ML19340A365
| ML19340A365 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 10/14/1975 |
| From: | Rodgers J FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | Schwencer A NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003250661 | |
| Download: ML19340A365 (30) | |
Text
1 k NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART SO DOCKET MATERIAL
' (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL NO: M/M FILE:
s
, am ee--
FROM: Florida Power Co.
DATE OF DOC DATE REC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER Florida J.T. Rodcers 1 75 10-17-75 XXX
- TO:
A. Schwencer 1 Signed 1
SENT LOCAL PDR XXX CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DOCKET NO:
XXX 1
50-302 DESCRIPTION:
ENCLOSURES:
Ltr. re our ltr of 8-11-75......Trans the Add'l infomation concerning FPC's qualificatic following.....
testing documentation for the 7 groups.of balance of plant Clas,s JE aquipment3......
g Q w ',, ;.:. s -
s
- s. Q g goT td,A #,,
PLANT AME:
Crystal River #3 FOR ACTION /lNFCRMATION VCR 11-6-75 BUTLER (L) gCHWENCER (L) ZIEMANN (L)
REGM (E)
REID(L)
W/ Copies W/,4 Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ COPIES i
CLARK (L)
STOLZ (L)
DICKER (E)
LEAR (L) j W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies PARR (L)
VASSALLO (L)
KNIGHTON (E)
SPIES W/ Copies W/ Copics W/ Copies --
W/ Copies KNIEL (L)
PURPLE (L)
YOUNGBLOOD (E)
Lpx W/ Copics W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ copies INTERNAL DISTRIDUTION 1
[NRL VUHEGTILE)
TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T IND.
SCHROEDER GRIM 3 R. DIGGS (L)
BRAITMAN
/ OGC, ROOM P 506A MACCARY GAMMILL H. GE ARIN (L)
SALTZMAN 1
/
GOULBOURNE (L)W*MELTZ GOSSICK/ STAFF KNIGHT KASTNER E
' CASE PAWLICKl BALLARD P KREUTZER (E)
GIAMBUSSO SHAO SPANGLER J. LEE (L)
PLANS BOYD' f STELLO M.RUTdBROOK(L)
MCDONALD
-MOORE (L)
HOUSTON ENVIRO S. REED (E)
CHAPMAN DEYOUNG (L)
NOVAK MULLER M. SERVICE (L)
DUBE (Ltr)
SKOVHOLT (L)
ROSS DICKER S. SHEPPARD (L)
E. COUPE
!IPPOLITO ~3 KNIGHTON M. SLATER (E)
PETERSON GOLLER (L) (Ltr)
TEDESCO YOUNGBLOOD H. SMITH (L)
HARTFIELD (2)
P. CO LLINS DENISE J. COLLINS REGAN S. TEETS (L)
. KLECKER
_ fEG OPR LAIN AS PROJECT LDR G. WILLI AMS (E)
EISENHUT V. WILSON (L)
WIGGINTON j
VFILE & REGION (2)
BENAROYA
__H AR' ESS R. INGR "4 (L)
MIPC VOLLMER 7b M. DUNCAN (a EXTERNAL DJSTRIBUTION A - LOCAL PDR d44/M
'7 1 -TIC (ABERNATFpi") (1)(2)(10)- NATIONAL LABS 1 - PD R-S AN/LA/NY 1 - NSIC (BUCHAN AN) 1 - W. PENNINGTON, Rm E.201 GT 1 - BROOKH AVEN NAT LAB 1 - ASLB 1 - CONSULTANTS 1 - G. ULRIKSON ORNL 1 - Newton Anderson NEWMARK/BLUME/AGBABIAN
- ACRS HOLDING /SENT 8003250 h I /
.gyggg.
t:geta; Dodet File uar e e
ne
.. c c C,a n :
.<. T,' '
u.
o s
y ale z
Qew p.s
- g c, C ' ' ' ~ '
October-14, 1975 3
/,.
Mr. A. Schwencer,-Chief Branch No. 2-3
~~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 In Re: Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Unit #3 Docket No. 50-302.
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
Attached are three (3) copies of Florida Power Corporation's (FPC) response to the NRC's Request of Additional Information contained in your letter of August 11, 1975.
The attached response contains information concerning FPC's qualifi-cation testing documentation for the seven (7) groups of balance of plant Class IE equipment, identified in the enclosure of your letter.
Should you require additional information or-discussion concerning our response, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Very truly yours, J
_T. Rodgers Asst. Vice President 3
- s JTR/iw Attachments.
p /p, On/ /fi//n ?,
I
. \\.)
h 6)O,
k'
~
>?~
g '.:
..w~
.c m,
1 d..A..L. *?
~
I.
'Switchgear - Engineered Safeguards 4160 Volts
. A.
Design Specifications (excerpts from Requirement Outline) 1.
