Mo.
CONCRETE 298,094 293,794 98.5 Ige. PIPE 343,152 287,528 83.8 95 11,272 Lge. PIPE Procesa 194,500 160,184.
82.3 92 9,725 6,846 334p t
Sm. Pipe 191,880 76,816 40.0 78 5,968 22,719 324p Cable Tray 95,830 72,043 75.2 94 2,825 4,753 123e Conduit (Exp.)
364,695 140,258 38.5 67 11,938 24,678 458e Conduit Emb.
183,103 160,462 87.6 627 i
Cable Excl. light 4,410,000 346,879 7.9 27 48,142 452,434 211e Termination 241,217 11,019 4.6 5
1,837 21,442 64e
\\4 Circuits 20,917 J3,013 43d
- 0ver last 6 months.
J
.1 s
e 9
I
[
', h d d \\.1. lu. _ u c
Q g
g n
ce f
_b1,E!
I il si!!
l ' f f _!
l1 I
'Ija e
i i
ii ij j
i
~~,,,
l 1!
8!!
i i
I ii l
i I
jii il j
-[
i si ill l
il j
jl
, j !l l
~"
_1
!!!i
!!'i rii iiii
!!i I
ll.
i li ti j
i i
li iiI:
il liit i
l "~,. d I
I!ii iiii iiii i!!i it i!!i ill
((
i i
i j
jj j
i I
i illiill ilt! ! iii liil i
is i
!j i
j ii i
.l
~~~
A
!! lIll
!! ii 8!i l it!l
.i.
i li 4
,i i
e s
~~
3
!! !!!I I!!!II I
!II I
'i ll i
i 11 "
c u E
"~
i i
lI:i isti iliille t
si.i lii.
ij i
i.
l i;
i
- i. i I
t I
il i
ll ji I
t-cc
'~~~~
l 3
w
!!!I!!!
l!!
il go i I
till iii iiii iiiiiii i,iiii; si iiii i.
i i
ij i;
ji i
!u no up
!n! !ni i
i l 'i n-i ini ni!
i i n n
I'
!i!!!!il!
!!!ift lii i
i l
l l
li i-il jiii is ij l'
I !
! II IIi!!!I!!
iiili!!! I l
S i
ii li
~
j!
14 ii jij l
ji I
i
!!'l !!
!!!i!'ti!
! 4'is;!i
!!!i i!
!ii il ii
! i !i.
i!
!l ii!
i jj ill lif!!; 'il!!'it!!!i illi is e
iiii iiij li sii i
i piij ji gij ij j
ji
}
d
!ii lil l li!..iiii!!!iliiii li i
it
}
iij
- ilis, iii jij j,i,j j j.
l jii j ;;
l sie sa y !I!6i!!itsi.iiii,i li j
}j ij!j
!ie si,9,,,,,
g,9j, p,
,ig j;
j j, j
m
_ TIT"T1.,
o F =oa*=*=s W,,,,:,.. =. =. e. sso. o.. n... e
',gi i.
li,
- i
- i.r
.i i
~
,,,,' M,,,,j'.,' Z.'_',_ i' 3'
i'_
lili 1
=
w i ii.i
,,,i.,
. f.
IIhill i h l l i t. i.
t !.i l e. l t.
- i. ~
i il
- i. !
!i i
ii i
e l
I I, I
{.E-l i'
vi tiniiiiri iiiii iii iiil i
ji
!ij j,
. il lli i
i
!!i!lii!!
!!iil i
ji li lii il ji j
i g-,.
j jj;jf,;
A!
li
!!illii!!
I!!!i!!!i afli i
i ti e
i';
i
- [
l
!! ! !Ii!i!!!
ilill!i!!
tali i
I ll t
i i
i i
it iii iii i
i i:T7===
L li
!*3!i!ais
!all!!!Ii
!iii i
i t
ij l
i i
i
}
ii jij j,i l
=jg qi_
sil-it,,,
- i.,,ii
,ii i
- i,;
- ,i,.,;
3 ii.
1.,11 1 kiii i18IIi) II IIi iii9 l i,iii ll,ll,j j jl,,
- jjj, jg, gjj
,g e l_4 Mille '!i!!!'t! jiiii!!ii infi 'lj i {lia ist! il joi iisi jjij e l ijg jj;.,j C __11!1 ii ! alii!! iiii ii!i !! ii si. i !!ij li i ij i si i, ,,i 5,ii 2 DI i!:'ill!l iisi ii !i i t.! l .il 1lti ii j j si si i .i ji ji: i Q[I sk !!iii! I!! iiii iiii i il j i it!1 i!i i,! i j ii. l fj!,,,,s ,ij i b f !! b i1.iliiiiil liitiillii i !!.i-liji iii !ii j tij i jji , t i j j id 7 ,f, wn u m m n m[!: ini ..u ni na n i on n ,n, ,o ni unon !il'N!!! iliti riti e le i !, gi,i 99); j g,ji j;, ,jj j,. g],, ;, ;n !!il !i!! I g-it!'I!!Il !fl'fa_i! ili!ii\\!! i! ! j t, i ji ijji
- ijj, j;
jj j ,,jj jj ,.;jjj,; j, _14!!!! !!ii!i' ? infil ! i !Il tit. ii!! l !! 11 !l ljli ij jj ,;j; j,; j ; },,j, j, i i i .p ; !!!Il !>i'iiiii it. ill ,i!j, it! J,
- jj9 gi,j
,g ; jj
- g,,, -
l j;,; j;, teti i jiji
- ist, si
,,; ;,,;i; 3 j ,,,j j g !!!!!1! !!I!!!i!. '! p d! ! N i! i !iifll ! !liitisl1 i l t y i s i i\\, ! !iti i j { liji
- 1 9, gj jgj
.j;,;
- j j
- .
