ML19340B397
| ML19340B397 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone, Dresden, Palisades, Oyster Creek, Haddam Neck, Ginna, San Onofre, Yankee Rowe, La Crosse, Big Rock Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/22/1977 |
| From: | Silver R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TASK-***, TASK-RR NUDOCS 8010220686 | |
| Download: ML19340B397 (8) | |
Text
U 5
y
".~.'
3*'
X1 c
s(b NOV22M
!!E"0RA!!DUM FOR:
D. Eisenhut, Assistant Director for Operational Technology FROM:
R. D. Silver, Systematic Evaluation Progran Review Group h.
V:
THRU:
D. L. Ziemann, Leader, Systematic Evaluation Progran Review Group
SUBJECT:
SUlt1ARY OF MEETItiG ON 140 vel 1BER 17,1977 TO DISCUSS U
THE SYSTEMATIC EVALUATI0ll PROGRAM (SEP)
On liovember 17, 1977 the HPR staff met with representatives of the licensees involved in Phase II of the SEP to inform then about the
,,x,
progran and answer questions.
=:
A list of attendees is presented in Enclosure 1.
The neeting was opened by E. Case, Acting Director of the Office of
~
Huclear Reactor Regulation who su:marized the bases for and the high-lights of the program. Mr. Case emphasized several points including:
.1.
!IRC believes the program is important and must be acconplished.
~ '
2.
The need for the program evolved because of changes in the licensing review process and changes in licensing criteria.
He noted that in
'i the early days, licensing was done on an ad hoc basis and the rationale on bases for safety was not always docu ented in a manner whic,h is clear today.
He emphasized that the need for the review
..J does not nean that there is a safety problea at any operating
~~
facility a najor concern is a lack of readily available infornation which hinders efficient and effective staff evaluations.
3.
The revie,r app cach selected should provide the appropriate cocunenta-p ~
tion and result in a minimum inpact on the licensees a..d flRC resources.
~
E 4.
Operating experier.ce, use of non-safety systems and UASH-1400 insights will be considered in the staff evaluations.
&l 5.
The staff manpower for the SEP program has been approved by Office 7
of Management and Budget and by Congress and the progran has been
' ^.
approved by the Cocmission.
- Z t:
i or rec s
- su=Maast >
oats >
Farm AIC318 (Rev. 9 53) AECM 0240 W u. s. novsanusur pai= vine oprica.,,r..
pp m o
801022O h [
[
foom om.Jul o
...e.1 s.
NRC FORM 318 (9 76) NRCM 0240
'dr u. s. oovsamurar enenrine orrican sore -ens.eae
^
, ?~
s}1 e-g
=l D. Eisenhut........
i+
5.
The implementation of pc;1tions developed for generic issues will be coordinated with the SE,P.;,",';;],
6.
Phase II of SEP will inc1ude review of eleven facilities. After Phase II is completed a decisio'n'will~bs'made regarding an SEP reviewofadditionalfacilitie;s,'.'];,~",',;.
The question of the relationship;;of this program to licensing 4...
7.
E fees is still being studied.,;
] ;~;;;;
8.
The staff intends to meet with th,e ACR,S an,d with the AIF to infom them of the program.
- 7 N
After the meetinge the meeting attendees were provided copies of the t=
generic Topic List which will bd the basi,s 'for plant specific lists.
I i
4 R. D. Silver Systematic Evaluation Program k
Review Group Division of Operating Reactors' h
Enclosure:
p-List of Attendees
';' f i
- i. -.
=
L e<
u@
GP cav
\\o g
' SEP'/ DOR AD/pJ/j0R RS M e"r' l'
DZiemann 11/ Jp77 31/21/77
_ lly/77
~
NRC FORM 318 (9-76) NRCM 0240 W un s. oovsanusur ensurine orracs. sore -ene.ea4
(;
==
DISTRIBUTI0ft Docket File 0-1~0 0-29/50-206/50-155/50-409/50-244 50- 9/50-213/50-237/50-245/50-255)
NRC POR
~
Local PDR SEP Reading NRR Reading E. G. Case V. Stello K. R. Goller D. Eisenhut T. J. Carter R. Baer W. Butler B. Grimes L. Shao A. Schwencer D. Davis G. Lear R. Reid W. Russell T. Wambach G. 'ech A. Burger E. Reeves R. Bevan D. Jaffe S. Nowicki G. Vissing OELD OI&E (3)
NRC Participants R. Fraley, ACRS (16)
T. B. Abernathy J. R. Buchanan
.r
== :
Esi
'=*
C-
=
ENCLOSURE 1
- = ;-
LIST OF~ ATTENDEES
~
SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM
==:- -
MEETING NOVEMBER 17, 1977
.;sggg
- .= 5!!
==::=:.
Name Organization
==u-R. W. Klecker NRC/ DOR cr= -
W. S. Hazelton NRC/ DOR
'"==
f==
C. H. Berlinger NRC/ DOR
.== -
N. Anderson NRC/ DOR 2"
D. Fitzgerald NUS Corp.
T. Crimmins JCP&L T. Tipton JCP&L
??6 H. Schierling NRC/ DOR M. Turbak Commonwealth Edison Co.
G. P. Wagner Commonwealth Edison Co.
= :. -~
D. E. Nunn Southern California Edison gs K. P. Baskin Southern California Edison En#=i L. S. Gifford General Electric Co.