One (1) certified copy of'all shop test data for the equipment, properly identified, shall be forwarded to the ENGINEER for acceptance, and three (3) copies shall be sent to the OWNER.
2.
Factory Tests a.
The equipment covered by this Requirement Outline shall be completely assembled in the factory and thoroughly tested in accordance with the latest applicable' standards of USA, IEEE (AIEE) and NEMA governing this type o'f equipment.
b.-
The primary equipment shall be subject to a dielectric test of 19 kv, 60 hertz for one minute between live parte and ground and between live parts of differing polarities. At least one circuit breaker of each current rating being fur-nished under this Requirement Outline shall be inserted into e.ach similarly rated housing to. ensure perfect alignment and interchangeability, All secondary and control wiring shall be subject to a di-c.
electric test of 1500 volts, 60 hertz-for one minute between live parts and ground. __ __
d.
Wire check, circuit continuity and operatien tests shall be-performed to ensure the correctness of.the wiring. Engineered Safeguards units shall each be operationally tested with a 1:
circuit breaker included in this order and tagged for safe-guards use.
One circuit breaker may $e u9ad for each bus.
~
Breaker shall be thoroughly checked for possible effects of multiple operations-before shipment. Tests and inspection
'shall be certified and circuit breakers used shall be identi-s-
'fied for record purposes.
L.
Pagn 2 3.
Seismic Design. Requirements a.
The Engineered Safeguards Bus 3A and the Engineered Safe-guards Bus 3B, assemblies 3 and 4 respectively, are designated seismic Class I ' mad shall be designed in accordance with the criteria for seismic conditions as outlined in b, below.
Class I designation is applied to structures, components, and systems including instruments and controls whose failure might cause or increase the severity of a loss of coolant accident
~
or result in an unc ontrolled release of excessive amounts of radioactivity and.those structures and components which are vital to safe shut down and isolation of the reactor.
b.
Seismic Conditions are as follows:
(1) Primary steady state stresses, when combined with the seismic stress resulting from the response to a ground acceleration of 0.05 g acting horizontally and 0.033 g acting vertically and occurring simultaneously, shall be maintained within the allowable working stress limits accepted as good practice.
~
(2) Primary steady state stresses, when combined with the seismic stress resulting from the response to a ground acceleration of 0.10 g acting horizontally and 0.'067 g acting vertically and occurr:.r.g simultaneously, shall be limited so that the functfon of the component, system, or structure shall not be impaired as to prevent a safe and orderly shut down of the plant.
(3) Design acceleration spectra as shown on Fig. 1 attached.
(4) Response spectrum for design as shown on Fig. 3 attached.
(5) Site ground level elevation at 95'-0".
(6) Switchgear shall be. installed at elevation 103'-0".
r.-
Piga 3
-c.
Seismic Test Data The CONTRACTOR shall submit with his bid Proposal to the OWNER, for his review and evaluation, actual Seismic Test Data covering tests performed on equivalent equ'ipment to that offered with the bid.
The Test Data shall be in sufficient detail to pro-vide documented evidence that the equipment offered will satisfactorily withstand without malfunction seismic forces equal to or
- greater than the minimum specified herein. So called " Shock" tests will not be considered in lieu of true seismic tests.
The CONTRACTOR shall perform and submit two (2) copies of formal calculations of the seismic analysis to the ENGINEER for record purposes which will be held available for inspec-tion and quality _ assurance.
4.
Copies of all seismic documentation, certificate of compliance, and certified test reports shall be furnished on or before final shipment.
5.
All equipme*' will be subject _to final inspection and approval by the OWNER and/or his consultants.
B.
Procedures l.
The equipment was' tested in accordance with ITE Imperial Corp. test procedures covering the requirements as stated above.
2.
Copies of the-ITE Imperial Corp. procedures are NOT available at Florida Power Corporation.
C.~
~ Acceptability 9
1.
The test results were reviewed by:
ITE Imperial Corp.
a.
~b.
Gilbert Associates, Inc. vendor inspector for FPC. A certif;.-
cate of compliance was issued by ITE Imperial' Corp. stating mk
IPega4 in part that all requirements of the customer (FPC) were i
satisfied, dated.1/7/71. Als, a certificate of inspection was transmitted from Gilbert Associates dated'1/7/71 stating in part that all requirements of the Purchase Order had been met by ITE for Florida Power Corporation.
2.
Seisinic Design Requirements were addressed and complied with.
~
A certificate of compliance concerning ITE test report #R8793 was transmitted to FPC, dated 12/21/70.
f 4
en O
C i
t i
n e
1 4
ana w
.n c.-
e e-
,n
-n
,m--
u
11.
Motsr Contr71'C nt'r magin"hr~d S9fcguerd 480 volta.
A.
Design Specifications. (excerpts from Requirement Outline) 1.