j g i (!' l'il tii! l!'i !!ii 'j?.(!ltIKi!ii j i j ,ll j j ijj,.l i! !!!!ie til ! f t ! Qi l i Ni t i j j l l i g j,; ' j;; jjj 4j, gj j
- jgj,
,j ii!! jiilitii ! -i i !ll! q2,N ij, l i., i j i_ i ,p, 3 f i ! 'i ll ii!!is*il stil !,iiting if lij gi, jij [j, j ij j j gg. gj. j,jj j, 13 i it ! # i!!!!! iiii i!!! s ii! Mig !i, ,,ij iii,i 1 ,,,, 2 q, is,-(j,, ,j ij i!!!!'!i t ie! i!>l ! iil -N Ni i j; i ll l ij !!! !i i!!!!! li!! !!ii !ill l iW A t i ! I i: j fii i, 9.:*]g,ij .!! I I' !'l!!! i!!! sil! 1 11: ~~ [ j ii i t i ~ ip i ,1, ,j ! !!'1 !!!! !i i i is i i
- iii i
j liti i !i si. e ! ii ri i iiii i j, ,,si ,.2
- , j ', j j,,
~, i!!iflittl!!I4!!ilt !ite I ilis' K i;, jti; jjl: l !Il ei!i!!iillii!Isi!!! !ill lii l. ij i A,iiij g; j} 3 ili! i'!!! I!al !al! till i 'l it. l l j ij j j ,4 j _1_ I '!!!!I!!! Ill t I!Illii I l !ii e i 1 'j!!alil! i!!! i i li ! A l p-~ j i i Ni j l-gj j !! Iiiiisi .iii i ! illiii i ii-i i ii g i 3, j !!1 !!!1 11 i .si i y 9, j 9 g,j j', 1 ! ii. I! j - j- - s :i l'i 6 iii ( j j 4, g'_ _1-i i I l g 7 I ; ! ! ': ! ! ! i I i i T l l i i: i y !!i!i!!i 1._.l!!!!!! i iI j g N l i f ! :i t i i m i ,i ll i ,=,, = ,. ! !I+l I w j g.g y - --q jin-fh iin m i o 4 8 R 8 s e 8 a a 3MWIDWD3
- 8 4
4 4 i s w n e o l % e... .n.,
11-12-80 CLINTON POWER STATION ILLIN0IS POWER COMPANY ENGINEERING STATUS DRAWING STATUS DRAWINGS DRAWINGS ISSUED DRAWINGS ISSUED ANTICIPATFJ EQR INFORMATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ' COMP. l. STRUCTURAL / ARCHITECTURAL 2,584 N/A 2,575 90% MECHANICAL 22,400 20,880 20,533 87% )l ELECTRICAL (PHYSICAL) 2,035 N/A 2,006 84%
- 'j PROCUREMENT & TECHNICAL SPEC. STATUS TOTAL No.
BEING j OF SPECS. COMPLETE PROCESSED MECHANICAL 119 96% 4 ll ELECTRICAL 36 100% 0 i ). - STRUCTURAL 46 100% 0 i. TOTAL 201 97.5%. 4 l 1 e l
..e STATUS OF VALVE - CONTRACTS AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1980 I STATUS OF 2" & UNDER VALVE CONTRACTS Released On Hold Received Total Manufacturer Specifica tion For Fab 8y S&L On Site Estimated Rockwell K-2865C 4134 35 3810 4200 International (NS) Anderson K-2865D 92 0 69 92 Greenwood (NS) Yarway K-2866B 1380 0 897 1400 (S&NS) l Misc. Valves K-2882 516 0 500 516 (S&NS) TO TAL - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- -- - - - 61 2 2 35 5276 6208 1 STATUS OF.2 /2" & LARGER VALVE CONTRACTS II Released On Hold Received Total Manufacturer Specification For Fab By S&L On Site Estimated Crane K-2865A 1240 18 1215 1280 Company (NS) Anchor Darling K-2866A 377 0 349 385 Valve Company (S) Rockwell K-2865B 27 1 21 29 International (NS) Post Seal K-2868 281 1 256 285 (Butterfly Valves) ~ l ' Fisher ' Controls K-2864 266 0 259-268 (S&NS) Misc. Valves K-2882 691 0 671 691 Plug Valves (S&NS) Ram Valves Larc Valves GPE Control K-2873 68 0 16' 68 (Vac. Relief) (S&NS) l Dresser K-2869 104 0 0 109 (ReliefValves) (S&NS) Atwood Morril K-2875 14 0 14 14 (Extraction Steam) (NS) Control Compts. K-2867 6 0 3 6 l (Special Control Valves) Misc. BA-B/M (Specia.1) 11 0 11 11 TOTAL - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - 3 08 5 20 2811 3146
STATUS OF LARGE BORE FABRICATED PIPING SP0OL PROCUREMENT AS OF 10-31-80 I Piping Spool Summary Total number of spool s estimated for enti re job...................... 12,406 * ) %d Total numbe r o f spool s on s i te....................................... 11,642
- Total number of spools currently on hold by Sargent and Lundy (on hol d fo r f a b ri ca ti o n )................................................... 119 II Piping Spool Status Segregated By Building Turbine Building I
Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............154 Total number of -spool s in buil di ng................................... 3,434 To tal number o f s pool s i ns tal l ed..................................... 2,64 2 Auxiliary Building Total number of spool s in buil ding................................... 1.125 Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............. 56 To tal numbe r of s pool s i ns ta11 ed....................................... 896 Fuel Building Total number of spool s in buil ding..................................... 972 Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............. 65 Total number of spool s insta11 ed....................................... 778 Diesel Generator Building Total number of spool s in buil ding..................................... 649 Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............. 72 To tal numbe r of s pool s i ns ta11 e d....................................... 429 Control Building Total number of spool s i n buil ding................................... 1,293 Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............. 73 Total numbe r o f s pool s i ns tall ed..................................... 1,103 Radwaste Building Total number of spool s in buil ding................................... 3,403 Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............195 Total number of spool s insta11 ed.................................... 2,867 Containment Building Total numbe r of spool s in buil ding................................... 1,322 Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator.............145 Ltal number of spool s ins ta11 ed....................................... 551 Screenhouse Total number of spool s in buil ding..................................... 208
