ML19332D386
| ML19332D386 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/1989 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19332D385 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8912010120 | |
| Download: ML19332D386 (97) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ __ ____ _ _ _ .
~
l f FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS L OCTOBER,1989 C ~
= '*
/
l
/
/
Prepared by: Production Engineering Division Special Services
! S
,E218s!R8sas8sas
-.-_-_n_---.__ .--___
3 1 1 I l L , l l-L OMAHA PUBLIC. POWER DISTRICT -j FORT-CALHOUN STATION l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l 1
.l l
i l l l i I PREPARED.BY:
. PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION ,
SYSTEM ENGINEERING-L 1 l I
-(;
OCTOBER, 1989
g .. . . . . - . . . . - . .
~hbOL h~y f?^
- i r
lh
, a l'
t
\v i
^
~ <
Pu rs ull' of es c e!Ie n c e is a n a t t l t u d e'. . . t it in v olve s wis d o m and s o u n d -j u d g m e n t . . . } l 't is a lif ell'me, c a r e e r-lo n g commitment... It is a.way of lif e . . . i t is doing 'th e joo righ t ' t h e fis t tim e, every tim e. It is , in n e r- dire e t e d; nof the resuit of ex t e e n a l' pressure, it is;our own s e lf w o r t h - w h o 1 we are and t h e 'p rid e e n d s a tisf a c tio n p that com es from b eing the right kin d of t h pevson, not just in doing the right Ihings. ~ James J. O'Connor l \; l
b TABLE OF CONTENTS- [ ic EbK
-. Distribution. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . iv 4
Preface . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .'. . . 1-
Purpose:
. .-. . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .-. 2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
;- Adverse Trend Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 i
- Index to Performance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . 5 L
(- Performance Indicator Graphs. . . . . . . . . . . . 10 , .-4 Escalated Enforcement History . . . . . . . . . . . 69 L Significant Items of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 i l .. Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance l -Indicator Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 1 L .Operati ng Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates . . . . 87 i :- l Production and Operation Records. . . . . . . . . . 88 . Data Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 h References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
DISTRIBUTION
-V. W. Anderson M. J. Guinn C. W. Norris R. L.:Andrews R.'H. Guy J. T. O'Connor -l W. R. Bateman R. M. Hawkins R. G. Odden i K. L. Belek M. C. Hendrickson W. W. Orr A. D. Bilau K. R. Henry E. C. Pape C. N. Bloyd J. B. Herman L. L. Parent J. P. Bobba K. C. Holthaus T. L. Patterson C. J. Brunnert L. G. Huliska- F. M. Petersen M. W. Butt R. L. Jaworski G. R. Peterson j R. H.-Cagle R. A. Johansen S. M. Peterson 1 C. A.-Carlson J. W. Johnson R. L. Phelps 1 G. S. Cary D. W. Jones T. J. Pirruccello- '
J. W. Chase W. C. Jones W. R. Plowman G. R. Chatfield J. D. Kecy S. C. Presler-L A. G. Christensen R. C. Kellogg T. M. Reisdorff R. P. Clemens J. D. Keppler A. W. Richard R. G. Conner D. D. Kloock G. M. Riva l J. L~. Connolley D. M. Kobunski T. J. Sandene ! M. R. Core G. J. Krause F. C. Scofield' l G. M. Cook G. A. Krieser L. G. Sealock P.'J. Cotton L. J. Kripal H. J. Sefick i S. R. Crites J. B. Kuhr R. W. Short D. W. Dale L. T. Kusek A. L. Shrum R. C. DeMeulmeester R. C. Learch E. L. Skaggs W. D. Dermyer R. E. Lewis F. K. Smith R. D. DeYoung- R. C. Liebentritt G. C. Smith i D. C. Dietz - C. J. Linden R. L. Sorenson D. E. Dirrim- B. R. Livingston R. T. Spetman J. A. Drahota J. M. Lofshult D. E.-Spires M. O. Elzway J. H. MacKinnon K. E. Steele R. G. Eurict. G. D. Mamoran W. Stee.le H. J. Faulhaber J. W. Marcil C. J. Sterba M. A. Ferdig N. L. Marfice 4. F. Sterba K. S. Fielding D. J. Matthews R. K. Stultz J. J. Fluehr J. M. Mattice G. A. Teeple f J. J. Foley L. K. McFadden M. A. Tesar , F. F. Franco T. J. McIvor P. L. Thompson j, M. T.- Frans R. E. McKay J. W. Tills-J. F. W. Friedrichsen M. L. Meador D. R. Trausch R. M. Fussell R. F. Mehaffey P. R. Turner S. K. Gambhir K. A. Miller C. F. Vanecek J. K. Gasper R. A. Miser L. P. Walling W. G. Gates K. J. Morris J. M. Waszak M. O. Gautier D. C. Mueller W. O. Weber J. T. Gleason R. J. Mueller G. R. Williams L. V. Goldber9 J. B. Newhouse S. J. Willrett R. E. Gray M. W. Nichols D. D. Wittke P. A. Yager iv
g PREFACE PERFC3MANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS l A.new section has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators 1 Report for the month of October. This new section is the Security Section found ' on pages 48 and 49. One of the new Security indicators is the Locaable/ Reportable Incidents LSrcur tv) Indicator found on page 48. This indicator shows the total number o" loggab'e/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), inattentive security officers, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control for the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicator Report to track security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNo.58. l The other new Security indicator is the Security Incidents Indicator found on page 49. This indiu; tor shows. the percentage of security loggable/ reportable incidents by breaking down the incidents into six categories for the reporting l month. The categories of incidents include the following; LDV's, inattentive security officers, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicator Report to track security performance for SEP Item No. 58. One indicator in the Maintenance Section has been changed for the month of l October and one Maintenance indicator has been added for the month of October. The- indicator that has been changed is the Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures l Indicat>r found on page 37. The new indicator that has been added for the month of Octo)er-is the Preventive Maintenance Backloa Indicator four.d on page 31. l The Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Indicator now shows total NPRDS component i failures and confirmed NPRDS component tailures. The total failures shown are l based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. Confirmed failures are based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INP0. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO. The Preventive Maintenance Backloo Indicator has been added to the Performance Indicator Report for October and shows the total number of backlog PM's, the number of old backleg PM's (overdue by more than 30 days), and the number of new backlog PM's. Two indicators in the Quality Assurance Section have been changed for the month of October. One indicator is the figmber of Violations ner 1000 In30ection Hours Indicator found on page 66 and the other indicator is the DR/0R's Issue _d versur Sianificant DR/0R's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported Inc icator found on page 68. The data concerning NRC Violations contained in these two indicators will now be one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in the collection and processing of this data.
--- -- , - - , , , , . , - - - - , ..,,,.--,..m-.- - - , - . - , , - . - - - - .a
s PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicatcrs" is interided to provide seleeted. Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's' personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The-information is . presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing , and. monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety _ and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for
~
comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. I i P 1 l-
u
)
1 i
, . SCOPE j 1
In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines.were followed while implementing this ' ) program: ! Select ' the data which most effectively monitors Fort Cal'houn's performance in key areas. I Present the data in a straight forward graphical' format using averaging and smoothing techniques. l-Include established corporate goals and industry
- information for comparison.
l t Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate. Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program . is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.
- i
{ ADVERSE TREND REPORT. The Adverse Trend Roport explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends, g Onerations and Maintenance Budoet Indicator - Page 21 The actual expenditures for operations have been above budget since ;
- March,1989. This is due to the fact that several items were not '
adequately included in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension' of the 1988 Refueling Outage, contract security support, " radiation protection support, and Design Basis support. Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Indicator - Page 30 The percent of preventive maintenance items overdue increased from L 0.3% in Sestember to 1.4% in October due to 13 preventive maintenance tems overdue. Primary System Chemistrv-Percent of Hours Out of Limit Indicator - Page 39 . The percent of hours out of limit increased from 0.0% for the month - of August to 2.8% for the month of September due to the startup :l ' which followed the forced outage that occurred in September. i Hazardous Waste 'roduced Indicator - Page 42 1 l The high mount of hazardous waste classified as "other hazardous waste" was caused by a mercury spill at the sulfuric acid tank l located on the east side of the service building. Temoorary Modificacions (Excludina Scaffoldina) Indicatgr - Page 54 Temporary mechanical modifications continue to increase due to the age of the plant, discovery of design basis discrepancies, the length of time required to resolve design discrepancies, and the i need for outage conditions to resolve many items currently being
- satisfied with temporary modifications.
1 Personnel Turnover Rate Indicator - Page 58 The turnover rate for the Quality and Environmental A'f fairs Division has increased since September due to one resignation.
[ 1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS t INDEX TO GRAPHS 1 INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS . l I Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ._.-. . . 10 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. . . . . . . . . 11 - Unplanned Safety System Actuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12- ) Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 l Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Fuel' Reliability Indicator . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . ._. . 16 l m Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste.-. . . . . . . . . . 17 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 , L L l
- p . g-- - . . - . - . , . . - _ .. ..
i l l 1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS L (CONTINUED) 3 QPERATIONS , Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrans While Critical. . . . . . . .. 11 Unplanned Safety-System Actuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 : Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
. Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Daily Thermal Output . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 l Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours . . . . . . . . 20
\ l Operations and Maintenance Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Document Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 l MAINTENANCC DieselGeneratorReliability(100 Demands)............23 Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands). . . . . . . . . . . . 24 1 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old . . . . . . . . . . 27 Ratio of Highest Priority MW0's to Total MWO's Completed . . . . 28 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 i Preventive Maintenance Backlog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments. . . . . . . . 32 Craft Work Activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 l l L 1
.)
