ML19345D639

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reviews Facility Des Per 801110 Request.Draft Appears Acceptable in Areas Reviewed
ML19345D639
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/1980
From: Heineman J
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
To: Schwencer A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8012160402
Download: ML19345D639 (1)


Text

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON 20426 y IN REPLY REFER TOs

v $

32  % N n; ~

December 10, 1980 E

Mr. A. Schwencer Chief, Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Schwencer:

I am replying to your request of November 10, 1980 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for comments on the Draft Environmental Impact S tatement related to the Operation of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Unit No. 1. This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate EERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.

This staff concentrates its review of other agencies' en-vironmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and cil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts in-voled with the proposed action. It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.

I thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.

Sincerely, i

Qq A - - -

J ck M. Heinemann l

dvisor on Environmental Quality I

9

\

l 2

8012160YOA -

I

/V

. . .- ._, __ _ . _ . _ _