ML19339C657
| ML19339C657 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07100018 |
| Issue date: | 10/07/1980 |
| From: | NAC INTERNATIONAL INC. (FORMERLY NUCLEAR ASSURANCE |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339C655 | List: |
| References | |
| 17586, NUDOCS 8011180772 | |
| Download: ML19339C657 (22) | |
Text
PROCEDURE:
QAM i
EFFECTIVE: 3-15-80
}lAC RECORDS MAtIAGEMFMTREVISION No.: 1 EFFECTIVE: 10-7-80 Nuclear Assurance Corporation cotiTROLLED DOCUI.
E 1 of 2 24 Executive Park West copy 110 N'
Atlanta, Georgia 30329
- b...w C)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS Date Revision
-r-Preface 10-7-80 1
Quality Assurance Manual 00.1 Quality Assurance Manual 3-15-80 0
-r-01.1 Organizing for Quality Assurance 10-7-80 1
02.1 Quality Program Planning 3-15-80 0
-r-03.1 Design Control 10-7-80 1
04.1 Procurement of Products and Services 3-15-80 0
04.2 Supplier Approval and the Supplier Directory 3-15-80 0
05.1 Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings 3-15-80 0
' i.1 Documents Control 3-15-80 0
U/.1 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment, and Services 3-15-80 0
[_]
08.1 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, & Components 3-15-80 0
09.1 Control of Special Processes 3-15-80 0
10.1 Inspection 3-15-80 0
11.1 Test Control 3-15-80 0
12.1 Control of Measuring and Testing Equipment 3-15-80 0
13.1 Handling, Storage, & Shipping 3-15-80 0
14.1 Inspection, Test, and Operating Status 3-15-80 0
15.1 Nonconforming Material, Parts or Components 10-7-80 1
-r-16.1 Corrective Action 10-7-80 1
17.1 Quality Assurance Records 3-15-80 0
18.1 Quality Assurance Audits 3-15-80 0
19.1 Quality of Spare Parts 3-15-80 0
19.2 Control of Lifting Devices 3-15-80 0
-r-20.0 NAC-1 Cask Handling and Mainte-nance Procedures 3-15-80 0
f^
(-
APPROVED:
REVISION:
o
/
,Vf &
DATE:
315-50 10 13 Corporate Manager APPROVAL: g)[J(/ %
Ouality Assurance 8 01118 o 7 7g -o-otteTion
-a-ADoitioN
-<- nevision
PROCEDURE: Q%
gt EFFECTIVE: 3-15-80 A
Nuclear Assurance Corporation D"> NbN U^ f[, MD REVISION NO.: 1
'"Ej10~7-80 p,a gg 2 ce 24 Executive Park West coPYUC' Atlanta, Georgia 30329 d'"
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.)
Date of Reference Corporate Policies & Procedures Current Revision I.ll Quality of Products & Services 6-16-78 III.2 Use of Outside Firms for Special Services 4-6-79 III.5 Purchasing Control 10-15-79 III.9 Records Management System 7-18-79 VII.1 Quality Assurance 3-30-79 VII.2 Corporate Quality Assurance Policy 4-6-79 VII.3 Reporting of Defects & Nonconformance 3-30-79 O
-a-Date Rev.
Procedures Affected Approvals QA Eng'gi Pres.
10-7-80 1
Pr e, 01.1, 03.1, 15.1, M. ([
I i
i 1
O APPROVED:
REVISION:
a j
dp DATE:
3 $ f 3 i/o,/.fg Corporate Manager APPROVAb g gg Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDUR1D QAM 01.1 EFFECTIVU: 3-15-80 REVISION NO.: 1 NAC RECORDS MANAGEME"T EFFECTIVE: 10-7-80 Nuclear Assuran:a C:rpor; tion CONTROLLED DOCU:4Etri PAGE 1
oF 5 24 Executive Park West COPY NO.
O Atlanta, Georgia 30329 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE TITLE:
ORGANIZING FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE PURPOSE:
To ensure that the organization of the Quality Assurance Function is established and maintained to provide the independence to achieve corporate quality objectives and all contractual require-ments.
REFERENCES :
QAM 00.1 GENERAL:
The assurance of quality at NAC is an interdisci-plinary function which involves several organiza-tions.