One (1) certified copy of all shop test data for the equipment, properly identified, shall be forwarded to the ENGINEER for acceptance, and three (3) copies shall be sent to the OWNER.
2.
Factory Tests a.
The equipment covered by this Requirement Outline shall be
~
completely assembled in the factory and thoroughly tested
'in accordance with the latest applicable standards of ANSI,
~
IEEE, and NEMA governing this type of equipment.
b.
The equipment shn11 successfully pass a standard high poten-tial test for 600 volt equipment i.e., 2,200 volts between phases and between phase and ground for one minute. At least one unit of each rating furnished under this Require-ment Outline shall be inserted into each housing of similar ratings to ensure perfect alignment and interchangeability.
c.
All secondary and control wiring shall be subject to a dielectric test of 1500 volts, 6C Sertz, for one minute i
between live parts and ground. Wire check, circuit continuity, and operation tests shall be performed to ensure the correct-ness of the wiring.
\\
d.
All Engineered Safeguard combination starters shall be operationally tested in their units. Test and inspection.
shall be certified.
s e.
Copies of all test and inspection reports.shall be furnished to the ENGINEER and to the OWNER in accordance with the GENERAL CONDITIONS.
3.
Seismic Test Data
.a.
~The CONTRACTOR shall submit with his Bid Proposal to the 0WNER, j
Pcg3. 2 ~
~
~
'for his review andLevaluation, actual Seismic. Test Data 4
covering tests performed on equivalent equipment to that
' offered with the bid.
The Test Data shall be in sufficient
. detail to provide documented evidence that the equipment offered will. satisfactorily withstand without' malfunction seis'mid forces equal to or greater than the minimum speci-fled herein;' - So called " Shock" tests' will not be considered in lieu of true seismic tests.
~ ~
'b.
All components associated with the' Engineered Safeguards-control centers, assembly numbers 3, 4, S, 6, and 7,.and pressurizer heater control centers, assembly numbers 8 and -9, shall be qualified for continuous-duty at 50 C.
All'com-ponents associated with the remaining control centers, assembly numbers'1, 2,. and 10 thru 20, shall be qualified -
-for continuous' duty at 40 C.
The CONTRACTOR shall provide written confirmation of this qualification.
Copies of certificate of' compliance and certified test c.
reports shall be furnished on or'.before final shipment of -
_ equipment.
d.
. Equipment will be subject to final inspection-and approval by the_ OWNER and/or his consultants.
B.
Procedures 1.
LThe Nbtor, Control Centers and associated equipment were manufac-
.tured and. tested:by t... Allen _Bradley Co. using their procedures.
'2.
LCopies'of the Allen.Bradley-Co. procedures are available at'-
Florida Power Corporation.
m 8
?
Ptg3 3 C.
Acceptability 1.
The testing requirements as called out in the above FPC require-ment outline were met by the following letters and certificates
' of compliance.
Letter of 10/9/72 from, Allen Bradley Co. stating that all a.
applicable FPC Specifications were met.
b.
Transmittal from Allen Bradley Co. dated 5/5/72 containing certified completed test procedure results on subject equip-
~
ment.
Letter of 5/9/72 from Gilbert Associates stating that they c.
had reviewed Allen Bradley Co.'s test report transmittal and had accepted their results, d.
Certificate of inspection dated 5/11/72 from Gilbert Associates on subject equipment.
Letter from Allen Bradley Co. dated 4/14/72 stating that sub-e.
ject equipment meets 50*C continuous duty requirement.
2.
Seismic Design Requirements were addressed and complied.with as evidenced by:
a.
Seismic test report dated 1/17/72 from the Allen Bradley Co.
'\\
concerning test done on 11/4/71.
b.
Letter from Gilbert Associates dated 5/26/72 stating in ffect that the results of the Seismic tests were acceptable.
Letter of review and approval frob Florida Power Corporation c.
Generation Engineering Section dated 11/10/71.
e 4
Fe--o m-
III Valve' Operators (in' containment)
- A.
- Design Specifications (excerpts from Requirement Outline) 1.
Electric l Motor Operators a.
Valves designated MO in the Operator column of the Valve List shall be provided with a. Philadelphia gear limitorque a-c or d-c uctor operator as designated. No motor control equipment shall be included.
b.
Motors:
(1) Electric motors used for valve operators used everywhere except in the Auxiliary Building and Reactor Building shall be as follows:
(a) totally enclosed with Class H powerhouse insulation and rated 460 volts, 3 phase, 60 hertz a-c for op. ration in an ambient temperature of 40 C with allowable maximum temperature-risc of 75 C by resistance at 100% rating; (b) totally enclosed with Class H powerhouse insulation and rated 240 volts d-c for operation in an ambient temperature of 40 C.
'(2) Electric motors for valve operators used in the Auxiliary Building shall be the same as above except suitable for operation in 50 C ambient with a maximum temperature rise of 65 C.
