ML19340B424

Requests That Util Resubmit as Suppls to FSAR Proposed QA Program That Will Fulfill Requirements of App B to 10CFR50. Forwards Specific Comments on 710623 QA Program Description

ML19340B424
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay
Issue date:	12/04/1972
From:	Skovholt D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Brian Lee COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8010230746
Download: ML19340B424 (4)

Text

.

DEC 1 572 Docket Nos 50-1 50-237,

.0-249, 5

+ and 50-265 Commonwealth Edison Company AT*IN:

Mr. Byron Lee, Jr.

Assistant to the President Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 Gentle =en:

Our review of previous submittals describing quality assurance programs at Dresden and Quad-Cities Stations indicates that the quality assurance f

programs as described must be revised to fulfill the requirenents of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.

A quality assurance program for the Zion Station was submitted as Amendment No. 22 to the Final Safety Analysis Report.

On Nove=ber 3, 1972, the Co= mission issued Safet';

Guide No. 33, Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operation),

copy enclosed. These two documents should be used as basic guidance in revising your quality assurance programs. Deficiencics in your present quality assurance programs for Dresden Unit 1 are noted in i

the letter from Boyce Grier, Directorate of Regulatory Operations, to Byren Lee, Jr., dated October 19, 1972, and in the enclosed specific co=ments on your quality assurance program description dated June 23, 1971 (Docket No. 50-10).

These doctr-cuas should be used as additional guidance in developing an acceptable program.

i Using the above noted documents as guidance, we request that you resubmit,

..s supplements to the Final Safety Analysis Reports, a proposed quality assurance prograc for the Dresden and Quad-Cities Stations that will fulfill the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50.

Your progrcn should be submitted within 60 days from the date of this letter with one signed original and fifty-nine additional copics.

Sincerely, y.W...l.? "

+

v.

Donald J. Skovholt issistant Director for 1

Operating Reactors l

Difectorate cf Licerefr+

cm:E 1C;ur.ca.Ind..;,.... Scc..ntxt age...........

80.102so7qg

v

}

i Commonwealth Edison Company. _ -

i

Enclosures:

l '. Specific c-n ts 2.

Safety Guide No. 33 cc w/cnclosures:

J.g1 W. Rowe, Esquire Morris Public Library f

Isham, Lincoln & Beale 604 Liberty Street

]

Counselors at Law Morris, Illinois 60451 i

One First National Plaza (For Docket Nos. 50-237 & 50-249) l Chicago, Illinois 60670 l

Moline Public Library i

Mr. Charles Whitmore 504 - 17th Street President and Chairman Moline, Illinois 61265 i

Iowa-Illinois Gas and (For Docket Nos. 50-254 6 50-265)

{

E)'cu!c Company i

2Co East Se ond Avenue Davenport, Iowa 52801 I

i Distribution Docket Files DRs

{

~

Local PDRs

}

RP Reading j

Branch Reading 1

DJSkovholt, L:0R i'

TJCarter, L:0R ACRS (16) i R0 (3)

{

J. Scinto, OGC M. Rarman, OGC l

DLZiemann, L:0RB #2 j

RDSilver, L:0RB #2 JIRiesland, L:0RB #2 R'IDig gs, L:0RB #2 CVa:J;iel, L:0S RHouston, L:0S 4

9 I

1 1

Ii 1

I L:0RB #2 L:QRBj2 j L:0S g L:Q)

L:0F.B #2 L:tR RDSilver: 5jhg h/k CRV2it icl c 1)ds

/Il 7

~

PMi'ggs

. RHouston'.

MHVelinar DLZicE&r DJ51avhcit JIRies lan de: s

,, u. e,

d[i!i'

' 2'

^

11/20/72 11/2[ /72..

llb 72 7

]M

' ~

ci t -

'*hcf3 AECM 0240

. AEC

J l

i~

t 1

SPECIFIC C01CICiTS i

1.

QA Program for Operations for Dresden 1, submitted June 23, 1971 a.

Each criterion should be addressed separately i

b.

Specific deficiencies are listed below:

Criterion Items that should be addressed V

1.

Activities affecting quality which are prescribed and acccx:plished by documented instructions,,ro-cedures, or drcvings, as appropriate.

i 2.

Acceptance criteria established to assure that important activities have been accomplished satisfactorily.

XI 1.

A test program to assure that required testing is identified and performed in accordance with written test procedures.

1 2.

Procedures which incorporate the requirements and acceptance limits as found in the FSAR and f

the Technical Specificat. ions.

t

~

3.

Proof tests prior to installation nrcoperational tests, and operational tests.

[

4.

Provisions to assure that procedures cover all prerequisites.

i 5.

Adequate test instrumentation availability and use.

6.

Tests performed under suitable environr. ental conditions.

7.

Tests results docu ented and evaluated to assure that the test requircacnts have been enticfied.

IIV 1.

Systems (e.g., star.ps, tags, labels, cards) to show the status of inspectio% and tests of plant equipment.

I-rrri:E

• g { f'.

t G.Eji d { { #,j 9

Ie I

t 1 i Criterion It ene. that should be addressed XIV 2.

Measures to indicate which equipncnt has satisfictorily passed inspections and tests.

XVIII 1.

Audits performed in accordance with written procedures and checklists by trcined personnel not having direct responsibility in the area j

being audited.

2.

Documentation and review of audit results by management having responsibility in the arca j

audited.

3.

A reaudit conducted in areas where deficiencies were noted.

l 2.

Fuel Management: Discuss the quality assurance progra=s and quality control checks that are designed to assure the meclmnical integrity of your fuel over its anticipated lifetime, including the design review ef fort, review and audit of quality assurance measures, and your planned inspections of the fuel upon delivery. Indicate how your QA program with respect to fuel design and fabricatien will einf rize possible failures from clad hydriding, clad collapse and UO -clad interaction. Describe the efforts to cpply the i

2 principles and practices of statistical quality contrel, reliability.,

and other recognized good practice in this aren.

i

?

e a

q, G. ! Al CV '.4P l