Furthermore, quality assurance encompasses many diversified functions and activities and ex-tends to various job levels within these organiza-tions, including all executvies and all employees whose activities af fect quality.
The implementation of quality assurance throughout the various functions of design, procurement, construction and operation
,]
at NAC must, therefore, be considered the direct V
responsibility of the organization performing the work and cannot be considered the sole domain of any single quality assurance group.
Persons or organizations charged with the develop-ment, the enforcement, or the measurement of the sufficiency and effectiveness of the quality assur-ance program shall have the authority and organiza-tional freedom necessary to effectively discharge those responsibilities.
Such persons or organiza-tions shall be independent of direct pressures of cost, schedule or production, and their authority and organizational freedom shall be sufficient to (1) identify quality problems; (2) initiate, recom-mend, or provide solutions; (3) verify implementa-tion of solutions; and (4) withhold and segregate nonconforming material or other action including stopping work for maintaining program integrity.
Furthermore, they shall have direct access to res-ponsible management at a level where appropriate action can be mandated.
p(_)
APPROVED:
REVISION:
O
/
JVMj DATE:
Ip./,g'g
' Corpor** Manager APPROVAL: $
/j Ouality surance
-e-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-,- AEVISION
PROCEDURE: QAM Ol'.1 EFFECTIVE: 3-15-80 NAC RECORDS MANAGEMENT REVISloN NO.:
1 Nuclear Assurance Corporation CONTROLLED DOCUMENT EFFECTIVE: 10-7-80 24 Executive Park West copy No } _
PAGE 2 of 5 Atlanta, Georgia 30329 g
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE Persons performing such quality assurance functions as checking, verifying or reviewing the work of another (functions which do not encompass the development, enforcement or measurement of the suf-ficiency or effectiveness of the NAC Corporate Quality Assurance Program), shall have authority and organizational freedom to a degree sufficient to properly discharge their assigned quality assur-ance responsibilities.
However, when authority and organizational freedom are restricted for any person performing quality assurance functions, an established line of communication to responsible management must exist sufficient to prevent the suppression of those quality assurance functions and/or to resolve any disputes.
Final responsibility r the effectiveness and sufficiency of the c Corporate Quality Assurance Program shall reside with NAC; however, NAC may 3
delegate the establishment and execution of the W
Program, or any part thereof, to other organiza-tions.
These organizations may, in turn, delegate responsibility for applicable portions of the Pro-gram to other organizations.
Whenever such dele-gation occure, the organizational structure for the assurance of quality of those to whom this responsibility is delegated shall, in principle, conform to this organizational policy to an extent consistent with the importance of their work to quality.
Organization structuring for the assur-ance of quality by those to whom such responsibil-ity has been delegated shall be subject to the approval of the delegator and the delegator shall adequately monitor the implementation of the organi-zational structuring for compliance with such approval.
The President of NAC is responsible for the main-l tenance of an effective quality assurance program l
for NAC.
Responsibility for the establishment, l
administration and enforcement of the NAC Corpor-ate Quality Assurance Program has been delegated 9
APPROVED:
REVISION:
0
/
M DATE:
/0-/d7 Corporate Manager APPROVAL:l $7/D Quality Assurance I
.m.
PROCEDURE:
QAM 01.1 EFFECTIVE: 3-15-80 i
NAC NECORDS MANM;EMp,p-EVISION No.: 1 R
Nuclear Assurance Corporation CONTH0aED coCUMEHf mE 3
m 5 g
24 Executive Park West copy no._ / ?
HI Atlanta, Georgia 30329 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE by the President to the Corporate Manager, Quality Assurance.
The Quality Assurance Department func-tions as a staff position reporting to the Presi-dent, is independent of all other Company organiza-tions, and assumes line responsibility for ensuring compliance with the NAC Quality Assurance Policy.
Also reporting to the President, but having direct line responsibility for design assurance and opera-tions, is the Vice President and General Manager of the Engineering and Transportation Services (ETS)
Division.
Figure 1 indicates the organizational structure of NAC and of ETS.
Any dispute between Quality Assurance and Engineering
-a-that cannot be resolved by the General Manager of ETS and the Corporate Manager of Quality Assurance shall be referred to the President for resolution.