. 1
. -; y ,
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS 1 (CONTINUED)
< MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED) 1 Maintenance Overt ime . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 I Procedural-Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 35 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) . . . . . 36 Numberof.NuclearPlantReliabilityDataSystem(NPRDS) y Reportable Failures. . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . 37 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel-Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . '. 16 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 17 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit . . . .. 39 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits . . . . 40
.In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service . . . . . . . . . . 41 Hazardous Waste Produced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Total Skin and Clothing Ccntaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . 46 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment . '. 47 L SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Security Incidents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 L
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX T0 GRAPHS (CONTINUED) jgIJRIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Spare Parts Inventory Value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Spare Parts _ Issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 l l: INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . .-. . . . . . . . . . . 55 Minor Injury Cases per Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 I HUMAN RESOURCES
. Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . . . . . . . . . 57 Personnel Turnover Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '
59 L TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . 60 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 R0 Hot License Exams . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . 62 L Hotlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Classroom (Instructor) Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Total Hours of Student Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 1
1 l 1
, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i INDEX TO GRAPHS 1 GONTINUED) i
_00nLITYASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000' Inspection Hours . . . . . . . . . 66 i Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old . . . . . . . . '. 67
' DR/QR's Issued versus Significant DR/QR's Issued versus. . . . . 68 NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported i
I L 1 p l 1 1
.g.
ff1 .
!, $-ti _ l
- Forced Outage Rate !
6 G- Fort Calhoun Goal 1
-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile I 5'
'l 6000 1 4- 4 R 1 a 1 t 3- q e
2 O---- O--- G----O - -- C O --- G ---G---- O ---G---- ---O . 1 3 O O O Q R0
'86 '87 0
'88 0
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
- - - - 1
! '1988 1989 FORCED OUTAGE RATE f t There were zero forced outage hours logged for the Fort Calhoun Station during Octour, 1989. The' present 12 month average forced outage rate is 1.8%. . The last - forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred in September of 1989. The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.0%. 1 The 1989 goal for forced outage rate is 2.1% and is based on seven days of forced outage > time. The- basis for establishing the 1989 performance goals can be found on page 85. Adverse Trend: None l
i 5-Reactor Scram .; e- Fort Calhoun Goal . Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4- ' I S 3- GOOD r + a m'
.g.
1 - l 1- e-----e---- e----e----e----e---e----e----e ----o----e.---.e l i n I0 3
,86 ,87 ,88 O C C Nov Dec Jan O O C Feb Mar C C C Apr May 'Jun- Jul c -
Aug Sep Oct l 1988 1989 l-UNPLANNED AU"04ATIC REACTOR SCRAMS L WHML E CRITICAL 1 There. were no un scrams in October. planned It has been automatic 1,217reactor days . I since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurred on July 2, 1986. The 1989 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1. - The industry upper ten percentile value is L zero . scrams par unit on an annual' basis. The Fort Calhoun Station -is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant performance in this area. Adverse Trend: None
4-R Safety System Actuations
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-A c
t-u BOOD L 2- 'N O n s
.i 1-i-
- D- 0 0. "
O C. O "- " " " " O " " " l:
'86.'87 '88 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May -Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 ;
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There were no unplanned safety system actuations-in October, 1989. ! The- 1989. g0al -for the number of unplanned ! safety system actuations is-zero. This goal -l l 1s based on past performance ' at the Fort ' Calhoun Station. L The industry upper ten percentile'value for ., the number of unplanned safety system " actuations )er year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Stat on is currently in- the upper
- l ten percentile of nuclear plants for this L indicator.
L L- Adverse Trend: None l l L
l l f l Monthly Gross Heat Rate ,
- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal i
a- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 10750-GOOD c
-- +
p-B 10500- & -- ) b g -, 0 NY -;e -- s 5- O---O U 10284 10270 K j W 10250-100v0, O O A e 1H O O O O O O O D I 9750 l
'86 'E7 '88 Jar. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
1989 SBQF,5 HEt,T RATE , I ( The gross heat rate for the fort Calhoun Station during l October, 1989 was 10,550 BTU /KWH. The gross heat rate values fer this cycle of operation will be increased due to the removal of the first stage of the high pressure turbine. The 1989 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,592 BTU /KWH. The 1989 goal is LO,500 BTU /KWH. This goal value of 10,500 BTU /KWH is the theoretical best heat rate that the 4 Fort Calhoun Station can obtain in its present configuration. L The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 BTU /KWH. Adypse Trends: None t
l L_J Monthly EAF i
^ I
- 12 Month Average EAF O- Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD l
-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile ;
100-85 o---s---e---e--- -e -o- .; g m 4 -
= =g!p .-
4- -- g -- 4 80- C D O .7 O O- ! 71 4 66 - [60- > / ; e < y 40 [ 20-
- 0 .
'86 '87 '88 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) was reported as 88.2% for the month of October.
The 1989 EAF goal is 84.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 60.9%. The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%. + Adverse Trends: None , F
< l i
r 5- -M- Fuel Reliability Indicator l G- Fort Calhoun Goal j
-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile j 4-l n i a :
n i 8 3 . !
-16 u !
lG000
$ + !
e t l2 r l 1 a i l 1- o----o---o---G---0-- e---o---e ---e ---0---G---e 3 ; 0 " # " " " 0 '
'86 '87 'b8 Nov Dec Jan FO Mar Apr May Jun J'.Il A'u'g S'e'p Oc't !
- 1988 1989 ,
p r f f FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR j t - The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was re O.005 nanocuries/ gram for the month of October.This ported FRI as , I value indicates that there have been no fuel failures ; since startup in January, 1989. The August and September Performance Indicator Reports ! showed the FRI value for August as 1.85 nanocuries/ gram. The actual FRI value for August was 0.0 nanocuries/ gram. The 1989 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 [ nanocuries/ gram, t The fuel reli6bility indicator industry u :' percentile value is 0.07 nanocuries/ gram.The pperFort ten
-Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile t of nuclear plants for this indicator Adverse Trer.d Nor.e f
- PersSnnel Radiatien Exposure 388 400 -e- Fort Calhoun Goal
-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 300 6000 272 4
C O I R . E 200- 1 N D ,
.. 9....O ---O 100- .e. -G- . !
74 4 r
... O --O-~~ * *~ 9...
( 00
'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1989 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE !
(CUMULATIVE) l During October, 1989, 5.4 man-rem was recorded by pencil dosimeters worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. . i The monthly cumulative exposure goal for . September was 110.0 man-rem while the actual l recorded exposure through September was 82.8 - l man-rem. , The personnel radiation exposure industry upper i ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year. Adverse Trend: None i
b l Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500-
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped G- Fort Calhoun Goal !
O Industry Upper 10 Percentile C . M ' c 7500- 4 F e &--- G ----&--- G---@ ---G----G---G----G----e---- O ----O . 4454 E' ' 4096 C O Q f
- m m m m m - -
2500-
" " " " " " " D i 1722
^
0- .-
'86 '87 88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
j 1989 ! VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE , , The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactiv'e waste i shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of : l waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the chanl)e in l inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for bur al. : 1 Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet): l Amocnt Shipped in October - 894.5 ' Amount in Temporary Storage - 217,5
^
1989 Cumulative Amount Shipped - 5518.5 1989 Goal - 6000.0 i There are two reasons for the very high amount of low-level solid radioactive waste that was shipped in January,1989. One reason is I that the 1988 refueling outage produced a large volume of radioactive l waste. Also, shipping of low-level solid radicactive waste stopped in
- October, 1988, due to samples being sent off-site for isotope analysis that could not be completed at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of , nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988. , Adverse Trend: None
i l
,
- Disabling Injury Frequ9ncy Rate j
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 3 -e Industry Upper 10 Percentile l
, 2- -
R GOOD a ' + 1.4 t
)
'1-l l
.3 G----O -- G ---e--G-- O ---G---G---& --- G---e---O O ~ ^
O
'86 '87 '88- Jan Feb MIr Apr MIy En $1 Aug Sep OIt Nov Dec Rates for 1986, 1987, !'
1989 and 1988 show the l year-to-date rate for the month of October l (. DISAB,.ING LNJURY FRE00 ENC" RATE . l (L0$T T;.ME ACCIDENT.RA"E) There o ;re zero disabling injuries reported at tb Fort Calhoun Station in October. The ' l total number of disabling injuries in 1989 is two. ' l' The '.989 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was based on one , disabling injury occurring in 1989. i The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0%. l The year end disabling injury frequency , rates for 1986, 1987, and 1988 were 0.0, i 0.6, and 1.6 respectively. Adverse Trend: None
- - Thermal Output I
- Technical Specification Limit
-e Fort Calhoun Goal
.1500< ..
p 1400-l i j M 1300- - g ' I
- 1200-a -
)
)
g .
. t.1100- /
I l 1000-l , 900 . . . . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , . . . . . 1 7 14 21 28 : October 1989 . I t DAILY IHERMAL DUIPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily ! I ' operatirg power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt - average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross : hatched area represents the difference between the ' maximum allowable operation and the actual plent i l-operation. The average percent power operation of the Fort \ Calhoun Station was 94.2% for the month of October. j Adverse Trendt None ! I
- v. .
1 l i 1-
-M- Equipment Forced Outa9e Rate
.8-6000
. .g .6- ,
a .
+
t ;
' .4- ,
.2- '
p .12 , 0 0 " " " ; L 0 <
'.87 Nov Dec Jan F'eb Ma'r A'pr sy Ju'n fu'l Aug Sep Oct
'86 '88 i 1991 1989 e
i There were zero forced outage hours l 1- reported for the Fort Calhoun Station
- l during the month of October, 1989. The l current value for the number of equipment !
