ML19340A172

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Tech Spec Exemption Permitting Continued Cycle 1, Operation W/Reactor Vessel Surveillance Specimens Removed. Tech Spec 4.2.3 Revision Indicating Exemption Encl.Requests Approval by 760402.WO Parker Affidavit Encl
ML19340A172
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/1976
From: Parker W
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Rusche B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML19340A173 List:
References
NUDOCS 8001100657
Download: ML19340A172 (4)


Text

NRC anu 195 m

ur NUCLEAR REQULATORY COMMISSif.N DOCKE T NUM E E 7 a7 Eo ~ 3 9'1

""""2'"

NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MA,TERIAL TO:

FROM: DU'KE PotiER CO DATE OF OOCUMENT b M ~N CHARLOTTE, NC d'R B C RUSCHE DATE RECEIVED W 0 PiRKER, JR 3 gg-g

% LETTER kNOTORIZ E D PROP l INPUT FORM NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED QRIGINAL NC LASSIFIE D M

OCOPY 21 [ 4fT ~

OE;CRITTION ENCLOSURE LTR NOTnRIZED 3 6.....RE THEIR 3-16-76 LT-D D

  • D f

REQUESTI"G PERMISSICN TO REMOVE THE REACTOR wcj w

.t

.a VESSELL SURVEILLiTCE CAPSULES AND PUSH RODS AT PRESENT TIME UNTIL END OF PRESENT FUEL CYCLE..

.R20tIST APPROVAL NLT 4-2-76......

y

q. 7 -

.e,. g., 6,; g

[.

[ 5" :.

I PLANT NAME: % N F E.

3 SAFEIY FOR ACTION /INFORMATION ENVIRO 3

~2.f.

To 9,6.

ASSIGNED AD :

m ASSIGNED AD :

h BRANCH CHIEF :

b YuS M G.

BRANCH CHIEF :

PROJECT MANAGER:, _

PROJECT MANAGER :

K LIC. ASST. :

(j}J Eh4r,,fY$R.D LIC. ASST. :

}b

\\ REG FILE __._

INTERN AL DISTRIBUTION l

3 SYSTEMS SAFETY PIANT RYSTEM9 FWTun Wen b

NRC PDR METNEMAN TFnFsen ERNST h

I&E (1)

ScnROFnER BENAROYA BAIJARD A

OELD LAINAS SPANGLER l

COSSICK & STAFF ENGINEERING IPPOLITO I

MIPC MAccAny SITE TECH CASE KNIGHT OPERATING REACTORS GAZO11LL HANAUER SIHWEIL STELLO STEPP HARTESS PAWLICKI 5'"I}iAN e

l OPERATING TECH

)

PROJECT MANAGEMENT REACTOR SAFETY N

EISENHUT l

SITE ANALYSIS I

l BOYD ROSS

\\

SHA0 VOLLMER I

P. COLLINS NOVAK

_\\

BAER BUNCH J

HOUSTON ROSZTOCZY

T SCHWENCER N

J. COLLINS l

PETERSON CHECK

\\

GRIMES KREGER MELTZ L

HELTEMES AT & I SITE SAFETY & ENVIRC SKOVHOLT SALTZMAN ANALYSIS RUTBERG DENTON & MULLER l

EXTERN AL DISTRIBUTION CCNTROL NUMBER N

LPDRhO M.W M1.A.%e NATL LAB BROOKHAVEN NATL LAB _

/J N

TIC REG. V-IE ULRIKSON(ORNL)

//

N NSIC LA PDR i

AST,3 CONSULTANTS I

F' ACSS IL

- vi TSENIX e001innf62 i

L

%C PCRM 195 (2 76)

_y

m e

DUKE POWER COMPANY Powza Dt:stonwo 422 SocTu Cuencu StassT. CHARLorTE. N. C. 23243 l

l eii,4, g

w w w o paamca sa.

rea..o~c2... ro.

i v.cc g.-.oc,

g

,g5

. gulatori DacM m.?~

i l

March 22, 1976

[.s k

xM9 9 k

U r*

p~. n.CDvCs 4

/

..s.

c L

s l-Mr. Benard C. Rusche

'IN

$$] MAR 051976 }

/

I l

Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l-comssen l

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Y

j Washington, D. C.