(]
PROCEDURE:
'J 1.
Engineering and Transportation Services (ETS) shall perform assigned quality functions for drawings, specifications, analyses, and other activities by assigning qualified personnel with organizational freedom and authority to:
1.1 Identify potential quality problems.
- 1. 2 Initiate, recommend, or provide solutions.
1.3 Verify implementation of solutions.
1.4 Verify accuracy and completeness of item being reviewed.
1.5 Communicate with responsible management.
2.
Quality Assurance shall through scheduled and un-planned audits verify the accomplishment of the quality assurance function in-house and at NAC sup-pliers.
/O l
(/
APPROVED:
REVISION:
o f
DATE:
6.jg[J gg.))g Corporate Manager APPROVAL: %
'/%
Quahty Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
P,7oCECURE:
01.1 EFFECTIVE:.3-15^ 80 AEVISICN No.: 1
- .W~'f, IIAC RECORDS MAllAGEME~
Nuclear Assurance Corporation EFFECTIVE: 10-7-80
> g)
C011 TROLLED DOCU:T" PAGE 4 oF 5 24 Executive Park West COPY 110.
j*a
>-J Atlanta, Georgia 30329 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE FIGURE 1 Corporate and ETS Organization D**D D
~ T }f M
'o o 65 L S$ LEG
..m
..r l
e ic..e se..e cv.or. *. =e.=3v
.. i v, a.
r..c.
rr
.rir+..
.,.. e e,.3 9
,.,e o,.,.er a.i. ore. i
- .r* EC e
f e * :..r
- e e ic..r 4..e c
.e..,
e s s..
.e...
v i e...
<e..,
m.v......,,
Engineering and Transportation Services Vice Freetdent and General Manager i
I t
)
18AC.) Project Operations & Engineering An.lysts Croup PL.na g e r Man.ger P.an.ger l
l occ rroject tosineer
....a........
l l
l i
APPROVED:
REV!SION:
o
/
M g-DATE:
3-/$f e.7.h j
Corporate Manager APPROVAL: N
//h l
Quality Assurance L
a
PROCEDURE:
QAM 01.1 EFFECTIVE 3-15-80 NAC RECORDS f.!ANAGEMErfTREVISION NO.: 1 Nuc! ear Assurance Corporation CONTROLLED DOCUMErn EFFECTIVE 10-7-80
'1 PAGE 5 oF 5 24 Executive Park West ccPy No.
Atlanta, Georgia 30329
(-
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE 3.
The corporate total quality program and the imple-mentation and adequacy of the QAM shall be audited at least annually.
4.
The attached Audit Checklist shall be used as a guide for audits for this procedure.
O APPROVED:
REVISION:
O
/
DATE:
$ 1f.fy IO -],fp Corporate Manager APPROVAL: &- [b l
Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETTON
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE: QAM 03.1 EFFEenve 3-15-80 NAC RECORDS ItM AGE""!'" REVISION NO.: 1 Nuclear Assurance Corporation coNTF.0LLED WW EFFECEVE: 10-7-80 24 Executive Park West cup; ;:0
'1 -
ME 1 oF 5 Atlanta, Georgia 30329
(.V QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE TITLE; DESIGN CONTROL PURPOSE:
To provide an independent review of program planning and design review from initial concepts through com-pletion of design, manufacturing and inspection plans, and planning for customer support.
REFERENCE:
QAM 00.1 GENERAL:
It is the policy of NAC that design shall be accom-plished within the framework of a system of design controls.
This system shall be structured to pro-vide assurance of design adequacy through the planned, controlled and documented application of reviewing, checking, re-evaluating and/or verifying.
The sys-tem shall assure the incorporation of all regulatory and contract requirements, engineering criteria and appropriate standards of quality into design docu-ments and provide for the control of deviations from such quality standards.
All characteristics of de-sign such as physics, stress, thermal, hydraulic and bq accident analyses, compatibility of materials, accessibility for in-service inspection, maintenance and repair, and delineation of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests shall be performed within the framework of the system.
7ndependent re-evaluation shall take the form of (1) design reviews, (2) a check of the adequacy of design by a competent person (not involved with the original design) using alternate or simplified calculational methods, and/or (3) an imple-mentation of a suitably controlled testing program, performed under the most adverse design conditions.