I forced outages per 1000 critical hours for i 1989 is 0.16. The last equipment forced outage occurred i in September of 1989 and was due to a cable L problem with the resistive temperature l detector on reactor coolent pump motor , RC-3A. : Ady.sne Trend None n t L-
i
- Actual Operatiens Expenditures !
-H- Operations Budget
)
Mh60-i , ; 1d l l$40- f ol I
~na 1 sr 20- '
s I 0 ; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun< Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ! 1989 , 15- # I
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures gl12 i
l Maintenance Budget { L Id 9 l l o- i il ! o l 6- , l na ; srs 3 :
)
0 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ! 1989 ! DP_ERAR ONS_AND MINTENANCE BUDGET , 1 The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to i date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for ! the Fort Calhoun Station. ; L The budget year to date for operations was 54.5 million dollars for October i l- while the actual cumulative expenditures for October totaled 64.8 million dollar:.. The budget year to date for maintenance was 10.1 million . dollars for ! October while the actual cumulative expenditures for October totaled 9.8 t million dollars. , : Adverse. Trerds: Since March the actual expenditures for o)erations have been a >ove budget. This is due to the fact that several < tems were not adequately included for in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension of the 1988 Refueling Outage, contract security support, radiation : protection support, and Design Basis support. Nc adverse trend associated , with the maintenance budget has been observed. l- L l.
500- . - Documents Scheduled for Review
-M- Oocuments Reviewed
- Overdue Documents 400-ND X
'" ' 300- ,
bu - em - p' m-r e-ok , fs .
\
f u 100- - s
- e. . / . 's-~~-- , ,, .a s
%g# r 'N
, 0 . Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 DOCUPENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during the reporting month, the number of biennial reviews schedu!=d for the reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that W overdue. These document reviews are perfo.wd in house and include Smetal Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procecures, Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. The documents
' included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical Data Book, the Radiological Emergency Resy.nse Plan, Emergency Plan .
Implementin
. Procedures,gAbnormal Procedures, Operatit.g Operating Procecures, Procedures, Operating Emergency Instructions, Operating '
the Radiologic 61 Protection Manual, the Chemistry Manual, the Fuel Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures. ; During October there were 54 document reviews completed while 6 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of October, there were 49 ' document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of October consisted primarily of maintenance documents. , Adverse Trend: None n
-M-
I i
~
i
'100- l Diesel Generator No. 1 j
-X- Diesel Generator No. 2 l 98} :
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal i 2 "
. t 96- !
o..__ e . o. ..e. .g. __.g. . .. .. g _ _+. .p___ e
^ " " "
- O n
V' m N[ m 1, m m 1, m p 90- l
, .i y 90-C -
, r e 88: "
3 ; n- . t 86- GOOD 84- , 82- l 80 - Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jur Jul Aua Sep Oct 1988 1989 y #G RIELIABILLTY ) LAST ,,00 )EfttNDS
- l Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability l factor over the last 100 valid demands.
L Diesel generator D-2 has a 'A percent reliability factor over the last 100 vahd demands. , The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%. Presently D-1 meets this goal. Adverse Trend: None
I
. : Diesel Generator No. 1 l
-X- Diesel Generator No. 2
{ G- Fort Calhoun Goal l 100- : : : : : : : : : : : l l I i e 95: 0----O'-----G----p----e----a-----e ----e----s-----e ----g----- g ; P e ! r !
,E X X 'n n X n .
t l. 85- ,
^
GOOD 80 : Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
- 1988 1989 P
NDS Diesel generator D-1 has not had a failure in the ! last 20 demands on the unit. The present reliability factor for D-1 is 100% over the last 20 demands. , Die",el generator D-2 has had one failure in the last 20 demands. D-2 has a 95% reliability factor over the last 20 demands. - The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 and diesel D-2 presently meet this goal. MyarseTrend: None
l l l l' 500-1 E Au;ust 1989
. 1 September 1989 q
400-l l October 1989 0 l . i
! Fort Calhoun Goal !
-a 300 '
(zeroMWO's>12monthsold) ' 1 . n 9
- 0
- 0. w 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 >12 :
Age in Months L AGE OF OUTSTANDlNG EINTENANCF WORK ORDERS :' LNON-0UTAGE) The above bar chart breaks down the i maintenance work orders by their age in months and trends each category over the previous three months. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero outstanding maliitenance work orders greater , than 12 months old. This indicator reflects the. data t,ource ct- ge that was made for the month of September,1989. The August,1989, data is not shown because the actual age breakdown ~ data for outstanding MWO's is date dependant and could not be taken from the CHAMPS database at a later date. Adverse Trend: None
+- l
. 1 l
1200- t _ ' August 1989
- - September 1989 I IOctober 1989 900
~
Fort Calhour. Goal ) 600-
/ !
l i 300-
~
e - - e l Total Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High ! MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related Old Related Priority MW0s MW0s MW0s > 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN : (NON-0UTAGE) l This indicator shows the total number of open , non-outage maintenance work orders at the end of l the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero MWO's older , than the average age of MWO's that are greater than three months old. The October goal was to have less than 441 o I than i.hree months old. pen MWO's that are greater
- This indicator reflects the data source change l ,
that was made for the month of September,1989.
- The August,1989, data is not shown because the actual category breakdown data for outstanding MWO's is date dependant and could not bn taken from the CHAMPS database at a later date.
Adverse Trend: None
,-a--,--,,-n , _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. -- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old f
+- Industry Upper Quartile l 80-t .
f 60-P .
.e C 40 /
e s . n ; L t . . 6000 { 20- + i L O Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 CORf:ECT1TE GINTEllAlCE BACKLOG GtEATEt RAF 3 @tTHS OLD (NON-0UThii) - 1 This indicator shows the percentage of open non-outage corrective maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month. The pert.entage of open non-outage corrective mainteunce work orders that are greator than three
.nonths old at the end of October was reported as 54.5%
The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 44.1%. This indicator reflects the data source change that was made for the month of September, 1989. The August, 1989, data is not shown because the actual corrective MWO backlog greater than 3 months old data for outstanding MWO's is date dependant and could not be taken from the CHAMPS database at a later W.te. .l Adverse Trend: hone -
~!
40- !
- Ratio of Highest Priority MOs to Total MOs Completed l 30- !
'p . ,
e . r ! GOOD c 20 , n $ i r t - I
, 10- '
l 0 ' Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun .lul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 l i , RATIO OF HIGHEST PRIOR::TY M)'S TO TOTALMD'S MLEIED ' LNON-0UTAGE) , The purpose of this indicator is to monitor the abilfty to effectively prioritire, plan, and schedule corrective maintenance. A higher ratio indicates that a coerparatively creater number of emergency type maintenance activities have been required to support plant operation. 1he value for the ratio of highest priority MWO's to total MWO's completed for the month of October, 1989, was ruported as 6.6%. The industry upper quartile for the ratio of ; highest priority MWO's to total MWO's completed l is no 'onger available. This indicator was
- discontinued for 1989 by INPO.
Adytese Trend: None ' . L
. - Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Indrtry Upper Quartile 90 e- Fort Calhoun Goal 80-
. 70-p ,
- 60'- O-----G -- - ---& ---- e---- ----- p -----Q -----Q----- 9-- --- Q --- -
V V V V V C . _ e n 50- C O O O O'/,e . t , 40-GOOD 30-20 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-0UTAGD , The ratio of preventive to total. mintenance indicator shows the ratio of c'mpleted non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort Calhoun . Station increased to 72.7% in September. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of g preventive to total maintenance greater than l 60%. The industry up>er quartile value for the ratio of prevent' ve to total maintenance is 57.4%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently - in the upper quartile of nu ' ar plant L performance in this area. i Adverse Trend: None L
i i
- Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue l 20- + Industry Upper Quartile l
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal l 1
l 15- ! p . : e . GOOD i r : c 10- + ! e : n f t - { 5- !
+
,.O O O- a-S-----$------S ---- $---
O m m - ~ Jan Aor Jul
~
Nov Dec Feb Mat May Jun Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 M i PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and prograus require. perform preventive maintenance tasks as The preventive maintenance items overdue value increased to 1.4% for the month of October. There were a total of 941 , preventive maintenance items completed during the month with 13 prever,tive maintenance items not completed within the allowanle grace period. - a The Fort Calhoun 9061 is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.5%. Tne Fort i Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear plants for tiis indicator. Adverse Trend: The increase in the percent of PM's overdue , was due to tie fact that 13 PM's were overdue at the end of October.
q
. _.___ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ - - .. - . _ - - ~
. l
)
80- Total Backlog PM's f Old Backlog PM's ] l lNew Backlog PM's O- Fort Calhoun Goal : N' W $ u , j
.a b . ,
e- l t l o 40- l f- ' P . i M i
- 20- ,
s : l . i l 0- 0 0 0 C O O O O O- i l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar- Apr May Jun Jul ; 1989 1990 L , PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG j The Preventive Mtintenance Backlog Indicator has been i added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of October, 1989. ! l This indicator rhows the total number of backlog . preventive maintenance items (PM's), the number of old . backlog PM's (PM's that have missed their late date), and ; the number of new backlog PM's (overdue PM's for the reportingmonth). ; Currently, the Fort Calhoun Station has a total of 46 , backlog PM's, 33 uld backlog PM's, and 13 new backlog PM's. h The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero old backlog L' preventive maintenance items. l-Adverse Trend: None I
l
' Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service i t
E Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month l C Out-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month l 35, Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments {
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments i I
l
.. s0OD !
