ML19332D122

Responds to NRC 891006 Request for Addl Info Re Proposed Combined Emergency Operations Facilities.Proposed Combined Staffing Plan & Positions & Work Locations Encl

ML19332D122
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom, Limerick, 05000000
Issue date:	11/21/1989
From:	Hunger G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 8911300040
Download: ML19332D122 (16)

Text

[

as t

a.

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY NUCLEAR GROUP HEADQUARTERS 955-65 CHESTERBROOK BLVD.

WAYNE, PA 19087 5691 "ov*r 21.1989 m i........

Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 i

50-352 50-353 License Nos. DPR-44 DPR-56 NPF-39 t

NPF-85 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk We,shington, DC 20555 i

SUBJECT:

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 Response to Request for Additional-Infomation Concerning Proposed Combined Emergency Operatiotas Facility l

Dear. Sir:

?

Attached is Philadelphia Electric Company's (PECo's) response to an NRC letter dated October 6, 1989, requesting additional information concerning the proposed combined Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) for Limerick Generating Station (LGS) and Peach Botton Atomic Power Station (PBAPS).

10n September 30, 1988, we submitted a letter requesting NRC approval 1

of a combined EOF for both LGS and PBAPS. This new facility would be located

- adjacent to an existing PECo service center and would be greater than 20 miles from the PBAPS site.

In response to our September 30, 1989 request, the NRC transmitted a letter dated December 6, 1988, requesting additional information j.

concerning this proposed combined EOF.

On August 10, 1989, we submitted a response to the NRC request, dated December 6, 1988, for additional information regarding this proposed combined EOF. Based on the NRC's review of the information we provided in our August 10, 1989 submittal, the NRC determined that additional information was still necessary regarding the acceptability of the proposed EOF. Accordingly, the NRC requested additional information by letter dated October 6, 1989. Specifically.

the NRC requested that we provide additional information pertinent to EOF staffing and communication capabilities with offsite teams.

0 9

g;P3288se $$Mj$37 I

... _ _ _... - _ _ _. _ _ _.. _, _ -..,. _, ~ _ _

m

W. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 Document Control Desk The attached response restates each question specified in the NRC October 6, 1989 letter along with our response. The information necessary to adequately address each of the NRC's questions is provided in the following

)

attachments. - Response to October 6, 1989 Request for Additional Infomation - Proposed EOF Staffing Plan - Proposed EOF Staffing and Corresponding Company i

Organizational Positions and Work Locations - Proposed EOF Staffing Travel Times If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, y

Z G. A.

nger Jr.

Director Licensing Section Nuclear Services Department Attachments cc:

W. T. Russell. Administrator Region I. USNRC T. J. Kenny. USNRC Senior Resident Inspector. LGS T. P. Johnson USNRC Senior Resident Inspector. PBAPS i

h y

.-.r

~ - - - -

,,,._i-._

__.,_._,--.~..._.,,,-...,_..-,,,,,,.._..._.-or-.

1 t-e

,3 l

i

[

ATTACHMENT 1

l' l

1 3-

!r i

i-h RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 6,1989 f

NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4

F.

k i,

5

($y.

a d-y,.

/j "l,

p

,9 g.

ATTACHMENT 1 I

l

~

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY n

RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4

REGARDING THE PROPOSED COMMON EMERGENCY OPERATIONS l

FACILITY FOR THE LIMERICK GENERATING STATION AND PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION,

Background

i l_

On August 10, 1989, Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) submitted a response to an NRC letter dated December 6, 1988, requesting additional infomation concerning the proposed combined Emergency Operations facility (EOF) l fortheLimerickGeneratingStation(LGS)andPeachBottomAtomicPowerStation (PBAPS) to be located in Coatesv111e, Pennsylvania.

In reviewing the information provided in our August 10, 1989 response, the NRC concluded thct additional information was still necessary to determine the acceptability of the proposed Coatesville EOF. Therefere, the NRC letter dated October 6, 1989 requested additional infomaticn pertinent to the proposed EOF's staffing and 4

communication capabilities with offsite teams.

The following section, " Response to Request for Additional Information j

Issues," provides the information requested by the October 6, 1989 NRC letter.

Response to Request for Additional Infomation Issues NRC Item 1.

Provide the proposed staffing plan for 3e new EOF.

List the proposed staff by title, indicating where they work (corporate office or at one of the plants) and where they live in relationship to the proposed EOF (miles and travel time).