When more than one design organization participates in related design activities, the system shall pro-vide for the delineation and control of design inter-faces, establish design interfaces and boundaries, identify areas of mutual responsibility, and prescribe the authority of the several design organizations so that each design organization is aware and beyond which one organization cannot proceed prior to action by interfacing design organizations.
nV APPROVED:
REVISION:
o
/
M DATE:
~
fo.J./u Corporate Manager
~ APPROVAL: p/
///Q Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-, REVISION
PROCEDURE:
QAM 03.1 EFFECTIVE:
'3-15-80 REVISION NO.:
1 Nuclear Assurance Corporation 11AC RECORDS MAfl AGEME!!T EFFECTIVE-10-7-80 24 Executive Park West coliTROLLED DOCUMEllT PAGE 2 OF 5 Atlanta, Georgia 30329 COPY 110
~
g QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE Changes in design, including field changes, shall be subjected to the same rigorous examinations and re-evaluations as the original design, and shall be performed within the framework of the design control system.
Design changes may be made by technically competent personnel when delegated by NAC but all such changes ar'e approved by NAC.
All changes are reviewed for effectivity, retroactivity, retrofit, and for changes required in the Quality Assurance Plan.
A flow diagram of the Design Assurance Function is shown in Figure 1.
PROCEDURE:
1.
Engineering and Transportation Services (ETS) shall:
1.1 Maintain a continuing review of all criteria pertinent to the technical and performance requirements of each program including:
ll 1.1.1 All characteristics of design such as physics, stress, thermal, hydraulic, and accident analysis.
1.1.2 Compatibility of materials.
1.1.3 Accessibility for in-service inspection.
1.1.4 Maintenance and repair.
1.1.5 Delineation of acceptance criteria for in-process inspections and tests, quali-fication and/or functional tests, and final acceptance criteria.
1.1.6 Specify traceability of materials, special calibration requirements, and shelf-life limitations.
-r-1.2 Identify safety related structures, sys-tems, c.nd/or components and their critical characteristics"wnich will require:
O APPROVED:
REVISION:
0
/
//W/hs/
DATE:
10 7.jy Corporate Manager APPROVAL: @-
'/p Ouality Assurance 4
-a-ADUlTION
-d-DELETION
-,- REVISION
EFFECTIVE: 3-15-80 REVISION NO.: 1 Nucle:r Assur;nca Ccrp3rati:n N AC RECORDS MMI AGEMENT EFFECTIVE: 10-7-80 (g
24 Executive Park West C
a LLED nocustir PAos 3
OF 5
' g g
I il sal Atlanta, Georgia 30329 COPYU3 --
O
-QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE FIGUPI 1 DESIGN ASSURANCE DESIGN CRITERIA 1
I Y
PRELIMINARY fyg ENG!NEERING g
DESIGN PROGRAM TECHNICAL I
ACTMTY i
TESTING NOT ANALYSIS 4
REVIEW OK PROGRAM DESIGN REVIEW T N OFF COMMITTEE ACTMTY OK I
DETAILED O'
ENGINEERING DESIGN l
TES M l
3 NOTf ANALYS!$
R VIE W OK '
TRADE-OFF CC51CX A!st*RANCE is an engineering iterative OK process of design, analyze and/or test and
'f then redesign until objectives are achieved.
It is first applied to the total design con-
" ", # "U ***i",T# *
- W "9 P***" **** 'I FABRICATE parts co ponents and systems. The aam pro-AND TEST cess is then applied for each of the portions of the total.
Finally, the portion are inte-PROTUTYPE grated into the end product and again eval-vated. Finally, the re,.lete specifications and drawin;s are reviewed and checked before P
final release for procurerent and prodvetier..
TESTING NA NOT/
ANALYSIS
-4 8
REVIEW / OK \\
TRADE OFF D'M h )
0*
0.'S1.Sld\\.11Lb y
PRODUCTION RELEASE
- eo, APPROVED:
REVISION:
0
/
f&fbffw DATE:
10.).j3 Corporate Manager APPROVAL: $
l'. ',
Quality Assurance
--o-A@XBITION
-d-OtLETION
-r-REVISION i
PROCEDURE:
QAM 03.1 EFFECTIVE.
