ML19344A960
| ML19344A960 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 02700047, Quad Cities |
| Issue date: | 04/21/1980 |
| From: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Reed C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008250216 | |
| Download: ML19344A960 (2) | |
See also: IR 015000039/1979008
Text
_.
.
,
.
s
h
p ne*o
UNITE 3 STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N
g
,
REGION iti
4
o
,
L
j j
m aoossvatr acao
%
p/
otan zu.vn. u.unois um
.....
APR 21 M
3
Docket No. 5C-254
Consonwealth Edison Company
ATTN: Mr. Cordell Reed
Vice President
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690
r
'
'
Gentlemen:
.
This is in reply to your letter of March 18, 1980 in response to our
Notice of Violation dated February 22, 1980. As discussed below, we do
-
not accept your position that the noncompliance did not occur. Please
review your position and respond, as requested in our February 22, 1980,
1etter, to the following:
(1) corrective action taken and the results
achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncom-
pliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
According to 49 CFR 173.392(c)(8) the outside of each outside package
must be marked " Radioactive - LSA."
49 CFR 171.8 defines "Outside Pack-
age" as the assembly of one or more containers necessary to assure com-
pliance with the requirements of 49 CFR 110-189. As stated in your letter
of March 18, 1980, the HN-100 cask was used as shielding, presumably to
meet the radiation level requirements of 49 CFR 173.393(j)(3) and (4).
We therefore conclude that the HN-100 cask was a necessary "Outside
Package" which required marking in accordance with 49 CFR 173.392(c)(8),
as stated in our February 22, 1980, Notice of Violation.
This noncompliance was incorrectly classed as Severity Level III. This
is a Severity Level IV noncompliance.
l
l
l
.
'
800823o 2 %
.
. . . . . . . _ . .
. _ _ . _ _ . .
...
- -
.
.
._
-_
-
.
. , _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ - . _ _ _
4
~
,
.
Compassalth Edison Company
-2-
g6
We will gladly d4 - s any fu ther quantimas you have concerning this
,
'
matter.
Simcarely.
.
A. 3. Davis, Chief
Feel Facility and
Materials Safacy Branch
ec w/Itr dtd 3/18/80:
Mr. D. L. Fooples, Director
of Euclear Licensing
Mr. E. Ealiv4M4m,
'
.
?lant SWa*endet
Castral Films
Emprodnetton Unic IRC 20b
FDR
'
Imcal FDE
EBIC
-
Mr. Dean Ranse11. Office of
Assistant Attotasy Gemacal
-
,
'
.
. i,.
...
'
.
.
.- -~
~
.
.e
.
... ..
.. _ . . , .
.
g
RIII
RITI
RITI .
RITI -
RTTt
RIIT
'
,
,
br
Fish
Davi
Sp
rd
Ch
s
s
Invend
. summawak
N/I
DATE)
4/10/80
.
nac r r= alas an m us.:si mnem osso
- u.s.novtaNMENT MNTmG OmCE: 19M-ge9 237
._. _ _- -
_ _ _
. . . _ _ -
--
. - - . --
.. ... _
-..
S
,.
,n-,
-.--, . . . - , -
. - , - - -
, - , - - , , ~.
,-
...----n-
-- . , . . - . . .,,,, --. _ , -.- , -. _ .-.,.. -,-, , - - . - - -
,.
'
'
..
'
?~
c A .m u sen
'
One F.rst Peones mara. cuaqo.16ewo_s
Accress Rapty to: Post Othee Boa 767
Chacago, liscoes 60690
)
.
March 18, 1980
,
Mr. James G. Keppler, Director
Directorate of Inspection and
Enforcement - Region III
U. S. Nuclear Regulatcry Commission
799 Roosevelt Road
Glen Ellyn, IL
60137
Subject:
Quad Cities Station Unit 1
Response to IE Inspection
Report No. 15000039/79-08E
NRC Docket No. 50-254
.
Reference (a):
A. B. Davis letter to C. Reed
dated 2/22/80
-
Dear Mr. Keppler:
Reference (a) transmitted the results of an inspection
conducted by Mr. R. A. Brown of Region II on December 19, 1979
and indicated that certain of our activities appeared to be in
noncompliance with NRC requirements.