Response

The proposed staffing plan for the Coatesville EOF would involve combining the personnel and capabilities of the existing LGS and PBAPS EOFs, and the Headquarters Emergency Support Center located in Philadelphia. The proposed EOF i.

could be adequately staffed by the key emergency response organization personnel

. ithin 60 minutes in accordance with the direction of NUREG-0696 " Functional w

r Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities." This staffing plan also utilizes the support staff call-out ability to meet additional staffing commitments.

Attachments are provided detailing specific information regarding the E0F e

staffing plan. The attachments identified below provide the necessary information regarding E0F staffing, travel times, company organizational positions, and work location relationships.

o Attachment 2 - Proposed EOF Staffing Plan o Attachment 3 - Proposed EOF Staffing and Corresponding Company Organizational Positions and Work Locations o Attachment 4 - Proposed EOF Staffing Travel Times The information provided in these attachments may be subject to change since revisions to the LGS o-PBAPS Emergency Plans or Emergency Plan l

e

id 0

Page 2 Implementing Procedures may necessiate the r.eed to revise the information provided in these attachments.

r

}=

NRC Item I-2.

Provide a description of the communications system proposed to connunicate between the proposed EOF and the offsite teams.

Response

i The existing methods for conmonicating between each site's EOF and emergency response field radiation survey and environmental sampling teams is by radio. This method can also serve as a backup connunication link between the EOFs and the respective stations during emergencies in the event that normal connunications are disrupted. This form of connunication will continue to be p

used at the proposed Coatesville EOF for communicating with field radiation L

survey and environmental sampling teams, and backup connunications with tha

' stations.

e

}

The radio link between the offsite teams and the proposed combined 1

Coatesv111e EOF will be modeled after the system that currently exists at LGS to

[

communicate between offsite teams located in regions of the LGS Emergency 6

- Planning Zone (EPZ) and the existing LGS EOF. This radio connunications system p

utilizes mobile radios in offsite team vehicles and handheld portable radios to i

4-connunicate information through a central repeater located at the station, j

PBAPS also has a central repeater located at the station for emergency communication use. Both the LGS and PBAPS central radio repeaters are 200 watt 2

F transmitter / receivers. These repeaters provide the necessary radio coverage for communicating with offsite teams in the EPZs around each plant site. The central radio repeaters will be hardwired to on-site radio consoles located at j

e each station's Control Room Operations Support Center, and Technical Support 1

i Center. In addition. these central radio repeaters will be connected to off j

site radio consoles located at the proposed Coatesv111e EOF via PECo's existing

~

microwave communications system.

The power supply for the central radio repeaters located at each station will be capable of being supplied by emergency power from a station emergency diesel generator with automatic transfer to batteries as an alternate power j

l source. To ensure that constant radio communication is maintained between the t

2 offsite teamr. and the proposed Coatesville EOF, a new radio repeater will be i

installed at the proposed EOF to serve as a radio backup link to the central radio repeater at each station should the normal microwave connunication link became inoperable. Therefore, the radio consoles located at the proposed EOF could then be manually switched to the EOF repeater in order to maintain communications.

s This radio connunication system will ensure reliable connunications between i

offsite field radiation survey and environmental sampling teams, located in any region of either the LGS or PBAPS EPZs, and personnel at the proposed Coatesville E0F.

l

- - =

~;

, fy.. a

; s.

j.

0 4

o

.$' Ti; r

? ATTACHMENT. 2

{I r.

-j-f PROPOSED EOF 1

.8TAFFING PLAN r

[.

4' p

l p

jf al sig pp h

m ATTACHMENT 2

$1 t-lL o PROPOSED COMBINED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF) jl STAFFING PLAN i

j{t

L

4,

EMERGENCY RES' 7NSE MANAGER

p k1 i

HEALTH PHYSICS and CHEMISTRY COORDINATOR g:

.'j.-

I'

.__ DOSE ASSESSMENT TEAM LEADER

'I

_ EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COORDINATOR

.j s

t:

I ADMINISTRATIVE and LOGISTICS COORDIN ATOR

[

1' j_

PLANNING and SCHEDULING COORDINATOR h:

yl,

__ SECURITY COORDIN ATOP

[;

t:

_ -DESIGN and. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT COORDINATOR i--

.t 9

_ CORE PHYSICS COORDIN ATO3 i

- COMMUNICATORS and STATUS BOARD KEEPE RS

)-

l.

i'

y

[;' j('l e:

u A:

M

~]

.?..

f f

t E.

