ML19339B612
| ML19339B612 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 10/17/1980 |
| From: | Miller W NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011070328 | |
| Download: ML19339B612 (1) | |
Text
pa as cg
/
'o, UNITED STATES f ';g.,, - f j NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
' ~
lp., 5 C
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
% lr 4% /
CCT 171980 00CKET NO. 50-312 Sacramento Municipal Utility District ATTN:
Mr. J. J. Mattimoe, Assistant General Manager and Chief Engineer 6201 S Street - Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95813 Gentlemen:
We have received a copy of your Proposed License Amendment No. 67 dated July 9, 1980, for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Unit No.1.
The application was filed with the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (ONRR) to correct an error in the plant organization chart and to clarify the requirement for surveillance testing when the reactor is critical.
Fees pursuant to 10 CFR 170,22 were not submitted with your application because your company determined that it was exempt from fees under the provisions of Footnote 2 of 10 CFR 170.22.
Based on information provided by the ONRR staff as a result of a preliminary review of your application, it has been determined that a Class II fee of $1,200 is appropriate because it involves administrative changes which are not for the convenience of the Commission.
On this basis, your application is not exempt from fees; therefore, the Class II fee should be remitted to this office.
If the final review of your application reveals that this fee is incorrect, your company will be refunded any overpayment or billed for any additional amount due.
Sincerely,
.b.
William 0. Miller, Chief License Fee Management Branch Office of Administration 801307 O F -
[