25-l 1 20- , l
- 0- -
l Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 The Number of Out-of-Service ' Control Room Instruments Indicator was changed for the month of May,1989. In addition to the previously shown total- number of control room instruments out-of-service, This indicator shows the number of out-of-service control room instruments that were ' corrected during the reporting month and the number of control room instruments that were added to the out-of-service control room ! instruments list during the reporting month. ! There was a total of 7 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of October. During the month of October, 7 out-of-service instruments were corrected and 2 instruments were added to the - out-of-service instruments list. ; The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 9. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile of nuclear plant performance in this area. , Adverse Trend None
)
r. EM GM M PE I&C Modifications (MOD) , I lMaint.WorkOrders(MPO) ' c' q , Illi One'stimated (UNE) ' ji
- !:!::: PreventiveMaintenance(PM) ,
E Trainir.g (TRA) t
'CalibrationProcedures(CP) m Surveillance Tests (ST) !
iiii'Maint. Work Requests (MWR) . [ CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The Craft Work Activity IndicMor snows the percentage of a type of work each craft (plant personnel odj) performed during the month. The crafts that are represented in this indicator are Electrical Maintenance (EM), General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Pressure Equipment (PE),andInstrumentationandControl(180). WORK ACTIVITY (IN PERCENT) CRAFT R t9fQ E _PM TRA CP ST ,jgR EM 10.13 25.89 6.59 12.12 24.06 0.40 8.97 11.84 GM 0.00 41.58 8.80 5.30 10.38 0.00 0.56 33.38 M 0.00 56.40 25.75 7.46 10.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 > PE 14.58 43.90 8.33 11.68 14.27 0.00 1.23 6.01 I&C 10.70 37.30 4.59 6.94 11.75 20.13 7.19 1.40 Adverse Trend: None 1
.. - . . . , , . , , . . - - . - - . . - , ,--- - , - - . . - - - - . . _ - - ~ - - . - _ - - - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - . _ _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
7 i
- Maintenance Overtime !
80- ,
\
i 60- l M ! P . + :
- l r
l c' 40 i e- , n - t - .
. 20- (
l . l 0 , Apr Jul Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar May Jun Aug Sep Oct l l 1988 1989 l } l MAINTENANCE OVERTIME ; The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired ; maintenance activities with the allottsd resources. Excessive overtime indicates - insufficient resource allocation and can lead 2 to errors due to fatigue. i i- The percent of overtime hours with respect to -l normal hours was reported as 5.3% during the j month of October, 1989. Adverse Trend: None - L '4
. 34 i
l .. 1 - , . . - . , - . . . . - - . - - - - . - . .
e L f fi ! 100-l l IIdentified Incidents I : Incident Reports Opened -l Incident Reports Closed u 80- ; a : b- , e- . r i 60- - 1 o i f I I k
" 40- .
c l 1 d- . 1 e . t 20- - i 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l l PROCEDURAL ImC0WLIAICE INCIDENTS i (PAlNTENANC ) , The Procedural Noncompliance Indicator has been changed for the month of October. This indicator will now show the number of , procedural noncompliance IR's closed for the reporting month. This new reporting m.thod is due to the new process in which IR's i re:eive category codes. IR's now receive their category code when : they are being closed. The new categorization method is being used , to be consistent with the process in which Deficiency Reports t (DR's)andQualityReports(QRs)arebeingclosed. During the month of October,1989, 7 procedural noncompliance IR's involving maintenance were closed. The data for September,1989, is unavailable due to the fact that the new process for IR's was being : implemented. Yhis indicator provides information on personnel perfonnance for
. SaietyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15.
Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that this indicator has been changed for the month of October. , t
)
900-
- Open MWO's
! s- fort Calhoun Goal j 800-I o 700- j Mf - J u . l mM - bW 600- 0---G- - --- O -----O----- G ----+---- G -----O --- G -----G----- O e0 ' r' t 500- ! 400- , i '
. i l I 300 .
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun l I l 1989 1990 MAllTENANCE WCRK Of DER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE MON ')UTAGE MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are open at the end of the reporting month. i The goal for this indicator is to have less than 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. At the end of October, 1989, there were 495 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. - i This indicator was- added to the Performance
- Indicators Report to trend Safety Enhancement ,
Program (SEP)ItesNo.36. , Adverse Trend: None t
50-
~
. I ITotal NPRDS Component Failures Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 40-
- W N
uF e a 30-bi . eI . . ru r a e 20 fs n
. 10 -
0- = = EM-- S E -- Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 NUMBER (F MUCLEA ' PLAPT LELIABILITY
- A"A SYF Wf IPl$
tEPORTABLE A1 .{ k ET I l This indicator has been changed for the month of 1 October. It now shows the total number of NPRDS I commnent failures and the number of confirmed j NPR)S component failures. The number of total l NPRDS component failures is based upon the number . of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of ' confirmed NPRDS commnent failures is based upon - the number of f a' lure reports that have been 1 accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO. ] During October, 1989, there were a total of 3 NPRDS component failure reports sent to INPO. Adverse Trend: None l 1 1
4
- See:ndary System CPI 1.5-
-O- Industry Upper Quartile i 1- 4---*---+---+--+--+---+---+-- -+---+---+
GOOD
.36 .5- * - - E0'87 '88 0
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep j 1988 1989 i 800
- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines i
600-l 000 ; H 400-8 + l r : ! s 200-0 0
'87 '88 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep !
1988 1989 ,
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Perfcreance Inde:c ICPI' ,
is a calculation based on the concentration o" key impur' ties ' n the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The CPI was reported as 0.42 for the month of September. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20. !
The bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owne s Guidtl' nes, i tracks the total hours of 13 parameters exceed ng guicle' ines during power operation. In September,1989, there were 144 hours outside owners group guidelines. The industry upper quartile value ;
for this indicator
C'C C C C 10 i
0 0 n.,
C C
C C
C O
'87 '88 0'c't No'y Dec Jan Feb Ma'r A'p'r May Jun Jul Au'g S'e'p '!
1988 1989 AUX 1tjARY SYSTEM lC T C Fu;STRY HOURS ' 00"S;.DE S'A"lON J : "S i The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the month 1 ' hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW i system is outside the station chemistry : limit. The above chemistry indicator is one
- month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station. j i
The' auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits for the month of August, 1989 ' was reported as zero. The industry upper quartile value for - auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside ; station limits is 2.6 hours. The Fort : Calhoun Station is currently performing in L' l the industry upper quartile for this area. Adverse Trend: None ' l l l
g - oyll : l , ; .a. _ . _ . 2'f ' .
' - Nu.uber of Out-of-Service Instruments 25 G- Fort Calhoun Goal 20-I '
.Nn ts 92m m t 15- fq
,r.
b m
.s i-
- r. .e e 10- W on m f t- . :l s ~f*.
.i
[ 5- .. r-e-----e-----o -----e-----c --e-----e ----e L , O l Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun l 1989 1990 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS , 1 OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end .of the reporting month. The chemistr.y systems . involved in this indicator include the Secondary System end the Post Accident SamplingSystem(PASS). At the end of October there were a total of 10 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Five of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five-were from PASS. ; The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are f out-of-sttvice is 3. , Myerse Trend: None 1
- y:::s
, Waste Oil W .
Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste g Halogenated Hazardous '.laste 7200- 1 IOther Hazardous Waste
- K
-go ,
L '1 f 5400; io - - W 9 - i 7_ a
.s yt3600-
.s c zil 1800-s g '
.i 0 ' E"""EEo .- ;
'Jan' 'Feb Mar .Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 1989 L !
L y H67.8BRDilLEASIILfEEICf.D. H This indicator shows the amount of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous- waste; ' halooenated hazardous waste, :and other hazardous waste L produced by Fert Calhoun each month.
, During' the' month of October, 94.2 kilograms of I waste oil was produced. 0.0 kilograms of non-halo pnated hazardous waste was produced, r
177.4 ki'ograms of heiocenated hazardous waste was produce:1, and 8379.4 kilograms = of other ; hazardous waste was produced. " M.yttss_..T.tgr': T 'ie high amount of other hazardous waste produced was caused by a mercury spill at the sulfuric acid tank !c::ated on the j east s'Me of the service building. o
'E \
i
, p/
, ~ .- . _ . . . . - . - . - . . . . - - . - - - - -.. -_- - . . -
q
. 0- I q
5000- - 1 IlMonth- ' Quarter OPPD . Year Limit -j 4000- 1
- l. .
^
3000 '
- l
- n- . 1 R .
E i M 2000- , f - i 6 1000-i- September 1989 o L MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE , L- The Maximum Individual Radiation Ex >osure graph is one
- month behind the reporting period cue to the lag time. :
- -involved with collecting and calculating the radiation exposure for the station.
During September, 1989 - an individual accumulated 217 mrem which was the- highest individual exposure at the Fort Calhoun Station for the month. i The maximum individual . exposure so far for the third
-qua n er of 1989 was 545 mrem.
The maximum , 'ividual exposure for the year so far was-967 mPa . The maximum accumulated 1988 individual exposure was 2,371 -mrem, received by a visiting. contractor during the refueling outage. The 0 PPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. . Adverse Trend: None / o: -43.
., v-,o
.1 Monthly Contaminations ;
500-
- Cumulative Contaminations
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal !
400
-O- Industry Upper Quartile 357- P J
e t r s 300-GOOD n 4 n e 200-161' l ' o , 100 C O --HV" -
" ,, f -O !
~O
U "-O ~~O " "" " p -& ~~O O - -
'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i 1989 l
l J.pJ& _.gTN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS 1
' There was a total of 1 skin and clothing contamination reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during October, 1989. This contamination was a clothing contamination.