ATTACHVIENT 3 1;-

-i d.1 t'

~,

t-PROPOSED EOF STAFFING AND

?

CORRESPONDING COMPANY ORGANIZATIONAL POSITIONS AND WORK LOCATIONS-e i-?

i'.'

i.:

.I i'

p 4

L L

p l;

b

s:

<,:.x m umu-m-m - w w: w w.u a.w s a,4 w uasa >; m m 6 1 & dig w irix s w Jee- & c.6 L % t W, ' 1ri ct un~

y

-3 S-g ;

^

~

ATTACHMENT 3 PROPOSED COMBINED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS: FACILITY (EOF)

STAFFING AND ' CORRESPONDING-COMPANY ORGANIZATIONAL POSITIONS /AND WORK LOCATIONS AVAIL ABLE EOF DESIG N ATED INDIVIDUALS WORK

-CURRENT COMPANY POSITION RESPO,NDERS REQUIRED NAME LOCATION ;ORG ANIZATIONAL POSITION EMERGENCY 4 (***)

1 (***)

G.1L EI TCH LOS VP. LGS

RESPONSE

D. SMITH PBAPS VP.PBAPS MANAGER S. KOMLSKI CB VP. NUCLE AR ENGIN E ERIN G

)

D. HELWIG CB.

VP. NUCLEAR SUPPORT l

DOSE 3 (***)

1 (***)'

K. HOLSOPPLE CB DIR., R ADI ATION PROTECTION l

ASSESSMENT J. M c FA D D E N CB SUPERISOR. DOSIM ETRY I

TEAM LE ADER D.ROMBOLD CB P H YSICIST I

l DOSE 5 (***)

1 (***)

S. LEVIN E CB

~ PHYSICIST ASSESSMENT A. ALLOMY CB P H YSICI ST TEAM MEB4BERS H. CUKIER CB ENGINEER K.BORTON CB ENGINEER M.ALPER CB PHYSICIST FIELD SURVEY S (***)

1 (***)

ASSIGNED FROM PBAPS AND LGS HEALTH GROUP LEADERS RESPECTIVE SITES PHYSICS SUPERVISORS l

H E A LT H P H YSICS 3 (*)

1 (*)

J. McFADDEN CB SUPERVISOR. DOSIM ETRY i

AND CHEMISTRY K. PRZEWORSKI CB PHYSICIST l

COO R DIN ATOR J. WILEY CB CHEMISTRY CONSULTANT l

l l

_______u a-

~

w.,' w, n u. A.sm..

ewa mww = "

~

ATTACHMENT 3 (CONTINUED)

PROPOSED COMBINED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF)

STAFFING AND CORRESPONDING COMPANY. ORGANIZATIONAL POSITIONS AND WORK LOCATIONS (CONTINUED)

AVAILABLE EOF DESIG N ATED INDIVIDU ALS.

WORK CURRENT COMPANY POSITION RESPONDERS REQUIRED.

NAME LOCATION ORG ANIZATIONAL POSITION AD M IN IST R ATIV E 3 (*)

1 (*)

8. MIN AKOWSKI C O R P O P. AT E TECHNICAL BUYER T. STAPLEFORD CO R POR AT E MGR., SERVICE OPER ATIONS AND LOGISTICS T. ROEHRIG COR POR AT E SUP*T., G AS DIST RIBU TION.

COO R DIN ATOR DESIGN AND 2 (*)

1 (*)

L. PYRIH CB M G R., NUCLE AR EN GIN EERING A. HOGAN CB STAFF ENGINEER CO N ST R U CTIO N K. POWERS CB M OR., EN GIN E ERIN G D EVEL.

SUPPORT COORDIN ATOR CORE PHYSICS 5 (**)

.1 (**)

L. RUBINO CB SUP*T. FUEL M AN AGEMENT W. LEE CB SUPERVISBNG ENGINEER COO R DIN ATOR J.' MLDM AN CB ENGINEER C.BORNAND CB ENGINEER l

W. G ASSM AN N CB ENGINEER CORE PHYSICS 9 (**)

1 (**)

L. RUBINO CB SUP*T, FUEL M AN AGE M ENT W. LEE CB SUPERVISBNG ENGINEER COORDIN ATOR STAFF J. mLOM AN CB ENGINEER C.BORNAND CB ENGINEER W. G ASSM AN N CB ENGINEER D. GL ASSIC CB ENGINEER S.HESSE CB ENGINEER A.0LSON CB ENGINEER G. STOREY CB ENGINEER

'\\

t u.

n..

m.-;_,__m._.....

