ML19332E847

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Interim SALP Board Rept Forwarded by & Addl NRC Comments Presented During 891109 Meeting.Util Generally Concurs W/Salp Board Observations.Steps Have Been & Are Being Taken to Address Identified Concerns
ML19332E847
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/1989
From: Eury L
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NLS-89-311, NUDOCS 8912130062
Download: ML19332E847 (2)


Text

e

(

e

- s uom e lo. Box 1661

  • Ra6egh, N.C. 27002 (sis) H & m ot I

i DEC 0 61989 j

LvwtW.EWW E w w po Vem Po w WW i

I New hw%

i SERIAL:

NLS-8 9-311 10CFR50 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTENTION: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 l

BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-325 & 50-324/ LICENSE NOS. DPR-71 & DPR-62 RESPONSE TO NRC SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF LICENSEE PERFORMANCE Gentlemen:

Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) has reviewed the Interin j

Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Board Report i

forwarded by your letter of November 3, 1989.

CP&L has also j

reviewed the additional NRC comments presented during the public SALP Report review meeting of November 9, 1989.

The report i

evaluated the performance of CP&L's Brunswick Nuclear Project I

i during the period September 1, 1988 through August 31, 1989..

The company appreciates the NRC's efforts to present a balanced report and understands the need to identify and provide additional, objective evidence of our performance improvements.

l CP&L takes the observations, recommendations, and ratings of the SALP Board very seriously, and will continue to use them as an input into our continuing process of evaluating and improving our overall performance.

As reflected by our comments during the November 9, 1989 meeting, we generally concur with the SALP Board's observations.

The following is a suggested clarification to the last paragraph of Section I.A (page 2).

The second sentence would be accurate as follows:

All nuclear activities, except Quality Assurance, report to a single Senior Vice President - Nuclear.

The Senior Vice President - Nuclear and the Manager -

Quality Assurance report to an Executive Vice President.

I$YO s-8912130062'g91206 k

PDR ADDCK 05000324 n

PNV

0-o.-

4 Document Control Desk NLS-89-311 / Page 2 Steps have been, and are being taken, to address identified concerns.

CP&L will continue to strive toward the goals of performance and operational excellence.

Yours very truly, q

-n

'N#$/

/24 Lynn W.

ry PDM / pdm

(\\cor\\SALPRES) cc Mr. S.

D. Ebneter Mr. W. H. Ruland Mr. E.

G. Tourigny l

L 1

l

.. -