There have been a total of 114 skin and clothing conteminations so far.in 1989. The 1989 goal for skin and clothing is ~ 110 contaminations. The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually. This indicator provider information on personnel performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.15. Adverse Trend: None I I . I s. I i L l,. -. . - . . - - - .. .. -- - -..-.. _.__----_-- - - - . - - - -
t I e
-l-- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building 100;
+
e 80- - # t . - _ [ 60- Y , e-
.n -
t. 40- '
"/\
20- LGOOD ' O o Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun -Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 !- DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING H This graph shows the percentage .of the auxiliary building whicis is decontaminated ' (clean)basedonthetotalsquarefootage. L As of ' October 31, 1989, 83.0% of- the total square footage-of the f.uxiliary building was deconta..nated. . Adverse Trend: None-l l i a w, - , . , .
i I IMonthly Radioactive Gas Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged e- Cumulative Goal I
-785 800'-
. GOOD
+ i
- C 600-
)
u , r ' I 432- G---e---e----e - ee----e ---e----e.---e----C
>--O s 400 I, 200-0
'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l
GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING : DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to_ the environment is shown for 1989. A total of 51.3 curies have been released to the environment from January through June of 1989. The Fort Calhoun Station goal is 450 curies fer this indicator. The gaseous radioactive . waste being r discharged to the environment .is calculated every s.x months. Adverse Trend: None n
y 4j i
.# 1
. L J Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged e- Cumulative Goal L
228 231 250-l G-- -e---e--e --e ---e --+--+---e---e---e---o
.Ir 200- !
u 150- 6000 i ) llC
- e. 100- + 1 s
50- , 0 ' ' '
'86 '
87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 91 ' f - Oct Nov Dec i
'192
.g a 200-i f
)fE .
L i1f . o1f 100-l132
- no1 snu .y y se 50-
' 4 o n f t o I li si il I '
'86 '87 '88- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec <
1909 ' LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid . radioactive waste. being discharged to i the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid L radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment totaled 78.8 curies and 83.7 billions
- u. of gallons - of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid if waste plus dilution weter) faw ' January through June 1989. .
, The high amount of waste that was discharged during the month of May was due w the dilution of coolant for the mainten>- s nutane that occurred in May. The Fort Calhev ct t m -cal for 1989 is 225 curies. The liquid radioact ve v: <
- he* , discharged to the environmen; is c. i_c'- S six months.
Adverse Trer, - None l L..-:-__._._...._... '
i i
+ Security Loggable/ Reportable Incidents
}
50 I
=
N ,
" 40
-b - i
( ,, .
-p .
L 30 1
+
l o. - f: .
-I
-n 20 C^ .
1 A
-d t'
s 10 W ' - 0 Jan- lFeb- Mar Apr May Jun .Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 I LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS
-(SECURITY) l This indicator has been added to the. Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report - for the month of October, 1989. '
- The Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator shows the total' number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning
. Licensee - Designated Vehicles (LDV's), inattentive security officers, security badges, security key control, escorting, and access control for the reporting month.
the month of October, 1089, there were '13 u Durin$s/ loggab reportable incidents identified. This indicator provides infonnation on security performance p' for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58. ? Adverse Trend: None 4
$-' w. s .-.E-., . ~ . . . . , . - . . -
j - L' I l Security Badges (A Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV) j lill Inattentive Security Officer E B Security Key Contro'1 ; Escort Access Control ! s . o
/ :
1 ; ] . 4 SECURITY INCIDENTS The Security Incidents Indicator has been added to the Fort Calhoun
-Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of October, 1989. This indicator shows the percentage of incidents concerning the following items fc"'the reporting month. These items include; Licensee Designated LDV's)
Vehicles-key contro (l,- esco,rting, and access control. inattentive recurity officers, secu Security Items Number of Incidents SEP 1989 OCT 1989 LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) 2 2 . Inattentive Security Officers- 0 0 Security Badges 10 5 Security Key Control 0 1
- Escorting 3 2 -
Accens Control 4 3 Tota' 19 13 This indicator provides information on escurity performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNo.58. If Adverse Trend: An adverse trend for this indicator is indeterminable due to the fact that it was added to the Performance Indicators Report for the I- month of October, 1989.
> ; l4! .!
, e~
1
}
;i I
10- - Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts ) 8- 1 l l- . GOOD , ! ':P '6- + e- - d r .. C - u e' ,
. n-
- t. 4- 1
, 2-0 [
Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
., 1988 1989-l I.
l AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITTNG PARTS .;~
-(NON-0UTAGE)
This procurement ~ indicator displays the ' amount , of open, non-outage, maintenance-
' items- that are on hold awaiting parts, to the -total amount of open, non-outage, n maintenance items, expressed as -a percentage.
The percentage of ~ work on hold awaiting parts decreased to 4.5% in October. ' As of October 31, 1989, there were a total of 1,121 open, non-outage, maintenance - items with 50 of these items on hold awaiting parts. , My.gtse Trend: None 4
E s '
. ?
s> >
)
- Spare Parts inventory Value
- n. .
p o 7 ,
.n
's: ,
J>- - D-p - 6- . a r .. L =s' t. l. l 5
~Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep : Oct I. 1988 1989 1,
p
-{
-r 1
SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The-spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of' October 1989 was reported as $7,509,300. I Adverse Trend: None
'L e i f
1 i., y , , . . - _ _ . . - - - _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ - - - . . _ - - - - _ _ . - - _ - - . _ _ -
- e. i i
. \
- 500-T:
- Spare Parts Issued h
- o=
u - 400-
-- s a- -
.n d 300-
.s -
o' I 200- -
.o 1
- 1. 100-l- a- 4
- j. r .
i s 0
'Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul' Aug- 'Sep Oct 1980 1989 c
I j.
']
1 SPARE PARTS ISSUED -j The value of the spare parts, issued during October, 1989, totaled $192,522. 1 Adverse Trend: None , i i 52-
-- a ..-._.a __-_m_._____s _-__-.-.3 -- _e.. .m -w-. -- ,w,_.- -4,...,%. - -, , . , , wn y-.,c . - - -.- +e, . ,
I 700-
- Total Modification Packages Open 640' -l 600- 'i s
500- ; 425 _ j _
~ '
~
400-i. 300-200 -
'86 '87 '88' Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS ,' -
i The total number of rtstanding modifications ' decreased by 10 during the month of October. CATEGORY AUG hs SEP 89 OCT 89 Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 89 87 64 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 169 157 133 Design Engr. Backlog- 0 0 0 l Design Engr. In Pro ress 73 80 99 l Construction Backlo /In Progress 44 47 53 l Desion Enar. Ucdate Backloa/In Proaress 5Q E E Tota 425 426 416 As1 of the end of October, 80 additional modification requests have been issued this year. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC' L has completed 349 backlog modification request reviews this year.
'The Nuclear Projects Committoa (NPC) has completed 299 backlog modification request reviews this year. The number of reviews completed is high due to the fact that some of these reviews were reviewed more than once.
L Adverse Trenri: None , l: c
~ , _. . - - , _ _ _ _. _ _- _ . - _
l} .$' L :
- Tem;)orary E1::ctrical Modifications -
-i M 60 -a- Temporary Mechanical Modifications '
o= , ,
-Nd '
a 1: ; in f 40- ! A-N - _q%$'~~I -
~t 20- g, -
,= oi , if o: ' n0
-s Nov Dec Jan Feb' Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -
0 1988 ' 1989 I August 1989 L ' M . 4 September 1989 < l . Nl30- f l October 1989
- ui ,
af 20-s L 0-3, 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 : h Age in Months j, T EMPORARY MODIFICATIONS L ( EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) )
-The top. graph, Mumber of Temporaru Modifications, displays a monthly trend of installed electrical and mechan cal temporary modifications. There was a total of.24 electrical jumpers and 33 temporary mechanical jumpers existing in the' Fort Calhoun Station at the end of October, 1989.
l The - bottom graph, Age of Temoorary Mod fications, displays the age of all electrical and sechar.ical temporary modi 1ications by months installed in the - plant. ' f Adverse T*end: Temporary modifications continue to increase due to the age of the p' ant, discovery of desigr, basis discrepancies, the length of time required,to resolve design discrepancies, and the need for outage conditions to- resolve many items currently being satisfied with temporary'- [_' modifications. The decrear.e in the number of temporary modifications is l _ expected duo to greater awareness and control of the number and types of temporary modifications currently in the plant. New procedures, such as GEI-60,. are also being established to decrease the number of temporary modifications. !
. _ . . ~ . . - __ . . _ __. _ _ . _ _ _ _._ ___
ly M - f. 7)
; , :12 - Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate 10-F. -
r ' e' 8-
. q- *
- u. .
e.
. n 6-C
[ _ GOOD R Y I a 4- u t
-{
- 2.6 8 -
.l g"
3.5 I'0 2-
~
-0 I l'86 '87
~
, ~ 88 - 1 Jan Feb Mar, Apr' May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j Rates for 1936,'1987 1989 1 and:1988 show the- 1 I year-to-date rate .
, :for the month of October l T
RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREOUENCY RATE l
- A recordable injury case it reported if Nuclear Production Division personnel are injured - on the job and require corrective medical :
treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed or, a year-to-date basis. ;
, ;There were zero recordable injury cases reported for the month of
- October. There have been a total of 10 recordable' injury cases so far '
in 1989.. There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1988, eight reported in -1987, and. four reported in 1986. The year end recordable, injury frequency rates for 1986, 1987, and 1988 were 1.6, 2.5, and - 2.6 ;
- o respectively.
This - indicator pretides iaformation on personnel performance for SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItesNo.15. Adverse Trend: None > b 3 .. , s ..... . . - . . _ , . . , . - - - . _ . . - . _ . . - - _ _ - . , . . -_2
. _ . .. .- . --- -.m - . . . -
src , l a J. < 1 -
. f '
)
- Minor Injury Reports Filed Per Month 1 30- ,
u g .