20555 c

anne l

Re: Oconee Unit 3 4-l Docket No. 50-287

?

Dear Mr. Rusche:

My letter of March 16, 1976 reported that Duke Power Company had been appraised of damage to the reactor vessel surveillance holder tubes which had occurred in another Babcock and Wilcox reactor. A description was provided of an inspection of the Oconee 1 surveillance specimen tube holders, and it was stated that the following actions would be taken during Oconee 1, Cycle 3 operation:

1.

The' reactor vessel surveillance capsules and push rods will be removed.

2.

The reactor vessel surveillance holder tubes will be secured i

from motion by a spring loaded retaining device which will be

[

loaded into the upper end of each holder tube.

l Requests for an exemption to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix H l

and a revision tio the Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Specifications were

(.

filed to permit this action.

In an effort to minimize the possibility of wear damage to the Oconee 3 reactor vessel surveillance specimen holder-tubes, the decision has been made to remove.the reactor vessel surveillance capsules and push rods at I -

the present time and, subsequently, to continue operation in a manner similar.to Oconee 1 until the end of the present fuel cycle.

An inspection of the' surveillance holder tubes will be conducted, similar in extent to L

chat performed on Oconee 1, and an evaluation will be performed to confirm their acceptability for operation for the remainder of the present fuel cycle.

.ii+

mA.*

A

-3 "Mr. Benard C. Ruscha Pcga 2 March 22, 1976 l

Oconee 3, Cycle 1 has currently accumulated 0.96 full power years of exposure for an equivalent capsule irradiation of 2.29 effective full power years, since the capsule receives 2.4 times the exposure of the inside \\ wall thickness (kt) location of the reactor vessel beltline.

Since available Oconee 3, Cycle 1 reactivity will allow operation for a maximum of approximately 486 EFPD (1.33_EFPY), there is ample margin between the present capsule irradiation of 2.29 EFPY and the maximum achievable exposure at t.he kt reactor vessel beltline irradiation at the end of Cycle 1.

In accordance with Technical Specification 4.2.9, a type

-B capsule removed from Oconee 3 during the present outage will be analyzed as part of the Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program.

l Pursuant to 10 CFR 50, 550.12, an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix H, Section II.C.2 is requested to permit the continued operation of Oconee 3, Cycle I with the reactor vessel surveillance specimens removed from the reactor vessel.

It is also requested, pursuant to 10 CFR 50, 550.90, that the Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Specifications be revised to indicate that the specimens will l

be removed from the reactor vessel for the remainder of Cycle 1 operation l

and that the surveillance withdrawal schedule will be revised prior to l

Cycle 2 operation. The attached proposed Technical Specification replacement page shows this change.

It is considered that the operation, for the duration l

of this fuel cycle, with the reactor vessel surveillance specimens removed l

will not be inimical to the health and safety of the public.

Oconee 3 is scheduled to resume operation on April 5,1976 following removal of the surveillance capsules.

It is requested that this request be proved no later than April 2, 1976.

ry truly yours, l

Guw. n. L I

William O. Parker, Jr.

MST:mmb l

Attachment l

l

R q

  • 'Mr. Benard C. Rusch 2 Pega 3 March 22, 1976 WILLIAM 0. PARKER, JR., being duly sworn,' states that he is Vice President of Duke Power Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission this request for amendment of the Oconee Nuclear Station Technical Specifications, Appendix A to Facility Operating Licenses DPR-38, DPR-47 and DPR-55; and that all statements and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best

~

of his knowledge.

/

~u_ u.

William O. Parker, Jr., Wite President ATTEST Ak

~J Ddrothea Stroupe Assistant Secretary Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of March 1976.

/.:

i/

O u

$ '/ ? r '

D Jg, j>a.,

Notary Public My Commission Expires:

$. 'l3 !L,

SG

-?Y,Y