ML19339A497
| ML19339A497 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/05/1980 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Hadnagy P PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19339A489 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900255 NUDOCS 8011040135 | |
| Download: ML19339A497 (2) | |
Text
_
i UNITED STATES
/g* * %g'o, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
?-
REGION IV I
-3 611 RY AN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 I'
E ARLINGTON, TEX AS 76012
\\...'.e!
0 5 MAR 1980 Docket No. 999000255/80-01 Pacific Scientific Kin-Teck Division Atta:
Mr. Paul A'. Hadnagy Quality Assurance Manager 1
1346 S. State College Boulevard Anaheim, California 92803 i
Gentlemen:
This refers to the QA Program inspection conducted by Mr. H. W. Roberds of this office on February 4-8, 1980, of your facility at Anaheim, California, associated with the manufacture of mechanical shock arrestors and to the.
discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclu-sion of the inspection.
This inspection was made to ecnfirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively !.mplemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As,you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the quality of specific products, components or services procured from others.
You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective cor-rective action in response to their findings.
Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector, j
During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements. The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.
Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.
t
'k D0Llogot35
Pacific Scientific 2
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Tsderal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the informa-tion is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Roora.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
[
)
N r
r Ul Et o
- ovs, 1
Vendor Inspection Branc.h
Enclosures:
1.
Notice of Deviation 2.
Inspection Report No. 999000255/80-01
....