ML19339C173
| ML19339C173 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/18/1980 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Johnson I ROBERTSHAW CONTROLS CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339C174 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900722 NUDOCS 8011170763 | |
| Download: ML19339C173 (2) | |
Text
%euQs
-~
a aso UNITED STAT
- S
/o w%,' "
NUCt. EAR REGULATOR' COMMISSION J'
nacion ov
\\
7
! i # I. l o 611 RY AN PLAZA oRIVE, SUITE 1000
'~*/
8 AALINGTON, TEXAS 76012
- L j bn d
'{!Ti 18 JUL 1980
... 6
. Do,ck,e t. No. 9, 99031,?.2/G-01
..o..,
r, r.
Fulton Syphongpivision Atta: Mr. I. O. Johnson Vice President and General Ma 2318 Kingston Pike S.W.
Knoxville, TN 37901 Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. William D. Kelley of this office on June 23-24, 1980, of your facility at Knoxville, Tennessee associated with the manufacture of ASME Code "N," Class 1, 2 and 3 valve and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the con-clusion of the inspection.
This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provider' by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requa.res each of its licansees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.
You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licenses or his agents nor from taking effective cor-receive action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection cons 10ted of an mmination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the ed.osures to this letter.
The corrective action to our finding, and the necessary corrective action to prevent recurrence, were initiated prior to the termination of the inspection; and a response to the identified deviation is not required. The implementatiort of the corrective action will be verified during cur next inspection.
801117 0 76 3
Docket No. 99900722/80-01 2
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Connaission's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2 Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Connaission's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the informa-tion is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we vill be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, bh VL Uldis Potapovs, lef Vendor Inspection Branch Enclosurest 1.
Notice of Deviation 2.
Inspection Report No. 99900722/80-01 i
,