S-15-80 REVISloN No.:
1 I'4C rec 03DS y^f'4 GEM Nuclear Assurance Corporation PAG 4 OF f
24 Executive Park West Collrno g Ef;p HI Atlanta, Georgia 30329 copyf,g' %7,WEttr g
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE special controls o
e acceptance test criteria, and/or e
preventative maintenance actions.
Safety related items are those which could affect public or employee safety in the event of a failure or malfunction when being operated by authorized personnel.
1.3 Through the iterative process of design, ana-lyses and test, develop drawings and specifi-cations for a complete description of the product being designed.
- 1. 4 Conduct and document design reviews with engi-neering and quality assurance personnel with the technical expertise required for the design concept under review.
1.5 Maintain documentation, e.g.,
a design log, of llI the development of the final design together with documentation of reasons for all changes.
1.6 Using technically competent personnel indepen-dent of the designer, review all drawings and specifications prior to final approval for release.
Apply the same review procedure for
-a-all design changes made to the initial release.
1.7 Maintain a list of all design errors or defi-ciencies including material applications, that could adversely affect safety-related struc-tures, systems, and components and corrective action to preclude repetition.
This should include items found during design, in fabrica-tion, and from field usage.
1.8 Review the suitability of all standard, commer-cial (of f-the-shelf ) material or components previously approved for use for suitability prior to selection.
lll APPROVED:
REVISION:
o
/
,MM DATE:
3 2ffo /0,f.fo Corporate Manager APPROVAL: M
'M Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE:
QAM 03.1i EFFECTIVE:
3-15-80 l NAC RECORDS."AMAGEMENTREVISION NO.:
1 conmoIJ ED D MENT EFFECTIVE.
10-7-80 Nuclear Assurance Corporation A
PAGE 5 OF 5
g 24 Executive Park West cop 7No.
n III Atlanta, Georgia 30329 l
U QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE 1.9 Utilize valid industry standards and specifica-tions for the selection of suitable materials, parts, equipment and processes.
1.10 Specify identification of parts, assembly, and components as required and when there are changes, ccidentification.
2.
Quality Assurance shall:
2.1 Maintain a continuing review of the engineering design activity as outlined in 1. above with particular attention to:
2.1.1 Safety-related designated structures, systems, and components and those characteristics that must be controlled during manufacturing and verified by 7x inspection.
O 2.1.2 Design details and their inspectability.
2.1.3 Applicability and currency of national and industry standards on drawings and in speci-fications.
2.1.4 Conformance to all regulatory and contractual requirements.
2.1.5 Operation, maintenance, and repair consi-derations.
2.2 Initiate a preliminary inspection plan of items that will require special inspections and tests, verifying inspection acceptance criteria specified by engineering, and utilization of nondestructive test methods.
2.3 Participate in all design reviews.
3.
The Audit Checklist for this procedure shall be utilized to assist in verifying bacic elements in the design assurance program in-house and at suppliers.
i APPROVED:
REVISION:
0
/
DATE:
$-iffp jQ-)fg Corporate Manager APPROVAL: M tJ,[
Quality Assurance
-a-ADoiTION
-d-DELETION
-r-REV:SION
PROCEDURE: QAM 15.1 EFFECTIVE:
3-15-80 A
24 Executive Park West REVISION No.:
1 fiAC RECORDS MAtlAGEME!!T
~
Nuclear Assurance Corporation cot:TE0LLED DrEU"N m
1 w 4 M
copy 3:0, Atlanta, Georgia 30329 gV QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE TITLE:
NONCONFORMING MATERIAL, PARTS, OR COMPONENTS PURPOSE:
To ensure that material, when first found to be non-conforming to engineering requirements, be immediate-ly identified and properly withheld to preclude in-advertent commingling with acceptable material.
Immediate reporting of the defect shall be made by either an NAC supplier or NAC employee if the same material had been previously delivered to a cus-tomer as required by 10CFR21 (Corporate Policy VII.3).
REFERENCE:
QAM 00.1 GENERAL:
It is the policy of NAC to establish measures to pre-vent improper operation or the inadvertent use or installation of materials, parts, components, or systems which do not conform to the requirements of engineering drawings, applicable standards, codes, license commitments, procurement specifications, or test procedures.
