ML19338G348

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards QA Program Insp Rept 99900268/80-02 on 800909-12 & Notice of Deviation
ML19338G348
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/25/1980
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Moon R
ARMCO, INC.
Shared Package
ML19338G340 List:
References
REF-QA-99900268 NUDOCS 8010290121
Download: ML19338G348 (2)


Text

_

k UNITED STATES

/# "%,*o*,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'l J h) # (./$

REGloN IV 4

l.

I o 611 RY AN PLAZA oRIVE, SUITE 1000

\\v'~

%-l ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 a

1;

/

2 5 SEP 1980 Docket No. 99900268/80-02 Armco-Incorporated Advanced Material Division Attn:

Mr. R. E. Moon Plant Manager 13835 Beaumont Highway, P.O. Box 23068 Houston, Texas 77028 Gentlemen:

This refers to the QA Program irypection conducted by Mr. R. E. Oller of this office on September 9-12, 1980, of yout facility at Houston, Texas associated with the manufacture of welded piping and to the discussions of our findings with you and members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

This inspection was made to confirm that, in the areas inspected, your QA Program is being effectively implemented. The inspection effort is not designed to assure that unique quality requirements imposed by a customer are being; implemented; nor to assure that a specific product, component or service provided by you to your customers, is of acceptable quality. As you know, the NRC requires each of its licensees to assume full responsibility for the i

quality of specific products, components or services procured from others, i

You should therefore not conclude that the NRC's inspection exempts you from inspections by an NRC licensee or his agents nor from taking effective cor-rective action in respo se to their findings.

Areas examined and our findings are discussed in the enclosed report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of an examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.

During the inspection it was found that the implementation of your QA Program failed to meet certain NRC requirements.

The specific findings and references to the pertinent requirements are identified in the enclosures to this letter.

Please provide us within thirty (30) days of your receipt of this report a written statement containing, (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct these items, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and (3) the date your corrective actions and preventive measures were or will be completed.

8010290 ggi L

~

Armco Incorporated 2

In accordance with Section 2./90 of the Commission's " Rules of Practice,"

Part 2, Title 10, Code of rederal Regulations, a copy of this letter with enclosure and your reply, together with the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the Commission's Public Document Room.

If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within thirty (30) days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure.

Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the informa-tion is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.

If we do not hear from you in this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed :.n the Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, SW p ldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch

Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Deviation 2.

Inspection Report No. 99900268/80-02 l

I

--