- j. !
.n .,
20- ; o , r 15- >
--I- -
n ,. 3-. u ' 10-r j.
- a 5
s, ' G
-0 Nov Dec Jan 1'b Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug. Sep Oct 1988- 1989 .4 MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH s The Minor Injury Cases per Month indicator shows.the number of minor injury cases each ,
month involving OPPD empicyees. t n ; During the. month of October,1989 there was
~
7.. a total of 1 minor injury case reported.
"- There have buen a total of 79' minor injury ,
cases reported in 1989. Adverse Trend: Nonc 4. t R } t h
- g-~. _,...g..,,m, _,.,ny,.,-, ,, . . _ y , , r,
. . . _ . _ . . . . _ - m . ._m.. _
l 4 19' , b 1 LicoIsee Event Reports 7 , l- IPersonnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported iii LERs 50- !
, 40 ; L: . 39 '49 4 30-26 , L - 20- - 10- - 5 0 -
'86' '87 '88 Jan Feb- riar Apr: May Jun- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec 1989 l
l 1 NMER OF PERSCfDIEL ERRORS EP,,QBJED_ I ( LER' S The Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC. L l In October, 1989 there was one LER. submitted. Tnere were. zero LER's attributable to personnel error. There have been 28 LERs reported sc-~far. in 1989 with only 10 attributable to personnel errors. - This iiidicator provides information on personnel performance for Safety - Enhancement Program (SEP)
- Item No. 15.
l Adverse Trend: None l' s
'^
- .n i Lyd 4 4
- 3 i
, ,, I INuclear Divisions Turnover Rate i
- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate .i 5- ;
~
/
-T' 4-
;u .
- I r .
- n- .
-o 3- '
y :
- e. -
-r .
2-IR
.a .
~t -
e 1 -
-0 Nuclear Operations Production Engineertng Quality Division Division and ,~
s Environmental Affairs.
.u PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE 4
The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions i s' 'shown for. the last twelve ' months.'. The. = personnel turhover rate is plotted against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of ; 4.0%. . This OPPD corporate turnover rate is 4 based on the turnover rate over the last l three years.
.l Adverse, Trend: The increase in the turnover l rate "or the Quality and Environmental .. 7 Affairs Division since September was due to !
one resignation. l l l l 1 l l w a
.l
~
600 Actual Staffing ' l 537 l IAuthorized staffing
. 489 f
P 400-e
.r .
.o n
n e 2I0 202 1 200-46 45 0-Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality
' Division Division and.
Environmental Affairs ' STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels - l are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions. 1 l Adverse Trend: None l l b y l l l L , __ ._ . _ . . _ , _ . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _
i
. I ISRO Initia' Exam SRO Requalification Exam
'100-
, , 80-q P. j a
60-l s- .
~
- R l
- a. !
,j ' 40-
-o l-l 20-1
'l 0-- -
1987 1988 1989 . L SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO There were three Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) exams taken in October. OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Initini Exam Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam DATE % PA'.S RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO March 87 - - 100 100 June 87 - - - 100 February 88 - 80 - - March 88 - 100 100 67 April 88 - 100 - - l: July 88 , ic0 - April 89 - - - 67 May 89 - 100 - - - September 89 100 - - - October 89 - - 100 - Adverse Trend: None L . .
- w . . . .
. ., -.-.- - .. - - w-.. .- - . . - . . - -.-- . - . ..-- . ,
1
+
w ,
, I IR0 Initial Exas.
R0 Requalification Exam
.100- ;
80- . 1 PI
- a -
s 60- l s- Q
- R. -
a ' t
-1 '40-
. -o 20 No Requal
- Exams Taken 0--
'1987-1988i .1989 RD 11GfliE LEMIH&Il0H1.aSI.BAIIA There were fourteen Reactor Operator (RO) ,
exams taken in October.- OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED _ Initial Exam Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam ' DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RA110 % PASS RATIO June 87 - - 100 - February 88 - 100 - - March 88 - 100 100 100 July 88 - - 100 - 1
'Apr11 89 - - 100 100 May 89 -
100 - -
' September 89 100 - - -
October 89 92.9 - - - Adverse Trend: None
- 61-i w
'.- 9 '-
m++w
.n ,
f s(, + c -,
+
r 3 - R0 Hot' License Exams' Administered . L ' ~ I IR0 Hot License Exams Passed l
.N '
! . u 15- .
.- . ~,. '
b - e -
- r o10- r f
l E i x } la l R 5- . H s - 0-Jan- Feb~ Mar Apr May -Jun Jul Aug Sep :Oct- Nov Dec
'1989 L
L , l R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS E The R0 Hot L'icense Exams indicator shows the~ number of RO Hot' License exams or' quizzes taken and passed each month. During the' month of October,1989, fourteen-l exams were administered ar.d thirteen were ! passed. Adverse Trend: None - L d i m, _ _ , . . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . - . . . _ . _ ~ . -
< A 1 l :,_ -!
u i
.j p
I
~ ~
!!!! Hotlines Initiated L 50- PR Hotlines~ Closed W Hotlines Open Under 4. Weeks 1 45- 1
, Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks
- q; m -N 40-L ,l u
' b 35- .
e . j
. r < 30-o-
f 25- : i H 20-l
. - t- !
-l215- . ! .
i - l- 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul- Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec- , !. 1989 1 L HOTLINES L This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during the reperting month, the number. of Hotlines closed during the ... - reporting: month, the number of Hotlines that H remain open and are less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain p open and are older than four weeks old. L During the month of October, 1989, there were 8 Hotlines initiated, 12 Hotlines closed, 7 Hotlines that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and 3 ,. Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old. 8 Adverse Trend: None
d a 4- 1' E Planned Classroom Hours l IActual Classroom Hours u. T , h 3-o u -
.s
- J a '
i n^_ 1 d, - s 2-I
~
o' '
. f! - '
H
- o. '
L u l-I i 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours .and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. The planned classroom hours for January and February are low because Maintenance and General . Employee Treining were not figured into the schedule for these months. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time to collect and process the needed information. t Adverse Trend: None
.:: l ._._. _ _ . . ~ . . _ _ - . - _ _ . , . . ., .. . . _ .
,: # @ g O
#d> IMAGE EVALUATION ///j// / d*/4 k// -[@ TEST TARGET (MT-3) ,
l l 1.0 'WW d i yll Es i.i- [' Ills 1.8 1.25 34 1.6 1 4 150mm >
< 6" >
d*% >,%cf ,)7// e
~
##a4%
o e i
<>+# < *b 4%
b.~=w - .
h E O
#$>@h IMAGE EVALUATION ////gf 9 /// \ ,f g k/ TEST TARGET (MT-3) T6 3(@Q, e[ %'>++ %'s4 I.0 llMM E 9 Nd l 1.1 5!7 e.
E2a l.8 11:1.25 I l.4 l 1.6 ll l i
< 150mm >
< 6" >
'4 4%
#y A+4 iy////c4>% ay ////
l%,,+D o k L k. _
..m !. . a
.+ @ l IMAGE EVALUATION d Ys d>#4 t [77/p 4),7j.e'A TEST TARGET (MT-3)
R>,/@ '%f,4@ 1.0 !!m BE yljBR i,i _ [m HE I.8 l.25 l.4 1.6 4 150mm ? 4 6" > k *'+//
*rgy A c z
/$
s43),;;g+4' Dp/7777 L g K . . _
.4.,~,
$*$* & E
'8k, q)d@ g IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-3)
///,/ p 0
l.0 lt M M 3 EE l ll 5 5' lE lHe i l I.8 l_ j l.25 1.4 1.6 4 150mm >
- 6" >
[.
%///
+ ,;y />,,,,,7 .
~
/!b4 ,
o// <
<g*)3*
u~
,c . . a a
o l I IOperations j
'25 E Maintenance E Chemistry and Radiation Protection l E Technical Support j
. E General Employee Training ,
T 20 M Other - h . u ' s a : 15- ..... ; n :3:.::: d' N . s g gjg } h.10- .:x b
?
E a p u .
.un r ' " "I '
5- - s . .- E ..... .
, O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 >
TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for - the Fort Calhoun Station.
- l. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time
, needed to collect and evaluate the data. Total Hours TRAINING AUGUST 1989 SEPTEMBER 1989 Operations 1,985 2,727 Maintenance 2,186 1,541 Chemistry and 1,352 920 Radiation Protection . l Technical Support 3,187 3,381 General Employee Training 2,512 1,969
.Qt,ht,t 360 292 Total 11,582 10,830 Adverse Trend: None
-. .- - - -- .-- - - ~ . - - . - -- -
1_ .'. a L/1 , - Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal
'14 i- . GOOD 10.6 -
+ ;
9' e.___ ' ' o ___.e - -e.___o ____e.__.e.___.e.___.ef.
^
n 6-L 3- ' l .
- o. . - .
L l
- 86. . '87 '88 0~ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct- Nov Dec >
l 1989 - l VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS ) L The Violations . per 1000 Inspection Hours has been l- , . changed for: the month of October, 1989. This L " - indicator will now be one month behind the re arting
- month _due to the time - involved with collect ng and -
l . processing the data.. This indicator-displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the number of - violations and the number of inspection hours fros' the months of December, 1988, through : September, 1989. The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator , was reported as 8.6 for the month of September, ' 1989. There were zero violations cited for the month of -
. September. There have been a total. of 21 violations
- cited with 2,220 inspection hours in 1989.
The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.6. Adverse Trend: None 4 4 i y -, a+e.--e,am,.e . . - - - - - - . - ,
( ,
- Total Outstanding DR/QR's.
