ML19340A570

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Repts 50-010/77-24,50-237/77-22 & 50-249/77-22 on 770824-26,30 & 31.Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Document Attendance of Certain Individuals to Mandatory Retraining
ML19340A570
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/14/1977
From: Little W, Maura F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML19340A568 List:
References
50-010-77-24, 50-10-77-24, 50-237-77-22, 50-249-77-22, NUDOCS 8008270835
Download: ML19340A570 (4)


See also: IR 05000010/1977024

Text

. - _ .

,

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION III

_

y

-

Report No. 50-010/77-24; 50-237/77-22; 50-249/77-22

Docket No. 50-D10; 50-237; 50-249

License No. DPR-02; 19; 25

Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company

P.O. Box 767

Chicago, IL 60690

Facility Name: Dresden Units 1, 2 and 3

Inspection at: Dresden Site, Morris, IL

Inspection Conducted: August 24-26, 30 and 31, 1977

$. A.(awn

f !/ '/!77

1

Inspector:

Maura

,

if

-

/!

Approved by:

W.

.L

ef

Nuclear Support Section

/

'

_

Inspection Summary

Inspection on August 24-26, 30 and 31, 1977 (Report No. 50-010/77-24;

50-237/77-22; 50-249/77-22)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the training program

for unlicensed individuals, and the requalification training program for

licensed individuals. The inspection involved 37 inspector-hours onsite

by one NRC inspector.

Results: Of the two areas covered no items of noncompliance or deviations

were found in one area. One apparent item of noncompliance was found in

one area (deficiency - failure to document attendance of some individuals

to mandatory retraining, Paragraph 2).

1

o W35

.8008og

-

.

.--

.

,

-

. _ - _ .

_

.

-

.

..

- - _ . _

.

~

~

~ ~

.

.

?

DETAILS

1.

Persons Contacted

1

~

  • A. Roberts, Assistant Superintendent
  • B. Zank, Assistant Training Supervisor

N. Howlet, Training Instructor

T. Blackman, Training Instructor

The inspector also talked with and interviewed several other licensee

employees, including instrument mechanics, rad-chem technicians, elec-

j-

trical helpers, equipment attendants, and subcontractor personnel.

!

  • denotes thc.se present at exit interview.

!

2.

Requalification Training

k

J

'

The inspector verified that for the 1976-77 school year a requali-

fication program which met the requirements of the "Requalification

3'

Program for Licensed Operators, Senior Operators, and Senior

Operators (Limited)",- approved by the NRC on May 11, 1977, was

carried out.

I

Due to scheduling problems experienced in prior years, the requali-

j

fication program for the school year to start in September 1977 has

.

been modified. Under the proposed program all subjects are covered

,

within a 4 day week and are repeated each week to ensure all person-

-

nel are covered prior to the expiration date of their license.

Each semester the material covered under a specific subject is

varied. The problem with this new method is the possibility.that

the lectures may not cover each subject to the depth required by

i

individuals for whom the Icctures are mandatory (those who receive

l

a grade 4 80 on a particular subject on their last annual examination),

and that the quiz given at the end of the week may only have

ne or

(

two questions on each subject covered. While the proposed program

1

appears to be satisfactory for most licensed individuals it does not

satisfy the requirements for those individuals for whom attendance to

specific lectures and taking of quizzes is mandatory. This item was

discussed at the exit interview.

The inspector reviewed the records of several licensed individuals

and found them to meet the requirements of the Requalification Pro-

j

gram approved by the NRC on May 11, 1977, and the applicable

i

I

I

-2-

,

.

.

-

- , _

__ . , ,

. . - ,

-

,.__m.

,-

,er

,

- . - .

.

-

.- .

--

.

.

Administrative and Training procedures with the exception that

the records failed to indicate that Employee "A" attended a

,

'

mandatory lecture on Engineered Safety Features prior to taking

'

the quiz on February 10, 1977 and that Employee "B"

attended a

mandatory lecture on Instrumentation and Controls prior to taking

_

the quiz in December 28, 1976. This is considered to be a deficiency

from the requirements of Technical Specifications 6.5.B.11.

This

l

item was discussed at the exit interview.

The inspector noted that several licensed individuals are quite

behind in their reading of the " Weekly Required Reading" material.

Some of the individuals, all holders of SRO licenses, are over 26

weeks behind with the worse being approximately 46 weeks behind in

their reading. (The amount of reading material accumulated during

that period is ~2 ft high). All are due for license renewal later

this year. The inspector discussed this at the exit interview point-

ing out that this problem had been discussed with site management on

June 2, 1976, with no apparent success.

The inspector noted that the Dresden Personnel Procedure (DPP-5)

which covers the requalification program fails to address the pro-

gram for licensed off-site personnel. This item was discussed at the

exit interview.

3.

Training Program - Nonlicensed Personnel

.

The inspector verified that a formal training and retraining pro-

-

gram exists for new employees, temporary employees, nonlicensed

operations personnel, technicians and craft personnel. The program

as defined by the Dresden Personnel Procedures (DPP series, revised

May 1977) cover administrative controls and procedures, radiological

health and safety, industrial safety, security procedures, emergency

plan, quality assurance, fire fighting, and on the job training.

Responsibilities to assure that the training program requirements are

met and for the conduct of periodic evaluations of the program are

described in Administrative Procedures DAP 8-1 and 8-2.

The inspector verified by direct questioning and record review that

the required training was provided to two electrical helpers, two

relatively new rad-chem technicians, one instrument mechanic ("B" man)

two temporary employees, three new employees (less than one year),

and two existing employees (over two years).

l

-3-

t

E

O

_

_

__

_

. , ,

- __

_

.__ -

--

-

. -- ~ _.

.

.

During Llw in t ers 16:* the following suggestions were made by the

employees. The suggestions were discussed with site managemant at

the exit interview.

,

Management personnel who are sent for training to vendor's

a.

.

,

school should upon their return train the personnel who

actually maintain the equipment.

b.

Whenever possible, "B" instrument mechanics who have no

specific assignment at the time be -sent with the "A" -IM's

who are doing surveillance testing, calibrations, etc., for

on-the-job training.

c.

Refresher course in the use of Scott-Air Packs should include

the actual use of the equipment in addition to the video tape.

(The inspector noted during the exit interview that this should

~

be mandatory of at least all personnel assigned to fire fighting.)

d.

Equipment, valves, lines, etc., should be marked for easy

identification by new personnel. Such marking would be very

i

beneficial in cases of trouble or emergency.

1

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identified.

i

4.

Exit Interview

The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Para-

graph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on August 31, 1977.

The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection.

The licensee made the following remarks in response to certain of

_

the items discussed by the inspector:

4

,

Acknowledged the statement by the inspector regarding the

item of noncompliance (Paragraph 2).

1

4

Acknowledged that there appeared to be problems with the

j

requalification program as planned for the coming school

yeat. They will look into it to see what modifications

have to be made so that it satisfies the requirements for

individuals for whom the program is mandatory (Paragraph 2).

Agreed to include the requalification program for licensed

off-site personnel in procedure DPP-5 (Paragraph 2).

Agreed to consider the recommendations made to the inspector

by interviewed personnel and noted that marking of plant

equipment has been done on all new systems installed during the

last three years and is planned for Unit 2 during the coming

refueling outage (Paragraph 3).

-4-

.

--