Commenwealth Edison Co. has reviewed the information
pertaining to the items of inspection and we do not agree that
any items of noncompliance existed.
As indicated in the
attachment to this letter, we believe that the radioactive
waste shipment in question did in fact meet all applicable
requirements of 49 CFR Parts 170-189, as required by 10 CFR 71.5.
Please address any questions you may have concerning
this matter to this office.
.
Very truly yours,
m=
D. L. Pe@les
-
t
-
Director of
Nuclear Licensing
Attachment
2426A
]COh!
dud
h 3 1880
-
--
-<-~
.
~~
. - - -
. . - - . -
._.-__..__.:_.:...._.
,------.:~..--
'
_
-
__ _
-.
. . - - . - - . . .
-
___
-
-
-
. - - - -
_ - - -
.
.
_-
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
- _
.
.
'
.
'
ATTACHMENT
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
NRC Docket No. 50-254
~
Response to Notice of Violation
.
,
The item of noncompliance identified in Appendix A to
,
the NRC letter dated February 22, 1980, is responded to in the
following paragraphs.
-
1.
As required by 10 CFR 71.5,'no licensee shall transport any
licensed materi 1 outside of the confines of his plant or
other place of use, unless the licensee complies with
applicable requirements of the regulations appropriate to
the mode of transport of the Department of Transportation
in 49 CFR Parts 170-189.
Contrary the above, on December 19, 1979, the day of the
inspection, a cask shipped from your Quad-Cities facility
was not marked " Radioactive LSA" as required by 49 CFR
173.392(c)(8).
This is a Severity Level III noncompliance.
Discussion
A review of the information pertaining to the shipment
inspected on December 19, 1979 indicates that the shipment
was conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements.
The shipment of concern was shipment number QC 962 which
l
departed the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station on December
17, 1979.
A copy of the Raoicactive Shipment Record (RSR)
for QC 962 is found in Appendix A.
The shipment consisted of 14 55-gallon DOT Spec 17H drums
in an HN-100 Unit 6 cask.
The RSR specifically stated "The
drums serve as the packages."
Each drum was labeled
" Radioactive LSA" by the manufacturer, in complete
conformance with 49 CFR 172.200 and 172.400 labeling and
marking requirements.
No drum exeeded a Type A quantity,
and thus, all were in compliance with 10 CFR 71.7; each
being an adequate package far the material contained
within.
The packages were in compliance with the General
Packaging and Shipment Requirements of 49 CFR 173.393 and
Lcw Specific Activity Radioactive Material 49 CFR 173.392.
The HN 100 cask was employed solely for shielding
-
purposes.
To label the cask " Radioactive LSA" would be
-
misleading, giving the incorrect impression that the cask
was the package.
This is equivalent to labeling as
.
sany, e
e
ed w bee T.
- , [e ===
een=*
e'
a
" " ~ - = - - -aus'*'8
~~
~~ " ""
'-
-'~~
-
..--.
- .
-.--.
.
. - - -
-- - - _ - - - , . - - - - . , - . . - _ - - _ _ - - . - - - - - _ - _ . . .
. , - - - - . - . , _ _ , , . - . ,
. - . , - - .
.
_
.
.
-
,.
.
.
-2-
.
" Radioactive LSA", any shield or vehicle structure that
encloses packages of LSA material.
49 CFR 172.392(c)(8)
states "The outside of each outside package must be
<l .
stenciled or otherwise marked ' Radioactive LSA'.7
The only
packages employed in the specified shipment, 14 17H 55
'-
gallon drums, were suitably marked.
No violation of
-
'.
applicable regulations existed with this shipment.
.
l
'
2426A
,
.
e
e
-
1
.
e
e
o
e
e
r-
,
-
,
, - - - -
,
,, ,
_
.
een m one--
--
% ., o - . .:
.L.~.
2.. u . _ .. .-
- .,nn...
. . . , , . . . .
.
.
. .. ...
1
-- -----.-- .
-
--
- _ _
,_ .- ._
_
__ _ ,_
__ _
_
_