(3) Electric motors for valve operators used in the Reactor Building shall be the same as those in subitem (1) above, except furnished with Class H insulation and suitable for operation in an atmosphere as follows:
1st 24 hrs following hypothetical accident 7
Radistion 5 x 10 Rem
" Temperature.
280*F
-External Pressure 55 psig Vapor Spray Demineralized Water containing 3000 ppm boron as H B0 ' 1% by wt. Na2 2 3-3 3 S7
-(sodium-thiosulphate) plus NaOH to pro-duce a pH=9
Pag 3 2
'Ist six months following hypothetical accident 7
Radiation 5 x 10 Rem Temperature 140*F Pressure atmospheric Valve operator manufacturer to certify that the operators furnished for this service have been qualified by test.
(4) All motors shall be suitable for operation in atmospheres
~
containing saline moisture, weak acid fumes, and abra-sive dust.
c.
Enclosures for limit owitches and torque switches are to be of weatherproof construction.
d.
Motor bearings shall be the permanently lubricated type. The grease and oil in the motor operators shall be certified to be radiation resistant.
Space heaters shall be furnished rated 115 volts a-c and cap-e.
able of maintaining dry electrical equipment conditions inside the motor and equipment enclosures during such times as con-struction to avoid condensation formation.
f.
Each valve operator shall include one pair of electrically independent torque switches with a single contact to open on
~
excess torque during opening-of the valve and a single contact
~
to open on excess torque during the closing of the valve. The closing torque shall be set as near to the " pull-out" torque of the motor as possible without damaging electrical equipment, or. components of the valve.
g.
Each valve operator shall include a four-train geared sliding contact type limit switch. Each train shall have.two normally open and two normally closed electrically. independent contacts.
-l I
P;g3 3 Each train shall be independently a'djustable to operate at any desired position of~ valve stem travel.
h.
Each valve operator shall have an auxiliary manual handwheel-clutch and gear train independent of the motor gear train capable of closing the valve against valve hydrostatic test pressure. Manufacturer shall state the actual required maximum rim pull required to operate the valve manually
~
through its full range of travel at maximum design flow
-~
conditions.
In no case shall the required rim pull exceed 50# or the required torque exceed 80 lb-ft.
i.
The operator shall be designed to ensure positive tight shut off against maximum design flow conditions. These conditions are represented on Valve List as the Differential' Pressure and Working Temperature.
The pressure, but not necessarily the maximum Differential Pressure the system will experience.
The maximum operating pressures and temperatures shall be, in any case, accounted for in the pressure rating of the valve.
j.
Operator housings, supports and connections to the valve shall be designed with a 150% minimum factor of safety based on the yield strength of the material.
k.
Operators shall be designed to maintain stem position upon loss
- of power.
1.
Provisions f'or handling the valve operator with the bonnet s
attached should be included in the design.
m.
- A local position indicator shall be supplied on each motor q
. operator.
.,_ n.
- Each' motor operator shall additionally be furnished with 'a lug
^
or'nat mounted on the declutchable handwheel suitable for air 1
wrench operation of thE valve. The lug or_ nut shall be the 1
a e
+
y
~ Pcgh 4' same as that specified and with' the spinner handle removed from the wheel.
o..
Motors shall be designed and be satisfactory for across-the-line starting.
Starting current shall not exceed six (6) times rated full load current at rated voltage. No starting compensators will be used. Motors may be subjected to repetitive starts during commissioning of the plant.
Limita-tions which should be observed to prevent overheating of motors due to frequent starting duty shall be clearly stated in the Proposal and shall be shown on the motor nameplate
~
and included in the instruction book. Motors shall be suit-able for a minimum of two (2) starts from ambient or one start from rated load temperature, using the actual load WK,
2 p.
Zinc, copper, aluminum, lead, or lead-containing materials shall not be used for components of the motor operators exposed to the atmosphere within the Reactor Building.
Ex-posed carbon steel or iron shall be painted in accordance with 2a.
2 Painting 1
Exposed carbon steel surfaces of valves and valve operators a.
to be installed in the Reactor Building shall receive one (1)
L coat of Wisconsin Protective Coating Company's Plasite 7155 hP Primer, 2.5 to 3 mils dry thickness.
Finish painting shall be one (1) icoat-of-Wisconsin Protective Coating Company's Plasite 9009, 4 mils dry thickness.
Eb.
Valves to be painted.in accordance with 2a shall be distin-guished by'a note, "Special Paint" in the Remarks column of the Valve List.
-.?-
---. -----.- -A- -.
'Pcg3 5 All other valves and their operators shall be shop painted c.
in accordance with the requirements.
3.
Seismic Design Where indicated, the equipment offered shall meet the conditions
. indicated under Classes I and II Seismic Design.
a.
