ML19330B067
| ML19330B067 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/11/1980 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Capra L SYSTEMS CONTROL, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19330B065 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900712 NUDOCS 8007300182 | |
| Download: ML19330B067 (2) | |
Text
.
. 7E: 3 ; 1 WC'5AR:EGUL.CG WC, W J:;/
j f'3
= sc;cr. i.
J su a < Au pu.::2 :aws. ces ::::
} y# *- > 8,'[, f Adi.;NGTON. 7sX AO 75C1
.u -..
.....f 11 JUN 1980 Docket No. 99900712/80-01 Systems Control Division of M. J. Electric, Inc.
Attn: Mr. L. A. Capra Senior Vice President Post Office Sox 788 Iron Mountain, Michigan 49801 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of May 16, 1980, in response to our letter dated April 14, 1980. As a result of our review, we find that additional information is needed.
Specifically, regarding Item B.1,, you have failed to describe what actions have been taken to prevent the exclusion of any given department from the required twice yearly audits.
For Item B.2., you did not indicate whether or not the Certified Material Test Reports were obtained for the ten spools of weld wire in question.
Further, you did not indicate the measures taken to assure that all certifications for welding materials would be obtained prior to releasing the material to the shop.
For Item B.3., you failed to indicate your corrective actions relative to the specific drawings identified in the NR' inspection report.
(Details Section, paragraph F.3.1 For Item B.4., you did not address your corrective action pertaining to the specific welds which were observed being made outside the parameters of the welding pr' cedure specification (WPS).
In addition, the question of o
requalification of the particular WPSs oue to the violation of AWS essen-tial variables, was not addressed.
Your response stated thet 'nspection in this area would be intensified.
Please indicate the means by which the intensified inspection will be implemented and documented.
For Item B.S., you did not indicate whether or not any evaluation was made as to the impact, created by the faulty readings on the power sources, on previous weldments.
In addition, you did not address calibration of the tong meters.
Further, please address the comment relative to the lack of an effective welder monitoring program.
(Details Section, paragraph H.3.)
,8007300l Q
Systems Control 2
i For Item B.6., you failed to address actions taken to preclude recurrence relative to inspections failure to detect nonconfoming welds.
Please provide this additional information within twenty (20) days in order that we may complete our review in a timely manner.
Sincerely, i
i nN vb3-p Uldis Potapovs, Chief Vendor Inspection Branch a
b l
e
+
y
,--r,,.-
-,-e