- Total number of spools yet to be shipped by the Fabricator............... 4 Total number of spool s insta11ed....................................... 190 *
- = 11-13-80
STATUS OF PIPE HANGERS'AS OF 10-31-80 I Status of Hanger Fabrication By Basic Engineers B,EM M Total number of, hangers released to Basic Engineers for fabricatio'n.......10,748 Total numbe r of hange rs shi pped............................................ 9,967 II Hanger Status Segregated by Building Turbine Building Total number of hangers in buil ding........................................ 3.505 I Total number of hangers instal led.......................................... 2.235 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator.........141 Auxiliary Building i Total number of hangers in buil ding........................................ 1,574 To ta l n umbe r o f ha n ge rs i n s tal l e d............................................ 858 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator.........138 Fuel Building l Total numbe r of hangers in buil ding.......................................... 934 Total numbe r o f hange rs i ns tall ed............................................ 533 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator.......... 73 l Diesel Generator Building }otal numbe r of hangers i n buil di ng.......................................... 615 Total numbe r o f hange rs i nstall ed..............................'.............. 458 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator..........19 Control Building To tal numbe r o f hange rs i n buil di ng........................................ 1,450 Total numbe r of hangers i nstall ed.......................................... 1,133 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator.......... 34 Radwaste Building Total number o f hangers in buil ding........................................ 3,574 To tal number of hange rs install ed........................................... 3,004 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator.........104 Containment Building - To tal numbe r of hange rs i n buil ding........................................ 1,913 Total number of hangers installed............................................ 100 Total number of released hangers yet to be shipped by the fabricator......... 272
s......., o,.*' III* Status of 2" & Under Hangers - Sargent an'd Lundy Design Responsibility Total es tima ted number o f, hangers.......................................... 2.400 Total number of hangers detailed individually by Sargent and Lundy........... 538 Total number of hangers detailed by Baldwin Associates from Sargent and Lunvy Standard Details....................................................... 705 Total number of hangers yet to be detailed from Sargent and Lundy S ta n d a rd De t a i l s............................................................ l.15 7 P r l l s b W W,'-- q_ 'm w _m v e *""
STATUS OF INSTRUMENTATION IV Instrumentation Procurement Status 1 i Total number of Panels assigned a Sargent and Lundy Panel number....... 954 Total number o f panel s received on si te................................ 771 Total number of locally mounted instruments.......................... 4,946 Total number of locally mounted instruments received................. 2,331 f b -.g_ ._,y
ss-so-ov l l HVAC QUANTITY
SUMMARY
i: l TOTAL INSTALLED % COMPL. DUCTWORK l i Cat I 542,700 # 199,478 f 37% Non Cat I 371,223 # 146,797 i 40% TOTAL DUCTWORK 913,923 f 346,275 # 38% HANGERS Cat I 573,632 f 264,552 # 46% Non Cat I 136,057 i 63,807 i 47% TOTAL HANGE,RS 709,689 f 328,359 i 46% TOTAL HANGER & DUCT 1,62.3,612 # 674,634 # 41.5% 9 Last six months, monthly average = 33,825#/ month installed l l I t I
- e
' MN * **
- N 6*
- w = 9 e any -
STATUS OF PIPING AS OF 10-31-80 1 SPOOL
SUMMARY
11,342 - Spools estimated for entiu,;ob to be supplied by Southwest Fabricating. 10,602 - Spools shipped through October 31, 1980. 11,175 - Spools expected to be shipped by February 15, 1981. SP0OL STATUS FOR PRIORITY AREAS (FABRICATED BY SOUTHWEST FABRICATING) II Estimated Total Spools Spools Currently p Number of Spools Identified In Progress Spools In Area . By SWF In SWF Shop Shipped Complete rea Turbine Building 737' & Below 937 937 10 909 97.0 737' - 762' 987 987 18 942 95.4 762' - 800' 1,271 1,271 54 1,199 94.3 Above 800' 95 95 5 86 90.5 Auxiliary Building Below 737' 500 500 5 479 95.8 737' - 762' 243 243 10 221 90.9 Containment Building OSDW Below 755' 222 222 18 154 69.4 ISDW Below 762' 168 168 9 158 94.0 Fuel Building Below 737' 305 305 10 275 90.2 DG/HVAC Suilding Below 737' 299 299 35 253 84.6 737' - 762' 95 95 12 77 81.1 Above 762' 70 70 4 62 88.6 bontrolBuilding $11 elevations 1,304 1,304 43 1,231 94.4 Radwaste Building Below 719' 743 743 77 647 87.1 719' - 737' 1,034 1,034 16 1,004 97.1 737' - 762' 347 347 8 331 95.4 Above 762' 715 715 26 662 92.6 Screenhouse All elevations 208 208 4 204 98.1