Class I Seismic Design:
(1) The seismic design of the valves and operators shall ensure no loss of function during and after a " Prescribed" seismic disturbance while in cperation at maximum condi-tions. Primary steady state stresses when combined with seismic stresses resulting from a 0.495 g acceleration acting horizontally and a 0.33 g acceleration acting vertically and occurring simultaneously shall be main-tained within those permitted in the designated Piping Code. Primary steady state stresses when combined with seismic stress resulting from a 0.99 g acceleration acting horizontally and a 0.66 g acceleration acting vertically and occurring simultaneously shall be limited to prevent loss of function such as rupture or leakage.
For purposes of calculation, the no loss of function stresses shall be limited to the yield strength of the material.
b.
Class II Seismic Design:
(1), The structural design of. valves in this class shall ensure j
that the primary steady state stresses when combined.with seismic stresses resulting from a 0.495 g acceleration acting horizontally and a 0.33 g acceleration acting
. vertically and occurring simultaneously shall be maintained within those permitted in the designated' Piping Code.
Pego 6 c.=
Class III Seismic Design:
.(1) Design of valves in this claas shall not con. sider any seismic stresses. This class valve is not required to conform to Item 3 of this Requirement Outline but shall conform to remainder of outline.
-4.
Drawings, Data, and Documents a.
For review and approval:
(1) Complete data on valve motor operators, including motor rating (specify time) with full load and locked rotor current, together with maximum stem torque in f t-lbs, seating thrust in pounds, the stem travel speed and time to open or close valve.
(2) General arrangement and sectional drawings showing stem packing details, all principal dimensions, operator arrangement, maintenance clearance requirements and weld or flanged end details.
(3). Valve motor operator outline drawings and wiring schematic f
drawings.
B.
Procedures
- 1..
The subject equipmeat was tested in accordance with Crane /Taulman Company procedures.
2.
Copies of the Crane /Taulman Company pr,ocedures are available at Florida Power Corporation.
C.
- Acceptability 1.
.The results-of tests called out in'the above requirements were met
~
'by the following:
Gilbert Associates letter cf acceptable qualification da'ted a.
9/11/70 on subject equipment.
- ~'t 4
-w N
h M ty u-$
P-7
P ga 7
- b.
Philadelphia Gear /Limitorque valve control test report dated 1/2/69.
-4 e
O O
e-O a mm me O
O t
9 e
e A
IV.
Motors - Engineered Safeguard 4160 volts.
.A.
Design Specifications (excerpts from Requirement Outline) 1.
One (1). certified copy of all shop test data for the equipment.
properly identified, shall be forwarded to the ENGINEER for.
acceptance, and three (3) copies shall be sent to the GWNER.
2.
Factory Tests a.
The motor shall be given a standard short commercial test including running current (light load), locked rotor current, high potential, and bearing inspection.
Copies of repo'rts of these tests shall be furnished to the ENGINEER and to the OWNER in accordance with the GENERAL CONDITIONS.
b.
In each case where identical motors have been manufactured and completely tested, copies of such test reports in-cluding a speed torque curve shall-be furnished to the ENGINEER and to the OWNER in accordance with r.no GENERAL CONDITIONS.
c.
The OWNER may elect to have performance testing conducted on certain motors in accordance with WSAS Standard C50.2 Section 2.~4 dated 1955. Charges for these. tests shall be separately stated in the proposal for each horsepower size specified.
3.
. Seismic, Test Data
-l 5
T>e CONTRACTOR-shall perform and submit two (2) copics of formal calculations of the seisade analysis to the ENGINEER for record purposes which will be held available.for inspection and quality j
-assurance.
Prg'i 2 c
f 14.
' Drawings and Engineering Data Complete certi'fied drawings covering essential dimensions of motors being supplied are required. Essential dimensions shall include the size of the terminal boxes.
Drawings shall also show voltage, full load current, full-load speed, locked rotor
~
current, phase, frequency, insulation, terminal boxes, and knockout sizes, type of bearings and weight. Certified drawings for torque and current vs. speed curves and current vs. safe time curves shall also be furnished.
B.
Pfocedures 1.
The equipment was testedlLn accordance with Electric Machinery Mfg. Co.
test procedures covering the requirements as stated above.
2.
Copies of the Electric Machinery Mfg. Co. procedures are available at Florida Power Corporation.
C.
Acceptability-1.
lThe testing requirements'were adhered to by the following letters and inspector certificates as follows:
a.
E-M induction motor test record dated 12/10/70.
b '.
E-M final _ inspection report dated 12/10/70.
~
c.
E-M report of induction motor routine tests dated 1/6/71.
d.
Gilbert Associates certificate of inspection 'ated-12/17/70.
d
'2.
A complete-set of approved drawings and technical manuals exist-on jobsite.
3.