Outstanding DR/QR's > Six Months'01d : i Outstanding DR/QR's That Are' Modification Related . 200- l
)
l 150-D- '
-R~ -
'/
Q R 100- . u 11 50-Nov Dec, Jan' Feb Mar- Apr May Jun' Jul- -Aug Sep 'Oct 1988 1989 l l OUTSTANDING DEFICIENCY AND OUALITY REPORTS 3 This indicator shows, the total number.of Deficiency. and Quality Reports outstanding (DR/QR's), t he number of outstanding DR/QR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding DR/QR's that are . modification related. As of the end of October,1989 there were 164 outstanding DR/QR's reports, 60. DR/QR's that are greater than six months old, and 9 DR/QR's that are modification related. Adverse Trend: None n
1988 -1989
- OPI'u SIGNIFICANT MC . OPPD SIGNIFICANT WC -
i' SALP FUNCTIONAL AREA W R- DR/GR 2 VIOLATIONS LER'S- DR/Gt DR/Gt- VIG.ATIONS LER'S-- - (1 month behind) , A. Plant Operations- 1 8 11 2. O ;7- 2 :(1) N i . i B. Radiological Controls 53 0 .5 1 22 1 1 l-
- C. Maintenance / 58 2 3 16 119(15).- 7'.(4) 1- 9.
l Surveillance .; j D. Emergency Preparedness 11 0 0 1 8 0 0 0- j ' { E. Security 49 0 10 11 25 0 5 9 F. Engineering / 30 1 2 3 84 (10) 2 6 6 . Technical '! l Support i G. Safety Assessment / 110 0 10 3 66 (2) 0 1 0 ! Qurlity j Verification h H. Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 349 4 38 46 326 (27) 10 (4) 21 28 (1) , DR/0R'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT DR/0R'S VERSUS INtc VIOLATIONS ISusn VERSK LER'S REPORTED This indicator has. Leen -changed for the month of October, 1989. The number of NRC violations will now be reported one' month behind .the reporting month due to the time i involved in collecting and processing the violations.-
~
The above matrix shows the number of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and Quality Reports'(QR's) issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Division versus- the . number of , Significant DR/QR's issued by 'the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs - Division '
. versus the number of. violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory. Commission (MC) for the Fort Calhoun. Station in 1988 and 1989. Included in this. table.is the number of. Licensee a Event Reports (LER's) issued by the station each year.
In October, 1989, there were 27' DR/QR's issued, 4 L Significant DR/QR issued, 0' RC
- violations (September data), and 1 LER issued. The conthly distribution of DR/QR's, ~
Significant DR/QR's, NRC violations, and LER's are shown in parentheses. q t
< , c - - = . _ _ . - = _ _--___._____
_- - .-_-_______:-- _ . - - . - _ _ - _ - _ . - -. L-., . - - - - - -
5 ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement -includes -level III, II, and I violations issued - by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies
- discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated. enforcement 'also includes civil penalties .which are usually assessed with -level III and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated- enforcement 1 history for the Fort Calhoun Station.
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT 1
- 1. February 1985' Site Security - Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III.
A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed. P
- 2. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation. 4 No civil penalty was assessed.
- 3. May 1986 Radiological Protection - Level III Violation.
No civil penalty was assessed.
'4; December 1986 P Level IV Violation.
~Ahysical civil. penalty Security of $15,000 was assessed.
.R
- 5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.
A civil penalty of.$50,000 was assessed.
- 6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health Physics- Coverage to .Very High Radiation Areas -
Level III Violation. A civil penalty of:$75,000 was assessed.
- 7. February 1988 Design Evaluation, Design Implementation and l' Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action- of L Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed. ,
- 8. May 1988 Unlocked Very High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations.
A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed.
. __ _ .~ ._ _ .. . . _ _ . _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _____ _ _ __ - _ ._ __ _ ___ _
b ESCALATEDENFORCEMENTHISTORY(CONTINUED) ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, ,
SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level III. violation. A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
. 10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response.
No civil penalty was assessed. E D 1 _l f l-l t
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
~
Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and
-management meetings held with the NRC.
RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS -
- 1. August 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC ,
in' August. One meeting was held to discuss the security program while another meeting was held on the OPPD independent appraisal results. i
'2. October 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC t- in October. One meeting was : held concerning - the l security program while another meeting was held to-L
-discuss the training program and . the radiation protection program.
- 3. November 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC .in November. One meeting was held con::erning the Safety ;
Enhancement Program while another was held to i discuss Decay Heat Removal.,
- 4. January 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan.
- 5. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in February. This - Enforcement Conference was held !
concerning the Radiological Protection Program. !
- 6. February 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in
-l February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 7. April 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in i April. This management meeting was held concerning l l the Safety Enhancement Program. _;
- 8. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.
This management meeting was held concerning the . Safety Enhancement Program. !
- 9. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller operability.
- 10. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems.
g e-, -e- *,--o ,.,,.-+,--v,-..-.,-- --#w, , , , . ,,-,+.,ww,,-,.,,my , , , , - - , -_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - -
. . . _ . - . - . ~ _ _ --
- g. , .
P .! i SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST i This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to.the Fort Calhoun -Station and will give a " heads-up"- l look at what is scheduled in the coming months. i The Fort Calhoun Station went critical on January 29, 1989 at 9:27 a.m. following- the 1988 Refueling _ Outage.. j
.j The Fort Calhoun Station went on-line on January 31, . l 1989 at 4:46 p.m. following the 1988 Refueling i Outage. l The 1990 refueling outage ~ is scheduled for February, 15, 1990.
The INPO Assist Visit concerning the Operating Experience and Review (0ER) Group has been postponed until January, 1990. t An INPO visit- to review the status of Technical Support findings is planned for January, 1990.
- The 1990 INP0 Plant Assessment is scheduled to start on June 18, 1990. ,
l l 1 i l l l' l 1 ! 1; e
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS 3 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding non-outage s Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in ; months.- AMOUNT Of WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator- is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders. AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first : sample exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to be back with<n limits. CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. ' CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported. CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The percentage of a - type of work performed by each craft d". ing the reported month involving plant personnel. DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point .XC105 in thermal megawatts. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply system, lubricating oil system, starting air system, autostart controls, manual controls, and diesel generator breaker. Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the-last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)' DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (CONTINUED) . A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of - I this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time ; period of:60 minutes. A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency or a valid test. The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of ' the failures and the successful runs. ; This definition Of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1". This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reliability 1 at the Fort Calhoun Station. l_ DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include I contractor personnel. l I DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)
-The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue.
EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by; equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period. l- EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to L gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation L is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations: Maximum y generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuous'y at maximum capacity. 74-i, I d , - , ---,w,---,, ->cs , ,, ,- . , e, ,,w.--- ,, - , _ , - -,---w- - - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - - . _ _ . - _ _ ----- ---
l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) e . FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator - is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical _ generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is- ' available but not in service.. FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.present Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power 1 for at least seven days. GASEOUS RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT 'l 1 This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station. GROSS HEAT RATE l 1 Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in British Thermal Units .(BTU) produced by the reactor to the total gross i electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH). l HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, I halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the ' Fort Calhoun Station each month. HOTLINES l The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for imediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of 1, receipt of the Hotline. L L l v . . _ . ..... _ .- _ . . _ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . . , ,
l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined'as greater than 30% @wer. The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator-pH, cation conductiv'ity, boron silica,. chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, i dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump. discharge dissolved; oxygen. IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE. 2 Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in l theSecondarySystemandthePostAccidentSamplingSystem(PASS). ] LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT l This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies - L discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River. ' LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE-INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The total number of security incidents for the reporting month. This indicator tracks security performance for SEP Item No. 58. MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the l Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 36. c MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN i l This indicator is a breakdown of all open non-outage maintenance work orders by several categories. MAINTENANCE OVERTIME I The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel. MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation L received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis. MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH The number of minor injury cases (short-form cases) involving OPPD employees. l L _ __ _ __ . . _ . _ . _ . _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ . . . _ . _ . _ . . . . _ . _ . . . . . _ _ _ . _ . . . -
p . k l FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) s t' NLMBER CF - NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS -
- SLBMITTE )
The ~ data plotte'd is the total number of NPRDS component failures , (confirmed and ' possible) and the number of confirmed NPRDS component i failures. The total. number of NPRDS component failures are based on the ' number of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of Nuclear- ; Operations (INPO). Confirmed NORDS component failures are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by INPO..Possible NPRDS com>onent failures are- based upon failure reports that are still under rev ew by
- INPO.
NPRDS is the ~ Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and implemented at the fort Calhoun Station. : NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS \ A control room- instrument that cannot perform its design function is l considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a l Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by
.. the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be !
counted.-The duration of the out-of-service condition.is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. i l NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S , The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error ~, on the original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel ' performance for SEP Item No. 15. l 1 NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This' indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC i inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC ins-)ection ! hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect'on was I l actually pe.rformed and not based on when the inspection re port is l received. The hours reported for each inspection report are uset as the ; inspection hours. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET l
. The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance. .l OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS ,
The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between the issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing l update. l
)
I
p FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) OUTSTANDINGMODIFICATIONS(CONTINUEDJ, l Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved. . Modification Requests Being Reviewed r This category includes: 1.) . Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed 2.)-* ModificationRequestsbeingreviewedby)the NuclearProjectsReviewCommittee(NPRC 3.) ModificationRequestsbeing(reviewedbythe Nuclear Projects Committee NPC) L
* - These Modification Requests may be reviewed several times L
i before they are ap) roved for accomplishme'it or cancelled. Some of these Modificat"on Requests are returned to Engineering for i .- more -information, some approved for evaluation, some approved u for study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined. these Modification Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled. All q of these different phases require. review. , l- Design Engineering Backlog Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed, but PED has not started design work. L Design Engineering In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress.