These measures shall, as appro-priate, provide for the identification, documenta-n()
tion, segregation, disposition, corrective action, and notification to affected organizations including reports in compliance with 10CFR21, 10CFR50.55(e),
and/or 10CFR71.61.
PROCEDURE:
1.
All Suppliers to NAC shall:
When required by purchase order or contract:
1.1 Document all nonconformances to purchase order or contract requirements and immediately withhold the material.
i 1.2 Subject each nonconformance report to a re' law by the 1
Material Review Board consisting of approved Engineer-ing and Quality Assurance representatives.
The non-conforming r.aterial shall be reviewed and the following decisions considered:
1.2.1 If in receiving inspection, return to supplier for correction or hold pending receipt of required data, e.g. certifications.
APPROVED:
REVISION:
0 f
DATE:
ig.7do Corporate Manager APPROVAL: g Afpk Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-OFLETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE:
QAM 15.1 EFFECTIVE:
3-15480 gggggE?"' REVISION NO.:
1 EFFECTIVE 10-7-80 Nuclear Assurance Corporation R0 L D DOCUE;,1 to 24 Executive Park West con No ~ 'L -
Atlanta, Georgia 30329 O
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE 1.2.2 Scrap if nonconformance can not be reworked or repaired to an equal or better condition than specified.
1.2.3 Rework / Repair if the nonconformance can be fixed to a condition equal to or better than specified.
1.2.4 Complete if a specified operation (s) can return the material to its specified con-figuration.
1.2.5 Use-as-is if the nonconformance is determined to be a minor deviation and form, fit, or function will not be impaired.
1.3 Submit all suggested dispositions of Rework / Repair or Use-as-is to NAC for ETS and Quality Assurance review and evaluation.
NAC may approve or reject the requested action.
1.4 Submit all other nonconformance reports - material h
found to be nonconforming in receiving inspection, Scrap, or Complete - to NAC for review and follow-up for corrective action effectiveness.
1.5 Immediately segregate and positively identify material that is designated Scrap until disposal to preclude the possible use on a product to be delivered to NAC or its customer (s).
1.6 Identify and document the cause of the defect (s) on all nonconformance reports and specify corrective action to be taken to preclude a recurrence.
1.7 Follow-up and verify that the corrective action committed effectively corrected the cause.
1.8 Include all nonconformance reports and related data in the manufacturing inspection records.
1.9 Periodically analyze all nonconformance reports for quality trends and report the results to management for review and assessment.
APPROVED:
REVISION:
0
/
M Mp DATE:
10fff Corporate Manager APPROVAL: M 9)$y Ouality Assurance j
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE:
QAM 15.1 EFFECTIVE:
3-15-90 NAC RECORDS MAP 4AukMErdEVISION NO.:
1 Nuclear Assurance Corporation coNTnoLLED DOCUMENT EFFECTIVE:
10-7-80 PAGE 3
OF 4 24 Executive Park West copy no.
/2 Atlanta, Georgia 30329 m
(v)
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE 2.
Engineering and Transportation Services (ETS) shall:
2.1 Review and evaluate all nonconforming reports from suppliers.
2.2 Technically evaluate and document the accept or reject decision for all supplier suggested dis-positions of Repair / Rework or Use-as-is.
2.3 If the supplier's disposition is unacceptable, con-sider alternative actions that may be acceptable-document and report to supplier.
2.4 Approve the application of standard repairs to be specified in the contract or purchase order, e.g.,
weld repair as specified in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
3.
Quality Assurance shall:
AV Verify through audits, survey, and/or source inspection that all NAC suppliers have documented end implemented procedures for:
3.1 Identification and segregation of all nonconforming material, parts, components, or work-in-process with appropriate controls to preclude the inadvertent commingling with accepted material.
3.2 Appropriate documentation of the nonconfornance and corrective action with reporting as applicable by contract or purchase order.
3.3 Utilizing re-acceptance inspection criteria of reworked or repaired material R ensure that it meets all re-quirements originally specified.
4.
