ML19344D851
| ML19344D851 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Mcguire, Catawba |
| Issue date: | 07/24/1980 |
| From: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008260137 | |
| Download: ML19344D851 (1) | |
Text
_
pa atcoq'o UNITED STATES o
8 A
~
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
/g [E REGION ll 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W.. SUITE 3100 c,
9 d'
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 24 In Reply Refer To:
R LO, 0-370J 13 50-414 Duke Power Company ATTN:
W. O. Parker, Jr.
Vice President, Steam Production P. O. Box 2178 Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:
The enclosed IE Bulletin No. 80-18, is forwarded for your information.
Although no written response is required at this time, these concerns will be addressed as part of the licensing process for your plant. If you desire addi-tional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
(
bv James P. O'Reilly Director
Enclosures:
1.
IE Bulletin No. 80-18 w/encls 2.
List of Bulletins Recently Issued cc w/ encl:
M. D. McIntosh, Plant Manager J. C. Rogers, Project Manager J. W. Hampton, Station Manager D. G. Beam, Project Manager 8008280
SSINS No.: 6820 Accession No.:
UNITED STATES 8005050062 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 July 24, 1980 IE Bulletin No. 80-18 MAINTENANCE OF ADEQUATE MINIMUM FLOW THRU CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMPS FOLLOWING SECONDARY SIDE HIGH ENERGY LINE RUPTURE Description of Circumstances:
Letters similar to the May 8, 1980 notification made pursuant to Title 10 CFR Part 21 (enclosure) were sent from Westinghouse to a number of operating plants and plants under construction (list, within enclosure) in early May, 1980.
The letters and the enclosed "Part 21" letter contain a complete description of the potential problem summarized below. The letters indicated that under certain conditions the cent-ifugal charging pumps (CCPs) could be damaged due to lack of minimum flow aefore presently applicable safety injection (SI) termination criteria are met. The particular circumstances that could result in damage vary somewhat from plant to plant, but involve unavail-ebility of the pressurizer power operated relief valves (PORVs), with operation of one or more CCPs repressurizing the reactor during SI following a secondary system high endrgy line break. Since the SI signal automatically isolates the CCP mini-flow return line, the flow through the CCPs is determined by the individual pump characteristic head vs. flow curve, the pressurizer safety valve setpoint, and the flow resistances and pressure losses in the piping and in the reacu. core. That minimum flow may not be adequate to insure pump cooling, and resulting pump damage could violate design criteria before current SI termination criteria are met.
Westinghouse recommends that plant specific calculations outlined in the letter (enclosure) be performed to determine if adequate minimum flow is essured under all conditions. If adequate minimum flow is not assured, Westinghouse recommends specific equipment and procedure modifications which will result in adequate minimum flow. The recommended modifications cssure availability of the necessary minimum flow by assuring that the cini-flow bypass line will be open when needed, but will be closed at lower pressures when the extra flow resulting from bypass line closure might be necessary for core cooling.
DUPLICATE DOCUMENT i $
Entire document previously I
entered into system under:
- 1 l
No. of pages:
r e
-4