Calculations 1of seismic analysis were transmitted to Florida Power Corporation on 2/23/70 by Electric Machinery Mfg. Co.
+
v a,
9 V.
Logic Equipment - Engineered Safeguards A.
Design Requirements (ex.aerpts from Requirement Outline) 1.
One (1) certifiaa c9py of all shop test data for the equipment, properly identified, shall be forwarded to the ENGINEER for acceptance, and three (3) copies shall be sent to the OWNER.
2.
Seismic Design Requirements The completely assembled engineered safeguards actuation relay cabinets shall, as a minimum, be capable of withstanding seismic forces in accordance with the criteria for seismic conditions as outlined in item a, below. Class 1 designation is applied to structures, ' components, and systems including instruments and controls, whose f ailure might cause or increase the severity of a loss of coolant accident or result in an uncontrolled release of excessive amounts of radioactivity, and those structures and components which are vital to safe shut down and isolation of the reactor.
a.
Seismic Conditions are as follows:
The completely assembled relay cabinets shall be installed on, and secured to, a concrete floor or wall. The natural fre-quency of the floor will be. in the range of 5.7 to 7.8 cycles per second in the horizontal direction and 10 to 19 cycles per second in.the vertical direction. The following shall be noted:
5 (1) Primary steady state stresses, when combined with the seismic stress resulting from the response to a ground acceleration of 0.05 g acting horizontally and 0.033 g acting vertically and occurring simultaneously, shall be maintained within the allowable working stress-limits v
e
+' t
P ga-2 accepted as good practice.
(Design Basis for Earthquakes).
The acceleration value includes the amplification factor.
(2). Primary steady state stresses, when combined with the seismic stress resulting from the response to an acceler-ation of 0.10 g acting horizontally and 0.67 g acting vertically and occuring simultaneously, shall be limited so that the function of the component, system, or structure shall not be impaired as to prevent a safe and orderly shut down of the plant.
(Design Basis for maximum hypothetical earthquakes). The acceleration value includes the amplification' factor.
(3) Site ground level elevation at 96'-0" (4)
Installation Elevations:
(a) The engineered safeguards actuation cabinets shall be installed at elevation 145'-0".
(b) The RB pressure switch cabinets shall be installed at elevations 108'-2" and 112'-0".
(5)
The estimated weight of the engineered safeguard cabinets is as follows:
(a) Three Engineered Safeguard Channel Cabinets - 650 lbs.
each.
(b) Two Engineered Safeguard Actuation Relay Cabinets -
S 1100 lbs. each.
(c) Six Pressure Switch Cabinets - 100 lbs.:each.
(6) The completely assembled relay cabinets will be installed on, and secured with bolts to, a concrete floor.
- (7) The completely assembled reactor building pressure switch cabinets will be installed and secured to the concrete reactor [ bu.'.lding wall.
~.
a 2-.
Pega 3 b.
Seismic Tests and Data:
The: CONTRACTOR shall submit with his bid Proposal to the OWNER, for review and evaluation, seismic test procedures covering the tests to be performed on the equipment. The test proce-dure shall;be in sufficient detail to provide documented
.eviden,ce that_the equipment will satifactorily withstand without' malfunction seismic' forces equal to or greater than the' minimum specified herein. So called " Shock" tests will l
not' be considered in lieu of true seismic. tests.
L c.,
The Contractor shall perform a shock test which will conform to the impulse test acceleration as stated in item a.
d.
The CONTRACTOR shall perform and submit two (2) copies of test data of the seismic analysis to the ENGINEER for record purposes which will be held available for inspection and quality assurance.
e.
Qualification Tests:
1 O
A qualification test program shall be developed by the t
i CONTRACTOR to satisfy.the specific seismic qualification of l
l the relay actuation cabinets at their relative location in the control room. The tests shall be performed in accordance with the following:
(1)
During the seismic qualification testing accelerometers will be mounted at' the prope*r position on the platform to determine the acceleration at the. equipment platform interface and.at various points in the cabinet to deter-
.{
l
.mine the various "g" loads experienced. Along with each test, a permanent record of the vibrating frequency shall
{
1
-be made, l
i
Pig 2 4 (2)' A representative number of the electrical relaying circuits shall also be monitored during the seismic
. qualification test to determine if there have been any circuitry malfunctions. This is a "no loss of function" test during a~besign Basis Earthquake of item a.,
subitem 1.
(3)' The control section circuitry shall be tested for circuit continuity and insulation resistance before and after the.
seismic test to determine if there have been any mal-2 functions for " safe shutdown test" following a maximum hypothetical earthquake of item a., subitem 2.
(4) The cabinets shall be tested in each of 3 perpendicular g
axes (East-West, North-South, and vertical) to produce a test acceleration as stated in item a.
