ML19339A256
| ML19339A256 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/01/1980 |
| From: | Haass W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Naughton W COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8011030446 | |
| Download: ML19339A256 (2) | |
Text
b y A * / *%,,
') q d J
UNITED STATES E
s, r' 7
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h, d,k f
WASHINGTON, D C. 20555 g
%,~
- /
cci 01 T980
...s Mr. W. F. Naughton Nuclear Licensing Administrator Pressurized Water Reactors Commonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, IL 60690
Dear Mr. Naughton:
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCEPTANCE OF REVISIONS TO QA TOPICAL REPORT We have completed our review of Revision 14 to the Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) Topical Report No. CE-1-A, "Comonwealth Edison Company Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Generating Stations." The revisicns concern general organiza-tional and programmatic changes. You indicated in your transmittal letter that the topical report and this revision are intended to be applicabls to nuclear units identified by Docket Numbers 50-10, 50-237, E,.249, 50-254,60-265, 50-295, 50-304, 50-373, 50-374, 50-454, 50-455, _50-466, and 50-457.
Based on our evaluation of the proposed changes described in Revision 14, we find that your revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and is therefore acceptable with the exception of certain potential changes currently under evaluation as noted below. To use the topical report in future license applications, CECO need only reference this topical report in Section 17 of the Safety Analysis Report. We do not intend to repeat our review of this topical report when it is referenced in an application unless changes occur in our acceptance criteria.
Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions about this topical report are invalidated, we will notify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. As noted above, should you desire to reference this topical report in support of quality assurance programs for new nuclear power projects, the basis of our evaluation will be the acceptance criteria included in SRP Sections 17.1 and 17.2, Revision 1.
Appropriate changes may, therefore, be necessary.
Programmatic changes by CECO to this topical report are to be submitted to the NRC for review prior to implementation. Organizational changes are to be submitted no later than 30 days after announcement.
As a result of the TMI-2 accident, plea.* rote that staff re-evaluation of the quality assurance program for Zion Units 1 and 2 in accordance with an action plan for plants located at relatively high population density sites may result in future changes to this topical report. Therefore, staff approval of Revision 14 is contin-gent upon the final resolution of this separate review activity.
Please replace our letter of August 7,1980 with this letter, renumber the report as CE-1-A, Revision 14, and submit 36 copies to the NRC. Your transmittal letter should identify the nuclear units to which this revised topical will apply.
B:011030y%
g,o' Mr. W. F. Naughton OCT 0 1 7930 Should you have any questions regarding our review or if we can provide assistance, t-please feel free to contact me or Mr. William Belke at (301) 492-7741.
Sincerely, 1
/
/
f'{/ x /Nl o-i Walter P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Division of Engineering t
J w
'g.
e
---c v
-.,ey-y y-
-y,-
=.
-ry-
--w-