STATUS OF PIPE HANGERS AS,0F 10-31-80 I HANGER
SUMMARY
Total number of hangers to be designed by Sargent and Lundy excluding additional hangers required as a result of revised Dynamic Analysis and 2" & under hangers with S&L hanger identities which are detailed by Baldwin Associates using S&L standard Details.......................... 10,790 Total number of hangers released to date by S&L........................... 10,748 Total number of hangers shipped by Basic Engineers as of 10-31-80.......... 9,967 Total expected number of hangers to be shipped by Basic Engineers by December 31, 1 9 8 0......................................................... 10, 3 6 7 I If HANGER STATUS SEGREGATED BY BUILDING AND ELEVATION (SARGENT AND LUNDY DESIGNED) l Total Hangers Currently Identified Total Total Percentage 2)/2" & Larger S&L (See note #1-pg. 2) Hangers Hangers Of Released Hangers By/2"& Larger /2"&Under Arca 2 Released Received Hangers / Received Installed Turbine Building 737' & Below 768 6 770 726 94 690 737' - 762' 869 18 610 799 99 700 762' - 800' 1,183 97 1,168 1,112 95 633 800' & Above 68 36 68 61 94 14 Radwaste Building 701' - 720' 785 49 81 2 726 89 554 720' - 737' 1,291 245 1,485 1,481 99 1,206 737' - 762' 292 38 326 318 98 226 762' - 784' 541 54 5'79 574 99 459 Control Building 702' - 719' 258 8 250 248 99 229 719' - 737'
- 168, 0
161 157 98 138 737' - 781' 407 15 394 393 99 344 781' & Above 291 95 288 282 98 165 uxiliary Building 737' & Below 602 34 481 420 87 337 737' - 762' 539 37 399 376 94 283 762' - 781' 160 34 107 85 79 44 781' & Above 114 34 95 81 85 41 Containment Building 737' & Below 162 22 76 61 80 11 737' - 762' 571 59 318 244 77 30 762' - 778' 209 33 90 50 56 10 778' - 803' 385 73 282 240 85 20 803' & Above 324 104 245 186 76 23
T;tal Hang 2rs . Currently Identified Total Total Percentage 2" & Larger ByS&L(Seenote#1-pg.2) Hangers Hang'ers of Released Hangers Area '2 /?" & Larger /2" & Under Released Received Hangers / Received Installed DG/HVAC Building 702' - 737' .277 0 272 268 99 245 737' - 762' 152 32 152 143 94 70 762' & Above 51 83 49 46 94 26 F,uel Building 737' & Below 418 8 326 301 92 255 737' '762' 202 5 148 141 95 112 s 762' & Above 162 0 98 86 88 54 i Screenhouse All Elevations 150 1 139 136 98 98 Note il The number of hangers currently identified by S&L does not include those 2" & under hangers which have a hanger number assigned by S&L but are to be detailed by Baldwin Associates using S&L Standard Hanger Details. g e y
i I \\ e, I . y n. < i CABLE PROCUREMENT STATUS November 12, 1980 1 CABLE ORDERED DELIVERED ESTIMATED TYPE 'IOTAL TOTAL COMPLETE DELIVERY COMPLETE POWER 826,900 383,924 46.4 6-81 CONTROL 2,545,000 1,742,709 68.5 6-81 INSTRUMENT 1,509,000 330,951 21.9 6-81 (CONTRACT A) INSTRUMENT 199,700 0 0 12-80 (CONTRACT C) s. i TOTAL lI 5,080,600 2,457,584 48.4 l e h a t l l w .e e e -.-.-.,-~,wy---.> 9 e -eg.w. e, w e g-w y-,,-we-m ,-+n.- _,,awyr,,.,,,. ,-__..,,,,,,a-,
i l ,l !I 'l 8 II fI Il i i i I I III I i i i l l Q; _,LiiI i i i I o e i i i e i t,. e i.,,.,, t ; e i ;; i i i i l l l i t i l l i i i l 1 1 t l l i 'l
- 6 l l e i si i l i ; l I
i i i t I !iiil l 1 i e I ! I t i i it i 1 e i t i i i g i I I i I 8 e i i j ! t I i i i l i l I i i ? I } ( l .i iQ g l i i i i i ! i i ! ; ! l l l i I 6 i 6 l . i i
- ; t 1 Z
l l l I I I I i i l i i e i t i I t 1 I I I i l i i i 5 e i t I e. Q t 3 l t I i i j I ! # 6. e t t i i i : i i i i i i ei i t i i i ; I e i t i ia t l i i i l i i 1 e i i ! i i i l I i l l l ) i i t ! l ! i ( t t t I ( -
- a l t l i t i
I i i i 6 i ' l t l i : 1 I f i n j i t i s i l l t i ' i t m n $e hiI 6 t i 1 i i i i t i t I i ! i 6 i i l ! I i l i i !6 e i t t t i m 4E,-
- ,3 ;; i i i i i i l I i i t i i i i i i t t i i i t i i
- i 1 t
i i.
- C l I t t Iil i ! I f I i i e ! 1 I I I l l 1 i l i ! i i !
6 I I i i l( [OI i i.. I ?$ e i e i i ! l 6 i t 6. i e i t i i I i i i l i i i i i i l 'g * ! I i t i 1 i I i i t t ! t i i : i ! l 1 e i eiit j i t.
- ii t ilm i i i ! ! i i i
'_ta i - -i-* t i -- i~' e i, t..... - r *i ' ' ~i t ' ll9 ~ 4 i i i ! i i ill 8 l 1 l! I J _ [. l. J. '.i l' i' r i
- f I i i e e i i i ! I i l i llQ l e i i ; t i ij,
- 1. J.l., t* i i I
I ei ! i i i i 1 6. i i i i e I i i! Z l i_ L,.I,--..S T *I* I 'l I i i l l I t i i I i i i l i l i.. t I i i I i i l Q 1. C
- T 'l I i 1 e i l I i i f i i
! i i eiiiie i 4 i I i i f f I i ' I ,7 _ to ,.= *l6 1 ! i i i l' i 6 I I i e i i l i i l ! I i i ! ) i i l i i ! I M4 4 ' i, e i i e i i t i i t 4 i i i ! I i i i i t i i l 6 : i I e, e i t jf6 i m dI I i I } l 1 i l : I i i t i i t I f I i t t l 1 4 i i e f I _ //- ! i m y i 'l I I i i l t I t i l I i I i i l i i } l i 6-1 I I I 3 d 'I.# 1 1 I 3 u -..'u#,
- s i e i ! 6 i I ! l