Quality Assurance shall:
4.1 Review and accept or reject all supplier suggested dis-positions or an alternate disposition proposed by NAC engineering from a quality point of view and verify that the reinspection criteria will ensure the reworked or repaired material meets all requirements originally specified.
g) tV APPROVED:
REVISION:
O
/
DATE:
. fg./,ga Corporate Manager APPROVAL: g g
duahty Assurance
-e-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDUAE: QAM 15.1 EFFECTIVE: 3415-8'O REVISION No/ 1 Nuclear Assurance Corporation tiAc EEcoRos mat 4AG EFFECTIVE; 10-7-80 24 Executive Park West cotiTaollID UCCW E PAGE 4 oF 4 Atlanta, Georgia 30329 copy 130 #, ~~
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE Each disposition shall be reviewed to ensure that the performance of the final product is not degraded and that all contractual and regulatory requirements can be met.
-a-4.2 Nonconformance reports documented at NAC and at suppliers chall be periodically analyzed to show quality trends and submit reports to management for review and assessment.
5.
The Designated Quality Assurance Representative (performing the receiving inspection of material received at (NAC) shall:
Verify conformance to all requirements of the purchase order or contract.
If there are any nonconformances found, the material shall be withheld and the nonconformance and re-lated pertinent data documented.
All material so docu-mented will be returned to the supplier for correction and action to preclude future nonconformances.
A copy of this a
documentation shall be filed in the Supplier History Folder. W Prior to returning the material to the supplier, the non-conformance may be reviewed by ETS and by Quality Assur-ance for determining if it is acceptable for "Use-as-is".
This decision shall be documented and filed.
9 APPROVED:
REVISION:
O
/
DATE:
3fifj l0-].&
Corporate Manager APPROVAL:
pf;(f M Ouality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE:
QAM 16.1 EFFF.CTIVE:
3-15-80 A
Atlanta, Georgia 30329 REVISION NO.:
1 NAC RECORDS MANAGEMENT EUECTIVE 10-7-80 Nuclear Assurance Corporat!on co37act LEn nocuwr 24 Executive Park West E
copy no.
nb QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE TITLE:
CCRRECTIVE ACTION PURPOSE:
To ensure appropriate managerial action is taken on each documented noncon' ce to determine the cause of the defect and take i
. ate corrective action.
REFERENCE:
QAM 00.1 GENERAL:
It is the policy to promptly identify and correct conditions such e.
..ture, malfunctions, defective mater-ial, or equipment, or other nonconformances which are ad-verse to the quality of material, components, structures, systems or operations.
All documented nonconfcrmances shall be investigated for determining the cause and then action taken to prevent recurrence.
PROCEDURE:
-a-1.
Engineering and Transportation Services (ETS) and Quality
(")
Assurance personnel shall document deficiencies within NAC operations on a Corrective Action Request form, as shown in Figure 1 for management concurrence that a defi-
- lency exists or improvements should be made on future programs.
All deficiencies shall be analyzed for disposi-tion and corrective actions as to cause which are to be taken by a specified date.
Improvement lists shall be maintained and reviewed for application in future programs.
2.
Engineering and Transportation Services (ETS) shall:
-r-2.1 Through design reviews, independent checking of draw-ings and specifications, test and development programs assure the adequacy of the product definition.
All errors found shall be evaluated and action documented for future reference.
2.2 Review all corrective action r vaunittaents from s".ppliers for technical adequacy and/or if a design change would be the most effective action to preclude recurrence.
3.
Quality Assurance shall:
3.1 Ensure that all material received at NAC is in accord-ance with all procurement requirements.
For any non-t
\\
V APPROVED:
REVISION:
0
/
DATE:
3./.(fU l0.ff)
Corporate Manager APPROVAL: -)]/;f M Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-AEVISION
PROCEDURE: QAM 16.1 EFFECTIVE: 3*-15-80 REVISION NO.: 1 liAC RECORDS MAriAGEMENT EFFECTIVE 10-7-80 Nuclear Assurance Corporation 24 Executive Park West CONTROLLED DgCWENT PAGE 2 OF 3 Atlanta, Georgia 30329 COPYNO.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE conformance, the cause of the defect shall be deter-mined and corrective action as to cause shall be re-quested of the supplier.
This request and the action taken shall be documented in the Supplier History Folder for consideration in future procurement and for follow-up on the effectiveness of the action.
3.2 Require all fabricators of NAC designed products to have a corrective action program for t.he prompt correction of the cause for each nonconformance documented as a part of their quality assurance program.
