ML19340A662

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-010/74-08,50-237/74-05 & 50-249/74-08 on 740610-14 & 25-26.Noncompliance Noted
ML19340A662
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/20/1974
From: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Ayers T
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML19340A664 List:
References
NUDOCS 8009020602
Download: ML19340A662 (3)


See also: IR 05000010/1974008

Text

~ . ' '

..

-

UNITED STATES

!

1

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

b*.

WASHINGTON. D.C.

20545

l

^

(L"@

.

  • " " *

SEP 2 01974

Commonwealth Edison Company

Docket Nos.50-010

ATTN:

Mr. T. G. Ayers, President

50-237

P. O. Box 767

50-249

Chicago, Illinois 60690

Gentlemen:

This letter refers to the inspection of your activities authorized

under AEC Facility License Nos. DPR-2, DPR-19, and DPR-25, conducted

'sy Mess. s. Dance, Johnson and Knop of this office on June 10-14, 1974,

at the Dresden Nuclear Station near Morris, Illinois, and on June 25-

26, 1974, at the Occmonwealth Edison Company offices in Chicago,

Illinois.

A copy of our report of this inspection is enclosed and identifies the

areas examined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspec-

_

tion consisted of a selective examination of procedures and represen-

tative records, interviews with plant personnel, and observations by

the inspectors.

~

During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities

appeared to be in violation of AEC requirements.

These matters, which

Messrs. Fiorelli, Knop and Keppler discussed with Messrs. Behnke and Lee

on July 30, 1974, at the Commonwealth Edison Company offices and which

Messrs. Dance and Knop discussed with other members of your Senior

Staff, at the Dresden site on July 26, 1974, are identified under

Enforcement Action in the Susnary of Findings Section of the enclosed

inspection report.

This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201

of the AEC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal

Regulations. Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office

within cwecty days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement

or explanation in reply, including: (1) corrective steps which have

been taken by you, and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps

which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when

full compliance will be achieved.

Since our meeting with you on February 14, 1974, we have observed

measurable improvements in the operation of the Dresden Station;

-

however, the actions taken have still not led to the prevention of

similar problems as evidenced by the findings from this inspection.

,

8009020- hO 2

1

-

-

.

'

.

s

,

-

Commonwealth Edison Company

-2-

SEP 2 01974

-

e'

While the progress observed during the past few months is encouraging,

it is F.portant that management continue its efforts,to assure that

all Drenden plant personnel recognize that safe operations and full

compliance with AEC related commitments are top management priority

Furthermore, based on our inspection findings to date, na

matters.

are unable to recommend at this time the issuance of the full term

Operating License'for Dresden 2.

As discussed with Messrs. Behnke

and Lee by Messrs. Fiore111 and Keppler on July 30, 1974, a favorable

recommendation by the Directorate of Regulatory Operations in support

of the Dresden 2 full term license will be contingent on the correc-

tion of the violations identified during this inspection, the steps

taken to prevent the recurrence of these and similar violations, and

the implementation of effective management controls to assure the

safety of operations and full compliance with AEC requirements.

The major fundamental areas chat need your additional attention

include:

1.

Marginal review and followup by members of the technical staff.

~

These, we believe, have resulted from inexperienced personnel and

high staff turnover.

2.

Overtaxing of supervisory personnel. We believe this has resulted

in a reduction in the effective supervision of operating, mainte-

i

nance and QA/QC activities due to less than complete - pervisory

]

planning and followup.

~

3.

Lack of organized training in quality control methods and lack

of complete implementation of your established quality control

procedures. These we believe, have resulted in incomplete under-

standing of quality and administrative requirements and consequently

have adversely affected the implementation of established controls

by those responsible for the conduct of these activities.

4.

Lack of coordinated and updated administrative procedures. This

is resulting in a lack of clarity of applicable procedures which

leads to an increased potential for problems due to questions

relative to the applicability of procedures.

In your reply to this letter, please provide us with your comments on

the actions taken or planned to increase your effectiveness in those

areas.

-

- -

r

.

.

__

.

.,'__

(

. .

.

,

Commonwealth Edison Company

-3-

SEP e o

-

  • u . .,

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice,"

t

Part 2, Title 10, Code 10 af Federal Regulations, a cony of this

notice, the enclosed inspection report, and your response to this

notice will be placed in the AEC's Public Docunent Room.

If this

'

report contains any infor=ation that you or your centractors believe

to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written applica-

tion to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this

'

.

notice, to withhold such information fro:a public disclosure. Any

!

such application must include a full state =ent of the reasons for

!

which it is claimed that the information identified in the applica-

tion is contained in a separate part of the document.

Unless we

receive an application to withhold information or are otherwise

contacted within the specified time period, the written naterial

identified in this paragraph will be placed in the Public Docu=ent

Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will

be glad to discuss them witn you.

Sincerely,

-

I

!

i

John G. Davis, Deputy Director

for Field Operations

Directorate of Regulatory Operaticus

Enclosure:

RO Inspection Report Nos.

050-010/74-08, and

050-237/74-05, and

050-249/74-08

'

Bec: D. K. Knuth

ec:

Byron Lee, Jr., Vice

J. G. Keppler, RO:III

President

RO:HQ (4)

W. B. Behnke, Executive

Licensing (4)

Vice President

'

JMurray, OCC

f

W. Worden

R0 Files

Dresden Station Superintendent w/ encl.

(,,,,,,M-*1"les (Central)

'

PDR w/ encl.

,

I

Local TDR w/ encl.

NSIC w/ encl.

_

DTIE w/ encl.

br m/Ih

Au-JzdT(,d/2 (g"'

i

i

"'h e LA : c, f '\\'b %

my p <>

.L

%g

s

i "/W Cress

I

/

R0 ,

! /" ' OGC bYb i

LRP

!

RO

I

n a _......P.O....f... ._!

'

.

_...r-r------r------------,--------------------------;7-

-- --- -------------

Cdaa7912: 1du

f,.

1.; .

. :

y-=

g 7;7,

> + . o %

A. _

....

SURNAdED*',,__ g, d,,c.j-a,___ _ ,_-J_ ,_,_ _ _ ,_*___3.

,,

a

n

,.,,4

,,_,____p_,,___,___.,

_ _ _ _ , _ _ ,,

____fQ_74_ _ _ _ _ _ ,

_ _ _Q _l_?Q_l} _

_ _ _ _ _ _l_ _ _ l.

_.

.l__ Q_ _0_

_. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _}f,

l

l

__ _

'

.

.].f.l.74____

    • T'**

_

taa. 9.sn accuei

.m s coa , - r .-+ m s or, u

.r,_...m

r