! I I I i 11 I i i i i i i I L# J t i I i I 4 4 i i:, i ! i i i i i i i i eii i i i eie i i l i i i s I ';l. t 6 i i l i i i i i-t 1 i l : ! I 1 a -II l J i ..L -F l i l i I i i l m ._ ll i i 4. I e a I i i 6 e i L.: -'.'s a t i i i l.o+- I m > s i i ! t i l 8 7 T P t-4 4_.L L i if,-i""" 7 1 I l ! I I I I l _,he-1 I I i i i O I : 1 i ! I i 6 l'i.:)f i j i i I I i ij *1 i i !l I ! I i i Z Iii i :/J' i i i ! t I i i i i e i I 'O .. e, I i I i l l Wr
- 1. l I'* (i i l 8 1/!' { 6 I i 1 I i i li l iI l I
. i M e i i i i pr i 6 i i i i.): ij, 1 I i i i i i I 6 e 3 i i 6 4 I f II I i l l l l l[t I l !! i l ! l f f i Ii !I il I i b O A i e i i Ai i i i i i t i i i it i 6 , t ; , i i i i i t i i i i is t N i i h i . 4 i 5 ti i i l i i l i i i I l i 1 i l 14 i i i MIN I I iN I I i lIi l-l 1 I Iii i li i i !( ii i l i i Fsi i fi I t 7 I i ih 4 4 4:.I I iit i j i i l i t i e 6 % e i i i ! I i i ki t i i i f, e i i e i Nt w,iii;e i i i i i i i. + w I i i i l i i l-Q __i i I 'f I i l i I 6 1 ! L i i M, I { i i Il I I i 6 i ! I I m l l i i I ' t i l i s' ? *= Qe j i i i # i i i Al '%,. i i i t i i ! i i t i 6 i O l l l l t1 I e i i l : I t WaQ l l ! \\ ['*4 ) I i ! I i i # 1 i i iZ l t I i i i t i i i i I ~ i N I N9 g t t i i ii i O i t ' i 3i i i i iTi%t i i l e i e 1 :ta I i I 6 6 i i t i I. i ei r { i i i I f I l l l l l l I I i i l i i l f\\ l I l \\' i'%. I ' i I liC i i i l i i ! i i i ! l b i M i \\ i I h. I I tm 06 l i i i i 1 N t 6 i i i t i i I i i i : ii i i i N hhN t -i I i i t, it I i i ie i i i ii i I i iiil i i ! i2I !R i i 1.2 1 l l l l 1 i i l l i ! I l I II i 1 ! I t l l ! l(! t I l I !4 1 IN ! iQ i l2 1 : t ! i i ! I i i I ' i _ i t ! I t l I i i i I !I j i I l ! I i! I I i i i A iN lm i i 1 e il I i i ! i i i i i i 1 1 Iiil I Il l 1 r il i N i 4 8 0 Q-0- g O O O O O O Q q e N e o ' O O O W n n
j ) i l-l 70, i l [ - -- J, - t - --- -- passer /3ru_-.- 7~ RZ've.- --.. JAEBMG-- I.- r i e i i l i 4 6 m Ex.wna s l l
- (O i.
l.. .mminummme e t gg/(/ g.---.-------- -~~ l' l t i i t, 8 Y ~~ l - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-~ ' lf e 8 8 t O E l 8 e I l - - - - - -l -- .. - - --p. e t l l [ 4 j i r i l ~. l i 1
h..----',---------~~,
-...- r----... 3a I-I l l i. l .i-. ---.,------L- -l-------- i l i i ' g o, l l l l l l l 1 I ---.-.,-_-.....-.-.---....---.--...l-.-----
l---~~-L-------
l 'k i l 4 I g l l [ e j 4 8 i, t u e i ~Je [ l /d i i i i I . - u.- -- - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - l i ~! l' l e [ s. 1 ? i .l I j. l 1 4 I I e 1 e t I i i f I I ~~ ' FEB ' MM ' APR ' MM ' JUN ' JUL ' AUG ' SEP ' NOV ' DEC JAN ' FEB ' JAN l /78/ /782 \\
November 10, 1990 Page 1 PRESENTATION TO NRC I. Review responsibilities of IPC Startup {.- a) Procedures - GTP, FTP, HTP, PTP, ATP, STP b) Review typical progression of activities of a system from turnover to preop. I II. Outline organization [/(,. n g fu Presently 25 7 Contract 400 '? <6 18 IP YM., vt~ 7 gy Maximum OO C- -\\/777 ~ 40 Supervisory and Engineers 30 Technicians (Elect & C&I) 20 Craft (Pipefitters & Electricians) III. Procedure Status a) Startup Percentage ACTUAL of Total (a) Total number of procedures required gueu r spur for fuel load 347 - n 100% /co? (b) Number of draft procedures not started 98 4 28% V6/ (c) Number of draft procedures being (, - written 14 9 4% II (d) Number of procedures approved 174 67 C* /97 (e) Number o_f procedures in review 61 27 J 'r t fo ;. (f) Total number of preop test required for fuel load 62 '4 18% / 81. (g) Number of preop test completed 0 o i lWEE (h) Number of preop test currently in progress. O o i M ( b) Operations (See next page) l l IV. Testing Status Temporary Power to 6 Plant Unit Substations (6.9KV to 480V) and 6 MCC's. Initial operational testing of the Turbine Bldg. Crane and Fuel Bldg. Crane. Generic testing and flushes and hydro's of systems to or'oduce demineralized water. (Instrument Air Header, Acid & Caustic, Sumo pumos, demineralizers.) Miscellaneous checkout of equipment to support construd-tion needs. (Batteries, sumps, station heating, etc.) l ..s...... = 1
Novsmber 10, 1980 Paga 1 PROCEDURE STATUS C<. Generic Test Procedures V' Total 79 71 100% Complete / c o 2. C.--urf Flush Procedures Total 78 79 Not Started 5 // Being Written 1 p Approved 65 31 In Review 7 A Hydrotest Procedures. Total 43 ?Y Not Started 2 r Being Written 1 2. Approved 16 P In Review 24 27 J 3. Acepptance Test Procedures Total 49 "7 Not Started 20 W Being Written 3 a Approved 12 C In Review 14 2-Preoperational Test Procedures Total 62 M Not Started 35 C'/ Being Written 9 o Approved 2 o In Review 16 0 Startup Procedures Total 36 37 Not started 36 37 e W ?..' m. s 4 r
DATE: November 13, 1980
SUBJECT:
System Turnover Volume based monthly with a projected April 1982 Fucl Load. Number of 480 Volt Numoer of System Unit substation and Turnovers scheduled MCC's (AZ) per month Jul 80 1 Aug 80 2 Sep 80 7 3 Oct 80 3 5 Nov 80 PGCC 3 Dec 80 8 7 Jan 81 12 10 Feb 81 12 11 Mar 81 15.. 3 Apr 81 3 6 May 81 3 7 Jun 81 6 Jul 81 1 3 Aug 81 16 10 Sep 81 3 8 Oct 81 3 8 Nov 81 6 6 Dec 81 10 25 Jan 82 23 9 I '. ' - Feb 82 1 13 Mar 82 Apr 82 FUEL LOAD May 82 Jun 82 ~ Jul 82 Aug 82 Sep 82 Oct 82 5* Nov 82 Dec 82 ~ ~
- Station Heating may be accepted during the pre-fuel load period 98.4 Y
- e, m.
