ML19332A967

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Response to IE Bulletin 79-03A.Two Pieces Type 300 Series Fusion Welded Pipe Installed in Containment Spray Sys.Both Pieces Removed.Subj Pipe in Storage Will Be Removed from Site
ML19332A967
Person / Time
Site: Waterford 
Issue date: 08/06/1980
From: Aswell D
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Seyfrit K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
References
IEB-79-03A, IEB-79-3A, LPL-14720, NUDOCS 8009190158
Download: ML19332A967 (2)


Text

$

PDR

.o LPDR TIC' -

NSIC CENTRAL FILES LOUISIANA P O W E R & L I G H T[ P O. 80X 6008 + New CRLeANS. LCU:SIANA 70174 ua asuncNee sraser N$'s sysSe O L ASWEL August 6, 1980 va %.mm,w %eucum LPL 14720 Q-3-A20.03.13 Mr. Karl V. Seyfrit, Director, Region IV U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington Texas 76012

SUBJECT:

Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 IE Bulletin 79-03A Longitudinal Weld Defects in ASME SA-312, Type 304 Stainless Steel Pipe

Dear Mr. Seyfrit:

We have reviewed the subject IE Bulletin concerning the possibility of existence of undetected longitudinal weld defects in ASME SA-312 Type 304 Stainless Steel Pipe.

LP&L investigated this matter and determined that our Waterford 3 SES project site has purchased 100 feet - 10 inches (5 - 20 ft. random length pieces) of 10 inch Sch 40, SA-312, Type 304 welded pipe from SWEPC0 Tube Corporation.

The status of this material is:

A.

98 feet - 4 3/4 inches - not installed, stock material on HOLD in Ebasco storage.

B.

13% inches - installed as part of piping shown on IC-24 (4305-3 R13) and subsequently removed.

C.

6 inches - installed as part of piping shown on IC-24 (4305-3 R13) and subsequently removed.

D.

Ik inches - consumed making 5 cuts.

E.

9 inches - discarded by Tompkins-Beckwith after making some practice welds.

The two pieces, B and C above, were installed in the Containment Spray System (Safety Class 2, in RAB).

The problem was discussed at length with our A/E and on their recommendations these two pieces were removed.

8009190/5P-g

cr Mr. Karl-.V. Seyfrit LPL 14720 Page.2 Our~A/E does not recommend using this material because of potential cracking at the weld because of centerline lack of weld penetration (CLP).

We have, therefore, initiated efforts to' remove the remaining materials from the site and instructed that no welded SA-312, Type 304 materials be used at Waterford 3 SES project.

If you have any questions on the above, please contact us.

Yours very truly, D. L. Aswell-DLA:IH:sg cc: Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

~

Division of Reactor Construction Inspection Washington, D. C.

20555 1