ML19345D516
| ML19345D516 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1980 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Burstein S WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19345D517 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8012150278 | |
| Download: ML19345D516 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000266/1980018
Text
T
.
_
Tid
Q
ff
o
UNITED STATES
g
_
_:fG
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
,c
g
>
- "
6'
.<
REGION lli
3
- St
0,
[
799 ROOSEVELT HOAD
'1
r.
.
t
%,
,e '
GLEN E LLYN, ILUNOIS 60137
,,
]
.....
- u.
.
J
im.
.
-
^
2
"
IDEC 0 4 naa
Docket No. 50-266
Docket No. 50-301
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
ATTN: fir. Sol Ilurstein
Executive Vice President
}
Power Plants
'
231 West Michigan
Milwaukee, WI 53201
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine physical security inspection conducted by
Messrs. J. R. Creed and J. R. Kniceley of this office on October 27-31,
1980, of activities at Point Ileach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 authorized
by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-24 and DPR-27 and to the discussion of
our findings with Messrs. G. A. Reed, R. Krukowski and D. Hart at the
conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
Areas examined during the inspection concern a subject. matter which is
exempt from disclosure according to Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of
Pract ice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Consequently,
our report of this inspection will not be placed in the Public Document
Room.
Although this inspection identified no items of noncompliance with security
requirements, we are concerned with the nature and number of complaints
and adverse comments expressed to the inspectors concerning NRC's security
requirements by both plant management and plant employees. Of particular
concern is that the attitude of management and employees regarding the
necessity of some of the NRC approved physical securit.y requirements might.
possibly precipitate security-related problems in the future. This matter
was discussed with you during our recent licensee performance appraisal
i
27F
.8012150
AITACHMENT CO.NTMd
80
2
1215 0 n.crRJ.793 (d)inroev4rro.)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
- - -
-
-
.
-
-
.-
__
_ . . . _ .
._
. _ . _ _ . - . .
= . - . . _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ -
. _ __,. _-___ _ _ -__ ._._
--
-
4
.
.
i
.
i
d
i
Wisconsin Electric Power Company
2-
-
,g
!
i
meeting on November, 7, 1980. As discussed, we believe you need to take
steps to encourage a more positive attitude at the plant with respect to
!
the requirements of your security plan and to seek changes through the
'
j
regulatory process for those security requirements you believe detract
from the safe operation of the plant.
We will gladly discuss any questions-you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
I
'
.
O . ,n > .\\;* /f
als* w
k
JJamesG.Kept
t
!
Director
!
Enclosure:
IE Inspection
Reports No. 50-266/80-18
,
and No. SG-301/80-18
,
i
(Part 2.790(d) Information)
I
cc w/ enc 1:
Mr. G. A. Reed, Manager
Central Files
4
1
Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
i
AE0D
Resident Inspector, RIII
!
cc w/o 2.790(d) Information
!
encl:
(
j
Local PDR
j
Sandra A. Bast, Lakeshore
Citizens for Safe Energy
l
Mr. John J. Duffy, Chief
Boiler Inspector
'
Mr. Peter Anderson, Wisconsin's
i
Environmental Decade
1
.
I
t.
4
4
AUACRGENT LSIAMS
ICFR g.m (d> mf 0RMAll0h
r
!
i
~ . .
_ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . , _ . . , . . . . . . . - _ . . , _ .,..,., _ _-
_ _ , _ _ . . . . . . . . _ , _ , . . , , _ , , _ , _ . _ _ . - . , , _ _ _ . , _ , _ _ _ , _ . , , _ . , , . _ < , - , _