D**D D T M 9] cc cJ L13 I I I =_ I I l o u2so wi:=:==cs 1 __aa I kT. ~
- a Ii 8
i i -= 8 = l t ,3 E a = l l l l l E cuco c7ss 1 I i l l l l ~ J l 6 I s = s \\ N b S s ,- g 's d o s = s - A s - 3 = 't i L s = 8 g 1 I l l l k u g l l l l l [ S ~ L i. .H .H i. A 's [ I 2 < h b
- j
&=,"; - s 'i o l\\ a-h = E .I = 3 = 6 3 n lll= . *w n 6 ~ = = t = lll 7 = lll d'$ g:- 1 -uM -e a g IE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 aine.cs aanvad 0
} } n-i a viso 7 ;swa.cs = ff = = .=.= E e i M I W
- =-
M} (6'25 ? q_3 l M ~ a cu o,os l F M 5 t Q \\ = 1. u N ~ e i i. s E s ~. s. 5 i i's_ i .\\ W = pr s k I a s s = i E a N s a = r s I l 's. \\ ,a 2 - s e \\ N H s \\ lui \\ l y = c 0 { -E 2 = 3 ~ t = = = :;; o.. gn-E. r O = a., = EIE 5* i t.a g = g = = = = 2 itsismos inisu24
6 1 I a4 4 una vs as cc ~E E l ~ t l Y y m_2 ~ E e
== E E V1 l l ivan 043 l l l l b y b a 9 E ^\\ b (. Ii W \\ = I \\ \\l I I a N h W w i N E z \\ s d s s a s g ( g s, = 3 s b s U s s s s H2 g a o g b s 6 s s s 4 D = I 0 -= w = H E e N = \\ ~ Q -a oo qOOst a2 t O .s g D a;0 E e= 8 6 ,2 l C= a 3 3 2 3 3 2 R E 2 e smacs sanuu e- =
m2 gggmp_ r-- ) i i i o us.a in13e3 e3-- gg m &b a E yV if I e I 3 l m ( i = m2 .m l l l l I l I l i s E I
- 9
\\ \\ ~e i s s 4 \\ \\ l I l l l W E 's g 's l= A E h [ 's 's. N b x \\ "= _V = E: I W E N 7 n.:- p o = I g = ll f = k U i3?i j As l i = = = = 24a w es antavad a I e e
D 99 0 D^TN b g6 k3& 'K' h U0 2 V' M 25 1 ww l l f 1 l m e r auCD 0123 l 9 z j = x m 6 t t f 1 E. t \\ \\l \\ s e 3 \\ u y A m ~ s o s N = = s s w E 's w i 0 's 'E r s h 's .k. a N s j 's \\ s E w \\ = 5 \\ 9 w t N E \\ a 6 ~ J I C C x W 2 = m E a 7 = ! l a
- d 5'
ena iM E '. l 5! u h*' w E Es ~ m l n'E I l e E*O + -as g E 2 3 ' R 2 3 2 2 2 2 3131 dug 3 AN13u1J e 9
j H I
- 6 esas int:ss==os 1
ou m e c i m 1 t I 9 1 s 00' * :". z b r.-- r1 CEE5 ( 3 m c=: :2 s l l \\ ~, J Gmau Q183 t g l m 2 \\ bW g a y w ca E 3 ~~ l 4 l 's -l l l\\ l d s 9 's o bd E t 's ~ 4 9 I 9 E = % 'n W z E N 's k UE u a.e \\ i \\ E E 9 9 {- E ~ W = 4 O E O '=* aa m 35 o e I E E a = m e. E
- =e
-on m . e.
- 4o
,a Ea* 9 s = I' s = nae e. I* f E -..E 2.M t ,2 ia E E E E E E I E E E 1431duC3 1N10W14 en .e. g-
D D 9 i A M I W ofJ1AAo I 95 ulos w i3 3mmo3 EE -z MUET-E E OO WW g 1 t 8 m a g a g l E i s \\ ~ , ~. y s I \\ s g s a N l\\ swon c7c3 f , ' 'l* l O = =, Eu E g h E g g y ~% = ~ t ~ 's E e~~ \\ 7 a E I i l i \\\\ d n r y \\ E g O
- E Y.
= E = = = n E ew E E b E p: O O Q E 1 E u E se E N i h ,e c y 0 e Z = U P ~~. I awa NTO E e a se e. F N se m e* r = I 2 .-ee 5 s.'s e ezu -SS 9 E O o O O O O O .O O O O O l S e M e F M N a .O 3131W 03 LN33 dad r S O
D"[ D ()Dl@lV@I J W E> J\\! W; m JiuJ l A iu 4 r u,. W340 isl3hlemb3 as a wu a 5 { m
- f. f.
-= m 1 t s i 2 I = 1 = m 4 b \\ 9 \\ A \\ = m \\ m I i i m I OudAs O'.03 \\ l x 6 m a g m y = a
=.