_. - ~.. _ _ _ ~, _

..- m a_

_a

.-,.~ m e.

> - - -.....,.,.. _.. - _. _..... _.. ~ _

ATTACHMENT 3 (CONTINUED)'

PROPOSED COMBINED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF)

' STAFFING AND CORRESPONDING COMPANY ORGANIZATIONAL-POSITIONS.'AND WORK LOCATIONS (CONTINUED)

AVAIL AB LE -

EOF DESIG N ATE D INDIVIDUALS WORK CURRENT COMPANY -

POSITION RESPONDERS REQUIRED NAME LOCATION ORG ANIZATIONAL POSITION PL ANNING AND 6 (*)

1 (*)

G.MADSEN

-LGS WORK COORD. ENGINEER D. POLIEf!O LOS OUTAGE SCHED. SUPERVISO A -

SCHEDULING F. Z ASTOWT LGS ENGINEER COOR DIN ATOR (3)

PBAPS TO BE ASSIGNED SECURITY 5 (*)

1 (*)

J. McGOLDRICK COR PO R ATE M GR.. CL AIMS SECURIT Y R.DENEEN COR PO R AT E DIR.. SECU RIT Y ADMIN.

COO R DIN ATO R J.RULLO COR PO R AT E DIR.. SECURITY OPER ATIONS T. O'DONNELL COR PO R AT E SENIOR AGENT N. CARTER CO R PO R AT E IN V E STIG ATO R E M E RG E N CY 4 (*)

1 (*)

A.DAUGHERTY CB

- ENGIN EER J.GERHART CB PHYSICIST P R E PAR E D N E SS K.SCHLECKER CB P H YSICIST COORDIN ATOR M. M EZI AS CB AN ALYST. SUP ERVISORY COM M U NICATOR S 9 (=**)

1 (***)

G.FOUST CB ENGINEER M.HARMON CB ENGINEER M. K R AY CB

~ ENGINEER C. L APISH CB-

. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT -

F. LEAR CB ENGINEER

- K. LEE CB TECHNICAL ASSISTANT '

L. MIDDLETON

-CB-AN ALYST M. R ESTA NIO CB ENGINEER G. SIE FE RT CB ENGINEER

3

=.u -

6 ;;'

ATTACHMENT '3 (CONTINUED)

PROPOSED COMBINED EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF).

STAFFING AND CORRESPONDING COMPANY ORGANIZATIONAL--

POSITIONS AND WORK LOCATIONS (CONTINUED)

AVAILABLE EOF DESIG N ATED INDIVIDUALS WORK C LAENT COMPANY POSITION RESPONDERS REQUIRED

~ NAME LOCATIO N ORG ANIZATIONAL POSITION -

STATUS BOARD 6 (=~)

1(~~)

C. L AU LE T TA CB TR AINING SUPERVISOR J. JOSEPH CB IN ST R U CTO R L.ANDRES CB TECHNICAL ASSISTAN T KEEPERS J.BUCKLEY CB ENGINEER R.GROPP CB TECHNICAL ASSISTANT H. RYAN CB TECHNICAL ASSISTANT

.L NOTES:

.i LGS - LIM ERICK GENER ATING STATION

[

PBAPS - PE ACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION CORPOR ATE - CORPOR ATE HE ADQU ART ERS. PHIL ADELP HI A CB - CHESTERBROOK. NUCLE AR GROUP HE ADOU ARTERS M G R. - M A N AG E R SUP'T - SUP ERINTENDENT DIR. - DIRECTOR

( --) - 60 MINUTE RESPONSE COMMITMENT

(~) - 90 MINUTE RESPONSE COMMITMENT

(=) - 120 MINUTE RESPONSE COMMITMENT 1

h

y.-

,e o:

vm

. t-x

) :

p.-

1 1:r t,

i ATTACHMENT 4 rL:

t.

t-3

~

'I h*-

PROPOSED EOF

[

STAFFING TRAVEL TIMES o

l l

1 1.,

b i

J 4

I i.

t '

I, I

j ':

I

/

/

[A

,j r j

[M ATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSED COMBINED l

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF)

STAFF-RESPONSE TIMES PERSONNEL RESPONSE TIMES FROM RESIDENCE u

['

TO PROPOSED EOF -

I Lv 1 6 h!