One of the 3 saf eguard channel cabinets (item a., subitem 5-(a))
shall be tested, one of the 2 ES actuation relay cabinets (item a., subitem 5(b)) or al,ternatively cabinets Sc and
'5 d shall be tested, two pressure switch cabinets (item a.,
subitem 5-(c)) shall~be tested, and one RC by-pass switch cabinet (item a., subitem 5-(e) shall be tested.
In the testing of-the pressure switch cabinets, cabinet 3A4 and any one of the remaining six shall be tested.
3.
The CONTRACTOR shall. furnish.to the ENGINEER and OWNER drawings and descriptive materials within 30 days af ter Contract award.-
The submittal shall include, but not be restricted to, drawings showing'the following:
a.
General. dimension and weight of each relay _ actuation cabinet,-
and-location and cize of opening for cables and power leads.
~
b.
Indicator light panel layout for each rclay nctuation cabinet.
2:g2 5
- 4.-
Equipment Qualification Equipment within the cabinets shall have a certificate of qualifi-
- cation from the manuf acturer that the devices supplied comply with prototype or catalog data.
B.
Procedures 1.
The subject equipment was tested in accordance with Unit Electric Control, Inc. test procedures.
2.
Copies of the Unit Electric Control, Inc. seismic test procedures are available at Florida Power Corporation.
C.
Acceptability 1.
The testing requirements called out in the above FPC tequirements outline were met by the following:
Unit Electric, Inc. checkout list dated 9/12/73.
a.
b.
Gilbert Associates Inspection Services Report of 9/10/73.
Gilbert Associates Certificate of Inspection dated 9/11/73.
c.
d.
Certificates of Compliance from Unit Electric, Inc. dated 9/4/73 and 11/19/73.
Seismic Qualification Test procedure dated 11/13/72.
c.
f.
Seismic. Test procedure approval by Gilbert Associates part one dated 7/7/72 part two dated 11/28/72.
g.
Seismic Test report dated 5/24/72.
h.
Florida Power Corp., Generation Engineering Dept. letter-stating seismic testing'was witnessed, dated 8/9/73.
i.
' Gilbert Associates letter of 8/30/71 containing A.M.C.0. Co.
shock tests.
2.
Instruction / Technical Manuals were sent to FPC on 5/14/73 by Unit Electric Control, Inc.
9 VI.
Cable.
- A.
Design Specifications (excerpts from Requirement Outline) 1.
. One' (1)~ properly identified copy;of fabrication data for the equipment,'shall be submitted to the ENGINEER for review and approval and three (3) copies shall be _ sent - to 'the OWNER.
2.
One (1) certified. copy of all shop test data for the equipment, properly identified, shall be forwarded to the ENGINEER for -
acceptance, and three (3) copies shall be sent to th'e OWNER.
3.
Data Required with Proposal a.
The flame-retardant properties of all cable insulation materials furnished shall be documented and such documents shall be' furnished as part of the bid package, b.
All cable test data, as specified in IPCEA standards S-19-81, publication WC3-1964, Fifth Edition, par. 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.7, 6.9, 6.22, 6.23, and 6.24, shall be furnished for each type of cable tested. Cable tests shall include dielectr'ic tests.
Bidders shall list in.the Proposal all
. tests to be performed. Radiation-resistance documentation shall be furnished for each type of insulation material in
-the Proposal.
~
Insulation thickness, sheath (jacket) thickness, ampacity c.
in air, ampacity in c'able tray and ampacity in underground-
~
ducts, and maximum outside diameter of each cable construction shall be furnished in the Proposal.
Such data shall be con-Efirmed in writing after' construction of the cable.'
d.
-The; Bidder.shall furnish with his Proposal the maximum outside dimensions of all cables specified in this Requirement Outline.
e e
r:
P g12 B..
Procedures
~
-1.
The subject material was tested in accordance with Kerite Company
- test procedures.
2.
Copies of the Kerite Company procedur(
are available at Florida Power Corporation.
Il].
. Acceptability 1.
The' testing requirements called out in the above Florida Power
. Corporation requirements were met and are filed according to
type" of cable as per:
a.
Flame retardent properties.
b.
-IPCEA Standards.
c.
Insulation thickness.
d.
Maximum dimensions.
2.
Gilbert Associates / Florida Power Corporation inspected at the factory or on site'each shipment of cable and a Certificate of Inspection is on file.
3.
A Certificate of_ Test / Inspection exists from Kerite for each shipment of cable by reel number.
O C
m,
- m 9
g 4
%9 g
.s
.y y
4
++p.
s
- e,a
VII. Diesel Generator Control Equipment,'
A.
Design Specifications (excerpts from Requirement Outline)-
~
1.
One (1) certified copy of all shop test' data forithe equipment,
. properly identified, shall be forwarded to the ENGINEER for acceptance, and. three (3) copies shall be sent to the OWNER.
~
~
2.
