ML19340D541
| ML19340D541 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/17/1980 |
| From: | Dietch R SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | Mccorkle G NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8012310092 | |
| Download: ML19340D541 (4) | |
Text
s Southern California Edison Company
[E A O. Box 800 2244 WALNUT GROVE AVENU C aoseucao. c4ureaNia smo
.c,,,,3,,,c, m._
wic s *=e s.c t =t 2i3 572-4644 Deceber 17, 1980 Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Attention:
G. W. McCorkle, mief Physical Security Licensing Branch 2
Division of Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cm mission Washington, D.C. 20555 Genticraen.
Subject:
Docket No. 50-206 Physical Security Requirenents San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 1 Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(p), the purpose of this letter is to advise you that a change has been made to the San Onofre Unit 1 Physical Security Plan. 'Ihe change involves the specific response capabilities of the U.S. Marshals Service, Southern District of California in San Diego.
Following discussions with representatives of the U.S. Marshals Service concerning the change and the basis therefor, m have determined that the change does not decrease the safeguards effectiveness of the Physical Security Plan. The change has also been reviewed with m ebers of your staff.
Specifically, an naministrative change has been made in the immHnte law enforement assistance provided by the U.S. Marshals Service which has an insignificant impact on the overall, workable response plan established at San Onofre Unit 1 in the event of industrial sabotage or other criminal activities. The enclosed letter dated June 18, 1980 fre Faard Safir, Assistant Director of Operations, Office of the Director, U.S. Marshals Service to David R. Pigott, Attorney for Southern California Edison Canpany, sets forth the latest response capabilities of the U.S. Marshals Service.
The overall, workable response plan establisbad at San Onofre Unit 1 is described in Chapter 1 of the Physical Security Plan. Except for the response capabilities outlined in the enclosed letter, all other aspects of the response plan rmnin unchanged.
In accordance with 10 CFR 73.55 (h) (1), the enclosed letter supersedes Exhibit 1-2 of
(
Chapter 1 of the Physical Security Plan as tne letter of understanding h 4 ;i which confirms the specific respcnse capabilities of the U.S. Marshals g
Service.
FO ! 2 310D%
G. W. McCarkle Page Two Washingtcn, D.C.
December 17, 1980 In accordance with Section 2.790(d) of the NRC " Rules of Practice",
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, you r.re requested because of the nature of this matter to withhold the enclosed letter frcm public disclosure.
If you have any questions, or desire further information concerning the enclosed letter, please contact me.
Very truly yours, n
Enclosure cc:
R. H. Engleken, Director, OIE, Region V Howard Safir, Assistant Director for Operations, Office of the Director, U.S. Marshals Service Jees R. Laffoon, Lhited States Marshal, Southern District of California in San Diego R. C. Mcdonald, Colonel, USMC, Provost Marshal, Cap Pendleton David R. Pigott, 011ckering and Gregorf