- Construction Backlog /In Progress '
The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System AcceptanceCommittee(SAC). I' Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress i PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the l drawings'have not been updated. l 1 1 L
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTI'NUED) PERCENT OF'DR/0R'S GREATER THAN SIX MONfHS OLD This indicator disahy:; the percentage of Deficiency Reports (DR's) and I QualityReports(QRs}thataregreaterthansixmonthsold. I PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) i Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose-received by. all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors during a_ time >eriod, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD)) . Collective rad"ation exposure is reported in units of man-rem. PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE -
.The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is 3 a vacancy created b l death,- termination, transfers y voluntary resignation within the company,from and the company. Retirement,-
part-time employees are not considered in turnover. , I PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG The total number of preventive maintenance backlog items, the number of I old backlog preventive maintenance items, and the number of new backlog ! preventive maintenance items for the reporting month. Old backlog items L include preventive maintenance items that have exceeded their late date. l New backlog items include preventive- maintenance items overdue for the l' reporting month. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE . This indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in- the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval. PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used. PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) The number of procedural noncompliance incidents involving maintenance that were closed during the reporting month. This ind'catar trends i personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15. I 1 l L
s K 'FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) RATIO OF HIGHEST PRIORITY MWO'S TO TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETEf. This indicator is defined as the ratio of the number of highest priority, non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders (priority 4 or 5) to the ! total number of ; non-outa ; n expressed as a percen'. age.ge, corrective maintenance work orders completed, : RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio- of? preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenanco and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel perfonnance for SEP Item l No. 15. R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken l and passed for the month they were taken. l ~RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO 1 The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Reactor Operator (RO) license examination to the total number of candidates i taking examinations. 1; I SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX i l The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based - on the
- l. concentration of key impurities- in. the secondary side of the plant. These i
key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators.- The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power. The following equation is how the CPI is calculated: CPI =((Ka/1.2)+(Na/20)+(C1/20)+(SO/20)+(0/10))/5 4 2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; L Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator Blowdown Sodium Concentration C1 = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration ! SO Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration 02 4 == Condensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration _ . _ . . _ . ~ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ -
i
- FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)'
SECURITY INCIDENTS This ~ indicator shows a percentile breakdown of the types of Security-incidents for the reporting month. The following items are the types. of. Security incidents represented in this indicator. LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's). I ' Incidents related to- the use of LDV's, e.g. ke ' vehicle,-loss of keys, or failure to return keys.ys left in the Security Badges - Incidents involving lost / unattended badges, badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges. Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilities, e.g. improper control or escort of a visitor (s). Inattentive Security Officers , Incidents -involved' with the inattentiveness of Security officers. L Security Key Control Incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost Security l ' keys, Security keys removed from site, or failure to return i; Security keys. This type of incident does not reflect incidents concerning.LDV keys. Access Control Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages, and vehicles, e.g. failure to properly search personnel, packages, and vehicles. This item also includes the E introduction or contraband or prohibited items into the Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items. This indicator tracks security performance for SEP Item No. 58. SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE L The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period. l-l l I
-
- ww -,e - - - - ,:_ . . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ , _ -
' l FORT CALHOUN FERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) l SPARE PARTS ISSUED The dollar. value of the s >are part issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc.
SR0 OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC. Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license examination to the total number of ; candidates taking examinations. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONQ 3 The number of temporary-mechanical and electrical configurations to the. i plant's systems. 1 Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical ! blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in ' , the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of: i
- the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams, j i
Jumpers and blocks which are installed for' Surveillance Tests', l Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or 1 0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless ! tte-~ jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is - L complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not L considered as temporary modifications. 1 Scaffolding is not considered a tem >orary radification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for whici EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the l EEAR and-the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the 1 drawings. TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING ; The total number of student hours of training for Operations, 1 Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, l General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort ; Calhoun Station. i I TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS L Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels 1 greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends personnel l performance for SEP Item No. 15. j
.r . _,_. ~ . _ --
1 FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) J UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE-CRITICAL
~
This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams' I (reactor protection system logic-actuationJ) that occur while the reactor is critical. The indicator is further defined as follows: Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution.- J Scram means- the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have ; resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious.- Automatic means thatLthe initial signal that caused actuation ef the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of ' E the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main ! control room. Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff) was equal to one. , UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS L, This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations: the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint-or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal H - the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations H that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus-An . unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety (system is generated ECCS only), is reached or when and major a spurious equipment in the or inadvertent system signal is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety I injection tanks. e
e, , FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) VOLUME OF LOW--LEVEL SOLID P.ADI0 ACTIVE WASTE ; This : indicator 'is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive
~
waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for dismsal, plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in- final form ! ready- for burial. The volume of radioactive waste that is not yet in j final form- ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid j radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges resins, and evaporatorbottomsgeneratedasaresultofnuclearpowerplantoperation and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning , materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any I other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste : disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level l refers to all radioactive waste-that is not spent fuel or a by-product of I spent fuel processing. ) l L I S i l 84-
*%, my *- y *+wr----m- a- 'aw-e- -m e ei a _+g--r'swtem+*- e- -- g=-w--@ r_im au- m we-w-em- ew- w m e ? N
- r 3*w
l-BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS I l L
-1 Tliis section will explain the basis used in establishing the - 1989 l l- performance 90als. I i
FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) ) goals have been established from 1989 to 1992. The following table is a j breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next five j years. STARTUP i GENERATOR- FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ! ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR Jfg (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS), (HOURS) f),). ,(1), 3 l; 1989(**) 7783 168 172 737 8750 84.4 2.1 1990(*) 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9' 2.3 1991(*). 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7
~
(** (*))RefuelingOutageYearsThe 1988 Refueling Outage continued into Janu M PLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL ( The 1989 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor. Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic reactor scram in the past three years of operation. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1989 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last five years. GROSS HEAT RATE ' The 1989 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at -10,500 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on the 1988 goal of 10,075 BTU /KWH less 20.6 MW(e) stated in memo TS-FC-83-233H, written on July 17, 1983. This states that operation without the governing stage of the turbine results in a gross electrical output loss of 20.6 MW(e). BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS ' (CONTINUED) FUEL RELIABILITY INDICAIQB, The 1989 - Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal- has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap)roximately one to two fuel pin , failures. A'lthough Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin- ; failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been - used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The"- Failed Fuel Action Plan Standing Order 0-43, allows for -approximatel four fuel pin failures pr,ior to implementing any increased action levels.y ' PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) - The 1989 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 130 man-rem. This goal was based on 50 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the month of l January,1989, and approximately 7.5 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the months of February,1989, through December,1989. ' VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The' 1989 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 6,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a recommendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division. DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE l ! The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1989 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1989. t l
l
=:
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES 1 PRODUCTION ' CUMULATIVE p EVENT FROM - T0 (MWH)- (MWH) , Cycle 1- 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 ; Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 I Third Refueling . 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 I Fourth Refueling 10/14/78'- 12/24/78
- Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling- 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle.8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling '03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 OC/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/15/90*
Twelfth Refueling 02/15/90*- 05/11/90* Cycle 13 05/11/90*- 09/01/91*
* - Planned Dates
FORT CALHOUN STATION ; PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS i
.The following seven- items are the current production and operation -I
" records".for the Fort Calhoun Station.
. I
.1. First Sustained Reaction . .o. . . . . . . .-. . . August 5,1973(5:47p.m.)-
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the System . . . . . August 25, 1973.
3.CommercialOperation(180,000 KWH).......c. September 26, 1973- . 4.AchievedFullPower(100%).............May4,1974
-5.LongestRun(477 days).............; June 8,11987 - Sept. 27,1988 6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.MostProductiveFuelCycle(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8,1987-Sept.27,1988
- (Cycle 11) !
v i L' l 9 l L
~ - - .- --. - -. .-- - - -. . .
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL ! Age'of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Shrum Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Henning Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Shrum
. Craft Work Activity Peterson/Shrum !
Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray ; Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Christensen Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log Disabling Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs Document Review Peterson/McKay DR/QRs Issued.Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Krieser Equipment Forced Outapes per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek h Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fual Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz
- L Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray
( Hazardous Waste Produced Schmidt/Sayre Hotlines Gasper /Kobunski In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Schmidt/Renaud Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz ! Loggable/ReportableIncidents(Security) Peterson/Ritter Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) Peterson/Shrum 1 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Shrum i Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Shrum
1 4 PERFORNANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)
- Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice !
Minor Injury Cases per Month Peterson/McFadden Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Chase /Rfva Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Trausch Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File Number of. Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Krieser Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent
. Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner
~ '
Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Krieser 1 PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative) Peterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Backlog Peterson/ Linden Preventiye Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/ Linden Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits / Jaworski'Henning Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) Peterson/ Smith Ratio of Highest Priority MW0s to Total MW0s Completed Peterson/Shrum Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Shrum Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs
)
- 1. R0 Hot License Exams Gasper / Herman R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Henning Security Incidents Peterson/Ritter Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager ]
l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) 1 Temporary Modifications Jumper Log j Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse ) Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Christensen I Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray-l Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Bilau I 8 l I I
. . . _ - -- _. _ _ . . . . - _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ . - - . - - - ~ _ _ . - - _ - - - . - - - -- - ~ ~ -
l
REFERENCES INPO. Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" IEEE.-Standard 762, "IEEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 1 J' i i _ . _ . . _ _ _ __ . . . -}}