Starting
~
Each unit shall be capable of starting automatically, be at synchronous speed and' full voltage and be ready to accept load
-in less than 10 seconds after the start signal is received.
c:
This~ feature must be proven prior to acceptance at the factor:r.
3.
Reliability a.
The-CONTRACTOR shall prove, by factory test on'a prototype engine generator, that the engine generator is capable of performing the following starting, running, loading, and stopping sequence at least 99 times out of-100 consecutive-times without adjustment to the engine:
1.
Start engine and load to generate _ full load maintaining-full load for.a minimum of 5 minutes.
2.
Reduce generator load _to zero, shut down engine and allow to cool down to the CONTRACTOR'S specified standby
- temperature.
3.'
Start engine again and follow step 1.
b'.
If the u'it shall have failed to meet the.above requirements n
during'the first 100 starts, the hause shall be analyzed and
-corrective action taken before another complete series of 100 starts is attemped.
Documentary-proof of such : tests shall
- be submitted with'the Proposal.
1:
- Peg 2.2
~
-4.
iCodes and' Standards The' diesel engine-generator sets and-all equipment furnished ~
shallibe' designed and manufactured in accordance with accepted 21
~
- current' standards for electric utility equipment.
All equipment i
design and construction shall be in accordance with. regulations as governed by NEMA, Proposed IEEE-Standard Class 1 Auxiliary
' Electric-Power. System for Nuclear Power Generating' Stations-
-(January 22, 1968), and Codes and Standards covered in item 1:05.
CONTRACTOR is reminded that in accordance with the proposed-IEEE
. standard, the emergency power. units must be-capable of operating with the-fire protection system in operation. A sprinkler system will-be installed'in the room housing this emergency generator i
unit.
5.
Tests-Final acceptance of the units will be based upon a performance.
a.
-acceptance' test for each unit.
The acceptance test p ocedure shall.be mutually agreed upon. For this purpose, Bidders-shall state the test procedure and minimum level of instru-
.~
menta cion acceptable to them.
As a minimum the generator shall be resistance loaded to 1500 kw and then and 850 hp
- induction motor shall-be started across the line.
Maximum 4
^
allowab1e voltage-dip is 35%.
ti b.
The armature windings.shall be sobject to a high potential test offl000' volts plus twice the rated voltage of the
. machine ~at 60 hertz for one minute between. live parts and
-ground.
4
l-Page13; The field windings shall be subject'to a high potential c.
'testlof 10 times the rated excitation voltage but in no case less than?l500 volts _at a frequency of 60 hertz for o
one minute between live-parts and ground, d.
Secondary'and control wiring shall be subject to a high potential test of 1500 volts, 60 hertz for one minute between live parts and ground. Wire check, circuit continuity, and operation tests shall be performed to ensure the correct-ness of the wiring.
The CONTRACTOR shall perform all normally '.es ?otad shop e.
testing procedures during equipment fabrication.
Each diesel-gene.:ator shall be given the CONTRACTOR'S standard running test and component testing shall be performed on all critical items: balancing and 120% overspeed testing, governor test and adjustment, etc.
l f.
=A hydrostatic test at 150% of design pressure.hal be performed on pressure parts supplied.
6.
Seis.mic Test -
f The CONTRACTOR.shall perform and submit "m (2) copies of-formal calculations of the seismic analysis to the ENGINEER for record purposes which will be held available for inspection and quality assurance.
i l
i e
i t
Pcga 4..
'B.
' Procedures 1.
frhe. subject' equipment was tested in accordance with Colt Industries test procedures.
2.
Copies of the Colt Industries procedures are available at Florida Power Corporation.
'C Acceptability 1.
The testing requirements called out in the above Florida Tower.
Corporation requirement outline were met by the following:
+
a.
Gilbert Associates Trip Report dated 4/7 & 4/8/71 of Fairbanks Morse subsidiary of Colt Industries test facilit; test of subject alternator and alternator accessories.
b.
Gilbert Associates Inspection Report dated 4/28/71 con-cerning subject equipment.
1 Gilbert Associates Trip Report of 5/6/71 for operation c.
and loss test of subject equipment, d.
Gilbert Associates Inspection Report of instrument and control equipment dated 9/29/71.
c.
Gilbert Associates Certificate of Inspection dated 3/15/73 j
for_ subject equipment.
o f.
Colt Industries transmittal of 9/13/71 containing complete i
factory test reports and certification data compiled e
6/15/71 on subject equipment.
~2.
The reliability requirement was met as called out in the requirement 1
outline :and oc umented on _ Colt Industries final report of starter and'1oad-acceptance reliability tests of 9/25 thru 10/3/68.
e d
e n
c v
b'w
Paga 5.
3.
Seismic Design. Requirements were complied with and a complete Seismic Calculation Transmittal from Colt Industries dated 5/21/71 is in file, e
4 O
5 g