-w ee m_ s g 3 e I. I ' ' -L. \\ W 's 6 w* i a s e \\ m E -E = ~ 4 =, I 1 - a w s ,s -u w a m a M a m ~ W = d E y ~ s m2 E E z a e, m e r N 2 e E .n 6
- pn m
e z - = E c = ~" e -ga d, e e Hat I I E E R 3 3 2 2 3131das03 tw33u3d 4 A
y l
- I I,
,p i i i i - a - 43e9 it13d3=m03 a ~< g h _ v v_ g RE r s e, I m b 3 I !1 t = !s. 2 - m2 \\g a \\ \\i l r Cucu 01C3 lN l l l l h s N N I N ?" I s = N s ( .5 N HEl N A4 N gl \\ I s ' :1 i 'x K i a j' N ~1 s. g M s if N '5 N g Q 'E' I i l 'AlN W ls al I U i i l - i I n ,d ag C e e M2 1 l 5 E w 1, E i W 1 l L m e Y
- 2. 0 3 b
I. .. =. eN a-1 Q t ~ g I 2.2 i i l i'd we j ie = = = = = = = = = l uvaa3 m3uu I A
- IA Cable Tray I
h Cable Tray Containment j Component Supports A45 i a Containment 470 Drywell O i A40 A100 Auxiliary 820 j Fuel Bldg. 350 1640 Fuel Dryw. Auxiliary l none N/C expected N/A s Diesel Control Turbine Radweste l Generator l Elevation i
Conduit Supports nj' Containment Conduit Supports I Auxiliary 2500 I Fu el 1200 ~ Containment i A60 A160 i Drywell Control 3900 'Fue Dryw. Auxillary Diesel - Generator 3500 N/C expected 1 'L y/ / i N/A i / \\ / Diesel Control Turbine-Radwaste l Generator l Elevation i 1 ~
ILL9NOIS POkTR COMPANY } CLINTON P0k'ER STATION FIGURE 2 // / 2 R-l CATEGORY 1 BUILDING SUPPORTS c 1 S, X i l 2100 ) i 1 I GOOD 3290 $b soj ss l h o
HVAC Component Supports aj((g HVAC Hangers Control Bldg. 1436 Containment Diesel Generator 476 Auxiliary 3 6'9 ]g Containment 306 Fuel 181 A10 A2O I N/C Anticipated.f or-l Fu Dryw. Auxiliary p lj N/C expected Cooling & Heating l" \\ N/A Coll Supports ) N Damper Supports 9 [. Fan Supports Area Cooler & Unit Heater i V/A A N Diesei' ~ 'Controf Turbine Radwaste Generator Elevation
NRC Caseload Forecast Panel Visit November 12-14, 1980 ,i Agenda Item No. 9 - Impact of NRC Action Plan on Project Schedule ILLINOIS POWER COMPANY'S gg,g} NRC ACTION PLAN RESPONSE PROGRAM I.. Internal Program Clinton Power Station Action Plan Steering Committee II. External Program A. BWR Owners TMI Response Group (SO u. tit it ica ) B. INPO, NSAC, AIF and EPRI III. Clinton Power Station Action Plan Response Summary A. Categories and General Schedules for Action Plan Tasks B. Status of Action Plan Tasks Engineering Authorizations C. Impact of Hardware-Related Action Plan Tasks i D. Action Plan Impact on the Clinton Project IV. Action Plan Resolution with NRC j I A. FSAR Action Plan Appendix B. NUREG-0660 vs. NUREG-0694 t I I
TABLE 1 Categories and General Schedules For Action Plan Tasks Schedule Categories Total (Year to bo Fully Imolecented) Training Hardware Analysis Administration Completed 0 7 3 3 13 1980 0 0 0 6 6 1981 6 5 13 17 41 1982 2 7 1 5 15 Long Term
- 2 4
8 16 30 Total 10 23 25 47 105
- "Long Term" implies that the task has no required implementation date, NRC criteria not to be issued in near future, or implementation date is 1983 or later.
O
TABLE 2 J Status of Action Plan Tasks Engineering Authorizations Task Projects Task Projects Organization Authorized Yet to be Authorized
- General Electric 16 6
via the BWR Owners Group Sargent & Lundy 11 9 Nuclear Services Corporation 1 0 Total 28 15
- Six of these projects cannot be started until other project results are available or NRC criteria issued.
The remainder of the projects are considered low priority. D i 4- .e -y., -e- .y-
=_ l TABLE 3 Action Plan Tasks With Hardware Impact Which Are Considered Comoleted I i Task Number Description I.D.l. Control Room Survey and Modific=*4m== I.D.3. Safety System Status Monitoring I.B.1 Reactor Coolant System Vents II.E.4.1 Dedicated Hydrogen Control Peneeratinns II.K.3(22) RCIC Water Source Automatic Switchover II.K.3(23) Central Water Level Recording II.K.3(26) Effects of Fuel Pool Cooling on RHR Reliability 1 G 6
) i ) i TABLE 4 Action Plan Tasks With Hardware Impact Which Are Currently Underway Task Number Description I.D.2 Plant Safety Parameter Display Console II.B.2 Plant Shielding for Post-Accident Operation II.B.3 Post-Accident Sampling II.D.3 SRV Position Indication II.F.1 Additional Accident Monitoring Instrumentation II.F.3 Instruments for Monitoring Accident Conditions (Reg. Guide 1.97) II.K.3(13) RCIC Automatic Restart on Low RPV Level II.K.3(15) Modify Break Detection Logic on RCIC to Prevent Spurious Isolations II.K.3(18) Modification on ADS Logic to Eliminate Manual ADS II.K.3(21) Core Spray and LPCI Automatic Restart on Low RPV Level III.A.1.2 Upgrade Emergency Support Facilities (TSC & EOF) III.A.3.3 Communications
i SUPPLEMENT s TO TABLE 4 [ Page 1 of 13 I i Current Schedules for Hardware-Related b Action Plan Tasks l !. I.D.2 Plant Safety Parameter Disply Console
- I BWR generic design work authorized 3/80**
Draft functional specification issued 9/80** BWR generic system design authorized 11/80 BWR generic system design issued 1/81 Hardware procurement (via GE proposal?) and interface engineering start 2/81 Installation of connecting cable start 8/81 Panel delivery and installation 1/82 Testing completed 4/82 l
- Not a NUREG-0694 requirement.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
I' I t t l l l l i
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 2 of 13 II.B.2 Plant Shielding for Post-Accident Operation BWR generic work on source terms and their distribution in the plant authorized 3/80** S&L development of post-accident radiation zone maps authorized 10/80** Access requirements and vital equipment identified by IP 11/80** Zone maps completed by S&L 12/80 Integration of. zone maps and access requirements completed 1/81 Supplemental shielding requirements identified by S&L (if any) 3/81 Supplemental shielding design completed and released for construction 6/81 Supplemental shielding modificard.ons completed 3/82
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 3 of 13 II.B.3 Post-Accident Sampling S&L sample system design effort authorized 7/80** Sample system specification prepared 11/80** Specification out for bids 11/80 Contract award 2/81 Sample system design interface completed and released for construction 7/81 Sample piping interface work installation completed 1/82 Sample system delivery 1/82 Installation and testing completed 4/82
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 4 of 13 II.D.3 SRV Position Indication Position indication engineering authorized for S&L effort 4/80** Position indication system specification out for bids 10/80** All bids received for evaluation 11/80** Contract award 1/81 Complete receipt of vendor drawings 4/81 Cable routing release for construction 8/81 Installation of system except acoustical monitors 12/81 Acoustical monitors delivery 1/82 Installtion and testing of acoustical monitors completed 4/82 i
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 5 of 13 f II.F.1 Additional Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Specific and detailed information supplied by the NRC via Eisenhut letter 9/80** S&L engineering evaluation of CPS current design authorized 10/80** Recouraendations from evaluation due from S&L 2/81 Development of procurement specifications by S&L authorized (if necessary) 4/81 Specifications out for bids and interface engineering starts 6/81 Contract award 8/81 Interface work released for construction 10/81 Equipment delivery 2/82 Installation and testing completed 4/82 L i
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
4 r-,a--, - n-- enae-,- ,.,,,w ,.m,,,,, ,,n -,--,--,srem, ,,,,,,.sc--,+ ,--,,re m,, ,r-. e- -e----e.,---.
W SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 6 of 13 II.F.3 Instruments for Monitoring Accident Conditions (Reg. Guide 1.97)* Evaluation of existing CPS design against recommendations of NUREG-0578/0585 2/80** Procurement of first package of additional equipment authorized 4/80** Draft 2 of Revision 2 of Reg. Guide 1.97 issued 7/80** Draft 3 of Revision 2 of Reg. Guide 1.97 issued 10/80** S&L evaluation of latest available edition of Reg. Guide 1.97 authorized 2/81*** Evaluation report completed 4/81 Development of procurement specifications authorized (if necessary) 5/81 Specifications out for bids 7/81 Contract awards and system interface engineering started 9/81 Interface engineering work released for construction 10/81 ~ Interface engineering work completed and equipment delivery 3/82 Final checkout and testing completed 4/82
- Not a NUREG 0694 requirement
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
- IP decision date - IP intends to proceed with evaluation based on currently available criteria if final form of Revision 2 of Reg. Guide 1.97 is not issued
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 7 of 13 II.K.3(13) RCIC Automatic Restart on Low RPV Level
- t BWR generic evaluation authorized 7/80**
Generic report to NRC on proposed change 10/80** NRC concurrence on proposed change and start of plant unique engineering 6/81*** Logic modification start 9/81 Test and checkout completed 12/81
- Not a NUREG-0694 requirement.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
- IP decision date - IP intends to proceed with proposed modification implementation by this time if NRC decision is not issued.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
e
SUPSLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page B of 13 II.K.3(15) Modify Break Detection Logic on RCIC to Prevent Spurious Isolations* BWR generic evaluation authorized 7/80** Generic proposed modification issued 9/80** GE proposal to each owner for logic change and delay timer 11/80 Logic modification stiart 8/81 Test and checkout completed 12/81
- Not a NUREG-0694 requirement.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
0 1 l l l l
>amag e S hh6 i i SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 9 of 13 c II.K.3(18) Modification of ADS Logic to Eliminate Manual ADS Initiation
- BWR generic evaluatien authorized 7/80**
Selection by GE of logic circuit to be modified 8/80** GE to perform reliability analysis 10/80 Generic design report to owners group 11/80 Generic report to NRC 1/81 NRC concurrence on proposed change and start of plant unique engineering 7/81*** Logic modification start 10/81 Test and checkout completed 12/81
- Not a NUREG-0694 requirement.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
- IP decision date - IP intends to proceed with proposed modification implementation by this time if NRC decision is not issued.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
l l . ~...
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 ~ Page 10 of 13 II.K.3(21) Core Spray and LPCI Automatic Restart on Low RPV Level
- BWR generic evaluation authorized 7/80**
CPS-unique evlation of diesel-generator load sequencing and capacity by S&L authorized 7/80** Generic draft report to Owners Group 12/80 CPS-unique evaluation report to IP 12/80 Generic report to the NRC 1/81 NRC concurrence on proposed changes and start of plant unique engineering 7/81*** Logic modification start 10/81 Test and checkout completed 12/81 i
- Not a NUREG-0644 requirement.
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
- IP decision date - IP intends to proceed with proposed t
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
modification implementation by this time if NRC decision is not issued. l
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page la of 13 II.A.l.2 Upgrade Emergency Support Facilities Technical Support Center BWR generic functional specification for equipment authorized. 3/80** Structure conceptual design developed 1/80** Structural and auxiliary systems engineering released for construction 2/ 80** Construction started 5/80** BWR generic functional specification for equipment completed 12/80 Development of equipment procurement specification authorized 1/81 Structural work and HVAC completed 3/81 Equipment specifications out for bid 5/81 Contract award 7/81 l Equipment delivery and start of installation 2/82 Final checkout and testing 4/82 l ( l
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
-~ _. _. _ _.. _ _ _ _.... _. ~. _. _ _ _. _.. _,
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 12 of 13 III.A.l.2 Upgrade Emergency Support Facilities 8 Emergency Operations Facility BWR generic functional specifications for equipment authorized-3/80** Primary site selection made 7/80** Secondary site selection made 10/80** NRC siting criteria via NUREG-0696 expected 11/80 BWR generic functional specification completed 12/80 Development of equipment procurement specifications authorized 1/81 Final decision on site location made and structural design work authorized 2/81 Equipment specifications out for bids 3/81 Equipment contracts issued 6/81 Structural design released for construction 6/81 Structural work completed 12/81 Equipment delivery and installation 1/82 Final checkout and testing completed 4/82
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
I I - - - _ -
SUPPLEMENT TO TABLE 4 Page 13 of 13 r III.A.3.3 Comunications* Comunications conduit size increased to accept additional dedicated telephone circuits 3/80** Comunications installation 5/81 l
- Not a NUREG-0694 requirement
(
- Denotes activities completed per this schedule.
l l a 1 4 . _, -,,. _. - - -,.. _.. _ _ _.. _ _,, _ _ _,,.. _..,.. - - - -, _ _ _ _,..}}