3.3 Through audits, surveys, and/or source inspection verify that an effective corrective acticn program at all suppliers is implemented and that closure is effected for each action.
3.4 Maintain a quality reporting system which will high-g light the effectiveness of a supplier's corrective action system for NAC program management and for their action whenever there are recurrences.
O APPROVED:
REVISION:
g N/,W_
DATE:
41[fo ny/[j Corporate Manager APPROVAL: gk Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE QAM 16.1 Ei'"ECTIVE.
REVISION NOc 1
NAC RECORDS MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVE Nuclear Assurance Corporation
' 10-7-80 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT PAGE 3 OF 3 24 Executive Park West
/q COPY NO'
'~
Atlanta, Georgia 30329 OO QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE Figure 1 - Corrective Action Request Form
~O~
CA A NC.
Nuclear Assurance Corporation 24 Ezec tive Park West
- ','$jf,C.*[g*0*gfo,,,a, w
At:anta. Georgia 30329 CCARECTlvt ACTION RECUEST
- o( 8 3* *
- C ' uo'- **
- 7 *o-t To:
c,.......r
- 1. !DENTIFICATION OF CONDaTION
- esen.re c= ce ca..c==cv l
1 I
i g
t)
..o.,.-
i.......o..-
l 2.
I 3., c: ris v.....c.a = o. me... a:,2 ca.. w.=r w s_m i o I
f i
l i
i i
i a
..m.
.e:.c= =% se c=w.u r e a v l es.m.G8 e of t T=4 ww 1 Far:sacu
- .: w-e = rs I
l i
e : cans::Tive aCTicN vsaie1eO sv
- .ve DTh r
b) v y ylk !,,,
n bAR Ylk Ok
(')
v l
APPROVED:
REVISION:
/
M DATE:
sof.fj l
Corporate Manager APPROVAL: g)fff/
l Quality Assurance 1
l
-a-AOolTION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION
PROCEDURE: QAM 20.1 )
EFFECTIVE: 3-15-80 REVISION NO.: 1 NAC R CORDS MMAGMM EFFECTIVE: 10-7-80 Nuclear Assurance Corporation COfiTROLLED DOCUMENT PAGE 1 oF 1 24 Executive Park West i
n COPY NO.
A
. q Atlanta, Georgia 30329 i
V QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURE NAC-1 SPENT FUEL SHIPPING CASKS HANDLING & MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES Handling and maintenance procedures for the NAC-1 spent fuel ship-ping casks are controlled documents and are issued as a part of the Engineering and Transportation Services Procedures.
A list of the current procedures are shown below:
Number Title Revision Dated 510 NAC-1 Spent Fuel Shipping Cask Transpor-1 11/79 tation Emergency Procedure 520 NAC-1 Spent Fuel Shipping Cask Handling 2
11/79 and Loading Procedure 525 NAC-1 Spent Fuel Shipping Cask Handling 2
11/79 and Unloading Procedure 530 NAC-1 Cask Annual Maintenance Procedure 2
11/79 O
540 NAC-1 Svene rue 1 Shingine Cask ouerter1r 2
11/79 Maintenance Procedure 550 NAC-1 Neutron Shield Tank Rupture Disk 2
11/79 Replacement Procedure 555 NAC-1 Relief Valve Rebuilding / Replacement 2
11/79 Procedure 560 NAC-1 Ball Valve Maintenance Procedure 2
11/79 565 NAC-1 Cask Cavity Rupture Disk Replacement 1
11/79 Procedure 570 NAC-1 Cask Lifting Yoke Load Test Procedure 0
11/79
-r-580 NAC-1 Cask Cavity Measurement Procedure 2
8/80 585 NAC-1 Cask Thermal Test Procedure 1
11/79 590 NAC-1 Cask Neutron Shield Tal.k Freeze Point 2
11/79 Determination 591 NAC-1 Cask Neutron Shield Tank Boron Analysis 1 11/79 m( )
APPROVED:
REVISION:
o
/
,gg/d DATE:
J@ 10 -1)7 17[ 36 C'orporate Manager APPROVAL: jfJ(j g Quality Assurance
-a-ADDITION
-d-DELETION
-r-REVISION