AVAIL ABL E AP P ROXIM ATE AP P ROXIM AT E.

i~

D ESIG N AT E D MIL E AG E TIME TR AVELLED EOF POSITION RESPONDERS (MILES)

(MINUTES) 1 1'

A.

I.-

EM ERGEN CY RESPONSE 4 (***)

40 50

')

M A N AG E R 45 50 e'

58 75 j'

40 50 i

j

-- DOSE' AS*LESSM E N T 3 (***)

39 60 L

TEAM LE ADER 105 (A)

'12 0 ( A) 15 25

}-

(

DOSE ASSESSMENT 5 (***)

78 ( A) 120 ( A)

L

- TEAM MEMBERS 50 60 j]

A 15 20 1

29 45 l'

30 45 l'.

FIELD SURVEY 5 (***)

38 50 j-OROUP LEADER (D) 15 25 1

71 ( A) 85 (A) 39 45 1

28 45

[

HE ALTH PHYSICS and 3 (*)

31 45' Y.

CHEMIST RY COORDIN ATOR 32 45 I

32 43

?.

ADMINISTR ATIVE and 3 (*)

44 60 LOGISTICS COORDIN ATOR 27 40 30 45 DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION 3 (*)

55 90 SU PPORT COORDIN ATOR 30 45 10 20 k

(

).

iLy e

v-f;n; u t

, T* -

e j'

r,

{

' ATTACHMENT 4-(CONTINUED) e l

PROPOSED COMBINED F

EMERGENCY. OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF)

STAFF RESPONSE-TIMES 1:

PERSONNEL RESPONSE TIMES FROM RESIDENCE 1

TO-PROPOSED EOF (CONTINUED)

..:C g :'

i AVAIL ABLE AP P ROXIM ATE

- APPROXIM ATE I

3:

DESIG N AT E D MILE AG E

- TIME TR AVE LLED

[-

EOF POSITION RESPONDERS (MILES)

(MINUTES) l-CORE PHYSICS 5 (**)

4 10

[;-

COO R DIN ATOR 15 25 31 45 3 -~.

23 30 23 30 h-CORE PHYSICS 9 (**)

4 10 f

COORDIN ATOR STAF F 15 25

};

26 40 4

31 45 26-40 J.

28 40 23 30 23 30 h2 1

5

}

{'

~ PLANNING and 6 (*)

15 30 SCHEDULING COORDIN ATOR 28 45 f-85 90 a

36 50 i

I 60 75 h.1 45 50 5'

O I

OR 2

40 30 4.

15 35 60 75

. E M E RG E N CY P R E PAR E DN E SS 4 (*)

15 30 l

COO RDIN ATO R 68 90 l

18 35 0

50 75 j'ie f.'

U

y,,,,,y.,-

g:r-a w

x

[ll.*'

' i ha

{;~

V m

ATTACHMENT 4_(CONTINUED) h PROPOSED COMBINED

' EMERGENCY: OPERATIONS FACILITY (EOF)

-STAFF RESPONSE TIMES PERSONNEL RESPONSE TIMES FROM RESIDENCE TO PROPOSED EOF (CONTINUED)

L:

z;i f

AVAIL ABLE AP P ROXIM AT E AP P ROXIM AT E j-DESIG N AT E D MILE AG E TIME TRAVELLED H',

EOF POSITION RESPONDERS (MILES)

(MINU T ES) '

!i 2

- f i.

1:

3 STATUS POARD 6 (***)

30 45 j

k '-

KEEPERS 26 40

'{'

42 60 1

30 45

i-30 45-15 30 l

l(~

C O M M U N IC ATO R S 9 (***)

29 45 20 25 f.

44 60 t

30 45 30 45

~

30 45 45 60

).

36 50 26 45

-)1

=t ;

i>

g E

NOTES:

(**a) - 60 MINUTE RESPONSE TIME COMMITMENT

-l'

. (**) - 90 MINU1E RESPONSE TIME COMMITMENT g :-

(*) - 120 MINUTE RESPONSE TIME COMMITMENT b

( A) - DESIGN ATED SECOND SHIFT RESPONDER

'1 -

(D) - FIELD SURVEY GROUP MEMBERS WILL BE j:

DISPATCHED FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE SITES lkof7 m l-J iy