ML19344D789
| ML19344D789 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1980 |
| From: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Berry G POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| References | |
| IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, NUDOCS 8004280223 | |
| Download: ML19344D789 (4) | |
Text
.
8 o
UNITED STATES DOCUMENT ROOM
['
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
p WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 49.....,o March 5,1980 Docket No. 50-286 Mr. George T. Berry, Executive Director Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019
Dear Mr. Berry:
RE: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT In our meeting of February 21, 1980 regarding the subject program, we indicated that an accelerated review schedule was being developed for this program and that Zion Units 1 and 2 and Indian Point Units 2 and 3 were being included.
Inclusion in this program exempts these facilities i
from having to respond to IE Bulletin 79-OlB on the same subject. The review schedule is. attached as Enclosure 1, which includes the required date for your submittal. The aim of this program is to accelerate the qualification review process by assuring that the NRC staff, instead of generating questions concerning deficiencies in documentation, can concentrate on (1) review of discrepancies you have identified, and (2) auditing the basis for accepting the qualification of other equipment.
The information to be provided in your submittal is summarized in.
References 1 and 2 of Enclosure 2 were provided to you previously. Where you have previously submitted some of the required information, it is sufficient to incorporate information already on the docket by specific reference.
It is not necessary to resubmit.
However, an orderly organization of the information should be maintained.
For example, if any previously submitted table is changed, revised pages should be submitted. does not show submittal dates for Palisades and Oyster Creek, since the scheduled site visits for these plants precede any practical submittal date. Material provided for these two plants will be upgraded to the level of other plant submittals through a question-and-answer process.
Sincerely,
- C M
, Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #1 l
Division of Operating Reactors i
Enclosures:
As Stated cc: w/ enclosures See next page 8004280 233
Y th Mr. George T. Berry Power Authority of the State of New York March 5,1980 cc: White Plains Public Library Mr. J. P. Bayne, Pesident ;ianager 100 Martine Avenue Indian Point 3 Nuclear Power Plant White Plains, New Yort 10601 P. O. Box 215 Buchanan, New York 10511 Mr. Vito J. Cassan Assistant General Counsel Mr. J. W. Blake, Ph.D., Director i
Power Authority of the Environmental Programs State of New York Power Authority of the 10 Columbus Circle State of New York New York, New York 10019 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Anthony Z. Roisman Theodore A. Rebelowski Natural Resources Defense Council U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 917 - 15th Street, N.W.
P. O. Box 38 Washington, D. C.
20005 Buchanan, New York 10511 Dr. Lawrence D. Quarles Ms. Ellyn Weiss Apartment 51 Sheldon, Hannon and Weiss Kendal at Longwood 1725 I Street, N.W.
Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348 Suite 506 Washington, D. C.
20036 Mr. George M. Wilveniing Licensing Supervisor Power Authority of the State of New Yort 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Mr. P.
'.J. Lyon Manager - Nuclear Operations Power Authority of the State of New York 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 l
l l
L e
ENCLOSURE 1 SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRAM SCHEDULE Licensee Site Visit Consultant Plag Submittal Date (week of)
Final Report Palisades Currently under review 1/21 6/30 Oyster Creek Currently under review 3/10 7/21 Ginna 4/25 5/5 8/4 Zion 2 5/1 5/19
- 8/11 Indian Pt. 3 5/1 6/2 8/18 i
Zion 1 5/1 6/9 8/11 l
In11an Pt. 2 5/1 6/16 9/2 Millstone 1 6/ 2 6/23 9/8 Haddam Neck 6/2 I-7/7 9/15 Dresden 2 6/ 2 7/14 9/22 i
San Onofre 6/2 7/21 9/29 Dresden 1 6/2 7/28 10/6 1
Yankee Rowe 6/2 8/4 10/14 Lacrosse 7/l 8/11 10/20 i
Big Rock Point 7/1 8/18 10/27 i
- Effort will be made to oerform a significant portion of the Zion 1 site evaluation at this time.
~
ENCLOSURE 2 SEP QUALIFICATION PROGRAM SUBMITTAL CONTENT 1.
The emergency procedures and list of safety-related systems addressed in reference 2.
2.
The definition of and basis for the hostile service conditions both inside and outside containment addressed in reference 1 section 4.0, Service Conditions.
3.
The identification and justification of equipment considered qualified by experience in accordance with reference 1 section 4.3.3, Areas Normally Maintained at Room Conditions.
4.
The tabulation of safety-related equipment located in a hostile environment, with identification of the service conditions and qualification testing for each, in the format used for either SEP Topic III-12 or IE Bulletin 79-018 submittals.
5.
The list of equipment in the tabulation of item 4 that is not qualified in accordance with the specific requirements of reference 1, together with justification for the deviations from the guidelines.
Reference 1: Guidelines for evaluating environmental qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in operating reactors.
Reference 2:
Guidelines for identification of that safety equipment of SEP operating reactors for which environmental qualification is to be addressed.
r l
l l