ML19339B225

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Suppl 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B, Environ Qualification of Class IE Equipment. Ieb 79-01B & Suppl Dtd 800229,not Previously Transmitted,Also Encl.No Written Response Required
ML19339B225
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/30/1980
From: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Kemper J
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
References
NUDOCS 8011060535
Download: ML19339B225 (1)


Text

_

['p n%'Io UNITED STATES 7A NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

$ ih.3f"'

n REGION I S ', '

631 PARK AVENUE

%, ' V KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA '9406 September a0, 1980 Docket Nos. 50-352 50-353 Philadelphia Electric Company ATTN:

Mr. John S. Kemper Vice President Engineering and Research 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Gentlemen:

The enclosed Supplement No. 2 to IE Bulletin No. 79-013, " Environmental Qualification of Class 1E Equipment," is forwarded to you for information.

No written response is required.

Also enclosed for information are IEB 79-018 dated January 14, 1980 and Supplemental Information to IEB 79-018 dated February 29, 1980, both u.' which were not previously transmitted to you.

If you desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact this office.

Sincerely, Ce?

yce H. Grier Director

Enclosures:

A.

Supplement No. 2 to IE Bulletin No.79-01B, dated September 30, 1980 with one attachment 1.

Generic Questions and Answers to IEB No.79-018 and Memorandum and Order (CLI-80-21) dated May 23, 1980 8.

IEB No.79-018, dated January 14, 1980 with four attachments 1.

SEP Plants 2.

Master List (Typical) 3.

System Component Evaluation Work Sheet 4.

Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class 1E Electrical Equipment C.

Supplemental Information to IEB No.79-018, dated February 29, 1980 with one attachment 1.

Generic Questions and Answers to IE Bulletin No.79-01B D.

List of Recently Issued IE Bulletins CONTACT:

S. D. Ebneter (215-337-5283) cc w/encis:

V. S. Boyer, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Power so n o s oS35 0

(

SSINS: 6820 Accession No.: Eddf220J///

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555 September 30, 1980 IE Supplement No. 2 to Bulletin 79-018: ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF CLASS 1E EQUIPMENT Enclosed are the generic questions and answers which resulted from NRC/ Licensee meetings in NRC Regional Offices during the week of July 14, 1980 regarding environmental qualification of Class 1E equipment in use at power reactor facilities.

These answers address specific questions asked during the meetings.

Due to the generic nature of some of these questions, the staff is issuing them as a bulletin suoplement.

The regional meetings highlighted the fact that in some cases, the scope and depth of the 79-018 review was not clear to licensees.

Therefore, these answers may affect your 79-01B submittal.

These submittals are requi ed by a separate order to be completed by November 1, 1980.

Some answers given in Supplemer t No.1 to IEB-79-018 are superseded by these answers.

For example, in Bulletin Supplement No. 1, issued on February 29, 1980, the answer to question No. 5 specified that TMI lessons learned equipment was not included in the review.

However, due to the extension of the response date from April 14, 1980 to November 1, 1980, this equipment is now being addressed since its installation is either complete or required before the issuance of the February 1, 1981 SER.

(See Question No. 21 of this Supplement.)

No specific response is requested by this Supplement; however, all answers contained in the enclosure to this Supplement should be carefully reviewed and considered for applicability in your response to IEB 79-018.

IE Bulletin No.79-01B was issued under a blanket GA0 clearance (B180225 (R0072); clearance expired July 31, 1980) specifically for identified generic problems.

Supplement No. 2 to Bulletin 79-018 is far information, hence no GA0 clearance is required.

Attachnent:

1.

Generic Questions and Answers to IEB-79-01B and Memorandum and Order (CLI-80-21) dated May 23, 1980 j

DUPLICATE DOCUMENT Entire document previously entered into system under:

O

2. M ANO No. of pages:

/

ENCLOSURE 1 UNITED STATES SSINS No.: 6820 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Accessions No.:

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 7910250528 WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555 IE Bulletin No.79-01B Date: January 14, 1980 Page 1 of 4 ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE E0_UIPMENT Description of Circumstances:

IE Bulletin No. 79-01 required the licensee to perform a detailed review of the environmental qualification of Class IE electrical equipment to ensure that the equipment will function under (i.e. during and following) postulated accident conditions.

The NRC staff has completed the initial review of licensees' responses to Bulletin No. 79-01.

Based on this review, additional information is needed to facilitate completion of the NRC evaluation of the adequacy of environmental qualification of Class IE electrical equipment in the operating facilities.

In addition to requesting more detailed information, the scope of this Bulletin is expanded to resolve safety concerns relating to design basis environments and current qualification criteria not addressed in the facilities' FSARS.

These include high energy line breaks (HELB) inside and outside primary cont. tin-ment, aging, and submergence., " GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT IN OPERATING REACTORS", provides the guidelines and criteria the staff will use in evaluating the adequacy of the licensee's Class IE equipment evaluation in response to this Bulletin.

In general, the reporting problems encountered in the original responses and the additional information needed can be grouped into the following areas:

1.

All Class IE electrical equipment required to function under the postulated accident conditions, both inside and outside primary containment, was not included in the responses.

2.

In many cases, the specific information requested by the Sulletin for each component of Class IE equipment was not reported.

3.

Different methods and/or formats were used in providing the written evidence of Class IE electrical ualifications.

Scme licensees used the System Analysis Method approach.

This method includes DUPLICATE DOCUMENT a.

Identification of the pro under postulated accident Entire document previously conditions are defined as entered into system under:

7g @ pg,ggy from both LOCA and/or HEL ggg outside the primary conta No. Of pages:

g

-