R. L. Gridley General Electric Co.
~
3 E. A. Reeves NRC/ DOR J. Parkyn Dairyland Power Coop.
E. B. Tremmel Dairyland Power Coop.
~
R. E. Shimshak Dairyland Power Coop.
~
A. Burger NRC/ DOR A. Schwencer NRC/ DOR A. Mitchell NRC
- = =
C. J.-DeBevec NRC/I&E
==
P. A. DiBenedetto NRC/ DOR G. T. Rahner EDS Nuclear W. A. Paulson NRC T. J. Carter NRC/ DOR R. W. Reid NRC/ DOR E. G. Adensam NRC/ DOR
- +:
R. L. Wright ACRS R. D. Silver NRC/ DOR D. Jaffe NRC/ DOR R. Mecredy Rochester Gas & Electric L. D. White, Jr.
Rochester Gas & Electric J. Arthur Rochester Gas & Electric J. J. Shea NRC/ DOR
.m.,
R. B. Hoffman NRC/DSE R. L. McGuinness Northeast Utilities Serv. Cc.
D. Ziemann NRC/ DOR D. K. Davis NRC/D0R
- s, i
=_
===s rh
-!!S5 5:b
,,;,,. =,::;*f:1
==
'Name
~-^~-'~," Organization J. Reece
~NRC/ DOR J. Guibert NRC/ DOR acc:;E~
E. Case NRC/NRR
- ia:iEI:l D. Eisenhut NRC/ DOR
.... 3;;.
K.-R. Goller NRC/ DOR
~ E=
G. A. Blanc Pacific Gas & Electric ge, P. A. Morris Scand Power, Inc.
ci A. A. Johnson NRC rr; D. A. Bixel Consumers Power R. B. DeWitt Consumers Power W. J. Beckius Consumers Power L. M. Hausler Consumers Power R. H. Groce Yankee Atomic 55;;.
R. A. Szalay AIF
~sil D. W. Edwards Yankee Atomic Electric Co.
l F. E. Greenman Yankee Atomic Electric.Co.
.=.,,
~~
S. E. Bryan NRC/ DOR
.e e..m "L::.
e 4
a
..a e
w
- 2... :, '
..I l
..l
~
EV ALUhTION OF DESIGil BASIS EVENTS (DBE) s COMP ARE Y!!TH CURRENT CRITERI A o
SRP CR1TERIA REGULATORY GUIDES o
1 BRAi!CH All0 ST AFF FOSITIONS e
10 CFR REQUIREMENTS e
YlHERE CRITERi A ARE MET, 00CUMENT ACCEPTASILiTY J. :.:
~
Y!HERE CRITERIA ARE liOT MET, CO.NSiDER ALT ERN AT IV ES JUSTIFICATl0tl FOR OPERATION YllTH DEVI ATION o
DEVi AT10ll DOES t!0T St GNIFICAtlTLY DECREASE LEVEL OF S AFETY PROBABILITY OF EVEllT IS SUFFIClEllTLY.
LO?l C0iiSEQUENCES (MORE REALISTIC) ARE SU FFICIEt!TLY LO?l USE-0F N0ll-SAFETY SYSTEMS TO PERFORM
~
o SAFETY FUi!CTl0f!
ADMINISTRATIVE OR PROCEDUR AL CHAllGES e
AUGl.iE!!TED SURVEl LL ANCE c
SELECTED BACKFITTil18 e
DOCUME!!T RESULTS L
=_
~
J\\
ou o
m : r:
t
....-.1
- ====::-
a ~
Cd O
}--
O
=**
2h LLJ
'l
~. -...
"~E9 8:--
D D
C.:
D D
D C:
D D
D D
LL Co CL C-C::3 co CL-C2 c
Co CJ c.
LL.I LL3 O "
sis.9 g
.. = -
1--
LLJ 2:
LIJ 2 1 ::.:q
~.-
CL LLJ p
C Lt.
F-=
O
~
Z O
.%=2 q:.
<C Z
= =:-
Lt.J
- D LLJ O
C~
=;:..
N
<C Lt)
==
M b
C CO U
D g
x c=
t :J
_J J
-J a
J
-s
.s
-s a
J J
~
cr --
F.-
O >-.
O O
O O
O O
C
~
W LL.
Lt-Lt.
CL U-.
C C
C-L1-C.-
CL CL D-CO C5 g
LL.
O
.J Lt I l--
CO g
LIJ <C p
h :.==:.
O l---
-I g
Z cc O
<C LLJ 3..
sc Z CD L:
~ Co C
J W Z W
O O
==
2 0
~
Z LL CD a
t%
N 1%
C')
CD t%
CD O
U >~'~
O LC CC CC CC CD CO CD CD CC t%
t%
U <
W D
d)
CD CD CD C")
CD CD CD CD C')
CD CM J LLJ C
LAj m
LtJ O
1--
O CO g
2~~
r
~
LtJ O C O
.>-- LLJ C:
~ LLJ 2
E""" D M
Z LLJ O
==C LLJ W
Q-
. q:
5 O
t.LJ C.-
Z LLJ LLJ O
O CE LIJ Z
CE M
N L1.3 CO 1
I-"'*
O Z
Z LLJ O
J C::
LL-M CC Z
O O CO CD aC Z
O O
~ ~ "
1 <
O W
LLJ Z O O
Cr LL.2 F---
<C CW o
LIJ Q
CC CC E
=C O
L1J Q C Cr LL Co M
O kJ 1--
Z Co W
t.LJ Z
Z C.D CC Z
UJ J
-- J C
'I-*
g
<C S--
O Cd 4 O cr
<C
.=:C O
Co C3 J
C5 O
O O
'E CL 9
.