ML19338E511
| ML19338E511 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1980 |
| From: | Hagins E NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-SC, NUDOCS 8010030131 | |
| Download: ML19338E511 (2) | |
Text
\\ \\ilijm b
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA g
d DL7Pa NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION U21!:::
~
9 4
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD
- t A
d Alan S.
Rosenthal, Chairman b
a4 Dr. John H. Buck Thomas S. Moore a
)
O In the Matter of
)
007
)
/ /
DAIRYLAND POWER COOPERATIVE
)
Docket No. 50-409 SC
)
(La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor)
)
)
ORDER October 1, 1980 In its prehearing conference order entered yesterday in l
this show-cause proceeding involving the La Crosse nuclear l
1/
l facility, the Licensing Board certified to us (at p. 21) the following question:
Under the July 29, 1980 delegation from the Commission, is it within our authority to l
consider the magnitude of the safe shutdown l
earthquake at the La Crosse site as part of our determination of whether a site dewatering system to prevent liquefaction must be designed and made operational on a specified schedule?
l For the reasons developed at some length in the order (at l
pp. 15-20), that Board believes that consideration of the SSE magnitude issue is essential.
Accordingly, it asks that, 1/ LBP-80-26, 12 NRC 8020080 13)
O, 2-should we conclude that its authority to do so is now lacking, we further certify the matter to the Commission with a recom-mendation that the Commission expand the Board's delegated authority to the " extent necessary to include the SSE issue".
Id.,
p.
21.
We accept the certified question as formulated by the Licensing Board.
All parties to the pro-ceeding shall file memoranda setting forth their views on 2/
that question no later than October 24, 1980.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD M
' Eleanor E.' Hagins (I Secretary to the Appeal Board 2/ The memoranda should also address whether, assuming that the certified question is answered in the negetiva, we should pass the' natter on to the Commission with the recommendation suggested by the Licensing Board.