ML19340E485

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reiterates NRC 800913 Request for Safety Evaluation of Sds. IE Circular 80-18 Stated That Evaluation Should Include Basis for Determining Whether Unreviewed Safety Question Exists
ML19340E485
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/24/1980
From: Snyder B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hovey G
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
References
IEC-80-18, NUDOCS 8101140671
Download: ML19340E485 (1)


Text

/~

f[pa arc o

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y

3er i

W ASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

  • /.E

.\\;M DEC 2 41980

~

Docket No. 50-320 Mr. Gale Hovey Vice President and Director of TMI-2 Metropolitan Edison Company P.O. Box 480 Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057

Dear Mr. Hovey:

13, 1980 (TLL 478) and December 2, 1980 We have reviewed your letters of October 13, 1980 (TLL 629) which were submitted in response to our letter of September requesting a comprehensive written safety evaluation of the S 10, 1980 (TLL 160) provide 10 CFR Part 50.59.

tion Report (TER) submitted with your letter of AprilTherefore, we are reiterating our re-an evaluation of the type we requested.Furthamore, since your letter of December 4, quest for such a safety evaluation.1980 (TLL 632) indicates that the SDS also address these revisions.

As noted in I.E. Circular No. 80-18, a copy of which was enclosed with our lette your safety evaluation should include the basis for deter-The criteria to be of September 13, 1980, mining whether or not an unreviewed safety question exists.

considered in making this determination are specified in (i)-(iii).

uation by January 9,1981.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Don Bri (301-492-8929) of my staff.

Sincerely, c!

.JL,h w Bernard J. Snyder, Program Director TMI Program Office Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 810114 O M I R