ML19344A581
| ML19344A581 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/05/1980 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19344A557 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8008210177 | |
| Download: ML19344A581 (2) | |
Text
..
.. ~.
enbyjo UNITED STATES g
2 a-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
{
%....../
i I
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT APPRAISAL BY THE DIVISION OF LICENSING SUPPORTING AMENDMENTS NO. 2 TO CPPR-97 AND CPFR-98 RELATING TO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN i
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-361 AND 50-362 Descriotion of the Proposed Action By letter dated July 17, 1979, and as updated by letter dated June 16, 1980, the Southern California Edison Company (Edison) and the San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDGE) filed a request with the Nuclear Regulatory Commmission to reflect additional ownership interest in the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 (the Facility). The action proposed by the permitees is the issuance of amendments to Construction Permits CPPR-97 and CPPR-98 that would specify the City of Anaheim, California (Anaheim) and the City of River-side, California (Riverside) as additional co-owners of the Station. At this time, Edison holds an 80 percent undivided ownership interest in the Facility and SDGE holds a 20 percent undivided ownership interest. The amendments would transfer a 1.66 percent undivided ownership interest in the Facility from Edison to Anaheim and a 179 percent undivided cwnership interest to '
Riverside, leaving Edison with a 76.55 percent undivided ownership interest.
Edison will retain exclusive responsibility and control over the physi. cal con-struction, operation, and maintenance of the Facility.
The NRC staff's Final Environmental Statement-CP Stage relating to construction of the Facility was issued in March 1973.
Environmental Impact of the Procosed Action The application for transfer of ownership and amendment of Construction Permits states that "No unreviewed environmental impact requiring an environmental impact statement pursuant to 10 CFR, Part 51 is presented by the contemplated transfer of a partial ownership interest in Units 2 and 3 by Edison to each of
' the Cities because such tran' ".r does not involve any design or other physical changes to Units 2 and 3, an
.hanges in the transmission or other facilities associated with Units 2 and,,, any increase in effluents created by Units 2 e...
and 3. or any~ increase in the authorized power levels for Units 2 and 3".
The applicant also states that Edison will' remain the organization responsibla for Faciltiy design, construction, operation, and maintenance.
e, e
4
.M e
,[
4.p sooMo 17 7 S
S
2_
Conclusion and Basis for Negative Declaration On the basis of the foregoing information, the NRC staff concludes that there will be no environmental impacts resulting from the proposed action in addition to these impacts predicted and evaluated in the NRC staff's Final Environmental
~Stateant-CP Stage issued in March 1973 or the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Initial. Decision of October 15, 1973. Having reached this conclusion, the NRC staff has further concluded that no environmental impact statement for the proposed action need be prepared, and that a negative declaration to this effect is appropriate.
Dated: August 5, 1980.
0 1
.)
~
/
.3
- 7.'
g
- w hp g,,h g aN,..4,
, hg
,3 3
a
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DOCKET NOS. 50-361 AND 50-362 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
~
SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE THE CITY OF ANAHEIM NOTICE CF ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS TO CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Notice is hereby given that the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Comission) has issued Amendment No. 2 to Construction Permit No. CPPR-97 and Amendment No. 2 to Construction Permit No. CPPR-98. The amendment reflects the addition of two new co-owners of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3 (the facility).
Initially, the construction permits were issued to Southern California Edison Company and Sar. Diego Gas and Electric Company. Amendment No. 2 adds as co-owners the City of Riverside and the. City of Anaheim. Southern California Edison Company has sole responsibility for the design and construction of the facility, which is located in San Diego j
i County, Califernia.
The application for the amendments complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the l
Comission's rules' and regulations. The Comission has made appropriate find-ings as required by the Act and the Comission's rules.and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the amendments.
Prior public notice of the amendments was not required since the amendments _ do not involve a significant hazards consideration.
For further details with' respect to this action, see (1) the application for amendment dated July 17, 1979, ar.d supplemental information dated June 16, f-st..
Om w.m oly o 300 & 30(.099
2-1980, (2) Amendment No. 2 to Construction Permit No. CPPR-97, (3) Amendment No. 2 to Construction Permit No. CPPR-98, (4) the Commission's related Safety Evaluatioh, (5) the Environmental Impact Appraisal and (6) the Negative Declaration supporting the amendments to the construction permits. All of these items are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N. W., Washington, D. C., and at the Mission Viejo Branch Library, 24851 Chrisanta Drive, Mission Viejo, California.
In addition, a ccpy of the above items (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) may be obtained upon request, addressed to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 20555, Attention: Director, Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this 5th day of August,1980.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY CCMMISSION Hulk V A. Schwencer.. Acting Chief.
Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing m
Y 9
9 e
0 l
- ~;.
w.w
/
_