ML19345C027

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Expresses Concern Re Health Effects of Facility Cleanup on Workers.Safer Cleanup Methods Should Be Developed to Protect Workers & Public
ML19345C027
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/28/1980
From: Ertel A
HOUSE OF REP.
To: Ahearne J
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19345C023 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-0683, RTR-NUREG-683 NUDOCS 8012030769
Download: ML19345C027 (1)


Text

..

. -. e.e m one.

r.

- _e Pan svi==,

Hamassan_m.Mwassa 17311 SON L masqueur,te Howes Orries h

"" # a.""'

Congre## of tfje U.initch 6tates r~

Jpouge of Representatibeg

  • -- :=. - - ma

==-~~e-

- -avio op mu.i.

EEastington, B.C. 20515 a-=-

--r,=

.e c=

= -

n,

-m y

asnnu.a August 28, 1980 Honorable John F. Ahearne Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Chairman Ahearzie:

I have recently begun my evaluation of the Commission's Draft Pro-grammatic Environmental Impact Statement concerning the cleanup of Three Mile Island Unit 2 (NUREG-0683), and am concerned over the anticipated health effects of the cleanu on the workers.

According to the draft statement, you are anticipai.ing Y a.lb.:.,

1.6 worker deaths from cancer and 3.1 genetic defects among the children of the workers, beyond the normal expected cancer and genetic defect rate, directly related to radiation exposures in-curred during the cleanup.

These health hazards are apparently within the range permitted by the Commis~sion.

While we often see health risks calculated as a decimal per millions of people, the projected hazards described in the draft statement in a group of only 2,500 workers seems extremely high and should be a matter of utmost concern.

In any case, they certainly should not be i

termed " negligible" as they are in the draft statement.

It is difficult for me to believe that safer cleanup methods 1

cannot be developed to protect the workers as well as the general t

public.

I look forward to your careful consideration of this '

matter and would further suggest a reexamination of permissible i

worker exposure standards if these risks are currently acceptable under NRC regulations.

r Sincerely, i

L len E. Ertel MEMBER OF CONGRESS f

AEE/bh s

W g/c 90 7 6 7

.